Literature DB >> 31808050

When do pictures reduce false memory?

Rebekah E Smith1, R Reed Hunt2.   

Abstract

An important discovery in false-memory research is Israel and Schacter's (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 577-581, 1997) finding that presenting pictures at study relative to words alone reduces false memory in the DRM paradigm, a result that has been replicated many times. The standard interpretation is that memory for visual processing of the pictures can be used to reject the critical distractors, which were not explicitly present at study. Beginning from the empirical observation that the pictures used by Israel and Schacter are not consistently labelled with the DRM word they are supposed to represent, we present a series of four studies designed to determine if it is the presentation of pictures or the mismatch between the pictures and the words that reduces false memory. The results across the four experiments demonstrate that picture presentation at study is neither necessary nor sufficient to reduce false memory in the DRM and the categorical associate paradigms. However, we discuss other studies in which picture processing clearly is responsible for reduction of false alarms and note that these studies use study materials and memory tests that are different from the DRM and categorical associate paradigms in that critical lures are externally provided rather than generated. We speculate that the effectiveness of memory for visual processing for reducing false memory may depend on the source of the false memory, but this remains for future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRM; False memory; Modality; Pictures

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31808050     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00995-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Modality effects in false recall and false recognition.

Authors:  D A Gallo; K B McDermott; J M Percer; H L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary; Robert L Greene
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002-01

3.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

4.  Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.

Authors:  Amanda C G Hege; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Developmental invariance in distinctiveness effects in memory.

Authors:  Mark L Howe
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2006-11

6.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

7.  When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  False memories in children and adults: age, distinctiveness, and subjective experience.

Authors:  Simona Ghetti; Jianjian Qin; Gail S Goodman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2002-09

9.  True and false memories in maltreated children.

Authors:  Mark L Howe; Dante Cicchetti; Sheree L Toth; Beth M Cerrito
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

10.  Visual distinctiveness and the development of children's false memories.

Authors:  Mark L Howe
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Maria M Robinson; Jamal R Williams; John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-19

2.  Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner; Matthew R Gretz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.