Literature DB >> 31809430

Refining Angular Pregnancy Diagnosis in the First Trimester: A Case Series of Expectant Management.

Kassie J Bollig1, Danny J Schust.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the natural history and outcomes of a large cohort of expectantly managed angular pregnancies diagnosed in the first trimester by specific ultrasound criteria.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective case series of women with prenatally diagnosed angular pregnancy at a single academic tertiary care center from March 2017 to February 2019. Participants were identified at first-trimester ultrasound scan using specifically proposed diagnostic criteria for angular pregnancy and followed prospectively. Maternal and fetal data were gathered from the medical record.
RESULTS: Forty-two cases of angular pregnancy were identified at first-trimester ultrasound scan. At presentation, 33 patients (79%) were asymptomatic, eight (19%) had vaginal bleeding, and two (5%) had pain. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 7.4±1.0 weeks; the mean myometrial thickness was 5.1±1.6 mm (95% CI 4.6-5.6). At initial follow-up about 2 weeks later, 23 patients (55%) had ultrasound scans that normalized, 13 (31%) cases persisted as angular pregnancies, and six (14%) resulted in early pregnancy loss. After each gestation had been followed until completion, 33 (80%) pregnancies resulted in live birth and eight (20%) in early pregnancy loss. One patient was lost to follow-up. Of the 33 live births, 24 (73%) were vaginal deliveries, nine (27%) were cesarean deliveries, 27 (82%) were term deliveries, and six (18%) were preterm deliveries. There were no cases of uterine rupture, maternal death, abnormal placentation, or hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: In 42 cases of angular pregnancy diagnosed by first-trimester ultrasound examination, outcomes were largely positive, with an 80% live-birth rate and a 20% early pregnancy loss rate. Early diagnosis of angular pregnancy using the described criteria may represent an entity that more closely resembles a normal, noneccentric intrauterine pregnancy rather than an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, most cases can be closely observed and efforts made to expectantly manage pregnancies while awaiting viability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31809430     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice.

Authors:  Emma Kirk; Pim Ankum; Attila Jakab; Nathalie Le Clef; Artur Ludwin; Rachel Small; Tina Tellum; Mira Töyli; Thierry Van den Bosch; Davor Jurkovic
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Uterine artery chemoembolization followed by hysteroscopic resection for management of retained placenta accreta with marked vascularity after evacuation of first-trimester miscarriage in angular pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  Akihiro Takeda; Wataru Koike; Takaaki Katayama
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2021-09-23

3.  The role of three-dimensional MRI in the differentiation between angular pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Ming-Hua Sun; Le Fu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Using MRI to differentiate upper-lateral intracavitary pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy for the patients with pregnancies in the uterotubal junction during the first trimester.

Authors:  Wenjuan Liu; Weili Xie; Hang Zhao; Xufeng Jiao; Enzhao Sun; Shan Jiang; Ning Zheng; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 7.034

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.