Is parity a cause of tooth loss? Perceptions of northern Nigerian Hausa women.

BACKGROUND: Reproduction affects the general health of women, especially when parity is high. The relationship between parity and oral health is not as clear, although it is a widespread customary belief that pregnancy results in tooth loss. Parity has been associated with tooth loss in some populations, but not in others. It is important to understand the perceptions of women regarding the association between parity and tooth loss as these beliefs may influence health behaviors during the reproductive years. AIM: To explore the views of Hausa women regarding the link between parity and tooth loss.
METHODS: Qualitative data were collected through a grounded theory approach with focus group discussions (FGDs) of high and low parity Hausa women (n = 33) in northern Nigeria. Responses were elicited on the causes of tooth loss, effects of tooth loss on women's quality of life, issues of parity and tooth loss, and cultural beliefs about parity and tooth loss. The data were analyzed thematically using ATLAS-ti.
RESULTS: Respondents associated tooth loss with vomiting during labor, a condition termed 'payar baka'. Poor oral hygiene, excessive consumption of refined carbohydrates, tooth worm, cancer and ageing were also believed to cause tooth loss. The greatest impacts of tooth loss on the lives of the respondents were esthetic and masticatory changes.
CONCLUSION: Respondents perceived that parity is indirectly linked to tooth loss, as reflected in their views on the association between vomiting during labor and tooth loss.

Introduction

“A tooth for every child” is a common phrase in many societies [1]. Women frequently trace their oral health problems to their reproductive years. A woman looks forward to being a mother with great joy, but could it be at a cost to her oral health? Pregnancy, breastfeeding and childcare are associated with physiological, metabolic and energetic demands. The stresses of repeated pregnancies can lead to permanent changes in health, especially when parity is high [2]. These changes can include negative effects on oral health. It is posited that the cumulative effects of nutritional stress from repeated pregnancies cause calcium depletion from bones and tissues in the oral cavity, with subsequent loss of teeth [3]. The notion of pregnancy draining calcium directly from teeth is often raised, but it has not been substantiated [4-6].

Parity research has focused on the effects of parity on general health, with few studies on oral health. General associations between higher parity and more teeth lost are documented among women of European ancestry [1,7-9]. There are few data for African women or women in rural settings. No study has focused on how women view the role of parity in tooth loss. Consequently, this study addresses a gap in the literature concerning information on the perceptions of African women regarding parity and tooth loss.

Tooth loss

In the past, tooth loss was considered part of normal aging and unavoidable [10]. Presently, the reverse is the case, particularly in areas where dental care is available. The loss of one or more teeth can affect an individual’s quality of life [11]. Aside from obvious changes in appearance and mastication, tooth loss can affect self-esteem, speech and social interaction. Koyama et al. [12] found that higher levels of social engagement were associated with less tooth loss in older Japanese individuals.

Qualitative and quantitative studies on individuals with complete or partial tooth loss document serious negative emotional consequences [13-15]. Completely edentulous patients reported bereavement, loss of self-confidence, concerns about appearance and self-image, tooth loss as a taboo subject that could not be discussed with other people, and keeping tooth loss secret [14]. Partially dentate patients described tooth loss as a sense of being incomplete and having lost a part of their body [13].

There are various causes of tooth loss. The principal contributors are caries and periodontal disease; others include trauma, orthodontic treatment, tooth impaction, cystic lesions and neoplasms [10,16]. Cultural identity markers also incorporate evulsion of the highly visible incisors and canines [17]. Globally, caries is the principal reason for tooth loss along with extraction following periodontal disease. This characterizes countries with extensive dental care facilities as well as developing countries [18-21].

Age, gender, socio-economic status, level of education and utilization of oral health services are associated with differing levels of tooth loss [12,22,23]. Individuals with low socio-economic status overwhelmingly have the worst oral health [24,25], yet lower level of literacy and poor attitudes towards dental check-ups also are associated with tooth loss [26,27].

Gender-based dietary differences, eating patterns, resource availability and cultural attitudes towards health, pain and dentistry underlie male-female differences in tooth loss [28,29]. Tooth loss frequency varies by sex in most societies and appears to be context dependent. Some studies describe sex as a significant predictor of tooth loss with a tendency towards higher prevalences in females [28,30-33], while others report higher levels in males [34,35].

