| Literature DB >> 31806811 |
Matthew G Betts1, Christopher Wolf1, Marion Pfeifer2, Cristina Banks-Leite3, Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez4, Danilo Bandini Ribeiro5, Jos Barlow6,7, Felix Eigenbrod8, Deborah Faria9, Robert J Fletcher10, Adam S Hadley11, Joseph E Hawes12, Robert D Holt13, Brian Klingbeil14, Urs Kormann11,15,16, Luc Lens17, Taal Levi11, Guido F Medina-Rangel18, Stephanie L Melles19, Dirk Mezger20, José Carlos Morante-Filho9,21, C David L Orme3, Carlos A Peres22, Benjamin T Phalan23, Anna Pidgeon24, Hugh Possingham25,26, William J Ripple11, Eleanor M Slade27, Eduardo Somarriba28, Joseph A Tobias3, Jason M Tylianakis29, J Nicolás Urbina-Cardona30, Jonathon J Valente11,31, James I Watling32, Konstans Wells33, Oliver R Wearn34, Eric Wood35, Richard Young36, Robert M Ewers3.
Abstract
Habitat loss is the primary driver of biodiversity decline worldwide, but the effects of fragmentation (the spatial arrangement of remaining habitat) are debated. We tested the hypothesis that forest fragmentation sensitivity-affected by avoidance of habitat edges-should be driven by historical exposure to, and therefore species' evolutionary responses to disturbance. Using a database containing 73 datasets collected worldwide (encompassing 4489 animal species), we found that the proportion of fragmentation-sensitive species was nearly three times as high in regions with low rates of historical disturbance compared with regions with high rates of disturbance (i.e., fires, glaciation, hurricanes, and deforestation). These disturbances coincide with a latitudinal gradient in which sensitivity increases sixfold at low versus high latitudes. We conclude that conservation efforts to limit edges created by fragmentation will be most important in the world's tropical forests.Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31806811 DOI: 10.1126/science.aax9387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728