Literature DB >> 31812144

Stimulated Raman histology for rapid and accurate intraoperative diagnosis of CNS tumors: prospective blinded study.

Daniel G Eichberg1, Ashish H Shah1, Long Di1, Alexa M Semonche1, George Jimsheleishvili1, Evan M Luther1, Christopher A Sarkiss1, Allan D Levi1, Sakir H Gultekin2, Ricardo J Komotar1,3, Michael E Ivan1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In some centers where brain tumor surgery is performed, the opportunity for expert intraoperative neuropathology consultation is lacking. Consequently, surgeons may not have access to the highest quality diagnostic histological data to inform surgical decision-making. Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) is a novel technology that allows for rapid acquisition of diagnostic histological images at the bedside.
METHODS: The authors performed a prospective blinded cohort study of 82 consecutive patients undergoing resection of CNS tumors to compare diagnostic time and accuracy of SRH simulation to the gold standard, i.e., frozen and permanent section diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by concordance of SRH-simulated intraoperative pathology consultation with a blinded board-certified neuropathologist, with official frozen section and permanent section results.
RESULTS: Overall, the mean time to diagnosis was 30.5 ± 13.2 minutes faster (p < 0.0001) for SRH simulation than for frozen section, with similar diagnostic correlation: 91.5% (κ = 0.834, p < 0.0001) between SRH simulation and permanent section, and 91.5% between frozen and permanent section (κ = 0.894, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: SRH-simulated intraoperative pathology consultation was significantly faster and equally accurate as frozen section.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI = confidence interval; HGG = high-grade glioma; LGG = low-grade glioma; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; SRH = stimulated Raman histology; TTD = time to diagnosis; brain tumor; frozen section; oncology; pathology; permanent section; stimulated Raman histology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31812144     DOI: 10.3171/2019.9.JNS192075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mammalian cell and tissue imaging using Raman and coherent Raman microscopy.

Authors:  Anthony A Fung; Lingyan Shi
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2020-07-19

2.  Stimulated Raman histology facilitates accurate diagnosis in neurosurgical patients: a one-to-one noninferiority study.

Authors:  Evan H Einstein; Faina Ablyazova; Ashley Rosenberg; Manju Harshan; Samuel Wahl; Gady Har-El; Peter D Constantino; Jason A Ellis; John A Boockvar; David J Langer; Randy S D'Amico
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 3.  Neurosurgical Clinical Trials for Glioblastoma: Current and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ashish H Shah; John D Heiss
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Letter: Academic Neurosurgery Department Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: The University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Model.

Authors:  Daniel G Eichberg; Ashish H Shah; Evan M Luther; Ingrid Menendez; Andrea Jimenez; Maggy Perez-Dickens; Kristine H O'Phelan; Michael E Ivan; Ricardo J Komotar; Allan D Levi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.