Phase-controlled synthesis of two-dimensional (2D) transition-metal chalcogenides (TMCs) at low temperatures with a precise thickness control has to date been rarely reported. Here, we report on a process for the phase-controlled synthesis of TiS2 (metallic) and TiS3 (semiconducting) nanolayers by atomic layer deposition (ALD) with precise thickness control. The phase control has been obtained by carefully tuning the deposition temperature and coreactant composition during ALD. In all cases, characteristic self-limiting ALD growth behavior with a growth per cycle (GPC) of ∼0.16 nm per cycle was observed. TiS2 was prepared at 100 °C using H2S gas as coreactant and was also observed using H2S plasma as a coreactant at growth temperatures between 150 and 200 °C. TiS3 was synthesized only at 100 °C using H2S plasma as the coreactant. The S2 species in the H2S plasma, as observed by optical emission spectroscopy, has been speculated to lead to the formation of the TiS3 phase at low temperatures. The control between the synthesis of TiS2 and TiS3 was elucidated by Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, high-resolution electron microscopy, and Rutherford backscattering study. Electrical transport measurements showed the low resistive nature of ALD grown 2D-TiS2 (1T-phase). Postdeposition annealing of the TiS3 layers at 400 °C in a sulfur-rich atmosphere improved the crystallinity of the film and yielded photoluminescence at ∼0.9 eV, indicating the semiconducting (direct band gap) nature of TiS3. The current study opens up a new ALD-based synthesis route for controlled, scalable growth of transition-metal di- and tri-chalcogenides at low temperatures.
Phase-controlled synthesis of two-dimensional (2D) transition-metal chalcogenides (TMCs) at low temperatures with a precise thickness control has to date been rarely reported. Here, we report on a process for the phase-controlled synthesis of TiS2 (metallic) and TiS3 (semiconducting) nanolayers by atomic layer deposition (ALD) with precise thickness control. The phase control has been obtained by carefully tuning the deposition temperature and coreactant composition during ALD. In all cases, characteristic self-limiting ALD growth behavior with a growth per cycle (GPC) of ∼0.16 nm per cycle was observed. TiS2 was prepared at 100 °C using H2S gas as coreactant and was also observed using H2S plasma as a coreactant at growth temperatures between 150 and 200 °C. TiS3 was synthesized only at 100 °C using H2S plasma as the coreactant. The S2 species in the H2S plasma, as observed by optical emission spectroscopy, has been speculated to lead to the formation of the TiS3 phase at low temperatures. The control between the synthesis of TiS2 and TiS3 was elucidated by Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, high-resolution electron microscopy, and Rutherford backscattering study. Electrical transport measurements showed the low resistive nature of ALD grown 2D-TiS2 (1T-phase). Postdeposition annealing of the TiS3 layers at 400 °C in a sulfur-rich atmosphere improved the crystallinity of the film and yielded photoluminescence at ∼0.9 eV, indicating the semiconducting (direct band gap) nature of TiS3. The current study opens up a new ALD-based synthesis route for controlled, scalable growth of transition-metal di- and tri-chalcogenides at low temperatures.
Since
the isolation of monolayer graphene, two-dimensional (2D)
materials such as the transition-metal di-chalcogenides (TMDCs) have
shown interesting electrical and optical properties.[1] TMDCs consist of a transition metal (such as Mo, W, Ti,
Nb, etc.) paired with a chalcogenide (S, Se, and Te) forming a layered
structure in which the layers are held together by weak van der Waals
forces. Besides TMDCs, there is an alternative class of low-dimensional
materials that consist of similar elements to TMDCs. This class of
materials is known as the transition-metal tri-chalcogenides (TMTCs)
and consists of quasi-one-dimensional materials possessing an added
degree of freedom that results in a strong electrical and optical
in-plane anisotropy.[2,3] The TMTCs are known for the groups
IV, V, and VI transition metals (such as Ti, Hf, Nb, etc.) and are
predominantly semiconducting in nature.[2−6] The electrical properties can vary between di- and tri-chalcogenide
systems containing analogous elements. For example, TiS2 and NbS2 are considered a semimetal and metal, respectively,
whereas TiS3 and NbS3 are both semiconductors.
