Literature DB >> 31804945

Multi-Level Multi-Modality Fusion Radiomics: Application to PET and CT Imaging for Prognostication of Head and Neck Cancer.

Wenbing Lv, Saeed Ashrafinia, Jianhua Ma, Lijun Lu, Arman Rahmim.   

Abstract

To characterize intra-tumor heterogeneity comprehensively, we propose a multi-level fusion strategy to combine PET and CT information at the image-, matrix-and feature-levels towards improved prognosis. Specifically, we developed fusion radiomics in the context of 3 prognostic outcomes in a multi-center setting (4 centers) involving 296 head & neck cancer patients. Eight clinical parameters were first utilized to build a (1) clinical model. We also built models by extracting 127 radiomics features from (2) PET images alone; (3-8) PET and CT images fused via wavelet-based fusion (WF) using CT-weights of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8, gradient transfer fusion (GTF), and guided filtering-based fusion (GFF); (9) fused matrices (sumMat); (10-11) fused features constructed via feature averaging (avgFea) and feature concatenation (conFea); and finally, (12) CT images alone; above models were also expanded to include both clinical and radiomics features. Seven variations of training and testing partitions were investigated. Highest performance in 5, 6 and 5 partitions was achieved by image-level fusion strategies for RFS, MFS and OS prediction, respectively. Among all partitions, WF0.6 and WF0.8 showed significantly higher performance than CT model for RFS (C-index: 0.60 ± 0.04 vs. 0.56 ± 0.03, p-value: 0.015) and MFS (C-index: 0.71 ± 0.13 vs. 0.62 ± 0.08, p-value: 0.020) predictions, respectively. In partition CER 23 vs. 14, WF0.6 significantly outperformed Clinical model for RFS prediction (C-index: 0.67 vs. 0.53, p-value: 0.003); both avgFea and WF0.6 showed C-index of 0.64 and significantly higher than that of PET only (C-index: 0.51, p-value: 0.018 and 0.031, respectively) for OS prediction. Fusion radiomics modeling showed varying improvements compared to single modality models for different outcome predictions in different partitions, highlighting the importance of generalizing radiomics models. Image-level fusion holds potential to capture more useful characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31804945     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2956354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  12 in total

1.  Myocardial Function Prediction After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using MRI Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Fatemeh Arian; Mehdi Amini; Shayan Mostafaei; Kiara Rezaei Kalantari; Atlas Haddadi Avval; Zahra Shahbazi; Kianosh Kasani; Ahmad Bitarafan Rajabi; Saikat Chatterjee; Mehrdad Oveisi; Isaac Shiri; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 2.  Radiomics in Oncological PET Imaging: A Systematic Review-Part 1, Supradiaphragmatic Cancers.

Authors:  David Morland; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Luca Boldrini; Roberto Gatta; Daniele Pizzuto; Salvatore Annunziata
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 3.  High-dimensional role of AI and machine learning in cancer research.

Authors:  Enrico Capobianco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 9.075

4.  Improved Prognosis of Treatment Failure in Cervical Cancer with Nontumor PET/CT Radiomics.

Authors:  Tahir I Yusufaly; Jingjing Zou; Tyler J Nelson; Casey W Williamson; Aaron Simon; Meenakshi Singhal; Hannah Liu; Hank Wong; Cheryl C Saenz; Jyoti Mayadev; Michael T McHale; Catheryn M Yashar; Ramez Eskander; Andrew Sharabi; Carl K Hoh; Sebastian Obrzut; Loren K Mell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 5.  Deep Learning in Head and Neck Tumor Multiomics Diagnosis and Analysis: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Bin-Bin Li
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  PET/MR fusion texture analysis for the clinical outcome prediction in soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Wenzhe Zhao; Xin Huang; Geliang Wang; Jianxin Guo
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Imbalanced Data Correction Based PET/CT Radiomics Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical Stage T1 Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jieqin Lv; Xiaohui Chen; Xinran Liu; Dongyang Du; Wenbing Lv; Lijun Lu; Hubing Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Deep Learning With Radiomics for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment: Challenges and Potential.

Authors:  Xingping Zhang; Yanchun Zhang; Guijuan Zhang; Xingting Qiu; Wenjun Tan; Xiaoxia Yin; Liefa Liao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Context-Aware Saliency Guided Radiomics: Application to Prediction of Outcome and HPV-Status from Multi-Center PET/CT Images of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Wenbing Lv; Hui Xu; Xu Han; Hao Zhang; Jianhua Ma; Arman Rahmim; Lijun Lu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Application of radiomics and machine learning in head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Zhouying Peng; Yumin Wang; Yaxuan Wang; Sijie Jiang; Ruohao Fan; Hua Zhang; Weihong Jiang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.