Literature DB >> 31812584

Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization in the young athlete: return to sport and revision stabilization rates.

Frank A Cordasco1, Brian Lin2, Michael Heller2, Lori Ann Asaro2, Daphne Ling2, Jacob G Calcei2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shoulder instability in young athletes is a complex problem with higher recurrence, higher reoperation, and lower return to sport (RTS) rates after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization compared with adults.
METHODS: This is a prospective case series of young athletes with anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic stabilization surgery. Primary outcomes were RTS and revision surgery, minimum follow-up was 24 months. Exclusion criteria were more than 3 preoperative episodes of instability, significant bone loss, or primary posterior instability. Demographic data, recurrent instability, revision surgery, sports pre- and postsurgery, patient satisfaction, level of RTS, time to RTS, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were analyzed.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven athletes met inclusion criteria, 19 females and 48 males, with a mean age of 17.5 years (range, 13-21 years). Fifty-nine (88%) athletes returned to sport at an average of 7.1 months (standard deviation, ±1.8); 50 (75%) returned to the same level or higher. Football and lacrosse were the most common sports. Four of 67 athletes (6%), all male, underwent revision stabilization at 11-36 months for recurrent instability. The overall mean SANE score was 88.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that when the high-risk athlete, 21 years old or younger, is appropriately selected for arthroscopic shoulder stabilization by excluding those with 3 or more preoperative shoulder instability episodes and those with off-track and engaging instability patterns, excellent outcomes can be achieved with low revision surgery rates, high RTS rates, and high patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior shoulder instability; Bankart repair; arthroscopic shoulder stabilization; return to sport; revision shoulder stabilization

Year:  2019        PMID: 31812584     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  8 in total

Review 1.  Managing Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability-Techniques and Outcomes: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Carlos Prada; Omar A Al-Mohrej; Ashaka Patel; Breanne Flood; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-12-28

2.  Safety, Efficacy, and Cost-Effectiveness of Simultaneous Bilateral Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Bilateral Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Kerem Yildirim; Tuna Pehlivanoglu; Reha N Tandogan; Tahsin Beyzadeoglu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  When to Abandon the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benjamin J Levy; Nathan L Grimm; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  High Variability in Functional Outcomes and Recurrences Between Contact Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Comparative Study of 351 Patients With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Luciano Andrés Rossi; Ignacio Tanoira; Tomás Gorodischer; Ignacio Pasqualini; Maximiliano Ranalletta
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-09-12

5.  High Rate of Return to Sports and Low Recurrences With the Latarjet Procedure in High-Risk Competitive Athletes With Glenohumeral Instability and a Glenoid Bone Loss <20.

Authors:  Luciano Andrés Rossi; Tomas Gorodischer; Rodrigo Brandariz; Ignacio Tanoira; Ignacio Pasqualini; Maximiliano Ranalletta
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 6.  Sex-specific differences in outcomes after anterior shoulder surgical stabilization: a meta-analysis and systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Ezra Goodrich; Megan Wolf; Matthew Vopat; Anthony Mok; Jordan Baker; Christopher Bernard; Armin Tarakemeh; Bryan Vopat
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-11-20

7.  Patients Report A Positive Experience on Social Media After Bankart Repair.

Authors:  Sanchita Gupta; Wendell W Cole; Cadence Miskimin; Michaela Stamm; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-04

8.  Is Revision Bankart Repair with Remplissage a Viable Option for Failed Bankart Repair in Non-contact Sports Person Aiming to Return to Sports?

Authors:  Skand Sinha; Nitin Mehta; Rakesh Goyal; Ankit Goyal; Deepak Joshi; R K Arya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.