Therefore, controlling phase transitions between TMDCs and TMTCs during
synthesis allows for direct tailoring of the electrical characteristics
of these low-dimensional materials. This phase control could offer
new possibilities for device fabrication.Titanium sulfide (TiS) is one of the
systems that could provide an excellent framework for phase control
during synthesis. TiS2 has been studied extensively for
batteries,[7] optics,[8] and thermoelectric material[9] applications
and has been synthesized by various techniques such as chemical vapor
transport (CVT),[10] chemical vapor deposition
(CVD),[11−15] atomic layer deposition (ALD),[16−18] and wet chemical synthesis.[19] Interestingly, the electrical properties of
TiS2 have been under debate for the last few decades, with
hypotheses from both theory and experimental results splitting between
a semiconducting, metallic, or semimetallic nature.[20,21] Recently, TiS2 has been considered as a degenerate, small-gap
semiconductor or a semimetal owing to its high conductivity and optical
absorption properties.[22] Conversely, TiS3 has a direct band gap in the infrared region (0.9–1
eV) irrespective of its thickness and is the only known TMTC possessing
a direct band gap.[3] This makes TiS3 an ideal candidate for (opto)electronics applications.[23,24] It is known from the literature that TiS3 is less common
to synthesize, with reports predominantly using CVT methods[3] with a few instances of CVD.[13,25,26] CVT is a technique where elemental Ti and
S are sealed inside a quartz ampoule and placed inside a furnace for
synthesis, making this a nonscalable (i.e., not wafer-scale), relatively
high temperature, and time-consuming technique.[3−5,27]In TiS CVT synthesis,[10] phase control can be attained by carefully modulating
both
the S to Ti ratio and the process temperature. TiS2 is
obtained with an initial S to Ti ratio of 2, whereas TiS3 is obtained by maintaining a S to Ti ratio above 3. Temperature
is also important due to pyrolysis of S from TiS3 above
550 °C. Thus, TiS3 must be synthesized at or below
550 °C. A significant drawback of the CVT technique is that it
requires days to weeks at high temperatures (>450 °C) for
growing
large crystals (>1 cm), which can be subsequently used to mechanically
exfoliate 2D flakes of several microns in size. Thus, a technique
to rapidly synthesize both TiS2 and TiS3 over
a large area (wafer-scale) with high uniformity and with controlled
thickness would be very beneficial for nanoelectronic applications.In this work, using atomic layer deposition (ALD) as a synthesis
technique, we address the challenges associated with other synthesis
methods. The ALD method has advantages such as precise thickness control
and conformal growth over a large area.[28,29] In addition,
most ALD processes are performed at low temperatures (<450 °C),
which are favorable for device manufacturing schemes.[29−31] Recently, interest in controlling the phase as well as the composition
of metal-oxide-based materials has been made viable by ALD.[32−34] Therefore, ALD could serve as an ideal technique for synthesizing
both TMDCs and TMTCs over a large area at low temperature with precise
thickness control. Previously, TiS2 has been reported to
be synthesized by ALD using TiCl4 and H2S with
a growth per cycle (GPC) between 0.15 and 0.5 Å depending on
the deposition temperature.[16,17] Recently, ALD of amorphous
TiS2 has been reported by Nam et al.[18] using tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium and H2S at a deposition temperature between 120 and 180 °C with a
GPC of ∼0.5 Å. They also reported the surface oxidation
of TiS2 after exposure to the ambient conditions. To the
best of our knowledge, TiS3 has not been synthesized by
ALD.This work describes a scalable, low-temperature ALD synthesis
route
with control over the phase of titanium sulfide (TiS). The effect of varying the sulfur coreactant and the deposition
temperature on the phase of the deposited material is studied using
an extensive array of characterization techniques (Raman spectroscopy,
transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS), and Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS)). Our work
shows that ALD is well suited for obtaining both metallic TiS2 and semiconducting TiS3 in a temperature range
of 100–200 °C. By tuning the temperature and the sulfur
coreactant in this temperature range, we demonstrate control over
the phase.
Experimental Details
Film Growth
The TiS thin
films were deposited by ALD using an Oxford
Instruments Plasma Technology FlexAL ALD reactor. The base pressure
of the system was 10–6 Torr, and the reactor was
equipped with a remote inductively coupled plasma source (ICP, 13.56
MHz). The deposition temperature was varied between 100 and 200 °C.
The reactor was a warm wall reactor where the wall temperature can
be varied from room temperature to a maximum of 150 °C, independently
of table temperature. For depositions below 150 °C, both the
table and wall temperatures were maintained at equal temperatures,
whereas for depositions above 150 °C, only the table temperature
was varied, while the wall temperature remained at 150 °C (maximum
wall temperature). The metal–organic precursor tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium
(TDMAT) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie BV, 99.999% pure) was kept in a stainless
steel bubbler at 50 °C and was bubbled using Ar as the carrier
gas. In the first half-cycle, the precursor was dosed into the reactor
using Ar as the carrier gas and the pressure was maintained at 80
mTorr. During the second half-cycle, a gas mixture of Ar and H2S (both >99.98% pure) with 10 and 40 sccm, respectively,
was
used as a coreactant in the case of thermal ALD. In the case of plasma-enhanced
ALD (PE-ALD), H2S:Ar plasma with the aforementioned gas
ratio was used as a coreactant and an ICP power of 200 W was applied
to ignite the plasma. Ar (300 sccm) was used as the purge gas after
the precursor as well as the coreactant dose steps in both the ALD
processes. The thin films were deposited on Si substrates covered
with approximately 450 nm thermally grown SiO2.In
some cases, postdeposition annealing of the ALD grown film was conducted
in a sulfur atmosphere in a tube furnace. The sample was placed at
the center of a quartz tube. After loading sulfur powder on a quartz
boat (500 mg, 99.98%, Aldrich), which was situated upstream, the tube
was sealed and Ar (50 sccm) was flown downstream as the carrier gas.
