James Eguchi1,2, Johnny Seales1, Rajdeep Dasgupta1. 1. Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS-126, Houston, TX 77005. 2. Current Address: Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521.
Abstract
For approximately the first 2 billion years of Earth history, atmospheric oxygen levels were extremely low. It wasn't until at least half a billion years after the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, perhaps as early as 3 billion years ago, that oxygen rose to appreciable levels during the Great Oxidation event. Shortly after, marine carbonates experienced a large positive spike in carbon isotope ratios known as the Lomagundi event. The mechanisms responsible for the Great Oxidation and Lomagundi events remain debated. Using a carbon-oxygen box model which tracks surface and interior C fluxes and reservoirs while also tracking C isotopes and atmospheric oxygen levels we demonstrate that about 2.5 billion years ago a tectonic transition resulting in increased volcanic CO2 emissions could have led to increased deposition of both carbonates and organic carbon via enhanced weathering and nutrient delivery to oceans. Increased burial of carbonates and organic carbon would have allowed accumulation of atmospheric oxygen while also increasing delivery of carbon to subduction zones. Coupled with preferential release of carbonates at arc volcanoes and deep recycling of organic C to ocean island volcanoes we find such a tectonic transition can simultaneously explain the Great Oxidation and Lomagundi events without any change in the fraction of carbon buried as organic carbon relative to carbonate, which is often invoked to explain carbon isotope excursions.
For approximately the first 2 billion years of Earth history, atmospheric oxygen levels were extremely low. It wasn't until at least half a billion years after the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, perhaps as early as 3 billion years ago, that oxygen rose to appreciable levels during the Great Oxidation event. Shortly after, marine carbonates experienced a large positive spike in carbon isotope ratios known as the Lomagundi event. The mechanisms responsible for the Great Oxidation and Lomagundi events remain debated. Using a carbon-oxygen box model which tracks surface and interior C fluxes and reservoirs while also tracking C isotopes and atmospheric oxygen levels we demonstrate that about 2.5 billion years ago a tectonic transition resulting in increased volcanic CO2 emissions could have led to increased deposition of both carbonates and organic carbon via enhanced weathering and nutrient delivery to oceans. Increased burial of carbonates and organic carbon would have allowed accumulation of atmospheric oxygen while also increasing delivery of carbon to subduction zones. Coupled with preferential release of carbonates at arc volcanoes and deep recycling of organic C to ocean island volcanoes we find such a tectonic transition can simultaneously explain the Great Oxidation and Lomagundi events without any change in the fraction of carbon buried as organic carbon relative to carbonate, which is often invoked to explain carbon isotope excursions.
Carbon dioxide and oxygen, two gases critical for Earth’s habitability, are linked via photosynthesis:
The link between CO2 and O2 is evident in the geologic record from the association of the most dramatic events in the histories of both gases. The Great Oxidation Event (GOE), during which Earth’s atmospheric oxygen levels increased by several orders of magnitude, and the Lomagundi Event (LE), during which carbon isotope ratios of marine carbonates increased by up to ~10‰, both occurred around 2.3–2.0 Ga[1-3] (Fig. 1). The temporal association of the two events suggests both may be attributed to a single mechanism, such as enhanced organic carbon burial[4]. This is because increasing the fraction of carbon buried as organic carbon (forg) relative to carbonate will increase the amount of oxygen produced and allowed to accumulate via equation (1). Increased forg also increases δ13C of carbonates because organic matter preferentially incorporates 12C, leaving the carbonate-forming C reservoir enriched in 13C (ref. [4]).