The observed male-female differences in tooth loss are usually attributed to changes in female sex hormones during pregnancy, with a logical inference that parity is related to tooth loss. Two different Swedish studies [7,8] observed that parity had an impact on tooth loss. High parity negatively correlated with the number of remaining teeth. Conversely, Scheutz et al. [36] documented no link between parity and tooth loss in Tanzanian women, but they observed a relationship between parity and the principal cause of tooth loss—periodontal disease.

Thus, the association between parity and tooth loss remains unclear. There are complex confounding factors that are frequently not considered (including age, age at first birth, duration of birth intervals, breastfeeding duration, pre-existing nutritional status and food uncertainty) and this makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding parity effects. It is also necessary to investigate the views of women on this issue to gain insights into their understanding and perception of parity and tooth loss. This is particularly critical in contexts with significantly differential parity and/or high parity. The perceptions of women are important as these may shape their behavior and attitudes towards oral health care. Women may resign themselves to a fate where pregnancy is expected to cause tooth loss, instead of seeking preventive care and dental treatment to maintain their oral health.

Hausa women of northern Nigeria were studied as part of a larger project on maternal and child oral health in a high parity population. Previously, the prevalence of caries experience and tooth loss in women from the region was found to be high. This was attributed to high consumption of sugars, low socio-economic status and poor utilization of oral health services [37]. However, the oral health conditions of the women may be related to their high parity. According to the latest available statistics, Nigeria has a high total fertility rate of 5.7 children per woman. In the northwest zone of the country where the Hausa live, it is 7.3 children [38]. This is ascribed to very early age at marriage, high levels of teenage childbearing, the male dominated social hierarchy, polygyny and low use of modern contraceptives [38,39].

Methods

Study design

A grounded theory approach, involving in-depth focus group discussions (FGDs) of high and low parity Hausa women in northern Nigeria, was implemented. This approach is suitable for obtaining data on married women’s views regarding parity and tooth loss. A repetitive method of data collection and analysis was employed to develop a theoretical explanation of perceptions grounded in the data collected from the discussions with Hausa women.

Sample population

The sample population was selected through a household survey in the Kumbotso Local Government Area (LGA) of Kano State, Nigeria using a multi-stage random sampling technique. Kano State is located in the northwest zone of Nigeria and has a population of 9.4 million [40]. Kumbotso LGA has its headquarters in the town of Kumbotso. The population is 295,979 people who live in an area of 158 km2. The LGA consists of 11 administrative wards. According to the 2006 census, 66,010 women aged 15–65 years reside in Kumbotso LGA. Six wards were randomly selected from the LGA. Within each ward, two communities were randomly selected and all households in each community were approached.

Group composition

A purposive selection [41] of women from different age cohorts and parity levels was identified from the participants in a general study on maternal and child oral health in Kano. The sample consisted of 33 women aged 19–66 years with the size determination based on the theoretical saturation concept of Grounded Theory [42]. Women of all parity levels were included. Participants were grouped into three age cohorts (19–30 years, 31–45 years and 46–66 years) and each group consisted of an average of five women.

Data collection method

Trained bilingual Hausa and English-speaking married women with previous experience in qualitative interviewing, along with the principal investigator, conducted the FGDs. The use of local Muslim Hausa women as field workers helped facilitate access to women in seclusion, promoted openness among the women during the FGDs, and minimized the potential objections and suspicions of participant's husbands. The local field workers were not assigned to groups in their own areas. Two FGD sessions were conducted per age cohort, for a total of six gatherings. Sessions were conducted in a quiet meeting room, and the discussions were moderated with the use of an interview guide that was prepared before the sessions.

The FGDs obtained responses to queries on the following topics: causes of tooth loss, effects of tooth loss on the quality of women’s lives, issues regarding parity and tooth loss, and cultural beliefs on parity and tooth loss.

