Literature DB >> 31812415

Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas.

Tianqian Chen1, Zhe Feng2, Huafu Zhao3, Kening Wu3.   

Abstract

In high-intensity human activity areas, such as metropolises, rapid changes in land use, agricultural intensification, and population urbanization have resulted in profound and complex transformations in socio-economic ecosystems. The study of ecosystem service (ES) bundle is conducive to various aspects, such as determination of the variation characteristics of ES; identification of the mechanism of interdependence within ES; and driving mechanism of socio-economic-ecological factors to ES to maintain the sustainable development of the region. The research areas include Beijing and its surrounding areas. Ten ES, including grain providing (GP), water yield (WY), carbon sequestration (CS), soil retention (SEC), purified water service, cultural services, and habitat quality (HQ) were selected for valuing and mapping. The ES paired trade-offs and synergetic relationship, bundle was determined, and the bundles' service types and spatial distribution characteristics were analyzed. Subsequently, GeoDetector was used for detecting the factors affecting the bundles' distribution. Results showed that WY, CS, SEC, and HQ were bounded by Tai-hang and Yanshan Mountains. Among the 45 pairs of ES, 38 pairs bore significant correlation. Multiple services had different degrees of positive and negative correlations with other services. For example, GP had a high positive correlation with WY while bearing a high negative correlation with HQ. Seven bundles include SEC, culture, urban, HQ, agriculture, water supply and purification, and water purification. Various factors played decisive roles in the bundles' spatial distribution. Among them, the investment capacity and demand for ecological protection depend on the level of GDP and POP. The formulation of agricultural planting plans is inseparable from TADEM. ASL is directly related to species richness. Results indicate that bundle research can identify the areas of the formation of co-occurrence of trade-offs and synergies and support the formulation of ES optimal management plans for different regions through further research of the driving mechanism.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem service bundle; GeoDetector; Principal component analysis; Trade-offs and synergies

Year:  2019        PMID: 31812415     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Dataset of ecosystem services in Beijing and its surrounding areas.

Authors:  Tianqian Chen; Zhe Feng; Huafu Zhao; Kening Wu
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-01-17

2.  Gray Forecast of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Forces in Karst Areas of China: A Case Study in Guizhou Province, China.

Authors:  Sipei Pan; Jiale Liang; Wanxu Chen; Jiangfeng Li; Ziqi Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Evaluation of eco-environmental quality for the coal-mining region using multi-source data.

Authors:  Huan Jiang; Gangwei Fan; Dongsheng Zhang; Shizhong Zhang; Yibo Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Multiscale Characteristics and Drivers of the Bundles of Ecosystem Service Budgets in the Su-Xi-Chang Region, China.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Qi Fu; Tinghui Wang; Mengfan Gao; Jinhua Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Scales and Historical Evolution: Methods to Reveal the Relationships between Ecosystem Service Bundles and Socio-Ecological Drivers-A Case Study of Dalian City, China.

Authors:  Xiaolu Yan; Xinyuan Li; Chenghao Liu; Jiawei Li; Jingqiu Zhong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.