Literature DB >> 31807063

Development and validation of a novel diagnostic model for assessing lung cancer metastasis in a Chinese population based on multicenter real-world data.

Yiyong Yao1, Cunling Yan2, Wei Zhang3, San-Gang Wu4, Jie Guan2, Gang Zeng1, Qiang Du1, Chun Huang1, Hui Zhang5, Huiling Wang6, Yanfeng Hou2, Zhiyan Li2, Lixin Wang7, Yijie Zheng8, Xun Li9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate disease staging plays an important role in lung cancer's clinical management. However, due to the limitation of the CT scan, it is still an unmet medical need in practice. In the present study, we attempted to develop diagnostic models based on biomarkers and clinical parameters for assessing lung cancer metastasis.
METHODS: This study consisted of 799 patients with pulmonary lesions from three regional centers in China. It included 274 benign lesions patients, 326 primary lung cancer patients without metastasis, and 199 advanced lung cancer patients with lymph node or organ metastasis. The patients were divided into nodules group and masses group according to tumor size.
RESULTS: Four nomogram models based on patient characteristics and tumor biomarkers were developed and evaluated for patients with nodules and masses, respectively. In patients with pulmonary nodules, the AUC to identify metastatic lung cancer from unidentified nodules (including benign nodules and lung cancer, model 1) reached 0.859 (0.827-0.887, 95% CI). Model 2 was used to predict metastasis in patients with lung cancer with AUC of 0.838 (0.795-0.876, 95% CI). In patients with pulmonary masses, the AUC to identify metastatic lung cancer from unidentified masses (model 3) reached 0.773 (0.717-0.823, 95% CI). Model 4 was used to predict metastasis in patients with lung cancer and AUC reached 0.731 (0.771-0.793, 95% CI). Decision curve analysis corroborated good clinical applicability of the nomograms in predicting metastasis.
CONCLUSION: All new models demonstrated promising discrimination, allowing for estimating the risk of lymph node or organ metastasis of lung cancer. Such integration of blood biomarker testing with CT imaging results will be an efficient and effective approach to benefit the accurate staging and treatment of lung cancer.
© 2019 Yao et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT imaging pulmonary lesions; biomarker; lung cancer metastasis; multicenter real-world; nomogram models

Year:  2019        PMID: 31807063      PMCID: PMC6827356          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S217970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


  31 in total

Review 1.  Seeking a home for a PET, part 1: Defining the appropriate place for positron emission tomography imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules or masses.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Steven Falen; M Patricia Rivera; Jan S Halle; Mark A Socinski
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Modern staging of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gregory P Kalemkerian; Shirish M Gadgeel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Assessment of a Combined Panel of Six Serum Tumor Markers for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Ramon M Marrades; Josep Maria Augé; Jose M Escudero; Nuria Viñolas; Noemi Reguart; Jose Ramirez; Xavier Filella; Laureano Molins; Alvar Agustí
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Clinical PET-MR Imaging in Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Samuel L Rice; Kent P Friedman
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2016-10

5.  Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Ewa Wojcik; Jadwiga Tarapacz; Urszula Rychlik; Zofia Stasik; Beata Sas-Korczynska; Piotr Skotnicki; Jan K Kulpa
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 1.138

6.  [Correlation of lymph node size and metastatic involvement of lymph nodes in bronchial cancer].

Authors:  P Vogel; H Daschner; J Lenz; R Schäfer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1990

7.  Role of a serum-based biomarker panel in the early diagnosis of lung cancer for a cohort of high-risk patients.

Authors:  Da-Wei Yang; Yong Zhang; Qun-Ying Hong; Jie Hu; Chun Li; Bai-Shen Pan; Qun Wang; Fei-Hong Ding; Jia-Xian Ou; Fang-Lei Liu; Dan Zhang; Jie-Bai Zhou; Yuan-Lin Song; Chun-Xue Bai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for use of tumor markers in clinical practice: quality requirements.

Authors:  Catharine M Sturgeon; Barry R Hoffman; Daniel W Chan; Soo-Ling Ch'ng; Elizabeth Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Lance A Liotta; Emmanuel F Petricoin; Manfred Schmitt; O John Semmes; Györg Söletormos; Elena van der Merwe; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Nomograms to Predict Individual Prognosis of Patients with Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Authors:  Fan Dong; Yifan Shen; Fengbin Gao; Xiao Shi; Tianyuan Xu; Xianjin Wang; Xiaohua Zhang; Shan Zhong; Minguang Zhang; Shanwen Chen; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Assessment of Seven Clinical Tumor Markers in Diagnosis of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Zhong-Qing Chen; Ling-Sha Huang; Bo Zhu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.