The furnace was heated up to the target temperature (400 °C)
with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Meanwhile, the sulfur powder
situated upstream of the tube was heated to 170 °C by heating
tape. The sample was annealed at 400 °C for 3 h and then cooled
down naturally in Ar to room temperature.
Analysis
Techniques
Spectroscopic
ellipsometry (SE) was used to investigate the film growth in situ
where the film thickness was measured as a function of the number
of ALD cycles. A J.A. Woollam Co., Inc., M2000U with a rotating compensator
having a photon energy range of 0.7–5 eV was used. The film
thickness was modeled using a B-spline oscillator (the film thickness
was verified using cross-section scanning electron microscopy (SEM)).
Raman spectroscopy was performed on a Renishaw inVia system using
a 514 nm excitation laser in the ambient environment. XPS was used
to determine both the elemental composition and valence band spectra
of synthesized thin films. A Thermo Scientific KA1066 spectrometer
with monochromatic Al Kα (hν = 1486.6
eV) X-ray radiation was employed. The crystallinity of the thin films
was studied by X-ray diffraction with a PANalytical X′Pert
Pro MRD analyzer using a Cu Kα (λ = 1.54 Å) X-ray
source. The surface morphology of the films was investigated by SEM
using a Zeiss Sigma with an in-lens detector and operating at an acceleration
voltage of 3 kV. The thin film microstructure was studied using TEM
and scanning-TEM (STEM) with a JEOL ARM 200F operated at 200 kV. For
TEM/STEM studies, the films were grown on Si3N4 TEM windows coated with ∼5 nm ALD SiO2. The selected-area
electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were acquired from a 1.3 μm
diameter area on each sample. For cross-section TEM/STEM, a thin lamella
(∼100 nm) was prepared by a focused ion beam (FIB) using the
lift-out preparation procedure. To protect the postdeposition annealed
TiS3 film during lamella preparation, a SiO2 layer was deposited on the top by electron-beam-induced deposition.
High-angle annular dark-field STEM (HAADF-STEM) combined with energy-dispersive
X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was used to study the chemical composition
of the postdeposition annealed TiS3 films. RBS and elastic
recoil detection (ERD) measurements were used to determine the composition
and purity of the thin films. The measurements were conducted by Detect
99 B.V. Eindhoven, The Netherlands with a 2 MeV He+ beam
source containing two detectors at scattering angles of 105 and 170°.
Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) of the H2S:Ar plasma
was performed using a USB4000 spectrometer from Ocean Optics with
a wavelength range of 180–1100 nm mounted vertically on top
of the plasma source. Resistivity measurements were performed ex situ
and at room temperature using a Signatone four-point probe in combination
with a Keithley 2400 sourcemeter acting both as a current source and
as a voltage meter. The resistivity of the thin films was determined
from the slope of the I–V curve. The near-infrared (NIR) photoluminescence (PL) measurements
were conducted using an inverted microscope in an epi-illumination
geometry with an objective lens (50X Mitutoyo M Plan NIR Infinity
Corrected, NA = 0.42) and a 2.040 eV excitation continuous wave laser.
The PL spectra were recorded using an Andor Shamrock 163 spectrometer
and an Andor iDus 1.7 μm InGaAs camera.
Results and Discussion
Phase control between TiS2 and TiS3 during
CVT has previously been observed to obey the following empirical relationship[35]where P corresponds to the
partial pressure of sulfur and T corresponds to the
synthesis/system temperature. This relationship indicates the sulfur
partial pressure at which the pyrolysis of TiS3 to TiS2 is favored at a given temperature and therefore illustrates
the minimum partial pressure of S required at a given temperature
to synthesize TiS3. Thus, these two variables can be modulated
accordingly to achieve phase control between TiS2 and TiS3. This forms the basis for studying both the effects of H2S as a coreactant and the deposition temperature during the
ALD process.The effect of the coreactant sulfur species was
studied by comparing
H2S plasma (PE-ALD) and H2S gas (thermal ALD)
as the coreactant at a deposition temperature of 100 °C for ∼30
nm thick TiS thin films. The schematic
representation of one complete ALD cycle as a function of time is
shown in Figure a.
