| Literature DB >> 31805047 |
Riyo Ueda1,2, Hiroshi Matsuda3, Noriko Sato4, Masaki Iwasaki5, Daichi Sone3,6, Eri Takeshita7, Yuko Shimizu-Motohashi7, Akihiko Ishiyama7, Takashi Saito7, Hirofumi Komaki7, Eiji Nakagawa7, Kenji Sugai7, Masayuki Sasaki7, Yoshimi Kaga1, Hiroshige Takeichi1,8, Masumi Inagaki1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to use graph theoretical analysis of anatomical covariance derived from structural MRI to reveal how the gray matter connectivity pattern is altered after corpus callosotomy (CC).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31805047 PMCID: PMC6894802 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Participant’s postoperative outcomes.
| Features | Preoperative data | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 328.0 ± 235.6 | 150.4 ± 234.0 | |
| 3.2 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | |
| 25.0 ± 20.8 | 24.5 ± 22.2 | |
| Seizure free | 4 | |
| >50% reduction | 8 | |
| <50% reduction | 9 |
DQ, developmental quotient; IQ, intelligence quotient; no., number; SD, standard deviation.
Fig 1Results of AUC comparisons in each network metrics among the three groups.
The meanings of the measures are described in the Materials and Methods section of the text. Each point is the mean value of global network metrics for the pre-CC, post-CC, and control groups across the range of density thresholds from 0.1 to 0.5 used to binarize the adjacency matrix. There was no relationship in global graph metrics among the three groups. AUC, area under the curve.
Fig 2Results of assessments of network resilience to targeted attack or random failure among the three groups.
The p-values of AUC comparisons between pre-CC and post-CC networks, between control and pre-CC networks, and between control and post-CC networks are shown in each targeted attack or random failure analysis. The trajectories of the relative size of the largest components as the principal nodes are demonstrated and each error bar represents the standard distribution for repetitive permutations. The asterisks denote significant differences between groups (p<0.05). The post-CC group showed significantly lower resilience to random failure than the pre-CC group and control group.
Fig 3Results of network hub nodes and edges.
Red denotes hubs with BC > 2 SD and green denotes those with BC > 1 SD. BC, betweenness centrality; SD, standard deviation; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; OG, olfactory gyrus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; FG, fusiform gyrus; RG, rectus gyrus; MFOrb, middle orbitofrontal gyrus; SPG, superior parietal gyrus; MCG, middle cingulate gyrus; L, left; R, right.
Locations of network hub nodes with BC values greater than 1 or 2 SD in the three groups.
| Nodes > 2 SD | Nodes > 1 SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Right | Olfactory | Olfactory |
| Left | Superior frontal | |
| Right | Olfactory | Olfactory |
| Rectus | Rectus | |
| Left | Fusiform | |
| Insula | ||
| Parahippocampal | ||
| Right | Insula | Fusiform |
| Middle cingulate | Insula | |
| Superior parietal | Middle cingulate | |
| Parahippocampal | ||
| Superior parietal | ||
| Left | Insula | Amygdala |
| Middle frontal | Fusiform | |
| Insula | ||
| Middle frontal | ||
| Superior occipital |
BC, betweenness centrality; CC, corpus callosotomy; SD, standard deviation.
Fig 4Regional comparison of betweenness centrality and degree distribution between pre-CC and post-CC groups.
The pseudocolor scale represents t-values for betweenness centrality and degree distribution. Colored areas denote significant differences (false discovery rate p<0.05). CC, corpus callosotomy; L, left; R, right.