All interviews were taped, transcribed, and translated verbatim from Hausa into English. Two Hausa language teachers at Bayero University, Kano, and two Hausa-speaking dentists (also from Kano State and not involved in the study) supervised the transcription and translation.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria (IPHOAU/12/717) and from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (M170343). A male local assistant who could speak Hausa fluently was employed to facilitate links with village leaders and husbands. Permission was obtained from local village leaders to conduct the study and informed consent was obtained from the husbands of married women living with their husbands. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The consent form was translated into Hausa and read to the participants who were not literate. Women who were not literate and were willing to participate in the study thumb printed on the consent form.

Data analysis and theory building using the grounded theory approach

Coding and theorizing

Using the grounded theory approach, open, focused and axial coding was employed [42-47]. Throughout the analysis, memoing was done to facilitate the hypothesis formulation [48]. Two major theoretical categories were generated around the assumptions and beliefs attached to childbearing and tooth loss in women: the causes of tooth loss and the effects of tooth loss on women of childbearing age.

Network diagrams were drawn using the network view function of ATLAS.ti to show the relationships between categories and to display the models to explore the data and visualize the ideas and findings [49]. Illustrative direct quotations were drawn from the text to highlight key findings.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 40.82 ± 14.99 years. More than half (54.5%) of the respondents had no formal education. Eighteen (54.5%) had five or more children. The mean parity was 4.48 ± 3.00. There was a significant difference between the mean parity levels by age group (p = 0.002). The majority of the women (78.8%) were small-scale informal traders in the market and the remainder (21.2%) were housewives (Table 1).

Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants.

Characteristics	Total N = 33
Age (years)
19–30	11 (33.3%)
31–45	12 (36.4%)
46–66	10 (30.3%)
Level of education
Koranic only	18 (54.5%)
Primary (partial or completed)	5 (15.2%)
Secondary (partial or completed)	10 (30.3%)
Number of children (living)
≤ 4	15 (45.5%)
5–8	14 (42.4%)
> 8	4 (12.1%)
Mean parity by age cohorts
19–30	2.18 ± 1.60
31–45	6.25 ± 2.22
46–66	4.90 ± 3.51
	p = 0.002
Mean age (years)	40.82 ± 14.99
Mean parity	4.48 ± 3.00
Occupation
Traders	26 (78.8%)
Housewives	7 (21.2%)

Key findings and interpretation

The findings from this study reflect the beliefs and thoughts of Hausa women of child bearing and post childbearing ages. The themes included “Perception on the relationship between tooth loss and childbearing”, “Beliefs about tooth loss”, “Causes of tooth loss”, and “Effects of tooth loss on women”.

The network diagram [Fig 1] shows the perceived causes of tooth loss among Hausa women of childbearing and post-childbearing age. These etiologies include dirty mouth, vomiting during labor, excessive sugary diet, aging, food impaction, tooth worm infection and hole in the tooth, drinking cold water, road traffic accidents, other accidents, fights, extractions or loss due to poor tissue support and cancer. These causes are further described below.

Fig 1

Causes of tooth loss during childbirth.

Array of reported causes of tooth loss

Poor oral hygiene

Respondents identified poor oral hygiene as a major cause of tooth loss among women. Because most women do not practice good dental care, they have tooth decay and tooth loss. Kolanut, a mild stimulant chewed to restore vitality and reduce hunger pangs, results in staining of teeth and was associated with poor oral hygiene.

….because of dirty mouth and kolanut chewing. Kolanut turn the colour of the teeth bad and make them dirty

…‥, ,

…. Some women are unable to take care of their teeth because they do not care about the mouth

…‥, ,

…‥lack of brushing the teeth will make them fall out.

…‥, ,

……….poor personal cleaning make the mouth to smell after sometime the teeth will be shaking and fall out.

…‥, ,

Food impaction, tooth worm infection and caries

It was also discovered during the discussions that food impaction, inadequate dental care during pregnancy, and worms infesting the oral cavity lead to tooth loss. Worms create the holes seen in teeth, cause caries, make the teeth weak and eventually they are lost. Below are responses to support these points:

….meat impaction between teeth.

….Hole made by worms

…‥, ,

…Tooth worms eat the tooth and make a hole in it. This cause tooth pain

…Tooth worms make holes in teeth and cause pain

… I hear traditional medicine people say that tooth worm make holes in teeth and later gives pain and the tooth will be removed

……dirty mouth have worms that damage the teeth

…‥, , , ,

Aging

Discussants stated that women age faster than men due to childbearing and domestic chores. These cause them to lose their teeth earlier than men.