Figure 1
Variations in atmospheric O2, δ13C of carbonates, and tracers of tectonic processes through geologic time.
a, Qualitative model of atmospheric O2 (solid blue curve)[1] and estimation of atmospheric O2 from Zn/Fe ratios in carbonates (dashed blue line with shaded region for uncertainties)[46]. b, Carbonate δ13C through time[43]. c, Zircon δ18O-εHf covariance*slope from Keller, et al.[24], where positive values indicate increases in crustal contribution to magmatism. Orange band is proposed timing for rapid emergence of subaerial continents inferred from triple-oxygen isotopes[15], blue band is timing large-scale glaciations[24].d, U/Pb age distribution of detrital and orogenic zircons[47], with orange band showing the proposed timing of transitional tectonics between stagnant lid and plate tectonics[12].
Despite the apparent temporal association of the GOE and LE and the conceptual consistency of explaining both events via increased forg, its role as the driver of the GOE and LE has been questioned. There is evidence that oxygenic photosynthesis evolved at least half a billion years before the GOE[5], so why would atmospheric oxygen have remained low for so long?[6]. In addition, other studies have suggested that the GOE may have preceded the LE by ~100 million years[2,3,7,8]. If the onset of the GOE and LE were indeed temporally disparate, it becomes difficult to explain both events via a single mechanism. This has led researchers to propose mechanisms invoking decreased sinks of atmospheric oxygen as the main driver of the GOE[9-11]. While decreased oxygen sinks would allow atmospheric O2 to accumulate, it is unclear how they would drive the associated positive C isotope excursion.Here, we propose a single mechanism for the GOE and LE. Our modeling shows that the proposed mechanism can simultaneously explain increased oxygen production as well as a positive C isotope excursion in marine carbonates. In addition, we show that the proposed mechanism is consistent with a delay between the evolution of photosynthesis and increased atmospheric oxygen levels, as well as a delay between the build-up of oxygen in the atmosphere and the positive C isotope excursion observed in marine carbonates.
Enhanced volcanic CO2 driven by tectonic transitions
We propose that around 2.5 billion years ago a major tectonic transition increased volcanic CO2 emissions, driving increased rates carbonate and organic C burial via enhanced weathering and nutrient delivery to oceans. A transition from stagnant/sluggish lid to plate tectonics has been proposed around 2.5 Ga[12], which would have caused increased volcanic CO2 emissions[13,14]. Also proposed around 2.5 billion years ago are the rapid emergence of subaerial continents[15] and major glaciations[16]. These events would have increased the supply of hydrated sediments to trenches, lubricating the subduction interface and enhancing plate tectonic activity, which would have led to enhanced volcanic CO2 emissions[17]. Moussallam et al.[18] propose that mantle cooling resulted in lower eruptive temperatures for volcanic gases, which caused the gases to become more oxidized, resulting in CO2 emissions to increase relative to emissions of more reduced C gases.A GOE resulting from tectonically-driven increases in volcanic CO2 emissions is consistent with oxygenic photosynthesis evolving prior to the GOE[5] because the production rate of oxygen is controlled by the flux of organic C burial:
where Forg is the flux of organic carbon burial, and Ftot is the flux of total carbon burial (carbonate + organic C). Therefore, Forg, and the oxygen production flux, can increase by increasing Ftot, instead of forg. At the onset of oxygenic photosynthesis, oxygen production could have been low because Earth’s tectonic mode promoted low weathering fluxes (i.e., stagnant-lid, un-emerged continents), resulting in low Ftot and thus low Forg. Then a tectonic transition could have increased Ftot and thus Forg, resulting in a delay between the evolution of photosynthesis and the GOE[5,19]. This could have all been achieved without any significant changes to forg.