In the case of PE-ALD, power was applied to the ICP source to ignite
the plasma during the H2S:Ar coreactant step, as shown
in Figure a, whereas
in the case of thermal ALD the ICP source was turned off. The film
thickness as a function of the number of ALD cycles as measured by
in situ SE is shown in Figure b. The growth per cycle (GPC) was calculated by taking the
slope of the curve in the linear part. Both the PE-ALD and the thermal
ALD processes have a GPC of ∼1.6 Å and exhibit typical
ALD linear growth behavior with precise thickness control from monolayer
to bulk. The self-limiting saturated growth behavior was observed
for both ALD processes at a deposition temperature of 100 °C
(Supporting Information Figure S1). In
the first half-cycle, the TDMAT precursor dose reached saturation
around 4 s for both ALD processes. In the second half-cycle, in the
case of PE-ALD, the H2S:Ar plasma exposure reached saturation
around 25 s. Although plasma exposure reached saturation around 25
s, a plasma exposure of 30 s was used during the film deposition to
ensure uniform growth over a large area. In the case of thermal ALD,
a 30 s dose time of H2S:Ar gas was chosen to have a fair
comparison with the PE-ALD process and the chosen dose time was observed
to be in the saturation regime as well.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of one
complete ALD process cycle implemented at
all investigated temperatures. Plasma power was on for PE-ALD, while
it was off for thermal ALD. (b) Film thickness as a function of the
number of ALD cycles measured using in situ SE for PE-ALD grown films
at deposition temperatures between 100 and 200 °C and also for
a thermal ALD film grown at 100 °C. Raman spectra of (c) PE-ALD
and (e) thermal ALD grown films at 100 °C deposition temperature
and also the corresponding TiS3 and TiS2 vibration
peaks. The peak at 520 cm–1 is of the Si substrate.
S 2p XPS spectra of (d) PE-ALD and (f) thermal ALD grown films at
100 °C deposition temperature. In (d), the (dark gray) doublet
peaks correspond to S2– species and the (light gray)
doublet peaks at higher energy correspond to (S2)2– species of TiS3 (Ti4+(S2)2–S2–). (g, h) Crystal structures of two TiS2 and TiS3 layers, where the respective thickness
of 1 c-axis plane is indicated.
(a) Schematic of one
complete ALD process cycle implemented at
all investigated temperatures. Plasma power was on for PE-ALD, while
it was off for thermal ALD. (b) Film thickness as a function of the
number of ALD cycles measured using in situ SE for PE-ALD grown films
at deposition temperatures between 100 and 200 °C and also for
a thermal ALD film grown at 100 °C. Raman spectra of (c) PE-ALD
and (e) thermal ALD grown films at 100 °C deposition temperature
and also the corresponding TiS3 and TiS2 vibration
peaks. The peak at 520 cm–1 is of the Si substrate.
S 2p XPS spectra of (d) PE-ALD and (f) thermal ALD grown films at
100 °C deposition temperature. In (d), the (dark gray) doublet
peaks correspond to S2– species and the (light gray)
doublet peaks at higher energy correspond to (S2)2– species of TiS3 (Ti4+(S2)2–S2–). (g, h) Crystal structures of two TiS2 and TiS3 layers, where the respective thickness
of 1 c-axis plane is indicated.Raman spectroscopy studies were conducted on the TiS films deposited by both ALD processes at 100 °C.
For the film deposited by PE-ALD, four vibrational peaks at 170, 295,
360, and 550 cm–1 were observed. These four vibrational
peaks correspond to the four A1g-type (Figure c) Raman modes of
TiS3.[36] Interestingly, the Raman
spectrum for the film deposited by thermal ALD had only two vibrational
peaks at ∼230 and 330 cm–1 with a shoulder
peak at ∼380 cm–1. The two vibrational peaks
at 230 and 330 cm–1 observed for thermal ALD (Figure e) film correspond
to the Eg and A1g Raman modes of
1T-TiS2, respectively.[37] These
findings indicate that phase-controlled synthesis of TiS2 and TiS3 can be attained with ALD by switching between
H2S gas and H2S plasma in the coreactant step
at 100 °C.The chemical composition and binding environments
in the deposited
films were then investigated using XPS analysis. The as-deposited
films had some C and O contamination at the surface due to exposure
of the films to ambient conditions after deposition. However, the
bulk of the films was free from C and O impurities. The XPS spectra
obtained were calibrated by setting the C–C peak to 248.8 eV
in the C 1s spectrum. The S 2p spectrum of the PE-ALD grown film at
100 °C contains two doublets (Figure d): one at 161.1 and 162.3 eV (dark gray)
and the other at 162.4 and 163.6 eV (light gray). In comparison to
the literature, the lower energy doublet at 161.1 and 162.3 eV corresponds
to the S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 spin–orbit
doublet of an isolated S2– species and the second
doublet at 162.4 and 163.6 eV corresponds to the spin–orbit
doublet of (S2)2– (also known as a S–S
pair). This is consistent with the TiS3 formula written
as Ti4+(S2)2–S2–.[38] The presence of both doublets could
also be due to the presence of a mixed phase of both TiS2 and TiS3, but the Raman spectrum from Figure c showed vibration modes of
only TiS3, indicating a lack of TiS2 in the
film. Additionally, the fitted peak area ratio of (S2)2–/S2– was calculated to be 2.5:1,
which indicated the presence of excess (S2)2– species in the film. From the XPS S 2p peaks, it was determined
that the excess S present in the film does not match the binding energy
of any elementary S species such as S8, S4,
etc. The S to Ti atomic ratio calculated from RBS measurements for
a PE-ALD grown film at 100 °C further confirms the synthesis
of TiS3 (see Table ) with the incorporation of excess S (S/Ti ratio above 3).