…‥Women become old earlier than men and it is because of childbearing. Because of this women lose more teeth than men

…‥My friend who left the city for the village now has missing teeth maybe because she works more and she is not able to take care of her body. She is going to become old earlier than the people in the city.

…‥,

…‥as you grow old the teeth are no more strong, they are weak and will fall out one by one

…,, ,

Nutrition and excessive sugar consumption

Furthermore, it was mentioned during the course of the discussion that pregnant women enjoy eating excessive sugar and sugary foods. This leads to weak teeth, causing toothache and easy loss of the teeth. It was unanimously agreed that women mostly lose more teeth than men because of excessive sugar consumption.

…‥maybe she chew gums which contains sugar and can cause tooth hole and tooth loss.

…‥, ,

….consumption of sugar coating food make holes in teeth

…‥consumption of honey, it is sweet and can cause holes in teeth

…‥, ,

…‥girls like to eat sweets and chew gum, these make the teeth go bad. They cause holes and pain and the teeth are removed later

…‥, ,

Cancer

Respondents suggested that women of childbearing age could lose their tooth if they have cancer of the mouth.

….Maybe the women that lost teeth have cancer

…‥ , ,

…. Cancer, big or small makes the teeth to be shaking and fall after some time

…….

Other causes of tooth loss

Respondents offered that using the teeth to open bottled drinks could cause pain/trauma leading to loss of teeth. In addition, it was mentioned that teeth can be lost through fights or road traffic accidents and can also fall off by themselves (perhaps due to periodontal disease) or through extraction.

…‥ using teeth to open drink/ Coca-Cola crown tops or biting something hard. The tooth can break or fall out

…… “Okada” (motorcycle) or car accidents can make teeth fall out if you hit you mouth on the“Okada”or ground

…‥, ,

…. My tooth was removed because of pain. There was a hole in it.

….Yes, my tooth came out on it own. It was shaking before it fell off

…., ,

…punch or slap on the face from fights between two people can make teeth fall off

…,, ,

Furthermore, it was mentioned that ingestion of cold water and cold weather could lead to tooth loss.

…… drinking cold water and cold weather… …

…‥, ,

Effects of losing teeth

Discussants described the effects of tooth loss in women of childbearing age as including esthetic decline, loss of self-esteem, eating and chewing difficulties, and financial burden.

Respondents said that tooth loss affects their self-esteem. Sometimes they lose their joy and are unable to speak in public and smile because of the shame of their lost tooth.

Very painful associated with missing of joy because you cannot talk or laugh like you want to in public

…‥, ,

Esthetic problem [I can’t laugh well because the gap (edentulous space) will show]

…‥, ,

R3: Esthetic/ loss of self-esteem [I don’t like to laugh or talk in public so that people will not laugh at me]

R5: It affects the beauty [when you lose your front teeth you don’t look beautiful again]

R6: Unable to smile

…‥, ,

In addition, tooth loss makes eating and chewing difficult for them. It was noted during the course of discussion that tooth loss causes pain and discomfort during mastication.

… difficulty in eating/ chewing—I am unable to chew meat or maize, I miss out on them

…….anytime I try to chew meat or maize, it is discomforting when the food is on the gum at the back where there are no teeth. I don’t enjoy it.

…‥because it is front teeth I don’t have difficulty in chewing but I don’t feel pretty like I was when the teeth were there.

…‥,

Finally, respondents complained about the financial burden to replace their teeth when they lose them. They mentioned that it is expensive to replace missing teeth.

…‥unable to chew and to replace with artificial teeth you have to pay money [Financial burden]

…‥, ,

Perceptions and beliefs on the relationship between parity and tooth loss

Respondents were unanimous in their belief that there is a relationship between tooth loss and childbearing [Fig 2].

Fig 2

Thematic beliefs of women on the relationship between parity and tooth loss.

Respondents said that during the course of labor, women vomit, which makes their teeth weak and results in tooth loss. Excerpts from interactions with the respondents include:

…‥Yes. I think because I know a woman with five children and she lost some teeth.

