| Literature DB >> 31807306 |
MariaPortia B Nagata1, Junki Egashira2, Naoto Katafuchi2, Kenji Endo3, Kazuko Ogata4,5, Kenichi Yamanaka6, Tadayuki Yamanouchi4, Hideo Matsuda4, Yutaka Hashiyada4,7, Kenichi Yamashita1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The application of cryopreservation and artificial insemination technology have contributed to the advancement of animal reproduction. However, a substantial proportion of spermatozoa undergoes alterations and loses their fertility during cryopreservation, rendering the frozen-thawed semen impractical for routine use. Cryopreservation is known to reduce sperm lifespan and fertility. Variation in cryosurvival of spermatozoa from different sires and even with the individual sire is common in artificial insemination (AI) centers. Our goal is to improve post-thawed semen quality by optimization of cryopreservation technique through sperm selection prior to cryopreservation process.Entities:
Keywords: Cryopreservation; Fertility; Livestock; Rheotaxis; Spermatozoa; Thermotaxis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31807306 PMCID: PMC6857337 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-019-0395-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Evaluation of semen quality based on MMS score by quantitative microscopic observation and total motility (%) by CASA
| Sire | Prefreeze processed by SSRT | Control straw | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull #1 | Cooled at 4 °C | MS score total motility | 70% +++ 87% (221/255) | 60% +++ 86% (278/324) |
| Frozen-thawed | MS score total motility | 50% ++ 86% (278/328) | 50% ++ 77% (125/163) | |
| Bull #2 | Cooled at 4 °C | MS score total motility | 80% +++ 93% (339/363) | 75% +++ 84% (125/148) |
| Frozen-thawed | MS score total motility | 60% ++ 79% (326/412) | 45% ++ 68% (116/171) | |
MS score for fresh semen of Bull #1 = 90% +++; MS score for fresh semen of Bull #2 = 90% +++
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the prefreeze semen processing technique based on sperm selection by rheotaxis and thermotaxis (SSRT) method. The platform includes a controlled condition of slow and uniform rotational flow (70 r/min) of Newtonian fluid and temperature gradient (25 °C to 30 °C) for 20 min
Fig. 2a Effect of semen processing by SSRT method prior to cryopreservation on post thaw sperm viability in bovine spermatozoa, and representative images of spermatozoa in dead (red) and live state (green). Viability values between SSTR and control straws differ significantly at P < 0.05 (Chi-squared test) for 7 h incubation. b Effect of semen processing by SSRT method prior to cryopreservation on the motility index (VAP × BCF, measured by CASA) of bovine spermatozoa at different incubation time (1 h, 7 h, 24 h). Viability values between SSTR and control straws differ significantly at P < 0.05 (t-test) for 24 h incubation (c) Effect of semen processing by SSRT method prior to cryopreservation on post thaw mitochondrial activity of bovine spermatozoa, and fluorescence photomicrography of sorted spermatozoa stained with JC-1 probe showing orange fluorescence of the sperm midpiece indicating hMMP and green fluorescence indicating low mitochondrial membrane potential. Values between the SSTR and control straws at 1 h and 24 h are not significantly different. Values at 7 h are significantly different at P < 0.01 (t-test). d Effect of semen processing by SSRT method prior to cryopreservation on post thaw DNA integrity measured by TUNEL index (%) that indicates DNA fragmentation. Each spermatozoon was assigned to contain either normal (blue nuclear fluorescence due to Hoechst 33342) or fragmented DNA (green nuclear fluorescence). There are 4 straws analyzed for each treatment (n = 4 per treatment), and every straw was subjected to 4 times CASA measurements, mitochondrial activity, and TUNEL assay. Values differ significantly at P < 0.01 (Chi-squared test)
Cryopreservation rates (% CSR) of semen subjected to sperm selection process prior to cryopreservation
| Sire | Prefreeze processed by SSRT (% CSR) | Control (% CSR) |
|---|---|---|
| Bull # 1 | 98.6 ± 1.04 | 88.1 ± 3.03 |
| Bull # 2 | 88.5 ± 3.70 | 79.4 ± 1.51 |
Values are significantly different at P < 0.01 (Bull#1) and P < 0.05 (Bull#2) (t-test)
Clinical data on pregnancy rate of cows inseminated with semen straw containing sperm cells selected prior to cryopreservation
| Cow | History of failed reproduction | Sire | Pregnancy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heifer | Japanese Black #1 | None | Bull #1 | Yes |
| Japanese Black #2 | None | Bull #2 | Yes | |
| Japanese Black #3 | None | Bull #1 | Yes | |
| Japanese Black #4 | None | Bull #2 | Yes | |
| Repeat breeder | Holstein #1 | 2 × ET, 2 × AI | Bull #1 | Yes |
| Holstein #2 | 2 × ET, 3 × AI | Bull #2 | Yes | |
| Holstein #3 | 2 × ET, 2 × AI | Bull #1 | Yes | |
| Holstein #4 | 2 × AI | Bull #2 | No | |
| Holstein #4 | 3 × AI | Bull #1 | Yes | |
| Holstein #5 | 2 × ET, 3 × AI | Bull #1 | Yes | |
| Holstein #6 | 4 × AI | Bull #1 | Yes | |
| Holstein #7 | 2 × ET, 2 × AI | Bull #2 | Yes | |
| Holstein #8 | 4 × AI | Bull #2 | Yes | |
ET embryo transfer, AI artificial insemination using conventional frozen semen
AI for Holstein #4 had been performed twice; first AI resulted in nonpregnancy, second AI achieved pregnancy
Pregnancy rates of Japanese Black and Holstein cows (n = 12) inseminated with pre-freeze selected sperm cells: Bull #1 = 100%, n = 7; Bull #2 = 83.3%, n = 6, Total pregnancy rate = 92.3%
Pregnancy rates of control Japanese Black cows inseminated with conventionally prepared semen from the 2 sires; Bull #1 = 59.2%, n = 76; Bull #2 = 44.4%, n = 36, Total pregnancy rate = 54.5%
Values between SSTR and conventional straws differ significantly at P < 0.01 (Chi-squared test)
Fig. 3a Effect of semen processing by SSRT method prior to cryopreservation on post thaw acrosome reactivity. The proportion of capacitation and acrosome-reacted, and uncapacitated spermatozoa were assessed by CTC assay. Each sample was incubated at 1 h, 8 h, and 25 h. Replicates of 2 for 192–297 sperm per replicate of SSRT and control sample per replicate. b Fluorescence photomicrography of sperms stained with CTC probe