Carbonate release at arcs drive positive spike in δ13C
Positive δ13C excursions in carbonates are commonly attributed to increased forg:
where δ13Cin is δ13C of atmospheric inputs of CO2 and δ13Corg is δ13C of organic C. If fractionation of C isotopes between carbonates and organic C (Δ13Ccarb-org ≡ δ13Ccarb- δ13Corg ≈ 25‰), and δ13Cin remain constant, increased forg increases δ13Ccarb. δ13Ccarb also increases if δ13Cin increases at constant forg and Δ13Ccarb-org. We propose that the increased δ13Ccarb of the LE could have been caused by increased δ13Cin rather than increased forg.δ13Cin depends on the balance of CO2 being emitted at different volcanic settings:
where Fi is CO2 flux at volcanic setting i and δ13Ci is δ13C of CO2 emitted at volcanic setting i. δ13CMORB ≈ −5‰[20,21], CO2 flux-weighted δ13Carc ≈ −3‰[22], and sparse studies on δ13COIB suggest it could be similar to MORB or more negative[21,23]. Therefore, increasing increases δ13Cin by shifting the balance of δ13Cin towards δ13Carc.The tectonic transitions discussed above can increase carbonate and organic C burial leading to increased subduction of C. Upon reaching subarc depths the increased flux of subducted C would be released from the slab at an increased rate resulting in increased , shifting the balance of δ13Cin towards δ13Carc. This mechanism is consistent with oxygenation preceding increased δ13Ccarb[8] because oxygen accumulates immediately after burial of organic C. Contrastingly, δ13Ccarb increases after the increased C flux is buried, subducted, released from the slab, emitted at arcs as CO2, and incorporated into marine carbonates. Evidence for increased delivery of subducted sediments to arc volcanic sources is provided by the record of covariance of δ18O and εHf in zircons - both of which quantify the contribution of subducted weathering products to magma generation[24]. Fig 1c shows that the peak in δ13Ccarb closely correlates with the peak in δ18O-εHfzircon covariance, supporting the idea that δ13Ccarb may be controlled by the balance of δ13C of CO2 emitted at different volcanic centers.Increasing δ13Cin by increasing is possible if δ13Carc is high, which is most easily explained by a heavy contribution of carbonates to arc CO2 emissions. A recent study determined that the flux-weighted, average δ13Carc≈−3‰[22]. Whether high δ13Carc is due to contribution of carbonates from the subducted slab or upper crust remains debated[22,25]. Figure 2a shows δ13Carc versus forg of the sediments entering the respective trench. As forg of subducted C becomes greater, δ13Carc becomes more negative, implying that forg of subducted sediments is the dominant controller of δ13Carc[26]. The dashed line in Fig. 2a shows what δ13Carc would be if carbonates and organic C were released with equal efficiency. Data in Fig. 2a suggest preferential carbonate release, supporting the idea that δ13Carc is high due to preferential release of carbonates relative to organic C from the subducted slab. Below, we test whether ancient arcs may have also had high δ13C.
Figure 2
Natural data and petrologic calculations suggesting preferential release of carbonate over organic carbon in present-day and ancient subduction zones.
a, δ13Carc[22] versus forg of sediments at modern subduction zones[48]. Orange symbols represent volcanoes erupting through carbonates, increasing likelihood of crustal carbonate dominating δ13Carc[49]. Dashed line shows equal efficiency of release for carbonates and organic C. Error bars are 1σ. b, Ancient slab P-T paths[27] (Dashed black lines are cold and hot P-T paths, solid black line is average of the two) compared to metamorphic decarbonation (blue lines labeled with wt% CO2 retained in slab), and melting out of carbonates[29] (red line). c, Percentage of C retained in slab versus depth. Blue lines show how much C remains in slab (solid and dashed lines calculated along respective P-T paths of b) during metamorphic decarbonation. Red lines calculated for carbonates released by carbonated melting (red line in b). Black lines for organic C release by graphite dissolution in silicate melts.
