| Literature DB >> 31810365 |
Ahmed Ghallab1,2, Maiju Myllys1, Christian H Holland3,4, Ayham Zaza1, Walaa Murad5, Reham Hassan1,2, Yasser A Ahmed6, Tahany Abbas5, Eman A Abdelrahim5, Kai Markus Schneider7, Madlen Matz-Soja8, Jörg Reinders1, Rolf Gebhardt8, Marie-Luise Berres7, Maximilian Hatting7, Dirk Drasdo1,9, Julio Saez-Rodriguez3,4, Christian Trautwein7, Jan G Hengstler1.
Abstract
Little is known about how liver fibrosis influences lobular zonation. To address this question, we used three mouse models of liver fibrosis, repeated CCl4 administration for 2, 6 and 12 months to induce pericentral damage, as well as bile duct ligation (21 days) and mdr2-/- mice to study periportal fibrosis. Analyses were performed by RNA-sequencing, immunostaining of zonated proteins and image analysis. RNA-sequencing demonstrated a significant enrichment of pericentral genes among genes downregulated by CCl4; vice versa, periportal genes were enriched among the upregulated genes. Immunostaining showed an almost complete loss of pericentral proteins, such as cytochrome P450 enzymes and glutamine synthetase, while periportal proteins, such as arginase 1 and CPS1 became expressed also in pericentral hepatocytes. This pattern of fibrosis-associated 'periportalization' was consistently observed in all three mouse models and led to complete resistance to hepatotoxic doses of acetaminophen (200 mg/kg). Characterization of the expression response identified the inflammatory pathways TGFβ, NFκB, TNFα, and transcription factors NFKb1, Stat1, Hif1a, Trp53, and Atf1 among those activated, while estrogen-associated pathways, Hnf4a and Hnf1a, were decreased. In conclusion, liver fibrosis leads to strong alterations of lobular zonation, where the pericentral region adopts periportal features. Beside adverse consequences, periportalization supports adaptation to repeated doses of hepatotoxic compounds.Entities:
Keywords: acetaminophen; bile duct ligation; chronic liver disease; cytochrome P450; inflammation; liver lobule; zonation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31810365 PMCID: PMC6953125 DOI: 10.3390/cells8121556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Antibodies and staining conditions.
| Target | Tissue Section | Primary Antibody | Secondary Antibody | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody | Dilution | Antibody | Dilution | ||
| CYP3A | Frozen | Rabbit anti-CYP3A1 | 1:250 | Swine anti-rabbit | 1:20 |
| CYP1A | Frozen | Rat anti-CYP1A2 | 1:500 | Rabbit anti-rat IgG | 1:1000 |
| CYP2C | Frozen | Rat anti-CYP2C6 | 1:250 | Rabbit anti-rat IgG | 1:1000 |
| CYP2E1 | Frozen/ | Rabbit anti-CYP2E1 | 1:100 | Swine anti-rabbit | 1:20 |
| GS | FFPE | Mouse anti-GS | 1:1000 | anti-mouse | 1:500 |
| Arginase1 | FFPE | Anti-arginase-1 antibody, rabbit monoclonal | 1:500 | Swine anti-rabbit | 1:20 |
| CPS1 | FFPE | Anti-CPS1 antibody—liver mitochondrial marker | 1:500 | Swine anti-rabbit | 1:20 |
Figure 1Mouse model of liver fibrosis induced by CCl4 administration. (A) Treatment schedule. (B) Macroscopical alterations and visualization of fibrosis by Sirius red staining. Scale bars: 200 µm.
