| Literature DB >> 31803829 |
B Larder1, D O Gericke2, S Richardson1,3, P Mabey4, T G White5, G Gregori1.
Abstract
Modeling many-body quantum systems with strong interactions is one of the core challenges of modern physics. A range of methods has been developed to approach this task, each with its own idiosyncrasies, approximations, and realm of applicability. However, there remain many problems that are intractable for existing methods. In particular, many approaches face a huge computational barrier when modeling large numbers of coupled electrons and ions at finite temperature. Here, we address this shortfall with a new approach to modeling many-body quantum systems. On the basis of the Bohmian trajectory formalism, our new method treats the full particle dynamics with a considerable increase in computational speed. As a result, we are able to perform large-scale simulations of coupled electron-ion systems without using the adiabatic Born-Oppenheimer approximation.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31803829 PMCID: PMC6874487 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw1634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Static ion-ion structure factors for aluminum.
The static structure factor is defined as S(k) = ∫ S(k, ω)dω. The main graph compares our results from Bohmian dynamics with data obtained by density functional theory molecular dynamics (DFT-MD) with orbital-free DFT (OFDFT) () for a density of 5.2 g cm−3 and a temperature of 3.5 eV. The lower insets compare our results to data from full Kohn-Sham DFT (KS-DFT) simulations at solid density and two different temperatures. The excellent agreement of the methods is also demonstrated by the very small differences in pressure as quantified by the parameter R: These values give the difference in ionic pressure between the methods normalized to the difference of the DFT pressures and the pressure of an ideal gas, that is, R = (PBohm − PDFT)/(PDFT − P0).
Fig. 2Results for the dynamic ion structure for aluminum at 3.5 eV and 5.2 g cm−3.
(A) The frequency-resolved DSF from the Bohmian dynamics. (B) Comparison of the dispersion relation of the ion acoustic modes from our Bohmian approach with the data from the Langevin model of ().
Fig. 3Schematic of the applied linearization approximation.
(A) The time evolution of an N-trajectory in an exact Bohmian representation of a pure quantum state (top) and the Bohm potential, VB, that it experiences (bottom). VB isa functional of the density of N-trajectories in configuration space, Φ. At each time step, all of the N-trajectories in the ensemble must be updated, Φ calculated, and the updated Bohm potential determined. (B) The time evolution of an N-trajectory in our linearized Bohmian representation of a thermal state (top) and the Bohm potential that it experiences (bottom). We need only to track a single N-trajectory: Its coupling to a heat bath ensures its ergodicity, so that Φ becomes equal, in equilibrium, to its time-averaged density in configuration space. As a result, the N-trajectory evolves with a time-independent Bohm potential, generated self-consistently by its own time-integrated density. (C) The block panel summarizes our scheme to determine the Bohmian dynamics and gives the sources for the different potentials needed as input.