| Literature DB >> 31806992 |
Jiang Zhu1, Rui Huang2, DaiXing Hu1, Yi Dou1, HaoYu Ren1, ZhiXin Yang1, Chang Deng1, Wei Xiong1, Denghui Wang1, Yu Mao1, Xuesong Li1, XinLiang Su1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to establish a prediction model based on preoperative clinicopathologic features and intraoperative frozen section examination for precise prediction of metastatic involvement of lymph nodes posterior to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve (LN-prRLN) in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).Entities:
Keywords: lymph node metastasis; lymph nodes posterior to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve; nomogram; papillary thyroid carcinoma; predict model
Year: 2019 PMID: 31806992 PMCID: PMC6842273 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S220926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the patient selection criteria.
Demographic And Clinicopathological Characteristics Of Patients With And Without LN-prRLN Metastasis
| Characteristics | LN-prRLN Metastasis, n% | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (n=481) | Positive (n=111) | ||
| Sex | 0.007 | ||
| Male | 122 (25.4%) | 43 (38.7%) | |
| Female | 359 (74.6%) | 68 (61.3%) | |
| Age (Mean±SD, years) | 42.6±12.2 | 41.0±12.0 | 0.215 |
| ≤55 | 410 (85.2%) | 98 (88.3%) | 0.454 |
| >55 | 71 (14.8%) | 13 (11.7%) | |
| Tumor size (M±SD) | 11.6±7.8 | 16.4±8.7 | <0.001 |
| ≤10 mm | 293 (60.9%) | 37 (33.3%) | <0.001 |
| 11–20 mm | 149 (31.0%) | 55 (49.6%) | |
| ≥21 mm | 39 (8.1%) | 19 (17.1%) | |
| Location | 0.821 | ||
| Upper | 133 (27.7%) | 34 (30.6%) | |
| Middle | 208 (43.2%) | 46 (41.4%) | |
| Low | 140 (29.1%) | 31 (28.0%) | |
| US-reported LN status | <0.001 | ||
| cN0 | 439 (91.3%) | 71 (64.0%) | |
| cN1 | 42 (8.7%) | 40 (36.0%) | |
| Multifocality | <0.001 | ||
| No | 386 (80.2%) | 71 (64.0%) | |
| Yes | 95 (19.8%) | 40 (36.0%) | |
| ETE | <0.001 | ||
| No | 406 (84.4%) | 75 (67.6%) | |
| Yes | 75 (15.6%) | 36 (32.4%) | |
| HT | 0.287 | ||
| No | 385 (80.0%) | 94 (84.7%) | |
| Yes | 96 (20.0%) | 17 (15.3%) | |
| Delphian LNM | <0.001 | ||
| No | 421 (87.5%) | 55 (49.5%) | |
| Yes | 60 (12.5%) | 56 (50.5%) | |
| Pretracheal LNM | <0.001 | ||
| No | 317 (65.9%) | 24 (21.6%) | |
| Yes | 164 (34.1%) | 87 (78.4%) | |
| Paratracheal LNM | <0.001 | ||
| No | 303 (63.0%) | 14 (12.6%) | |
| Yes | 178 (37.0%) | 97 (87.4%) | |
| rCLNMa | <0.001 | ||
| No | 232 (48.2%) | 6 (5.4%) | |
| Yes | 249 (51.8%) | 105 (94.6%) | |
| LLNM | <0.001 | ||
| No | 326 (67.8%) | 23 (20.7%) | |
| Yes | 155 (32.2%) | 88 (79.3%) | |
Note: aLN-prRLN was excluded from rCLNM.
Abbreviations: LN-prRLN, lymph nodes posterior to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve; US, ultrasonography; ETE, extrathyroid extension; HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis; rCLNM, right central lymph node metastasis; LLNM, lateral lymph node metastasis.
Results Of Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis Showing Predictors Of LN-prRLN Metastasis
| Variables | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| US-reported LN status (cN1 vs. cN0) | 2.179 (1.156–4.107) | 0.016 |
| Extrathyroid extension (yes vs. no) | 2.232 (1.240–4.017) | 0.007 |
| Delphian LNM (yes vs. no) | 2.580 (1.466–4.541) | 0.001 |
| No. of pretracheal LNM | ||
| 0 | 1 (reference) | |
| 1–3 | 2.499 (1.376–4.541) | 0.003 |
| >3 | 3.558 (1.467–8.626) | 0.005 |
| No. of paratracheal LNM | ||
| 0 | 1 (reference) | |
| 1–3 | 4.866 (2.789–8.490) | <0.001 |
| >3 | 21.078 (7.305–60.817) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: US, ultrasonography; LNM, lymph node metastasis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Nomogram for prediction of LN-prRLN metastases in patients with PTC. A line is drawn straight up to the point axis that corresponds with each patient variable to obtain the points. The sum of these points is located on the total score points axis. Lastly, a line is drawn downwards to the risk axis to determine the likelihood of LN-prRLN metastases.
Abbreviations: US-reported LN status, ultrasound-reported lymph node status; ETE, extrathyroidal extension; Delphian LNM, Delphian lymph node metastasis; No. of pretracheal LNM, number of pretracheal lymph node metastasis; No. of paratracheal LNM, number of paratracheal lymph node metastasis.
Figure 3Calibration plot of the nomogram. The calibration curve depicts the calibration of model in terms of the agreement between the predicted risks of LN-prRLN metastasis and observed outcomes of LN-prRLN metastasis. The x-axis represents the predicted LN-prRLN metastasis risk. The y-axis represents the actual LN-prRLN metastasis rate. The diagonal dotted blue line represents an ideal calibration model in which the predicted probabilities are identical to the actual outcomes. The dotted line represents the predictive performance of the nomogram; the closer the fit of the dotted line to the ideal line, the better the prediction. The black line represents the bias corrected.
Figure 4Decision curve analysis for the nomogram. The y-axis measures the net benefit. The x-axis represents the threshold probability. The red solid line represents the nomogram. The gray line represents the hypothesis that all patients had LN-prRLN metastasis. The black solid line represents the hypothesis that none of the patients had LN-prRLN metastasis. The decision curve indicates that when the threshold probability is >10.0%, use of this predictive model would accrue greater benefit than that accruing from a treat-all or treat-none strategy.