Figure 2Bioinformatics of RNA-seq data of mouse liver tissue after exposure to CCl4 for up to one year. A. Analysis schedule; B. Principal component analysis (PCA). Untreated mice at the time point zero (0), the day of onset of exposure for the other mouse groups, period of olive oil exposure in blue (2 and 12 months) and period of CCl4 (solved in olive oil) exposure (2, 6 and 12 months) in red. C. Visualization of significantly up (green) and downregulated (blue) genes after 2, 6 and 12 months of CCl4 exposure. D. The 20 most up- and downregulated genes after 2, 6 and 12 months exposure to CCl4. E. Up- and downregulated pathways via PROGENy. The color legend indicates pathway activity (z-score). F. Transcription factor (TF) activities computed with DoRothEA. The color legend indicates TF activity (normalized enrichment score, NES). G. Enriched Gene Ontology (GO) groups. The color legend indicates the degree of enrichment (NES).
Figure 3Periportalization of CCl4 exposed liver tissue. A. Enrichment of pericentral and periportal genes among genes up or downregulated by CCl4 exposure. B. Summarized results of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showing normalized enrichment score (NES) and p-values. C. Leading edge of periportal and pericentral gene set that mainly accounts for the enrichment score of the gene set. The color scheme indicates the logFC. D. Selection of GO-terms and TFs that characterize the overlap of CCl4 signature and pericentral/periportal gene sets.
Figure 4Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) confirmation of selected pericentral (A) and (B) periportal genes. The x-axis represents the time of CCl4 treatment, while the y-axis depicts relative RNA expression normalized to controls (0 months). Glt1: glutamate transporter 1; GS: glutamine synthetase; Oat: ornithine aminotransferase; Avpr1a: arginine vasopressin receptor 1A; Gls2: glutaminase 2; Cps1: carbamoyl phosphate synthetase I; Arg1: arginase 1; Pck1: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1. The data are means ± standard errors of 6 mice per time point. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p <0.001 compared to the untreated controls (0).
Figure 5Spatio-temporal analysis of periportalization of selected pericentral and periportal enzymes. (A) Immunostaining of the pericentral proteins cytochrome P450 3A, 1A, 2C, 2E and glutamine synthetase (GS) as well as the periportal proteins arginase 1 and carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1). The left margin indicates the time of treatment with CCl4. Scale bars: 200 µm. (B) 3D-Reconstructions of CYP1A immunostained liver tissue showing normal pericentral zonation in control (left), and central-to-central bridging at month six of CCl4 intoxication. (C) Whole slide scans of CYP1A-immunostained liver lobules at 2, 6 and 12 months after CCl4 treatment with segmentation (green) and quantification of the fraction of the CYP1A positive area. The data are means ± standard errors of 3 mice per time point. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 compared to the untreated controls (0). (D) Whole slide scans of CYP1A and arginase1 positive liver tissue.
Figure 6Periportal fibrosis after bile duct ligation (BDL). (A) Experimental schedule. (B) Macroscopic appearance and visualization of fibrosis by Sirius red staining. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Figure 7Periportalization of lobular zonation after BDL. (A) Immunostaining of the pericentral proteins CYP2E1 and GS. Scale bars: 100 µm. (B) Immunostaining of the periportal proteins arginase1 and CPS1. Scale bars: 200 µm. (C) CYP2E1-immunostained whole slide scans of liver lobules of BDL mice, and segmentation of the positive area (green). (D) Quantification of the fraction of CYP2E1 positive tissue 21 days after BDL and in controls. The data are means ± standard errors of 3 mice per group. *** p < 0.001 compared to the sham controls (0).
Figure 8Increased ammonia blood concentrations after 1 year CCl4 treatment. The data are means ± standard errors of 6 mice per group. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared to the corresponding controls (0).
Figure 9Acetaminophen (APAP) resistance of mice after one year of treatment with CCl4. (A) Experimental schedule. (B) Macroscopic appearance. (C) The concentration of liver enzymes in the blood. The data are means ± standard errors of 5 mice per time point. *** p < 0.001 compared to the corresponding controls without APAP intoxication. (D) H&E-stained tissue. Scale bars: 100 µm. (E) CYP2E1 immunostaining. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Figure 10APAP resistance of mice 21 days after BDL. (A) Experimental schedule. (B) Macroscopic appearance. (C) H&E staining. Scale bars: 100 µm. (D) CYP2E1 immunostaining. Scale bars: 100 µm.