Literature DB >> 31804678

Head and Neck Injuries Associated With Cell Phone Use.

Roman Povolotskiy1, Nakul Gupta1, Adam B Leverant1, Aron Kandinov1, Boris Paskhover1.   

Abstract

Importance: As cell phones gain more influence in daily life, they also become potentially more hazardous. Injuries resulting from cell phone use have long been reported largely in the context of driving-related incidents, but other mechanisms of injury have been underreported. Objective: To assess the incidence, types, and mechanisms of head and neck injuries associated with cell phone use. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional study using data from a national database of individuals with head and neck injuries related to cell phone use who presented to emergency departments in the United States between January 1998 and December 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence, types, and mechanisms of injury related to cell phone use in the US population.
Results: A reported total of 2501 patients (1129 [55.0%] female, 795 [38.8%] white, and 772 [37.6%] aged 13-29 years) presented with injuries of the head and neck related to cell phone use; the estimated weighted national total was 76 043 patients (42 846 females [56.3%], 34 894 [45.9%] white, and 29 956 [39.4%] aged 13-29 years). The most commonly reported subsites of injuries in the head and neck region included the head (33.1% of estimated total); face, including eyelid, eye area, and nose (32.7%); and neck (12.5%). The most common injury diagnoses included laceration (26.3% of estimated total), contusion/abrasion (24.5%), and internal organ injury (18.4%). Age group distributions showed that most injuries associated with cell phone user distraction occurred among individuals aged 13 to 29 years (60.3%; Cramer V = 0.29). In addition, those younger than 13 years were significantly more likely to sustain direct mechanical injury from a cell phone (82.1%) than to have a cell phone use-associated injury (17.9%) (Cramer V = 0.305), whereas a cell phone use-associated injury was more likely than a direct mechanical injury to occur among those aged 50 to 64 years (68.2% vs 31.8%; Cramer V = 0.11) and those older than 65 years (90.3% vs 9.7%; Cramer V = 0.29). Conclusions and Relevance: Cell phone-related injuries to the head and neck have increased steeply over the recent 20-year period, with many cases resulting from distraction. Although the disposition of most cases is simple, some injuries bear a risk of long-term complications. Many of these injuries occurred among those aged 13 to 29 years and were associated with common activities, such as texting while walking. These findings suggest a need for patient education about injury prevention and the dangers of activity while using these devices.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31804678      PMCID: PMC6902153          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.3678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  29 in total

Review 1.  Mild traumatic brain injury and the postconcussive syndrome.

Authors:  A Jagoda; S Riggio
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.

Authors:  Fernando A Wilson; Jim P Stimpson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Cellular phone collateral damage: A review of burns associated with lithium battery powered mobile devices.

Authors:  Peter J Mankowski; Jonathan Kanevsky; Parseh Bakirtzian; Sabrina Cugno
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Psychological sequelae of facial trauma.

Authors:  J I Bisson; J P Shepherd; M Dhutia
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-09

5.  Distracted driver behaviors and distracting conditions among adolescent drivers: findings from a naturalistic driving study.

Authors:  Robert D Foss; Arthur H Goodwin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance.

Authors:  Joanne L Harbluk; Y Ian Noy; Patricia L Trbovich; Moshe Eizenman
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2006-10-19

7.  Quality and productive efficiency in simple laceration treatment.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Yuichi Imanaka; Tatsuro Ishizaki
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Epidemiological survey of head and neck injuries and trauma in the United States.

Authors:  Rosh K V Sethi; Elliott D Kozin; Peter J Fagenholz; Daniel J Lee; Mark G Shrime; Stacey T Gray
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Race and Sex Differences in Adult Facial Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Curtis Hanba; Peter F Svider; Frank S Chen; Michael A Carron; Adam J Folbe; Jean Anderson Eloy; Giancarlo F Zuliani
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  Road Traffic Injuries and Fatalities among Drivers Distracted by Mobile Devices.

Authors:  Natasa Zatezalo; Mete Erdogan; Robert S Green
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Risk of Accidents or Chronic Disorders From Improper Use of Mobile Phones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinxi Cao; Yangyang Cheng; Peng Jia; Yaogang Wang; Chenjie Xu; Yabing Hou; Hongxi Yang; Shu Li; Ying Gao
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.428

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.