| Literature DB >> 31810348 |
Abstract
Independence and having control over one's own life are important factors for residential satisfaction. In rural areas, the mobility of people is based on owning a private car, due to the lack of public transport. Furthermore, planning in rural municipalities is highly car oriented. Small municipalities with shrinking and aging populations have many challenges to ensure access to services for their residents. This paper focuses on a case study of a small municipality with less than 2000 inhabitants. The objective of the study was to enhance sustainable change in shrinking rural areas and maintain them as good places to live even in the future. Access to local services and social activities is a major challenge for older people, who no longer have the possibility to use their own car. The problem with relocation is the lack of suitable apartments for older people. A dense and walkable municipal centre with accessible apartments may help municipalities provide for their older populations. Moreover, in Finland, second homeowners are an important resource for small municipalities. Spaces for social intercourse between residents and between permanent residents and second homeowners may enhance vitality and community building in these municipalities.Entities:
Keywords: mobility; older people; services; shrinking municipalities
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31810348 PMCID: PMC6926713 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1This paper focuses on the results of the third phase of the iterative development process.
Number of respondents in Pertunmaa (N = 575).
| Total | Male | Female | Residents | Second Homeowners | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All respondents | 575 | 272 | 303 | 229 | 349 |
| Respondents 64 years old and older | 297 | 166 | 131 | 108 | 185 |
| Respondents 74 years old and older | 113 | 67 | 46 | 45 | 67 |
Total population, population 64 and 74 years old and older for 2018 and projections for 20301.
| Total Population 2018 | Total Population 2030 | Population 64 Years Old and Older, 2018 N (%) | Population 64 Years Old and Older, 2030 N (%) | Population 74 Years Old and Older, 2018, N (%) | Population 74 Years Old and Older, 2030, N(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pertunmaa | 1750 | 1472 | 644 (37%) | 673 (46%) | 280(16%) | 391 (27%) |
1 Official Statistics Finland, OSF, 2019.
Figure 2Plan view of the centre of the municipality.
Pertunmaa, household size, age of the oldest resident and housing type 2.
| Pertunmaa All | (%) | Residents 74 Years Old and Older | (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-family house | 636 | (70 %) | 139 | (64 %) |
| Row house, semi-detached house | 235 | (26 %) | 68 | (31 %) |
| Apartments | 11 | (1 %) | 4 | (2 %) |
| Other | 28 | (3 %) | 7 | (3 %) |
2 Official Statistics Finland, OSF, 2018 [39].
Figure 3In Pertunmaa, the majority of residents live outside municipal center (OSF, 2017).
Figure 4Individuals that reported using the services outside Pertunmaa.
Figure 5Mode of transport reported by the residents.
Figure 6The services that should be developed reported by the residents.