Xuan Zhu1, Nuo Wang1, Huangbin Lin1, Ping Zhang1, Lei Chen1, Minmin Zhang1, Benqiang Deng2, Tao Wu3. 1. Department of Neurology, Center of Cerebrovascular Disorders, Changhai Hospital, Secondary Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China. 2. Department of Neurology, Center of Cerebrovascular Disorders, Changhai Hospital, Secondary Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China. Electronic address: xiaocalf@163.com. 3. Department of Neurology, Center of Cerebrovascular Disorders, Changhai Hospital, Secondary Military Medical University, Shanghai, PR China. Electronic address: twu163@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVT) for posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in the real world are rarely studied. This study was designed to evaluate the prestroke and baseline characteristics, stroke sub-types, complications, and outcomes of PCS patients and compare them with anterior circulation stroke (ACS) after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with PCS and ACS treated with alteplase in a standard dose of 0.9 mg/kg in our stroke center were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Presenting characteristics, hemorrhage transformation, mortality, and favorable outcomes (modified Rankin scale 0 or 1) at 90 days were compared between PCS and ACS patients. RESULTS: A total of 462 patients were included in this study, including 350 (75.8%) in ACS group and 112 (24.2%) in PCS group. A history of coronary artery disease was significantly more common in ACS patients than that in PCS patients (15.1% versus 6.3%, P = .015). There was no significant difference in fast glucose and baseline NIHSS scores between PCS and ACS groups. In PCS group, 7 patients (6.3%) had hemorrhage transformation after IVT and 5 patients (4.5%) were symptomatic versus 32 (9.1%) and 22 (6.3%) in ACS group (P > .05). 75.5% PCS patients versus 72.2% ACS patients had excellent recovery outcomes (mRS 0-1) at 90 days (P = .507). For PCS patients, logistic regression analysis after adjusting the covariates identified age (P = .047, OR .920, 95% CI = .847-.999) and atrial fibrillation (P = .007, OR 12.149, 95% CI = 1.966-75.093) as independent significant predictors of hemorrhage transformation. In addition, atrial fibrillation was also an independent predictor of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P = .008, OR 21.176, 95% CI = 2.228-201.273). Multivariate logistic analysis identified hemorrhage transformation (P = .012; OR .131, 95% CI = .027-.644) and onset to drug time (P = .026, OR 1.006, 95% CI = 1.001-1.011) as independent predictors of functional independence (mRS 0-2). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P = .007, OR 15.094, 95% CI = 2.097-108.661) and baseline NIHSS score (P = .050; OR 1.070, 95% CI = 1.000-1.145) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that IVT in PCS patients is safe and effective as that in ACS patients. In PCS patients, long onset to needle time and hemorrhage transformation were identified as independent predictors of unfavorable outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVT) for posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in the real world are rarely studied. This study was designed to evaluate the prestroke and baseline characteristics, stroke sub-types, complications, and outcomes of PCSpatients and compare them with anterior circulation stroke (ACS) after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with PCS and ACS treated with alteplase in a standard dose of 0.9 mg/kg in our stroke center were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Presenting characteristics, hemorrhage transformation, mortality, and favorable outcomes (modified Rankin scale 0 or 1) at 90 days were compared between PCS and ACSpatients. RESULTS: A total of 462 patients were included in this study, including 350 (75.8%) in ACS group and 112 (24.2%) in PCS group. A history of coronary artery disease was significantly more common in ACSpatients than that in PCSpatients (15.1% versus 6.3%, P = .015). There was no significant difference in fast glucose and baseline NIHSS scores between PCS and ACS groups. In PCS group, 7 patients (6.3%) had hemorrhage transformation after IVT and 5 patients (4.5%) were symptomatic versus 32 (9.1%) and 22 (6.3%) in ACS group (P > .05). 75.5% PCSpatients versus 72.2% ACSpatients had excellent recovery outcomes (mRS 0-1) at 90 days (P = .507). For PCSpatients, logistic regression analysis after adjusting the covariates identified age (P = .047, OR .920, 95% CI = .847-.999) and atrial fibrillation (P = .007, OR 12.149, 95% CI = 1.966-75.093) as independent significant predictors of hemorrhage transformation. In addition, atrial fibrillation was also an independent predictor of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P = .008, OR 21.176, 95% CI = 2.228-201.273). Multivariate logistic analysis identified hemorrhage transformation (P = .012; OR .131, 95% CI = .027-.644) and onset to drug time (P = .026, OR 1.006, 95% CI = 1.001-1.011) as independent predictors of functional independence (mRS 0-2). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P = .007, OR 15.094, 95% CI = 2.097-108.661) and baseline NIHSS score (P = .050; OR 1.070, 95% CI = 1.000-1.145) were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that IVT in PCSpatients is safe and effective as that in ACSpatients. In PCSpatients, long onset to needle time and hemorrhage transformation were identified as independent predictors of unfavorable outcomes.