In contrast to the PE-ALD film, the films deposited by thermal ALD
(Figure f) at 100
°C exhibited only one S 2p doublet at 161.1 and 162.3 eV (spin–orbit
doublet of S2–), indicating the deposition of TiS2. The S to Ti atomic ratio calculated from RBS measurements
also confirms that the TiS2 film obtained by thermal ALD
is slightly S-deficient (S/Ti ratio less than 2). The RBS and XPS
results confirm that we can obtain phase control during ALD by tuning
the gas composition in the coreactant step.
Table 1
In Situ
SE, RBS, ERD, and Four-Point
Probe Measurements of PE-ALD Deposited Titanium Sulfide Thin Film
between 100 and 200 °C Deposition Temperaturesa
GPC, Å
S/Ti ratio
O, atom %
C, atom %
H, atom %
resistivity, 103 μΩ cm
100 °C
1.6
3.48 ± 0.02
1.4 ± 0.6
3.7 ± 0.9
1.3 ± 0.1
-
150 °C
2.1
1.94 ± 0.01
1.7 ± 0.1
1.0 ± 0.1
10.1 ± 0.8
9
200 °C
2.3
1.93 ± 0.01
0.6 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.1
9.8 ± 0.8
3.5
All films were ∼30 nm thick,
and the GPC was calculated by taking the slope of the linear region
above 140 cycles; see Figure b. The atomic concentrations of O, C, and the S/Ti ratio were
determined by RBS. The H content was determined by ERD. The resistivity
was measured using the four-point probe method.
All films were ∼30 nm thick,
and the GPC was calculated by taking the slope of the linear region
above 140 cycles; see Figure b. The atomic concentrations of O, C, and the S/Ti ratio were
determined by RBS. The H content was determined by ERD. The resistivity
was measured using the four-point probe method.To better understand the conditions
contributing to the phase-controlled
synthesis of TiS2 and TiS3, OES was performed
(Figure ) to obtain
insight into the composition of the H2S:Ar plasma. In the
H2S:Ar plasma, S-containing species, including SH+ (at around 337 nm) and S2 (peaks between 280 and 610
nm) species, were detected along with the Ar and H species.[39,40] The contribution of S2 species in the OES spectrum (between
280 and 610 nm) is significant (see Supporting Information Figure S2, where Figure is compared with the OES spectrum of H2:Ar plasma without S species). In the case of thermal ALD,
the H2S:Ar gas (no optical emission in the gas phase) would
most likely decompose into Ar and reactive H, SH, and S species at
the reaction surface.[41,42] By comparing both the cases,
we hypothesize that the generation of S2 species in the
H2S:Ar plasma could lead to the synthesis of TiS3 [Ti4+(S2)2–S2–] where majority of the sulfur exists as S–S pairs. A similar
observation was made by Carmalt et al. using CVD,[13] where TiS3 was synthesized only when a coreactant
containing S2 species was used. These S2 species,
however, are not present in the case of H2S:Ar gas utilized
during thermal ALD, which yielded only TiS2.
Figure 2
Optical emission
spectrum of the H2S:Ar plasma from
PE-ALD with a gas flow of 10:40 sccm. It shows the corresponding peak
for SH+ (blue) and the range of peaks for S2 (green) species along with H and Ar species (black).
Optical emission
spectrum of the H2S:Ar plasma from
PE-ALD with a gas flow of 10:40 sccm. It shows the corresponding peak
for SH+ (blue) and the range of peaks for S2 (green) species along with H and Ar species (black).Following the synthesis of TiS3 by PE-ALD at 100
°C,
the effect of the synthesis temperature (second variable in the earlier-mentioned
empirical relationship) on the material’s phase/composition
was studied by varying the deposition temperature in PE-ALD between
100 and 200 °C. In Figure b, the film thickness as a function of the number of ALD cycles
is shown for the investigated deposition temperatures. Linear growth
was observed for deposition at 100 °C without any nucleation
delay, whereas for depositions at 150 and 200 °C, nonlinear growth
was observed. This nonlinear growth can be ascribed to both the change
in morphology of the film and the change in material phase (as will
be discussed later). The GPC of the PE-ALD films increased from 1.6
Å at 100 °C to >2.0 Å at the higher temperatures;
see Table . In comparison
to
the 100 °C film, the increase in GPC at higher temperatures is
due to fin-like, out-of-plane oriented (OoPO) growth, as will be discussed
later (in Figure ).
Similar growth behavior and increased GPC with OoPO growth have been
previously observed for PE-ALD grown MoS2.[29]
Figure 4
Electron microscopy studies
of the structure of PE-ALD films. Images
(a, d, g), (b, e, h), and (c, f, i) correspond to films deposited
by PE-ALD at 100, 150, and 200 °C, respectively. (a–c)
Top-view SEM images showing the change in film morphology for various
deposition temperatures. (d–f) Top-view TEM images showing
the microstructure of the films; in (e) and (f), layered structure
of the OoPO structure in the TiS2 film can be seen. The
average measured distance between two layers is highlighted. (g) SAED
pattern showing the amorphous nature of the film deposited at 100
°C. (h, i) SAED patterns showing the polycrystalline nature of
the films deposited at 150 and 200 °C.