…‥, ,

……Vomiting during labor in female, which will make the teeth weak and will not last. Yes, I am having vomiting during labor and only one tooth lost after menopause.

…‥, ,

….Yes, I do vomit during labor and I lost my tooth [two teeth]

…‥, ,

…We heard that when women are having vomiting during labor their teeth are not going to last.

…‥, ,

‥ I vomited during labor but did not lose a tooth but I am afraid that I will lose one soon or later

……, ,

…. I know that pregnancy will cause lose of hair, nail, tooth. It also causes pain in tooth. When I was pregnant I lost my hair but not my tooth or nail.

……, ,

…….the number of pregnancy that a woman has is the number of teeth she will lose.

……, ,

……‥ I lost a tooth because I vomited when I was in labor

…,, ,

During the course of the discussion, respondent gave a local phrase “ for vomiting during labor. Quotes to buttress this are:

…… Vomiting during labor [payar baka]

…‥, ,

…‥ I vomited when I was going to have my last child and my tooth fell off

…., ,

However, some respondents believed there is no relationship between tooth loss and child bearing. Excerpts from interaction with the respondents are shown below:

…‥ (Q: Any relationship between parity and tooth loss?). It’s not due to pregnancy. It’s due to guava seed impaction between the teeth but that happened during pregnancy, I have 12 children without losing any tooth.

…., ,

……. I lost some teeth before I marry so it cannot be pregnancy that cause it since I was not pregnant before I marry

…., ,

…… No (Q7: Is there any relationship between the number of children women have and the number of teeth lost?)

…‥ No [unanimously]

…‥, ,

Some respondents stated that tooth loss is not associated with pregnancy or childbirth. It emerged that this belief was based on the observations that young girls can also have tooth decay that leads to tooth loss. Excerpts from interactions with the respondents are provided below:

……some women also have holes in teeth associated with tooth loss but not really associated with childbearing. Because even a very young girl can have holes in teeth associated tooth lost.

…….I lost some teeth before I marry or even have children. It cannot be pregnancy maybe the sweets and chewing gum I took when I was young.

…‥, ,

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to explore the perceptions of women on parity and tooth loss. Our research provides an in-depth understanding of women’s perceptions regarding the issue in a society where high parity is the norm. All the discussions were conducted in the participant’s local language (Hausa) and environment. This was to reduce misinterpretation, possible bias and false response [50]. The separation of participants into different age groups allowed for diverse experiences and perceptions within the cultural group to be expressed.

Generally, the women in this study did not perceive that the number of children is directly associated with tooth loss. Pregnancy was indirectly related to tooth loss via the belief that a woman is prone to lose a tooth or at risk of losing one in future if she vomits during childbirth—the condition known as “payar baka”. Those who vomited during childbirth but did not lose a tooth were afraid that they would lose a tooth or more teeth later in life. The participants could not explain the basis for the link between vomiting during labor and tooth loss. Women could be conflating forceful vomiting with expelling of teeth that are lost due to weakened gingival and periodontal tissues.

Vomiting, the forceful expulsion of gastrointestinal content through the mouth, is common during labor. It is often a result of anxiety and nervousness about the labor process. In addition, severe labor pains and contractions can induce vomiting. A literature search on vomiting during labor and tooth loss did not yield any further information. It is possible that the belief of the Hausa women is specific to their population.

The participants in this study offered various causes for tooth loss. One of these was “dirty mouth”. Dirty mouth, often the result of inadequate or no tooth brushing, is characterized by accumulation of plaque and calculus deposits. These deposits harbor microorganisms that produce toxins, which are harmful to the supporting structures of the teeth. This situation leads to gingivitis, and if untreated may progress to periodontitis and possibly tooth loss. Pregnancy is associated with gingivitis and periodontitis, with progression of these oral conditions during the pregnancy [51]. In addition, women with previous pregnancies have higher gingival index scores and periodontal probing depths than those pregnant for the first time [52-54]. It is therefore likely that pregnancy has an indirect effect on the supporting structures of the teeth that may affect tooth loss. However, the women in the focus groups did not mention the acute symptoms associated with pregnancy gingivitis.

