Literature DB >> 31808607

Clinical outcomes of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis versus proximal venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: The Cleveland Clinic experience.

Shyam K Poudel1,2, Deborah Y Park3, Xuefei Jia4, Mailey Wilks2, Vicki Pinkava2, Meghan O'Brien2, Barbara Tripp2, Jung-Min Song2, Keith R McCrae2, Alok A Khorana2, Dana E Angelini2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) has a self-limited clinical course. However, these studies excluded cancer patients, who remain a high-risk population. In addition, studies to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of IDDVT in cancer patients have been limited. Here, we report outcomes from our experience in treating cancer-associated IDDVT versus proximal venous thromboembolism (VTE).
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a cohort of patients referred to our cancer-associated thrombosis clinic from August 2014 through May 2018. We compared clinical characteristics, anticoagulation prescription, VTE recurrence, overall survival, major bleeding, and subsequent hospital admission between cancer patients with IDDVT and proximal VTE. A propensity score matching method was used to reduce bias from confounding variables.
RESULTS: Of 1100 patients referred to the clinic, 124 IDDVT and 178 proximal VTE events were analyzed. After propensity score matching, 96 patients were included in each cohort. There was no difference in the rate of recurrent VTE between cancer patients with proximal VTE vs IDDVT, with or without matching (matched: hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.92; P = .58). There was no difference in overall survival between cancer patients with proximal VTE vs. IDDVT with or without matching (matched: HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.77-1.82; P = .45). Furthermore, subsequent hospital admissions and major bleeding events were similar between patients with proximal VTE events versus IDDVT.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients with IDDVT have similar outcomes as their proximal counterparts, including rate of recurrence and overall survival. These findings suggest treatment of cancer-associated IDDVT should mirror treatment of proximal events.
© 2019 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulants; neoplasms; recurrence; treatment outcome; venous thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31808607     DOI: 10.1111/jth.14700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  3 in total

1.  Dose-adjusted enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients: a randomized, double-blinded multicenter phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Zwicker; Joanna Roopkumar; Maneka Puligandla; Benjamin L Schlechter; Anish V Sharda; David Peereboom; Robin Joyce; Bruno Bockorny; Donna Neuberg; Kenneth A Bauer; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

2.  Management of isolated distal deep-vein thrombosis with direct oral anticoagulants in the RIETE registry.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Galanaud; Javier Trujillo-Santos; Behnood Bikdeli; Pierpaolo Di Micco; Cristiano Bortoluzzi; Laurent Bertoletti; José María Pedrajas; Aitor Ballaz; Joaquín Alfonso; Manuel Monreal
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  EHA Guidelines on Management of Antithrombotic Treatments in Thrombocytopenic Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Falanga; Avi Leader; Chiara Ambaglio; Zsuzsa Bagoly; Giancarlo Castaman; Ismail Elalamy; Ramon Lecumberri; Alexander Niessner; Ingrid Pabinger; Sebastian Szmit; Alice Trinchero; Hugo Ten Cate; Bianca Rocca
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2022-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.