Raman spectra of the films grown at higher temperatures
were compared
to the previously studied TiS3 film grown at 100 °C. Figure a shows the Raman
spectra of the films deposited at 150 and 200 °C containing two
vibrational peaks at 230 and 330 cm–1 along with
a shoulder at 380 cm–1 analogous to the Raman spectrum
obtained for the TiS2 film grown at 100 °C by thermal
ALD (Figure e). These
results demonstrate that phase control within the PE-ALD process was
achieved between TiS2 and TiS3 by increasing
the growth temperature, similar to CVT. In the PE-ALD process, the
transition temperature of ∼100 °C for TiS3 to
TiS2 synthesis is very low in comparison to that in CVT
(550 °C). Additionally, the XPS S 2p spectra for the 150 and
200 °C films corroborate this result with the Figure f. The S 2p spectra of both
films display only one doublet at 161.1 and 162.3 eV (similar to thermal
ALD grown films at 100 °C) corresponding to the spin–orbit
doublet of S2– species, indicating the deposition
of TiS2.
Figure 3
(a) Raman spectra showing the vibration mode peaks and
(b) XPS
valence band spectra of PE-ALD grown films between 100 and 200 °C
deposition temperature. (c) Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD)
patterns of the films deposited at various temperatures where the
peaks corresponding to (001), (011), and (110) planes are mentioned.
(a) Raman spectra showing the vibration mode peaks and
(b) XPS
valence band spectra of PE-ALD grown films between 100 and 200 °C
deposition temperature. (c) Grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD)
patterns of the films deposited at various temperatures where the
peaks corresponding to (001), (011), and (110) planes are mentioned.The valence band spectra of the films deposited
by PE-ALD were
also investigated using XPS analysis. The Fermi level (BE = 0 eV)
was calibrated by measuring the Fermi edge of gold. At 100 °C,
four broad peaks (see Figure b, black) at around 1.6, 4.5, 10.7, and 15.3 eV binding energies
(BE) were observed. Due to the hybridization by S–S pairs in
TiS3, the two valence band peaks of TiS2 split
to form four broad peaks.[38] The XPS valence
band spectra for films deposited at 150 and 200 °C differed from
the spectrum obtained at 100 °C showing only two broad peaks
at around 3.5 and 13 eV (Figure b). In comparison to the literature, the spectra for
the films deposited at 150 and 200 °C correspond to the valence
band spectrum of TiS2.[38] These
results further confirm that the phase-controlled synthesis of TiS2/TiS3 can be obtained by tuning the deposition
temperature.The composition and purity of the material were
further determined
using RBS measurements; see Table . The S/Ti ratio was measured to be 3.48 for the film
deposited at 100 °C, whereas the S/Ti ratio for the films deposited
at 150 and 200 °C was around 2 with a small S deficiency (or
excess Ti). Additionally, contaminants such as C and O were detected
within the error limit (Table ), confirming the high purity of the films similar to the
XPS measurements. Interestingly, ERD revealed a significant amount
of H impurities (∼10 atom %) for the 150 and 200 °C films.
The H may have most likely been incorporated from the plasma coreactant
and/or precursor ligands. It could be possible to reduce the H impurities
in the film by further optimizing the H2S:Ar plasma coreactant
exposure time during the ALD cycle.The crystallinity of the
PE-ALD grown TiS3 and TiS2 films was investigated
using grazing-incidence (GI)-XRD.
The GI-XRD pattern of the film deposited at 100 °C (TiS3) does not show well-defined peaks, indicating the formation of an
amorphous film (Figure c). The films deposited at 150 and 200 °C, however, confirm
the synthesis of crystalline 1T-TiS2.[19][19] The strong peak around 2θ
of 15° corresponds to the (001) plane of 1T-TiS2 and
reveals a significant orientation effect. This orientation effect
can be explained by a crystalline layer in which a strong majority
of crystals have their basal planes of 1T-TiS2 oriented
parallel to the substrate. This implies that below the OoPO structures
visible in the SEM and TEM images (Figure ) a continuous film
of the aforementioned basal plane texture is present. The contribution
of OoPO structures to the XRD pattern ((011) and (110) peaks) is small
because of their limited volume fraction and random orientation with
respect to the XRD detection geometry.Electron microscopy studies
of the structure of PE-ALD films. Images
(a, d, g), (b, e, h), and (c, f, i) correspond to films deposited
by PE-ALD at 100, 150, and 200 °C, respectively. (a–c)
Top-view SEM images showing the change in film morphology for various
deposition temperatures. (d–f) Top-view TEM images showing
the microstructure of the films; in (e) and (f), layered structure
of the OoPO structure in the TiS2 film can be seen. The
average measured distance between two layers is highlighted. (g) SAED
pattern showing the amorphous nature of the film deposited at 100
°C. (h, i) SAED patterns showing the polycrystalline nature of
the films deposited at 150 and 200 °C.Additionally, the SAED pattern also shows the amorphous nature
of the film synthesized at 100 °C (Figure g). Complementary to GI-XRD, the SAED patterns
of the 150 and 200 °C films display reflections of lattice planes
oriented perpendicular to the substrates. As a result, for both 150
and 200 °C films (Figure h,i) high-intensity (011), (110), and (010) rings are visible.