Ancient subduction zones were likely hotter than present day due to secular mantle cooling[27]. Figure 2b,c demonstrates that along P-T paths of subducting slabs adjusted for secular mantle cooling[27], carbonate will be removed from the slab more efficiently than organic C, which metamorphoses to graphite during subduction[28]. In a carbonated pelitic sediment, metamorphic decarbonation and partial melting[29] can release up to 100% of subducted carbonates (Fig. 2c). Graphite removal via CO2 dissolution in pelitic sediment partial melts can only extract up to ~50% of the subducted organic C. This demonstrates that like present-day arcs and perhaps even more so, ancient δ13Carc was more strongly influenced by δ13Ccarb than δ13Corg.Considering the results provided above, we propose enhanced subduction of C can increase δ13Ccarb by increasing δ13Cin due to preferential release of carbonates relative to organic C at arcs. This explains increased δ13Ccarb observed in the LE, however it doesn’t explain why δ13Ccarb returned to around 0‰ (Fig. 1). We propose that the return to “normal” δ13Ccarb (~ 0‰) can be explained by delayed release of organic C at intraplate ocean island volcanoes.
Return to normal δ13Ccarb via deep recycling of organic C
After releasing carbonates, the slab becomes enriched in organic C, which remains in the slab as refractory graphite/diamond[27,30]. Subducted slabs have been proposed to descend to the core-mantle boundary and reside in “slab graveyards” until being entrained in upwelling mantle plumes, fueling volcanism at ocean islands[31,32]. Upon ascent through the mantle, reduced organic C oxidizes and initiates redox melting[33], allowing organic C to be emitted at ocean islands as CO2. The large reservoir of Fe3+ relative to organic C in the mantle can effectively oxidize organic C without experiencing major changes over geologic time. Unlike arc δ13Carc, δ13COIB has received relatively little attention. However, several studies report δ13COIB, which may support the hypothesis of ocean islands being enriched in organic C.Figure 3 shows a compilation of δ13COIB. δ13COIB measurements at Kilauea were made on high-temperature volcanic CO2[34], making them the most appropriate to compare with the arc dataset, which are largely fumarolic measurements. Figure 3 shows that δ13C at Kilauea is lower than δ13Carc. Measurements made at Koolau[35], Society[23], Loihi[36], and Pitcairn[21] were made on CO2 from vesicles, glass, or melt inclusions and are subject to isotope fractionation during degassing[37]. For this reason, we identify the least degassed sample from each dataset. Except for Society, which has been shown to have similar noble gas ratios to MORB[23], the least degassed samples from ocean islands have lower δ13C than MORBs and arcs. These measurements support the possibility of organic C enrichment in ocean island basalts. We propose that delayed release of organic C at ocean islands can explain the return to “normal” δ13Ccarb (about 0‰) at the tail-end of the LE. This mechanism requires that subducted organic C retains its low δ13C, which is supported by the observation of light δ13C values in eclogitic diamonds[38]. Additionally, organic C hosted in subducted oceanic crust may remain physically and chemically isolated from C hosted in ambient mantle precluding any alteration of δ13C values. Other elements, such as nitrogen, have also been argued to show an enrichment in subducted organic components at ocean island volcanoes[39]. A schematic diagram showing preferential release of organic C at ocean islands and carbonates at arcs shown in Fig. 4.
Figure 3
Comparison of carbon isotope compositions of CO2 emissions from different volcanic settings.
Measurements made on samples from Koolau[35], Society[23], Loihi[36], and Pitcairn[21] were made on CO2 from vesicles, glass, or melt inclusions and are therefore subject to isotope fractionation during degassing[37]. Least degassed samples are marked for each location with a green star. Measurements at Kilauea[34] are made on high-T volcanic gas emissions and are therefore the most directly applicable for comparison to the global flux-weighted average of arc CO2 emissions[22]. Available data suggests that ocean islands may emit CO2 with lower δ13C than MORB and arcs.
Figure 4
Schematic diagram showing preferential release of carbonate C at arc volcanoes and organic C at ocean island volcanoes.
Both carbonates and organic carbon are deposited on the seafloor and subducted into Earth’s interior. Upon subduction, organic C metamorphoses to graphite, which is more refractory than carbonate. At subarc conditions carbonates are preferentially released from the slab (Fig. 2) relative to graphitized organic C, increasing arc volcano δ13C to values greater than −5‰. Graphitized organic C remains in slab and is transported deep into the mantle, where it may become entrained in upwelling mantle plumes feeding ocean island volcanoes. Upwelling, reduced organic C likely undergoes redox melting, decreasing ocean island volcano δ13C to <−5‰.
