Literature DB >> 31808722

Telehealth Acceptability for Children, Family, and Adult Hospice Nurses When Integrating the Pediatric Palliative Inpatient Provider during Sequential Rural Home Hospice Visits.

Meaghann S Weaver1, Jacob E Robinson1, Valerie K Shostrom2, Pamela S Hinds3,4.   

Abstract

Background: Children in rural geographies are not universally able to access pediatric-trained palliative or hospice providers. Objective: Determine whether telehealth inclusion of a familiar pediatric palliative care provider during the first two home-based hospice visits was acceptable to children, families, and adult-trained home hospice nurses in rural settings. Design: Case series. Setting: Home hospice in rural Midwest. Participants: Patients <18 years of age enrolling in home hospice for end-of-life care. Measurements: The acceptability of telehealth inclusion of a hospital-based pediatric palliative care provider in home hospice visits to the family caregiver and home hospice nurse was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model Questionnaires with the inclusion of the child perspective when possible.
Results: Fifteen patients mean age of seven years enrolled. Family caregiver included 11 mothers (73%), 2 grandmothers (13%), and 2 fathers (13%). Fifteen nurses from nine hospice agencies participated. Twelve families (80%) included additional relatives by telehealth modality. Home distance averaged 172 miles with mean eight hours saved by accessing telehealth encounter. Visit content was primarily caregiver support, quality of life, goals of care, symptom management, and medication review. Telehealth acceptability improved between time points and was higher in family caregivers (4.3-4.9 on 5-point scale; p = 0.001) than hospice nurses (3.2-3.8 on 5-point scale; p = 0.05). All children able to self-report stated a "like" for telehealth, citing six reasons such as "being remembered" and "medical knowledge and care planning." Conclusions: Pediatric palliative telehealth visits partnered with in-person hospice nurse offer acceptable access to services, while extending support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hospice; pediatric palliative care; rural; telehealth

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31808722     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  5 in total

1.  Psychological distress, depression symptoms and fatigue among Quebec nursing staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  José Côté; Marilyn Aita; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Julie Houle; Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay; Lily Lessard; Geneviève Rouleau; Céline Gélinas
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 2.  Global Research Trend and Bibliometric Analysis of Current Studies on End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Genevieve Ataa Fordjour; Amy Yin Man Chow
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Can you hear me now?: Improving palliative care access through telehealth.

Authors:  Kristen Allen Watts; Emily Malone; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Susan McCammon; Erin Currie; Jennifer Hicks; Rodney O Tucker; Eric Wallace; Ronit Elk; Marie Bakitas
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  The impact of digital health interventions on the psychological outcomes of patients and families receiving paediatric palliative care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Stephanie Archer; Natalie H Y Cheung; Ivor Williams; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 5.  Harnessing New and Existing Virtual Platforms to Meet the Demand for Increased Inpatient Palliative Care Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 5 Key Themes Literature Review of the Characteristics and Barriers of These Evolving Technologies.

Authors:  Holly R Cherniwchan
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.