Worm infection is another factor our respondents believed to cause tooth loss. Tooth worm was a widely held concept historically. There are oral and written accounts of tooth worms and tooth decay in antiquity [55]. The worms were believed to burrow through the teeth to cause decay and pain. Similarly, tooth worms were linked to periodontal disease. In Africa, guinea worms from infected drinking water were considered to be a cause of tooth decay because the worms breed in cool water settings such as deep wells [56]. Presently, deep cool wells serve as major sources of drinking water in developing countries but not in developed countries [57]. Consumption of rotten, maggoty cheese was another suggested source of tooth decay [58]. The Sudanese believed in the concept of tooth worms (‘sosa’) from infested foods as a cause of tooth decay [59]. The tooth worm theory of tooth decay was first discredited by Fauchard (1678–1761) and further disproved following the Age of Enlightenment [60]. For the Hausa people, the tooth worm concept may persist because worm infestation is a reality of their daily lives. Guinea worms, now approaching eradication, were until recently endemic in regions of northern Nigeria [61]. Their breeding in cold water may tie into Hausa women’s belief that drinking cold water is a cause of tooth loss.

Some of the respondents in our study perceived that sugary foods, including chewing gums, are associated with tooth loss from carious decay. The origin of this belief is most likely a reflection of Hausa women’s exposure to modern dentistry and health awareness. Even the packaging of common products, such as chewing gums, frequently includes messages about the effects of sugar. The Hausa women in our study related sugar consumption to pregnancy cravings. This may be culturally specific or dependent on local food resources, as pregnancy cravings for non-sugary foods in Africa are known to include clay and soils [62,63]. While most studies document higher caries rates in women than men [28,30-33], differential consumption of sweet foods has not been directly implicated as the cariogenic agent. Walker and Hewlett [28] attributed the heightened caries experience of women to their involvement in food processing and preparation, and with snacking patterns that enhance the cariogenic oral environment. Pregnancy and parity are related to caries experience in some groups, with women of high parity having more caries in studies of Thai and US women [64,65]. However, there was no link between parity and caries in women from Tanzania and black South African women [4,36]. This is an area requiring further research with more detailed examination of dietary variability and oral health practices amongst women of high parity.

The participants in this study believed that women age faster than men due to the stress of reproduction and household chores. Consequently, women lose more teeth than men. The natural process of ageing is universally linked with tooth loss. Periodontal disease, caries and tooth wear become worse and predispose an individual to tooth loss as they age. Maintaining good oral hygiene can be difficult in old age due to poor mobility or the inability to carry out fine movements for effective plaque removal [66]. In addition, ageing comes with health challenges such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and the use of medications that can cause gingival swelling and xerostomia (dry mouth) [66]. These health challenges, if not adequately managed, further deteriorate the oral health leading to tooth loss. High parity women are prime candidates for oral health complications. They are at greater risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease [2]; a systematic review concluded that adults with diabetes have an increased risk of onset and progression of periodontal disease [67]. At present, it is unknown if the advancement of aging described by Hausa women refers to their general strength and energy or if it includes some of these other age-related issues.

Tooth loss impacts greatly on the quality of life, and the participants in this study perceived that the loss of one or more teeth affects mastication, their appearance, their sense of well-being and their financial status. Functional and esthetic impairments are widely reported in the literature as major effects of tooth loss on individual quality of life [11,14,68]. As tooth loss is associated with ageing, individuals may perceive that they are old following the loss of a tooth. Affordability of dental care may be a challenge, especially in developing countries. The participants in this study perceived that replacement of a missing tooth was expensive. This may further reduce their quality of life because their hope of tooth replacement is low.

Hausa women’s views on tooth loss illustrate that their knowledge base incorporates traditional beliefs (payar baka, tooth worm, sugar cravings), cultural notions of aging and attractiveness, and Western dental concepts regarding oral hygiene. These findings have clear implications for future health initiatives, which need to address the complexity of existing beliefs when working to change oral health behaviors.

The results of this study cannot be generalized because they represent the perspectives of a specific group of participants. It is possible that a different group of participants may have different views. However, this limitation was taken into consideration by involving women of different age groups and parity levels.