The continuous nature of the rings confirms the polycrystalline nature
of PE-ALD grown TiS2 films. The discontinuous (001) ring
reflects the presence of only a few OoPO structures per probed area
having their c-axis parallel to the film surface.Top-view SEM images (Figure a–c) display the morphology of the PE-ALD grown films
deposited at all three temperatures. For the film deposited at 100
°C, no surface texture was observed. Similar to SEM, top-view
TEM (Figure d) shows
no lateral variation in the morphology (i.e., crystallinity and density)
of the film. On the other hand, for the films deposited at 150 and
200 °C, top-view SEM images show OoPO structures, which can explain
the high growth rate observed in the in situ SE measurements. Analogous
OoPO structures have been observed previously for other TMDCs like
MoS2[29] and ReS2.[43] A similar relation between the OoPO film morphology
and increased GPC has been previously observed for MoS2.[29] The top-view TEM images of films grown
at 150 and 200 °C (Figure e,f) confirm the OoPO morphology of the TiS2 film.
The average distance between the 2D layers was measured to be ∼5.7
Å (Figure e,f),
equivalent to the distance between two 1T-TiS2 layers (Figure g).[44]The electrical resistivity of the PE-ALD deposited
TiS films was measured using a four-point
probe method.
The resistivity of the TiS3 film deposited at 100 °C
could not be measured due to its primarily amorphous nature, which
could have yielded a high resistivity value that was beyond the measurement
detection limit. Table shows the measured resistivity of the other films. The deposited
TiS2 films exhibit a decrease in resistivity from 9000
to 3500 μΩ cm with the increase in temperature from 150
to 200 °C. From an application perspective, these low-resistivity
1T-TiS2 films could be used as 2D contact materials with
2D semiconductors in device fabrication. (Note that the crystalline
(by GI-XRD) TiS2 film synthesized by thermal ALD at 100
°C has a resistivity of 2000 μΩ cm.) In summary,
the effect of temperature on material composition, phase, morphology,
and resistivity was studied in detail. All of the discussed characterization
techniques confirm the synthesis of TiS3 at 100 °C
and a transition to TiS2 at temperatures above 100 °C
by PE-ALD. We also investigated the effect of deposition temperature
by thermal ALD and observed no change in phase from TiS2 at all investigated temperatures. These studies, however, will be
discussed in detail in a future work.The crystallinity of the
PE-ALD grown amorphous TiS3 film at 100 °C deposition
temperature was improved by a postdeposition
annealing step. To avoid oxidation to TiO2 and pyrolysis
to TiS2 during annealing, a sulfur-rich atmosphere was
chosen for the annealing treatment of 3 h at 400 °C. The Raman
spectra of TiS3 before and after annealing are compared
in Figure a. The four
vibration peaks observed for the annealed film confirm that the TiS3 phase was preserved. Additionally, the red shift of the vibration
peaks along with the reduced width of the peaks, indicated improved
crystallinity of the film. Some surface oxidation to anatase TiO2 (∼143 cm–1) was observed, probably
due to the transfer of the sample through the air from the ALD chamber
after deposition to the annealing furnace. The GI-XRD pattern (Figure b) of the annealed
film also confirmed improved crystallinity and preservation of the
TiS3 phase of the film, along with TiO2 (*)
due to surface oxidation. Similar to the PE-ALD grown 1T-TiS2 crystalline films, a strong peak around 2θ of 10° corresponds
to the (001) plane of TiS3 and indicates that basal planes
of TiS3 are orientated parallel to the substrate. An average
(vertical) crystal size of ∼16 nm was calculated using the
Scherrer equation.[45]
Figure 5
(a) Comparison of the
Raman spectra of PE-ALD grown TiS3 before (red, amorphous)
and after annealing at 400 °C (blue).
(b) GI-XRD pattern of the postdeposition annealed TiS3 film
showing its crystalline nature with peaks corresponding to TiS3 (00l) planes. (c–f) TEM image showing
a cross section of the postdeposition annealed TiS3 film
with corresponding EDX elemental mapping of Ti, S, and O. The red
(*) in (a), (b), and (c) indicates the presence of anatase TiO2 due to surface oxidation. The white dashed line in (c) highlights
the interface between TiO2 and TiS3. (g) High-resolution
HAADF-STEM image shows the cross section of postdeposition annealed
TiS3 with atomic resolution. The average measured distance
between two layers is highlighted. (h) Zoomed-in area (red box) from
(g) with an atomic model of the TiS3 crystal structure
overlaid on the STEM image. (i) PL spectrum demonstrating the semiconductor
nature of the annealed film with an optical band gap ∼0.9 eV,
compared with PL (red) of the fused silica substrate.
