Sofi Fristedt1,2,3, Paul Nystedt4, Örjan Skogar2,5. 1. Department of Rehabilitation and ARN-J Aging Research Network, Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping, Sweden. 2. Futurum - The Academy for Health and Care, Jönköping, Sweden. 3. Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 4. Jönköping Academy, Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden. 5. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Demographic changes combined with costly technological progress put a financial strain on the healthcare sector in the industrialized world. Hence, there is a constant need to develop new cost-effective treatment procedures in order to optimize the use of available resources. As a response, the concept of a Mobile Geriatric Team (MGT) has emerged not only nationally but also internationally during the last decade; however, scientific evaluation of this initiative has been very scarce. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a mixed methods analysis, including a prospective, controlled and randomized quantitative evaluation, in combination with an interview-based qualitative assessment, to measure the effectiveness and user satisfaction of MGT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Community-dwelling, frail elderly people were randomized to an intervention group (n=31, mean age 84) and a control group (n=31, mean age 86). A two-year retrospective quantitative data collection and a prospective one-year follow-up on healthcare utilization were combined with qualitative interviews. Non-parametric statistics and difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses were applied to the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: No significant group differences in healthcare utilization were found before inclusion. Post intervention, primary care contact (including MGTs) increased for the MGT group. Inpatient care decreased dramatically for both groups. Hence, the increase in primary care contact for MGT patients was not accompanied by a reduction in inpatient care compared to the control group. Utilization of non-primary care was lower (p< 0.01) post-intervention in both groups. CONCLUSION: There appears to be a "natural" variation in healthcare needs over time among frail elderly people. Hence, it is vital to perform open, controlled clinical studies in tandem with the implementation of new caregiving strategies. The MGT initiative was clearly appreciated but did not fully achieve the desired reduction in healthcare utilization in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 09/10/2018, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03662945.
BACKGROUND: Demographic changes combined with costly technological progress put a financial strain on the healthcare sector in the industrialized world. Hence, there is a constant need to develop new cost-effective treatment procedures in order to optimize the use of available resources. As a response, the concept of a Mobile Geriatric Team (MGT) has emerged not only nationally but also internationally during the last decade; however, scientific evaluation of this initiative has been very scarce. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a mixed methods analysis, including a prospective, controlled and randomized quantitative evaluation, in combination with an interview-based qualitative assessment, to measure the effectiveness and user satisfaction of MGT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Community-dwelling, frail elderly people were randomized to an intervention group (n=31, mean age 84) and a control group (n=31, mean age 86). A two-year retrospective quantitative data collection and a prospective one-year follow-up on healthcare utilization were combined with qualitative interviews. Non-parametric statistics and difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses were applied to the quantitative data. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: No significant group differences in healthcare utilization were found before inclusion. Post intervention, primary care contact (including MGTs) increased for the MGT group. Inpatient care decreased dramatically for both groups. Hence, the increase in primary care contact for MGT patients was not accompanied by a reduction in inpatient care compared to the control group. Utilization of non-primary care was lower (p< 0.01) post-intervention in both groups. CONCLUSION: There appears to be a "natural" variation in healthcare needs over time among frail elderly people. Hence, it is vital to perform open, controlled clinical studies in tandem with the implementation of new caregiving strategies. The MGT initiative was clearly appreciated but did not fully achieve the desired reduction in healthcare utilization in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 09/10/2018, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03662945.
Authors: Malin Tistad; Charlotte Ytterberg; Christina Sjöstrand; Lotta Widén Holmqvist; Lena von Koch Journal: Top Stroke Rehabil Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.119
Authors: Anne W Ekdahl; Ann-Britt Wirehn; Jenny Alwin; Tiny Jaarsma; Mitra Unosson; Magnus Husberg; Jeanette Eckerblad; Anna Milberg; Barbro Krevers; Per Carlsson Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: David E Bloom; Somnath Chatterji; Paul Kowal; Peter Lloyd-Sherlock; Martin McKee; Bernd Rechel; Larry Rosenberg; James P Smith Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert Briggs; Anna McDonough; Graham Ellis; Kathleen Bennett; Desmond O'Neill; David Robinson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-05-06