The proposed mechanism combined with the observation that δ13Ccarb has always returned to ~0‰ after large excursions (Fig. 1), leads us to infer that C fluxes into and out of the mantle are at near steady-state with response times to perturbations on the time-scale of mantle transit times, which are on the order of hundreds of million years[40]. If C fluxes into and out of the mantle were out of balance, then due to the more refractory nature of graphitized organic C, we would expect δ13Ccarb to increase with time due to the preferential sequestration of light organic C in the mantle. However, δ13Ccarb is not observed to increase with time, rather it experiences excursions then returns to ~0‰ (Fig. 1).
Modeling oxygen levels and δ13Ccarb
Here, we present a carbon-oxygen box model to test whether increased volcanic CO2 emissions can drive oxygenation and a positive δ13Ccarb excursion. The key model assumptions are: 1) Atmospheric oxygen levels are proportional to the mass of organic C in the system. 2) The mass of organic C buried depends on the flux of carbon deposition, which is proportional to the concentration of atmospheric CO2:
where Fw is the flux of CO2 drawdown from the atmosphere, k is the strength of the weathering feedback, and [CO2,atm] is the concentration of atmospheric CO2. 3) δ13Carc is strongly influenced by δ13Ccarb and δ13COIB by δ13Corg. 4) Farc responds to surficial changes in CO2 fluxes on the order of 10 Myr, while FOIB responds on the order of 100 Myr, corresponding to one mantle transit time for subducted crust[32,40]. These timescales are equivalent to residence times of subducted carbonates and organic C in their respective mantle reservoirs. These residence times appear short compared to those estimated in previous studies (e.g.[41]). However, the > 1 billion years residence time of carbon in the mantle is calculated assuming the mantle as a single reservoir for C, which is an oversimplification of the natural C cycle because the mantle contains both recycled and primordial carbon. We assume the residence time of subducted carbonates in the ancient mantle is on the order of 10 million years because they are rapidly released to arc source mantle during subduction[42]. We relate the residence time of organic C to the timescales of mantle convection because organic C is hosted as refractory/graphite diamond in subducted oceanic crust and is unlikely to efficiently mix with surrounding mantle. Therefore, as soon as the subducted oceanic crust completes a convective cycle and undergoes partial melting in the oxidized upper mantle, organic C will be efficiently degassed as CO2.Figure 5 was generated by increasing mid-ocean ridge CO2 emissions by 1000-fold instantaneously at 2.5 Ga. Figure 5 demonstrates that in response to increased CO2 emissions, the production flux of carbonates and organic C increases, causing atmospheric oxygen to increase immediately due to the increased reservoir of buried organic C. Shortly after oxygen increases, δ13Ccarb increases as increases, with the delay being dictated by the time required for carbonate to be deposited, subducted, and released at arcs as CO2 (Fig. 5). After a longer delay, dictated by the time required for organic C to be buried and later released as CO2 at ocean islands, δ13Ccarb decreases in response to increased . Note that model results were generated keeping forg constant at 0.20 throughout the model run.
Figure 5
Model results showing how tectonically-driven increased CO2 emissions and deep recycling of organic C can drive GOE and LE.
a. δ13Ccarb versus time. Orange curve is model result, blue symbols are natural data. When increases to MOR CO2 emissions are large, magnitude of C isotope excursion becomes insensitive to magnitude of changes to MOR CO2 emissions (See SI). b. Atmospheric O2 versus time. Orange curve shows results for 1000-fold increase in MOR CO2 emissions, while bands show results when increases range from 100-fold to 10,000-fold. Blue curves from Fig. 1. Vertical dashed line emphasizes that oxygen increases before C isotope excursion. c. CO2 fluxes versus time. Shaded regions as in b. d. C reservoir size versus time. Shaded regions as in b.
