Literature DB >> 31807099

Machine Learning For Tuning, Selection, And Ensemble Of Multiple Risk Scores For Predicting Type 2 Diabetes.

Yujia Liu1, Shangyuan Ye2, Xianchao Xiao1, Chenglin Sun1, Gang Wang1, Guixia Wang1, Bo Zhang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study proposes the use of machine learning algorithms to improve the accuracy of type 2 diabetes predictions using non-invasive risk score systems.
METHODS: We evaluated and compared the prediction accuracies of existing non-invasive risk score systems using the data from the REACTION study (Risk Evaluation of Cancers in Chinese Diabetic Individuals: A Longitudinal Study). Two simple risk scores were established on the bases of logistic regression. Machine learning techniques (ensemble methods) were used to improve prediction accuracies by combining the individual score systems.
RESULTS: Existing score systems from Western populations performed worse than the scores from Eastern populations in general. The two newly established score systems performed better than most existing scores systems but a little worse than the Chinese score system. Using ensemble methods with model selection algorithms yielded better prediction accuracy than all the simple score systems.
CONCLUSION: Our proposed machine learning methods can be used to improve the accuracy of screening the undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and identifying the high-risk patients.
© 2019 Liu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  machine learning; prediction; risk score; stacking; type 2 diabetes; voting

Year:  2019        PMID: 31807099      PMCID: PMC6842709          DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S225762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1179-1594


  29 in total

1.  AUSDRISK: an Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Dianna J Magliano; Beverley Balkau; Stephen Colagiuri; Paul Z Zimmet; Andrew M Tonkin; Paul Mitchell; Patrick J Phillips; Jonathan E Shaw
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Risk scores for type 2 diabetes can be applied in some populations but not all.

Authors:  Charlotte Glümer; Dorte Vistisen; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Stephen Colagiuri
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

4.  Discussion of "Sure Independence Screening for Ultra-High Dimensional Feature Space.

Authors:  Hao Helen Zhang
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.488

5.  A risk score for predicting incident diabetes in the Thai population.

Authors:  Wichai Aekplakorn; Pongamorn Bunnag; Mark Woodward; Piyamitr Sritara; Sayan Cheepudomwit; Sukit Yamwong; Tada Yipintsoi; Rajata Rajatanavin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Meta-analysis and aggregation of multiple published prediction models.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Hendrik Koffijberg; Daan Nieboer; Yvonne Vergouwe; Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.

Authors:  William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Clare L Gillies; Keith R Abrams; Paul C Lambert; Nicola J Cooper; Alex J Sutton; Ron T Hsu; Kamlesh Khunti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-01-19

9.  Development of a new risk score for incident type 2 diabetes using updated diagnostic criteria in middle-aged and older chinese.

Authors:  Xingwang Ye; Geng Zong; Xin Liu; Gang Liu; Wei Gan; Jingwen Zhu; Ling Lu; Liang Sun; Huaixing Li; Frank B Hu; Xu Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Quan Zou; Kaiyang Qu; Yamei Luo; Dehui Yin; Ying Ju; Hua Tang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Random Forest Model Has the Best Accuracy Among the Four Pressure Ulcer Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Jie Song; Yuan Gao; Pengbin Yin; Yi Li; Yang Li; Jie Zhang; Qingqing Su; Xiaojie Fu; Hongying Pi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 2.  Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luis Fregoso-Aparicio; Julieta Noguez; Luis Montesinos; José A García-García
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.320

Review 3.  Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review.

Authors:  Ashwini Tuppad; Shantala Devi Patil
Journal:  Adv Comput Intell       Date:  2022-04-13

4.  Hard Voting Ensemble Approach for the Detection of Type 2 Diabetes in Mexican Population with Non-Glucose Related Features.

Authors:  Jorge A Morgan-Benita; Carlos E Galván-Tejada; Miguel Cruz; Jorge I Galván-Tejada; Hamurabi Gamboa-Rosales; Jose G Arceo-Olague; Huizilopoztli Luna-García; José M Celaya-Padilla
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Validation and Comparison of a Modified Elixhauser Index for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Italian Internal Medicine Wards.

Authors:  Alfredo De Giorgi; Emanuele Di Simone; Rosaria Cappadona; Benedetta Boari; Caterina Savriè; Pablo J López-Soto; María A Rodríguez-Borrego; Massimo Gallerani; Roberto Manfredini; Fabio Fabbian
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-05-20

6.  Addressing practical issues of predictive models translation into everyday practice and public health management: a combined model to predict the risk of type 2 diabetes improves incidence prediction and reduces the prevalence of missing risk predictions.

Authors:  Martina Vettoretti; Enrico Longato; Alessandro Zandonà; Yan Li; José Antonio Pagán; David Siscovick; Mercedes R Carnethon; Alain G Bertoni; Andrea Facchinetti; Barbara Di Camillo
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.