Conclusion

The study participants offered various reasons for tooth loss, including poor oral hygiene, vomiting during childbirth, tooth worm and ageing. The respondents perceived gender inequality in tooth loss, with a tendency towards more loss in females. Masticatory and esthetic impairments were the most perceived negative effects of tooth loss on the quality of life. Generally, the women in this study do not perceive parity per se as directly associated with tooth loss. They associated childbirth experiences, particularly vomiting, as the cause of tooth loss. The fact that the condition was identified with a specific term in the Hausa language (‘payar baka’) illustrates that it describes a common occurrence with relevance to women’s health knowledge and oral health behaviors.

Bio data.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Questionnaire data.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file.

10 Sep 2019

PONE-D-19-21577

Is parity a cause of tooth loss? Perceptions of northern Nigerian Hausa women

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Schepartz,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Oct 25 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Denis Bourgeois

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The paper concerns an original issue with interesting data on subjective perception in a sample of women in a developing country about the relationship between tooth loss and parity.

Statistical and methodological procedures are described and conducted with the Focus Group Discussion, which is a correct way to assess subjective perceptions in specific cultural environments.

Besides, there are several redundancies within the whole text that require an optimization of the text itself that can lead to better overall readability; a thorough English language review is needed as well, in particular in the abstract, introduction, tooth loss and discussion sections.

Moreover, authors should explain what the Kolanut is (mentioned in the "Poor Oral Hygiene" paragraph page 9) and should correct the concept stating that untreated gingivitis leads authomatically to periodontitis reported at page 15, second paragraph, line 5. Author should express the possibility of periodontitis development, and not its certainty.

Reviewer #2: • The introduction is too long and dispersed. Refocus on the dental problem

• "Parity has been linked to tooth loss, although the association remains poorly investigated".

This sentence is difficult to understand. Please clarify the meaning

• "Tooth loss impacts greatly on the quality of life. The participants in this study perceived that the loss of one or more teeth affects mastication, their appearance, their sense of well-being and their financial status. Functional and esthetic impairments are widely reported in the literature as major effects of tooth loss on individual quality of life [20,23,77]. Fiske et al. [23], in a qualitative study of edentulous patients, documented bereavement, loss of self-confidence, concerns about appearance and self-image as part of the emotional responses to tooth loss. As tooth loss is associated with ageing, individuals may perceive that they are old following the loss of a tooth. Affordability of dental care may be a challenge, especially in developing countries. The participants in this study perceived that replacement of a missing tooth was expensive. This may further reduce their quality of life because their hope of tooth replacement is poor".

This sentences are not one of the objectives of the study.

• Dental references must be updated

• Why do not the authors speak about pregnancy gingivitis, a classic clinical sign between the 3rd month of pregnancy and 45th after childbirth?

Comments for the editor:

Original qualitative study but whose main criticisms reside in obsolete references associated with a need to condense the introduction

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

16 Oct 2019

Response to Reviewers

Note: Due to revisions and deletions, the locations of deletions (Page #, paragraph and line) do not pertain to the new text.

A thorough English language revision of the entire text was done to improve the flow in certain sections.

Reviewers 1

1. There are several redundancies within the whole text that require an optimization of the text itself that can lead to better overall readability; a thorough English language review is needed as well, in particular in the abstract, introduction, tooth loss and discussion sections.

We have deleted the following:

Introduction

Page 3 paragraph 2 deleted

High parity, when a woman has given birth five or more times regardless of whether the child survived, (also referred to as grand multiparity [7]) adversely affects maternal morbidity and in some cases contributes to mortality [8-10]. Increased number of children is associated with greater risk of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, especially in developed countries [11-14]. Conversely, high parity is linked to lower maternal morbidity in developing countries [15]. In the latter environments, healthier women may have more children simply because they have better access to resources that can sustain pregnancy.

Tooth loss

Page 3 paragraph 1 lines 1-2 – deleted

Teeth play important biological and aesthetic roles in the life of an individual. The loss of a tooth is associated with negative social, functional and psychological consequences.

Page 3 paragraph 1 last line –deleted

The loss of teeth has negative consequences on the individual irrespective of the reasons for the loss or the life stage in which it occurs.