A notable result of the model is that simply increasing volcanic CO2 emissions can match the magnitude of oxygen increase while nearly matching the magnitude of δ13C excursions observed for the GOE and LE, which can’t be achieved by solely changing forg[43,44]. Another notable result of the model is that it closely reproduces the topology of the Lomagundi event, which displays a gradual increase in δ13C and terminates abruptly with δ13C rapidly decreasing to ~0‰. Supplementary Fig. 2 shows how varying different model parameters affects the shape and magnitude of the C isotope excursion. Furthermore, the present model shows that a permanent transition to increased volcanic CO2 emissions produces a permanent transition to higher atmospheric O2 but causes a transient excursion in δ13C as observed in natural data. We note that our model is consistent with any event that increases CO2 emissions. Therefore, the proposed mechanism is not only applicable to the Great Oxidation and Lomagundi event (see Supp. Fig. 3), it can also explain other large oxidation and C isotope excursions such as the events observed at the end of the Proterozoic[1], which have also been proposed to result from large emissions of CO2[45]. This is in contrast to the model of Duncan and Dasgupta[27], which relies on initiation of plate tectonics to coincide with the GOE.In summary, we propose that the GOE and LE can be explained by a single mechanism – increased carbonate and organic C deposition driven by enhanced volcanic CO2 degassing, possibly driven by a transition from stagnant/sluggish lid to plate tectonics[12]. Alternatively, the rapid emergence of subaerial continents[15] or global glaciation[17,24], proposed to have occurred ~2.5–2.3 Ga, have been argued to facilitate enhanced volcanic CO2 emissions by supplying sediments to convergent margins thereby facilitating more efficient subduction and related volcanism[17]. The presented hypothesis is consistent with natural observations such as contemporaneous increases in continental weathering[24], heavy δ13Carc[22], and possible light δ13COIB[21]. We present a carbon-oxygen model which demonstrates increased volcanic CO2 emissions coupled with preferential release of carbonate-derived CO2 at arc volcanoes and the delayed release of organic C at ocean island volcanoes can drive atmospheric oxygenation and positive C isotope excursions without requiring any changes to forgThe present study raises several important implications. 1) Large-scale, long-lived positive δ13C isotope excursions such as the LE do not require changes in forg, they may be the result of fractionation of carbonates and organic C in Earth’s interior. 2) Oxygen and biomass production may be controlled by tectonic conditions dictating volcanic CO2 emissions. 3) Carbon fluxes into and out of the mantle may be close to steady state, with response times to perturbations on the order of mantle transit times. These conclusions provide an alternate interpretation of the evolution of CO2 and O2 on Earth and can inform our thinking on how Earth, the only known inhabited planet in our Solar System and beyond, became and remained oxygenated, allowing for the proliferation of complex life on the surface.
Methods
Quantifying C release from the subducting slab
To quantify carbon release from the subducting slab via metamorphic decarbonation, we performed thermodynamic calculations with the software package Perple_X
[50]. We calculate the stable mineral assemblage of a model carbonated pelite as a function of pressure and temperature, with a bulk composition from Tsuno et al.[29]. We use the calculated bulk composition of the residual solid lithology to determine the amount of CO2 that can be retained in the solid lithology in the form of carbonates. The CO2 wt.% of the bulk rock decreases as P and T increase (Fig. 2a). We then calculate how much of the original carbon is retained in the solid lithology along subduction zone P-T paths relevant to ancient subduction zones. Following the arguments of Duncan and Dasgupta[27] we assume that ancient subduction zones were hotter than those in the present day by about 70 °C/Gyr. Therefore, to investigate conditions relevant to the GOE and LE, we increased the temperatures of slab top P-T paths from Syracuse et al.[51] by 175 °C. Assuming a starting CO2 of 5 wt.% as mineral carbonates, the amount of original subducted CO2 retained in the slab as carbonate was calculated along P-T paths according using the following equation:
Where 5 is the initial amount of CO2 in the bulk rock composition in wt%, and ‘CO2 wt% of bulk rock’ is the CO2 content of the bulk calculated as a function of pressure and temperature using Perple_X.We note that the extent of metamorphic decarbonation calculated in this fashion provides an underestimate if extraneous fluid source is available. Incorporating open system, fluid infiltration induced metamorphic decarbonation more efficiently breaks down carbonates in the slab[52]. Similarly, the availability of extraneous fluid allows carbonate dissolution to be an important process of carbonate removal[42]. Furthermore, for warm subduction zones of ancient past, complete carbonate removal from the downgoing slab likely took place via carbonated melting[53]. Hence there are several mechanisms that could have led to complete exhaustion of carbonates from the slab in ancient subduction zones.To quantify graphitized organic carbon release from subducting slabs we followed the methods of Duncan and Dasgupta[27], in which the authors predict dissolved CO2 concentrations in hydrous rhyolitic melts in equilibrium with graphite/diamond as a function of P, T, and fO2. In our calculations of graphite/diamond dissolution in silicate melts we use the same P-T paths described above and fO2 was calculated along the CCO buffer[54]. Organic C removal efficiency would be even lower if more reduced slab conditions are used, i.e., the fO2 conditions used give the highest CO2 dissolution capacity and graphite/diamond saturation. The results shown in Fig. 2 were generated assuming 1 wt% graphite in the initial bulk composition. See Duncan and Dasgupta[27] for more details on calculations.
Modeling atmospheric oxygen levels and δ13C of carbonates
We developed a new coupled carbon-oxygen cycle model which tracks δ13C. The model tracks how a set of carbon reservoirs (Ci) respond to changes in carbon fluxes (Fi) between these reservoirs. The surface reservoirs are the atmosphere-ocean (Catm), solid carbonates (Ccarb), and organic carbon (Corg), which are generated from the atmospheric reservoir (in this model we do not treat any fractionations between the ocean-atmosphere reservoirs). The transfer of carbon from the atmosphere-ocean reservoir into the carbonate and organic carbon reservoirs is controlled by a weathering flux (Fw, which is divided into Fcarb and Forg) which is proportional to the weathering constant (k) and the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere (Catm). Carbon that is fluxed out of the atmosphere can be deposited as either carbonates or organic carbon. In Fig. 5 we prescribe that 40% of carbonates and organic C fluxed out of the atmosphere are added to a crustal reservoir (Ccarb and Corg), while the other 60% are subducted (χ =0.60). To demonstrate that a carbon isotope excursion is possible without changing the fraction of organic C buried relative to carbonate, we hold forg constant at 0.20 throughout the model.While treating carbon in the Earth’s interior, we divide the mantle into three different carbon reservoirs. The first reservoir holds primitive carbon Cprm, which we treat as having existed in the mantle since its formation, additionally it receives no contribution from subducted components throughout the model evolution. The other two mantle carbon reservoirs consist of carbon hosted in subducted carbonate (Cmcarb), and carbon hosted in organic carbon (Cmorg), which have influxes from surfaces reservoirs controlled by the flux of subducted carbonate (F) and organic carbon (Fsubo) respectively. To relate oxygen levels to the carbon cycle we assume the atmospheric oxygen levels are