Literature DB >> 31806356

Transforming towards sustainable health and wellbeing systems: Eight guiding principles based on the experiences of nine Dutch Population Health Management initiatives.

N J E van Vooren1, B M Steenkamer2, C A Baan3, H W Drewes4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Population Health Management initiatives are increasingly introduced, aiming to develop towards sustainable health and wellbeing systems. Yet, little is known about which strategies to implement during this development. This study provides insights into which strategies are used, why, and when, based on the experiences of nine Dutch Population Health Management initiatives.
METHODS: The realist evaluation approach was used to gain an understanding of the relationships between context, mechanisms and outcomes when Population Health Management strategies were implemented. Data were retrieved from three interview rounds (n = 207) in 2014, 2016 and 2017. Data was clustered into guiding principles, underpinned with strategy-context-mechanism-outcome configurations.
RESULTS: The Dutch initiatives experienced different developments, varying between immediate large-scale collaborations with eventual relapse, and incremental growth towards cross-sector collaboration. Eight guiding principles for development towards health and wellbeing systems were identified, focusing on: 1. Shared commitment for a Population Health Management-vision; 2. Mutual understanding and trust; 3. Accountability; 4. Aligning politics and policy; 5. Financial incentives; 6. A learning cycle based on a data-infrastructure; 7. Community input and involvement; and 8. Stakeholder representation and leadership.
CONCLUSION: Development towards a sustainable health and wellbeing system is complex and time-consuming. Its success not only depends on the implementation of all eight guiding principles, but is also influenced by applying the right strategies at the right moment in the development.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cross-sector collaboration; Population Health Management; Realist evaluation; Triple Aim

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31806356     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

1.  Integrated Care for Older Adults: A Struggle for Sustained Implementation in Northern Netherlands.

Authors:  Sander Holterman; Maarten Lahr; Klaske Wynia; Marike Hettinga; Erik Buskens
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 5.120

2.  Different Contexts, Similar Challenges. SUSTAIN's Experiences with Improving Integrated Care in Europe.

Authors:  Simone R de Bruin; Jenny Billings; Annerieke Stoop; Manon Lette; Eliva A Ambugo; Erica Gadsby; Christina Häusler; Konrad Obermann; Gerli-Paat Ahi; Jillian Reynolds; Georg Ruppe; Nhu Tram; Gerald Wistow; Nick Zonneveld; Giel Nijpels; Caroline Baan
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.120

Review 3.  Moving the needle on health inequities: principles and tactics for effective cross-sector population health networks.

Authors:  Allison Gertel-Rosenberg; Janet Viveiros; Alexander Koster; Georgia Thompson; Bilal Taylor; Kate Burke Blackburn; Cindy Bo
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  What Makes Integration of Chronic Care so Difficult? A Macro-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators in Belgium.

Authors:  Katrien Danhieux; Monika Martens; Elien Colman; Edwin Wouters; Roy Remmen; Josefien van Olmen; Sibyl Anthierens
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Improving performance intelligence for governing an integrated health and social care delivery network: a case study on the Amsterdam Noord district.

Authors:  Véronique L L C Bos; Niek S Klazinga; Dionne S Kringos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.