Page 4 paragraph 3 lines 4-5 –deleted

Important factors include attitudes toward dental care and availability of resources for treatment.

Page 4 last paragraph line 2 – deleted

While most researchers used quantitative data to establish a link between the two,

Page 5 paragraph 1 lines 4-5 – deleted

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand the beliefs among Hausa women through development of a theoretical framework explaining the pathways linking their views on parity and tooth loss.

Discussion

Page 15 paragraph 2 lines 1-3 – deleted

Parity has been linked to tooth loss, although the association remains poorly investigated. This study provides information on parity and tooth loss beliefs in women from northern Nigeria.

Page 15 paragraph 2 line 6 – deleted

Some of the women in the study experienced the phenomenon while

Page 18 paragraph 2 line 5– 7 - deleted

Fiske et al. [14], in a qualitative study of edentulous patients, documented bereavement, loss of self-confidence, concerns about appearance and self-image as part of the emotional responses to tooth loss

2. Authors should explain what the Kolanut is (mentioned in the "Poor Oral Hygiene" paragraph page 9) and should correct the concept stating that untreated gingivitis leads authomatically to periodontitis reported at page 15, second paragraph, line 5.

Kolanut has been explained under “Poor Oral Hygiene” page 10 paragraph 1.

Kolanut, a mild stimulant chewed to restore vitality and reduce hunger pangs, results in staining of teeth and was associated with poor oral hygiene.

Re untreated gingivitis. Thank you. Agreed. The concept that untreated gingivitis automatically leads to periodontitis has been amended. We expressed the possibility of periodontitis and not its certainty – Page 16 paragraph 1

Response to Reviewer 2

3. The introduction is too long and dispersed. Refocus on the dental problem

We made deletions in response to this comment and to Reviewer 1.

See point one for Reviewer 1 above.

4. "Parity has been linked to tooth loss, although the association remains poorly investigated".

This sentence is difficult to understand. Please clarify the meaning

Thank you. The sentence is deleted as unnecessary as the point is made elsewhere.

5. "Tooth loss impacts greatly on the quality of life. The participants in this study perceived that the loss of one or more teeth affects mastication, their appearance, their sense of well-being and their financial status. Functional and esthetic impairments are widely reported in the literature as major effects of tooth loss on individual quality of life [20,23,77]. Fiske et al. [23], in a qualitative study of edentulous patients, documented bereavement, loss of self-confidence, concerns about appearance and self-image as part of the emotional responses to tooth loss. As tooth loss is associated with ageing, individuals may perceive that they are old following the loss of a tooth. Affordability of dental care may be a challenge, especially in developing countries. The participants in this study perceived that replacement of a missing tooth was expensive. This may further reduce their quality of life because their hope of tooth replacement is poor".

This sentences are not one of the objectives of the study.

In the methods section, under data collection method, we referred to obtaining information on the effects of tooth loss on the quality of lives of the women. Page 6 paragraph 4.

Thus the above should not be deleted because it is the aspect of the discussion on the participant’s responses to the effects of tooth loss on their quality of life.

We did delete the sentence on Fiske’s work as it was previously mentioned.

6. Dental references must be updated.

We are unable to respond directly to this comment, as it does not tell us specifically what areas need to be updated. We checked our references with this comment in mind. We do include a few ‘historic’ references where appropriate to provide context, but otherwise our cited literature is current. The sources on oral health for Northern Nigeria are, sadly, the latest available statistics.

7. Why do not the authors speak about pregnancy gingivitis, a classic clinical sign between the 3rd month of pregnancy and 45th after childbirth?

Pregnancy gingivitis, and the clear acute clinical symptoms associated with it, did not emerge as a cause of tooth loss in the focus group discussions. However, we did refer to it in our discussion under

21 Nov 2019

Is parity a cause of tooth loss? Perceptions of northern Nigerian Hausa women

PONE-D-19-21577R1

Dear Dr. Schepartz,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Denis Bourgeois

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

26 Nov 2019

PONE-D-19-21577R1

Is parity a cause of tooth loss? Perceptions of northern Nigerian Hausa women

Dear Dr. Schepartz:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Denis Bourgeois

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE