Literature DB >> 31803774

Molecular Characterization of Anopheles sacharovi Based on Sequences of ITS2-rDNA Region and COI Gene in North of Iran.

Sahereh Gholami1, Hasan Bakhshi1,2, Seyyed Hassan Moosa-Kazemi1, Alireza Zahraei-Ramazani1, Alireza Chavshin3, Mohammad Mehdi Sedaghat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malaria is an important mosquito-borne disease considered as one of the public health concerns across many countries. Anopheles mosquitoes are the main vectors of Plasmodium parasites, which cause malaria. Some of these vectors such as Anopheles maculipennis s.l. and Anopheles sacharovi are considered as complex of sibling species distributed in north of Iran.
METHODS: This study was conducted in north and northwest of Iran including East Azerbaijan, West Azerbaijan, Ardabil, Golestan and North Khorasan provinces with emphasis on the northern borders of the country during 2015-2016. Adult specimens were collected and subjected to morphological identification as well as molecular analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 10405 mosquitoes were collected comprising 21 species. Culex pipiens and Cx. theileri were found as the most frequent species in whole study area. Morphological identification showed that out of 1455 female Anopheles specimens, 77% belonged to An. maculipennis Group. Out of the identified species, ITS2 region and COI gene sequences of 8 An. maculipennis s.s. and 31 An. sacharovi representing all provinces were obtained and submitted to GenBank. The COI sequences for An. sacharovi revealed the presence of 9 haplotypes with similarity of 98.17-100%.
CONCLUSION: Some investigations have reported An. martinius as a member of sibling species of An. sacharovi among Iranian Anopheles genus; while based on our study, there was no evidence of the presence of this species in north and northwest of Iran. Copyright© Iranian Society of Medical Entomology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles martinius; Anopheles sacharovi; COI; ITS2-rDNA, Iran

Year:  2019        PMID: 31803774      PMCID: PMC6885140     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis        ISSN: 2322-1984            Impact factor:   1.198


Introduction

Anopheles mosquitoes are responsible for transmission of malaria parasites in humans. There are 30 definitive reported species, 3–4 biological forms and geographical races of Anopheles in Iran. There are seven primary malaria vectors recognized in Iran including An. stephensi, An. culicifacies s.l., An. fluviatilis s.l., An. superpictus s.l., An. dthali, An. maculipennis s.l. and An. sacharovi (1). Some of the most important species are in the Maculipennis group comprised as a primary or secondary vector of malaria parasites in the Palaearctic Region (2, 3). There is a report on the bionomics of An. maculipennis and An. sacharovi from Iran and Iraq and the distribution of the two species in central and northern areas of Iran (4). Anopheles maculipennis s.l. was reported in central and northern areas of the country (5). Twenty-two species of Anopheles were listed in Iran based on literature records. The list included An. martinius among Iranian Anopheles species (6); although, there is no evidence of An. martinius occurrence in Iran so far. As a result of recent molecular genetic studies, DNA sequence data are available for identification of the members of the complex. Anopheles persiensis was described as a new species of the An. maculipennis complex in north of Iran (2). Two members of An. maculipennis complex including An. maculipennis and An. sacharovi have been reported as vectors of malaria parasites in central and northern parts of the country. They are also considered as vectors of Plasmodium parasites from Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey (7). Members of the An. maculipennis complex are distributed mostly in northern and central areas of the country (8). The An. maculipennis complex comprises several sibling species including major vectors of malaria parasites of historic Europe (9). Currently, there are 10 members of the An. maculipennis complex in the Palearctic Region including An. melanon, An. messeae, An. persiensis, An. sacharovi, An. martinius, An. atroparvus, An. daciae, An. labranchiae and An. artemievi (10). Out of the complex, six species including An. maculipennis s.s., An. maculipennis, An. persiensis, An. messeae, An. atroparvus, An. labranchiae and An. sacharovi have been identified in Iran based on molecular methods (3). Anopheles melanoon and An. messeae are listed as Iranian species based on the egg morphology studies as well as molecular studies (8). This study was carried out based on the molecular and morphological characters of An. maculipennis s.l. collected from north and northwest of Iran with emphasis on border lines including East Azerbaijan, West Azerbaijan, Ardabil, Golestan and North Khorasan provinces where are considered as important biogeographic regions, being the corridor between Europe and Asia. These provinces have share borders with five countries including Turkmenistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iraq and Turkey where the members of the An. maculipennis complex play an important role in malaria transmission. The potential occurrence of An. martinius, a close species of An. sacharovi, was also considered in this study.

Materials and Methods

Adult mosquitoes and larvae were collected from five provinces located in north of Iran during 2015–2016 using standard methods (Fig. 1, Table 1). Animal bite traps and shelter pit methods were used for collection of adults. The collection of larvae was carried out by dipping method.
Fig. 1.

The study area: 1. North Khorasan, 2. Golestan, 3. Ardabil, 4. East Azerbaijan, 5. West Azerbaijan

Table 1.

Geographical coordinates of the study areas

No.ProvinceCountyLatitudeLongitude
1West-AzerbaijanPoldasht39° 20′ 49.69″ N45° 3′ 59.61″ E
Shahindej36° 40′ 26.74″ N46° 34′ 12.48″ E
Oshnavieh37° 2′ 11.17″ N45° 5′ 49.69″ E
Makoo39° 17′ 44.24″ N44° 30′ 51.07″ E
2ArdabilParsabad-Moghan39° 37′ 14.80″ N47° 54′ 18.22″ E
Aslan-Duz39° 26′ 29.57″ N47° 24′ 40.25″ E
Meshgin Shahr38° 23′ 41.38″ N47° 39′ 53.46″ E
3East-AzerbaijanKaleybar38° 51′ 51.27″ N47° 2′ 25.94″ E
Azarshahr37° 44′ 39.54″ N45° 59′ 13.95″ E
4North-KhorasanBojnord37° 28′ 12.74″ N57° 18′ 51.61″ E
Shirvan37° 24′ 33.25″ N57° 55′ 39.42″ E
5GolestanGorgan36° 50′ 44.31″ N54° 26′ 21.61″ E
All samples were identified to the species level by using morphological keys (11). These identifications were used to target specimens for molecular identification using ribosomal internal transcribed spacer II (ITS2-rDNA) region and cytochrome oxydase I (COI) gene to differentiate cryptic species within the An. maculipennis complex. Genomic DNA of the mosquitoes was extracted using (G-spine ™) DNA Extraction Kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reactions were carried out in a total volume of 20µl using the PCR kit. The desired ITS2 fragments were amplified by using universal 5.8S (5´-TGTGAACTGC AGGACACATGAA-3´) as the forward and 28S (5´-ATGCTTAAATTAGGGGGTAGTC- 3´) as the reverse primers (12). The PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 2min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 20sec, 50 °C for 15sec, and 70 °C for 25sec and terminating with a 72 °C for 5min. The desired COI fragments were amplified using LCO1490 (5´-GGTCAACAAATC ATAAAGATATTGG-3´) as the forward and HCO2198 (5´-TAAACTT CAGGGTGACC AAAAAATCA-3´) as the reverse primers (13). The PCR conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 2min, followed by 5 cycles of 94 °C for 30sec, 45 °C for 40sec, and 72 °C for 1min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30sec, 55 °C for 30sec, and 72 °C for 1min, respectively, terminating with a 72 °C for 5min. Accuracy and quality of the amplicon were examined using a 1% agarose gel and visualized by Gel Doc after staining with Sinacolon® (Tehran, Iran) safe stain. DNA chromatograms were inspected using Chromas software (Version 2.23) and the sequences were submitted to GenBank. Similarity with other sequences in GenBank was assessed using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) online tool. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA7 (ver. 7.0.21) software (Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis) using Maximum Likelihood method with 1000 replicates of bootstrapping. Phylogenetic tree of fifteen COI sequences obtained from this study (An. sacharovi: 11 and An. maculipennis: 4) and four COI Genbank sequences as outgroup (KU950429: An. martinius, KM224658: An. melanoon, KM258220: An. messeae and KU 380466: An. gambiae) were created (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree constructed by 15 COI sequences (about 601bp) obtained from Anopheles sacharovi=11 and Anopheles maculipennis=4. The sequences KU950429: Anopheles martinius, KM224658: Anopheles melanoon, KM258220: Anopheles messeae and KU380466: Anopheles gambiae (as the out-group) were derived from GenBank

Results

Morphological investigations

Out of 10405 specimens, 6556 adult samples and 3849 larvae were collected. Morphological identifications revealed that the specimens represented five genera and 21 species including An. maculipennis s.l., An. sacharovi, An. claviger, An. hyrcanus, An. superpictus s. l., An. psudopictus, Culex hortensis, Cx. pipiens, Cx. theileri, Cx. modestus, Cx. mimeticus, Cx. perexiguus, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, Aedes caspius, Ae. geniculatus, Ae. vexans, Ae. flavescens, Ae. echinus, Culiseta longiareolata, Cs. subochrea and Uranotaenia unguiculata. Culex pipiens (30.2%), Culiseta loniareolata (23.8%) and Cx. theileri (22.3%) were the dominant species, and accounted for 76.3% of the collected samples (Table 2). Culex pipiens and Cx. theileri were found as frequent species in whole study area. Uranotaenia unguiculata (n=1, 0.009%), Cs. subochrea (n=4, 0.003 %) and Ae. vexans (n=4, 0.003%) were considered as infrequent species. Uranotaenia unguiculata was only collected in West Azerbaijan Province. Among Aedes mosquitoes, Ae. caspius (1.2%) was found in whole study area and Ae. flavescens in sympatry with Ae. vexans in Ardabil Province.
Table 2.

Species composition of mosquitoes collected from East-Azarbaijan: EA, West-Azarbaijan: WA, Ardabil: A, Golestan: G, North-Khorasan: NKh

No.SpeciesAdults SpeciesSpecies LarvaeAdults (%)Larvae (%)Total (Adults and Larvae) (%)

EAWAAGNKhEAWAAGNKh
1An. maculipennis8897331924-155118-72261 (3.98)345 (8.96)606 (5.8)
2An. sacharovi2635-------34 (0.51) 34 (32)
3An. claviger644399142-9950-104222 (3.38)253 (6.57)475 (4.56)
4An. hyrcanus12-23209-----64 (0.97)-64 (0.61)
5An. superpictus-3-13116-15--266132 (2.01)281 (7.3)413 (3.96)
6An. psudopictus---15----- 15 (0.22)-15 (0.14)
7Cx. hortensis1209-203-180106-28152 (2.31)314 (8.15)466 (4.48)
8Cx. pipiens132696310946-3361254-81553 (17.58)1598 (41.51)3151 (30.28)
9Cx. theileri170314-3913-281243-351769 (26.98)559 (14.525)2328 (22.38)
10Cx. modestus-3----4750--3 (0.04)97 (2.52)100 (0.96)
11Cx. mimeticus----17-76-1317 (0.25)26 (0.67)43 (0.41)
12Cx. perexiggus--3173--18-323 (0.35)21 (0.54)44 (0.42)
13Cx. tritarincus-------15---15 (0.38)15 (0.14)
14Ae. caspius1632318--33-1578 (1.18)48 (1.24)126 (1.21)
15Ae. geniculatus-4-6------10 (0.15)-10 (0.096)
16Ae. vexans-------4--4 (0.1)4 (0.038)
17Ae. flavecence-------11--11 (0.28)11 (0.1)
18Ae. echinus---15------15 (0.22)15 (0.14)
19Cs. loniareolata208042-7111-21555-62204 (33.61)276 (7.17)2480 (23.83)
20Cs. subochrea---4------4 (0.06)4 (0.038)
21Ur. ungiuiculata------1----1 (0.02)1 (0.009)

Total (%)5420 (52.09)234 (2.24)258 (2.48)393 (3.78)252 (2.42)1336 (12.83)1963 (18.86)-550 (5.3)6556 (63)3849 (37)10405 (100)
Among Anopheles mosquitoes, An. claviger and An. hyrcanus were widespread across the whole study area. Anopheles maculipennis s.l. (5.8%) was found in five provinces and An. sacharovi (0.3%) was found in sympatry with An. maculipennis s.l. only in three provinces located in northwest. Anopheles superpictus s.l. was also found with frequency of 3.9%. The last three species are the main malaria vectors in Iran.

Molecular investigations

Anopheles maculipennis s.l. and An. sacharovi were subjected to molecular study using ITS2 and COI sequences. Eight sequences of An. maculipennis s.s. for the ITS2 region (n=4) and COI gene (n=4) were obtained and the sequences submitted to GenBank under accession numbers KY225560, KY225561, KY225562, KY225563 and KY196448, KY196449, KY 196450, KY196462 for ITS2 and COI regions respectively. All specimens were identified as An. maculipennis s.s. by an identity of 100 %. Thirty one sequences for An. sacharovi for the ITS2 region (n=19) and COI gene (n=12) were obtained and the sequences were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers KY225557-KY225559, KY263795-KY263806 and KY 196451-KY196461 for the ITS2 and COI regions respectively. All ITS2 sequences for An. sacharovi were identical with 100% similarity. The COI sequences for An. sacharovi showed that there were 9 haplotypes with similarity of 98.17–100%. The base composition of the COI fragments showed an AT bias with all sequences being between 66.4 and 67.8% AT rich (mean= 66.8%). Seventeen single nucleotide polymorphisms among the haplotypes were observed (Table 3).
Table 3.

DNA sequence comparison of about 601bp of COI gene of Anopheles sacharovi distributed in the study area. Totally 9 haplotypes were identified within the sequenced samples, *: non-synonymous base change, Dots show identical sequences to the top sequence

Position38116155170203209278323326341347368401487509557563
PoldashtTGATATCATCAGACGAA
Azarshahr.................
Parsabad-Moghan..............T..
Shahindej..............T..
Makoo..............T..
Kaleybar.......G......T..
Azarshahr..G.......G.....G
PoldashtCA.CGCT...GA..TG.
Kaleybar............G.T..
Parsabad-Moghan..G.....C.GA.G*...
Oshnavieh..........G...T..
Aslan-Duz.........T....T..
Based on the COI sequences of An. sacharovi and An. maculipennis s.s. (about 601bp), phylogenetic tree was constructed. A tree for 15 COI sequences including 11 An. sacharovi, 4 An. maculipennis as well as 3 sequences of An. maculipennis complex deposited in GenBank (AN: KU950429 (An. martinius), KM 224658 (An. melanoon), KM258220 (An. messeae) and KU380466 (An. gambiae) was constructed (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic tree revealed the inter-population differences of the studied species. The smallest genetic distance was shown between the An. sacharovi populations from three provinces including East Azerbaijan, West Azerbaijan and Ardabil provinces rather than Golestan and North Khorasan provinces. The three mentioned provinces are closely located in northwest of the country (Fig. 1). Moreover, An. melanoon, An. messeae and An. martinius were recognized in separate clades from all An. sacharovi and An. maculipennis s.s. populations. The study area: 1. North Khorasan, 2. Golestan, 3. Ardabil, 4. East Azerbaijan, 5. West Azerbaijan Geographical coordinates of the study areas Phylogenetic tree constructed by 15 COI sequences (about 601bp) obtained from Anopheles sacharovi=11 and Anopheles maculipennis=4. The sequences KU950429: Anopheles martinius, KM224658: Anopheles melanoon, KM258220: Anopheles messeae and KU380466: Anopheles gambiae (as the out-group) were derived from GenBank Species composition of mosquitoes collected from East-Azarbaijan: EA, West-Azarbaijan: WA, Ardabil: A, Golestan: G, North-Khorasan: NKh DNA sequence comparison of about 601bp of COI gene of Anopheles sacharovi distributed in the study area. Totally 9 haplotypes were identified within the sequenced samples, *: non-synonymous base change, Dots show identical sequences to the top sequence

Discussion

The Maculipennis subgroup currently comprises 10 members including An. artemievi, An. atroparvus, An. daciae, An. labranchiae, An. maculipennis, An. martinius, An. melanoon, An. messeae, An. persiensis and An. sacharovi. Six members of An. maculipennis complex have been identified as primary or secondary vectors of malaria parasites in the Palearctic Region (2). These members are very close related species which are difficult to be identified by morphological characteristics. Although it is possible to distinguish An. sacharovi from other members by morphological characteristics, An. martinius is remained as a sibling species of An. sacharovi which makes it impossible to identify them by their morphological characteristics; these two species can be detected by cytological studies (14). Although the occurrence of An. martinius in Iran had been mentioned, there is no evidence for distribution of this species in the country so far. The most ambiguity is the distribution of An. martinius in east of Caspian Sea and east of Iran. Although it was reported in 1941 (15), but there is no new evidence of occurrence of this species in north of Tajikistan as well (16). This is in concordance with another study (17). Cytogenetic study showed that only An. maculipennis s.s. was present in this region. However, An. artemievi described as a homosequential species with An. maculipennis, could be erroneously identified as An. martinius (18). Anopheles artemievi is a new and predominate species in Kyrgyzstan, where it was identified as An. martinius (18). On the other hand, there are cytological or molecular evidences for occurrence of An. martinius in northeast of Turkmenistan, the Turkmen-Khorasan Mountain Range, Karakalpakstan and the Khorezm areas of Uzbekistan (19, 20). Our molecular studies on the An. maculipennis complex were conducted to elucidate the possible occurrence of An. martinius. Members of the An. maculipennis complex were identified by sequence analysis of the ITS2-rDNA and COI gene. Morphological character-based identification showed that out of 1455 female Anopheles specimens, 1121 (77%) belonged to An. maculipennis complex. Molecular analysis of the complex indicated the presence of An. sacharovi and An. maculipennis s.s. in northwest and north of Iran. This result is in agreement with other studies (2, 3). Three genetically distinct species of the An. maculipennis complex were reported in Iran (2): An. maculipennis s.s., An. sacharovi and An. persiensis. However, the last species was not found in this study as it was found as a dominant species of the complex in the southern Caspian Sea littoral provinces of Guilan and Mazandaran (2). Six members of the group were reported based on molecular approach, while there was no An. martinius in the study area in northern Iran (21). No species of this complex was found but An. maculipennis s.s. based on molecular study in Zanjan Province located in the northwest of Iran (22). Anopheles maculipennis s.s. and An. sacharovi were found in nine provinces from northwest to central regions of Iran, it was no molecular evidence for presence of An. martinius either (23). Molecular and phylogenetic analysis of the present investigation indicates more species diversity of An. sacharovi than has been recognized up to now. Divergence among the members of mosquito complexes varies but can be fundamental. Twenty-two species of Anopheles were reported in Iran including An. martinius (6). Apparently, there is no molecular evidence of An. martinius presence across the whole study area. The results correspond with other findings (24). The base composition of the COI fragments showed an AT bias with all sequences being between 66.4% and 67.8% AT rich (mean=66.8%). These levels fall within the range of AT bias in mitochondrial genomes of other members of An. maculipennis complex including An. maculipennis (25), An. messeae (26), An. sacharovi (2, 3) and An. martinius (AN: KU950429). The COI sequences of An. sacharovi showed that there were 9 unique mtDNA haplotypes with similarity of 98.17–100%. The sequences were translated into amino acids to obtain the mitochondrial code. Translation of the sequences into amino acids showed all but one of the twelve specimens shared the same amino acid haplotype. Only one specimen (KY196454) from Parsabad-Moghan in Ardabil Province showed two nucleotide transversion (G⇔C, C⇔G) at the second and third codon position bases of 478 and 479bp (Table 3). These nonsynonymous bases change altered the codon from the consensus CCG (Arginine) to CGC (Proline), thus resulting in a unique amino acid haplotype.

Conclusion

We collected three important malaria vectors in north of Iran. The permanent presence of historical vectors of pathogens results in potential epidemiological threats. Some malaria foci have been spotted in the northwest of Iran. Significant increases in commercial activities and travel from the neighbouring countries has led to increase concern about malaria and other vector-borne diseases in the Northern provinces. This has increased the concern of malaria cases occurrence in the area. A better understanding of the accurate identification of sympatric sibling species and their distributions remain important as the malaria control programs depend on the accurate identification of the vectors. Here, there is no evidence for occurrence of An. martinius in north of the country.
  15 in total

1.  [The malaria mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae, Anopheles) of the Amudarya river valley].

Authors:  M I Gordeev; I I Goriacheva; E V Shaĭkevich; A B Zvantsev; M N Ezhov
Journal:  Med Parazitol (Mosk)       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

2.  An annotated checklist of the Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sedaghat; Ralph E Harbach
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 3.  A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species.

Authors:  F H Collins; S M Paskewitz
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.585

4.  Molecular characterization of the Anopheles maculipennis complex in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Authors:  M A Oshaghi; M M Sedaghat; H Vatandoost
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.628

5.  [Supplement to the list of Anopheles (Diptera, Culicidae) mosquitoes of Tadjikistan and the predominant types of vectors in the current foci of malaria in the republic].

Authors:  M I Gordeev; M N Ezhov; A B Zvantsov; I I Goriacheva; E V Shaĭkevich; S S Karimov; D S Kadamov
Journal:  Med Parazitol (Mosk)       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep

6.  Molecular characteristics of Anopheles maculipennis Meigen in Zanjan, north west of Iran, inferred from ITS2 sequence analysis.

Authors:  M B Ghavami; N Dinparast Djadid; A Haniloo
Journal:  Pak J Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-15

Review 7.  The Anopheles maculipennis complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Germany: an update following recent monitoring activities.

Authors:  Helge Kampen; Mandy Schäfer; Dorothee E Zielke; Doreen Walther
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Phylogenetic analysis of the oriental-Palearctic-Afrotropical members of Anopheles (Culicidae: Diptera) based on nuclear rDNA and mitochondrial DNA characteristics.

Authors:  Fateh Karimian; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi; Mohammad Mahdi Sedaghat; Robert M Waterhouse; Hasan Vatandoost; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Naseh Maleki Ravasan; Ali Reza Chavshin
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.362

9.  Malaria and the Anopheles mosquitoes of Tajikistan.

Authors:  Zamonidin Habirov; Dilshod Kadamov; Firuz Iskandarov; Saodat Komilova; Shelley Cook; Erica McAlister; Ralph E Harbach
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Molecular identification of Palearctic members of Anopheles maculipennis in northern Iran.

Authors:  Navid D Djadid; Saber Gholizadeh; Elham Tafsiri; Roberto Romi; Mikhail Gordeev; Sedigheh Zakeri
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.