directly proportional to the mass of organic carbon in the surface and mantle reservoirs.We prescribe that subducted carbon can leave the mantle reservoirs via arc volcanoes (Farc) and ocean island volcanoes (FOIB). In order to keep track of how differential release of carbonates versus organics at different volcanic settings affects C isotopes of CO2 emissions through time, we treat volcanic CO2 fluxes at arc volcanoes and ocean island volcanoes as the sum of CO2 fluxes derived from carbonates (Farcc & FOIBc), organic carbon (Farco & FOIBo), and primitive mantle carbon (Farcp & FOIBp), each having their own distinct δ13C. To account for the differential release of carbonates and organics at arcs and OIBs we prescribe that a certain fraction of subducted carbonates (αcarb) and organics (αorg) are released at arcs, with the remaining fraction released at OIBs (1- αcarb, and 1- αorg). In accordance with our calculations in the main text (Fig. 2), we treat carbonates as being completely released at arcs (αcarb = 1), and organics as being completed released at OIBs (αorg = 0) when generating Fig. 5. Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3 show how probable variations in αcarb and αorg would influence the modeled evolution of δ13Ccarb.Subducted carbon cycled through the mantle and released at arc volcanoes travel on the order of hundreds of kilometers, while carbon cycled through ocean island volcanoes may travel to the core-mantle boundary, traveling distances on the order of thousands of kilometers. Assuming mantle convection occurs on the order of 1 cm/yr the residence time of mantle carbon released at arcs (τarc) is on the order of 10 Myr, while the residence time of mantle carbon released at ocean island volcanoes (τOIB) is on the order of 100 Myr. Therefore, perturbations to subduction carbon fluxes will manifest themselves in arc volcanoes before ocean island volcanoes. The total volcanic CO2 outgassing flux (Fout) is a sum of the fluxes at arcs, OIBs, and MORB.The system of equations representing this coupled surface and interior carbon cycle are:A main focus of the model is to demonstrate how δ13Ccarb evolves in response to perturbations to carbon fluxes. Therefore, we track the δ13C evolution of different carbon reservoirs and fluxes with the following set of equations:
where is the value for carbon reservoir or flux i at time t, with atm = atmospheric reservoir, carb = carbonate reservoir, org = organic carbon reservoir, prm = primitive mantle reservoir, arc = arc flux, and OIB = ocean island flux, and MORB = mid-ocean ridge flux. We set to a constant value of −5‰ for the duration of the model, as we have assumed it has no influx of carbon from the surface reservoirs. The equations for and are offset from by +5 and −20 respectively because we assume that Δ13Ccrb-org = 25‰ and forg = 0.20.The model run to generate Fig. 5 was designed to simulate increased CO2 emissions. To simulate this scenario, the model was run with the initial conditions given in supplementary Table 1. After evolving with no perturbations for 1 billion years, we prescribed that MORB emissions increase from 1013 to 1016 g C/Myr. In order to check whether the model is an acceptable representation of the global C cycle model we increased MORB emissions a second time to 1019 g C/Myr (similar to present day estimates[41]), and model-dependent reservoir sizes and fluxes are in line with present day estimates (Supp. Fig. 3). The increased CO2 emissions cause increased deposition of carbonates and organic C, which drives increased subduction fluxes of both carbonates and organic C. The increased subduction flux of C coupled with the differential release of carbonates and organics at different volcanic settings described above results in increased oxygen levels and the positive C isotope excursion shown in Fig. 5.
Authors: A Bekker; H D Holland; P-L Wang; D Rumble; H J Stein; J L Hannah; L L Coetzee; N J Beukes Journal: Nature Date: 2004-01-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: I N Bindeman; D O Zakharov; J Palandri; N D Greber; N Dauphas; G J Retallack; A Hofmann; J S Lackey; A Bekker Journal: Nature Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Genming Luo; Shuhei Ono; Nicolas J Beukes; David T Wang; Shucheng Xie; Roger E Summons Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: C Brenhin Keller; Jon M Husson; Ross N Mitchell; William F Bottke; Thomas M Gernon; Patrick Boehnke; Elizabeth A Bell; Nicholas L Swanson-Hysell; Shanan E Peters Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P Bouilhol; B Debret; E C Inglis; M Warembourg; T Grocolas; T Rigaudier; J Villeneuve; K W Burton Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Andrea Giuliani; Russell N Drysdale; Jon D Woodhead; Noah J Planavsky; David Phillips; Janet Hergt; William L Griffin; Senan Oesch; Hayden Dalton; Gareth R Davies Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 14.136