Literature DB >> 31804114

Cohort differences in adult-life trajectories of internal and external control beliefs: A tale of more and better maintained internal control and fewer external constraints.

Denis Gerstorf1, Johanna Drewelies1, Sandra Duezel2, Jacqui Smith3, Hans-Werner Wahl4, Oliver K Schilling5, Ute Kunzmann6, Jelena S Siebert5, Martin Katzorreck6, Peter Eibich7, Ilja Demuth8, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen9, Gert G Wagner10, Ulman Lindenberger2, Jutta Heckhausen11, Nilam Ram12.   

Abstract

Life Span theory posits that sociohistorical contexts shape individual development. In line with this proposition, cohort differences favoring later-born cohorts have been widely documented for cognition and health. However, little is known about historical change in how key resources of psychosocial functioning such as control beliefs develop in old age. We pooled data from 3 independent samples: Berlin Aging Study (6 waves, N = 414); Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study of Adult Development (4 waves, N = 925); and Berlin Aging Study II (4 waves, N = 1,111) to construct overlapping multiyear longitudinal data from ages 61 through 85 years for cohorts born 1905 to 1953 and examine historical changes in within-person trajectories of internal and external control beliefs. Results revealed that earlier-born cohorts exhibit age-related declines in internal control beliefs regarding both desirable and undesirable outcomes, whereas later-born cohorts perceive higher internal control and maintain this advantage into old age. Earlier-born cohorts also experience steep age-related increases in external control beliefs regarding both powerful others and chance, whereas later-born cohorts perceive lower external control and were stable across old age. Education and gender disparities in control beliefs narrowed over historical time. Sociodemographic, physical health, cognitive, and social factors explained some of the differences in control beliefs, and accounted for sizable portions of cohort effects. Our results indicate that current generations of older adults perceive more and better maintained internal control and fewer external constraints. We discuss potential underlying mechanisms and consider conceptual and societal implications of our findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31804114     DOI: 10.1037/pag0000389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  7 in total

1.  Acting Like a Baby Boomer? Birth-Cohort Differences in Adults' Personality Trajectories During the Last Half a Century.

Authors:  Naemi D Brandt; Johanna Drewelies; Sherry L Willis; K Warner Schaie; Nilam Ram; Denis Gerstorf; Jenny Wagner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-02-22

2.  Historical change in midlife health, well-being, and despair: Cross-cultural and socioeconomic comparisons.

Authors:  Frank J Infurna; Omar E Staben; Margie E Lachman; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2021-09

3.  Subjective age and attitudes toward own aging across two decades of historical time.

Authors:  Hans-Werner Wahl; Johanna Drewelies; Sandra Duezel; Margie E Lachman; Jacqui Smith; Peter Eibich; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Ilja Demuth; Ulman Lindenberger; Gert G Wagner; Nilam Ram; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2021-10-25

4.  Awareness of Age-Related Changes Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Longitudinal Trajectories, and the Role of Age Stereotypes and Personality Traits.

Authors:  Markus Wettstein; Anna E Kornadt; Hans-Werner Wahl
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.435

5.  Role-Based Framing of Older Adults Linked to Decreased Ageism Over 210 Years: Evidence From a 600-Million-Word Historical Corpus.

Authors:  Reuben Ng; Nicole Indran
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Gender score development in the Berlin Aging Study II: a retrospective approach.

Authors:  Ahmad Tauseef Nauman; Hassan Behlouli; Nicholas Alexander; Friederike Kendel; Johanna Drewelies; Konstantinos Mantantzis; Nora Berger; Gert G Wagner; Denis Gerstorf; Ilja Demuth; Louise Pilote; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.027

7.  Cohort profile: follow-up of a Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II) subsample as part of the GendAge study.

Authors:  Ilja Demuth; Verena Banszerus; Johanna Drewelies; Sandra Düzel; Ute Seeland; Dominik Spira; Esther Tse; Julian Braun; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Lars Bertram; Andreas Thiel; Ulman Lindenberger; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.