(a) Comparison of the
Raman spectra of PE-ALD grown TiS3 before (red, amorphous)
and after annealing at 400 °C (blue).
(b) GI-XRD pattern of the postdeposition annealed TiS3 film
showing its crystalline nature with peaks corresponding to TiS3 (00l) planes. (c–f) TEM image showing
a cross section of the postdeposition annealed TiS3 film
with corresponding EDX elemental mapping of Ti, S, and O. The red
(*) in (a), (b), and (c) indicates the presence of anatase TiO2 due to surface oxidation. The white dashed line in (c) highlights
the interface between TiO2 and TiS3. (g) High-resolution
HAADF-STEM image shows the cross section of postdeposition annealed
TiS3 with atomic resolution. The average measured distance
between two layers is highlighted. (h) Zoomed-in area (red box) from
(g) with an atomic model of the TiS3 crystal structure
overlaid on the STEM image. (i) PL spectrum demonstrating the semiconductor
nature of the annealed film with an optical band gap ∼0.9 eV,
compared with PL (red) of the fused silica substrate.A cross-sectional TEM image of the postdeposition annealed
TiS3 film displays the layered crystalline nature of the
postdeposition
annealed TiS3 film (Figure c). Similar to the results from GI-XRD, the basal planes
of TiS3 are oriented parallel to the substrate. An average
(lateral) crystal size of ∼50 nm was measured from the cross-sectional
TEM images. The corresponding EDX elemental mapping of the S, Ti,
and O are shown in Figure d–f, respectively. EDX mapping also further confirms
the surface oxidation (to TiO2) of the film and also shows
the presence of a pure titanium sulfide phase below the oxidized surface. Figure g shows a high-resolution
HAADF-STEM image of a cross-sectional region in the postdeposition
annealed crystalline TiS3 film. The average distance between
the monolayers was measured to be 8.9 Å, which is equivalent
to the distance between two TiS3 layers reported in the
literature.[46] In the zoomed-in inset (Figure h), an overlay of
the TiS3 crystal structure viewed along the [010] zone
axis, is shown in the HAADF-STEM image.Finally, the semiconducting
nature of the TiS3 after
annealing was confirmed using NIR PL spectroscopy. PL was observed
to be centered around ∼1400 nm (∼0.9 eV) after annealing
(Figure i), whereas
it was not detectable before annealing. The position of the PL peak
is close to the band gap of TiS3.[47][47] Thus, the postdeposition annealing
treatment of the PE-ALD grown amorphous TiS3 at 400 °C
improves the quality and crystallinity of the TiS3 film.
Conclusions
We report on a low-temperature ALD process
with which the phase
of titanium sulfide films can be precisely tuned between TiS2 and TiS3. The key to successful phase control was to
carefully tune the coreactant composition and deposition temperature.
The generation of S2 species in the H2S plasma
has been speculated to lead to the formation of amorphous TiS3 by PE-ALD at a deposition temperature of 100 °C. Above
100 °C, a transition to the formation of TiS2 occurs
by PE-ALD. Electrical measurements show the low resistive nature of
the TiS2 films. The crystallinity of PE-ALD grown TiS3 films was improved by adding a postdeposition annealing step
of 400 °C for 3 h. After annealing, NIR PL was observed at ∼1400
nm, confirming the direct optical band gap of TiS3 at ∼0.9
eV. This approach can potentially be extended to other transition-metal
di- and tri-chalcogenides, opening up new avenues for implementation
of both transition-metal di- and tri-chalcogenides in nano- and optoelectronic
device fabrication schemes.
Authors: Joshua O Island; Mariam Barawi; Robert Biele; Adrián Almazán; José M Clamagirand; José R Ares; Carlos Sánchez; Herre S J van der Zant; José V Álvarez; Roberto D'Agosta; Isabel J Ferrer; Andres Castellanos-Gomez Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Akhil Sharma; Marcel A Verheijen; Longfei Wu; Saurabh Karwal; Vincent Vandalon; Harm C M Knoops; Ravi S Sundaram; Jan P Hofmann; W M M Erwin Kessels; Ageeth A Bol Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Wilson Kong; Cihan Bacaksiz; Bin Chen; Kedi Wu; Mark Blei; Xi Fan; Yuxia Shen; Hasan Sahin; David Wright; Deepa S Narang; Sefaattin Tongay Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Vladimir V Plashnitsa; Felix Vietmeyer; Nattasamon Petchsang; Pornthip Tongying; Thomas H Kosel; Masaru Kuno Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Tahsin Faraz; Harm C M Knoops; Marcel A Verheijen; Cristian A A van Helvoirt; Saurabh Karwal; Akhil Sharma; Vivek Beladiya; Adriana Szeghalmi; Dennis M Hausmann; Jon Henri; Mariadriana Creatore; Wilhelmus M M Kessels Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Miika Mattinen; Farzan Gity; Emma Coleman; Joris F A Vonk; Marcel A Verheijen; Ray Duffy; Wilhelmus M M Kessels; Ageeth A Bol Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 10.508