| Literature DB >> 31803728 |
Yu Yang1, Li Wang1,2, Bin Wan1,2, Yuxin Gu1,2, Xinxin Li3.
Abstract
Non-invasive tracking for monitoring the selective delivery and transplantation of biotargeted agents in vivo has been employed as one of the most effective tools in the field of nanomedicine. Different nanoprobes have been developed and applied to bioimaging tissues and the treatment of diseases ranging from inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases to cancer. Herein, we will review the recent advances in the development of optics-responsive nanomaterials, including organic and inorganic nanoparticles, for multimodal bioimaging and targeted therapy. The main focus is placed on nanoprobe fabrication, mechanistic illustrations, and diagnostic, or therapeutical applications. These nanomedicine strategies have promoted a better understanding of the biological events underlying diverse disease etiologies, thereby facilitating diagnosis, illness evaluation, therapeutic effect, and drug discovery.Entities:
Keywords: bioimaging; nanomaterials; optical; therapy; tissues
Year: 2019 PMID: 31803728 PMCID: PMC6873787 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Figure 1(A) Formation of PPHAuNC-TNC. (B) in vivo biodistribution of differently-sized PPHAuNCs-TNCs. After intravenous injection with (a) naked Cy5.5-miRNAs (control group), (b) PPHAuNCs-30-TNCs, (c) PPHAuNCs-50-TNCs, and (d) PPHAuNCs-70-TNCs.
Figure 2(A) Photoluminescence excitation (black solid line) and emission (black dotted line) spectra of Cr3+ doped n-ZGO. (B) Schematic representation of in vivo imaging after in situ activation of persistent luminescence nanoparticles (PLNPs). (C) Optical image of a tumor-bearing mouse. (D) Persistent luminescence image of a tumor-bearing mouse 2 h after injection of ZGO-PEG NPs. (E) Persistent luminescence image of a tumor-bearing mouse immediately after LED illumination, 4 h after injection of ZGO-PEG NPs.
Persistent luminescence NPs for bio-imaging and therapy.
| Gd2O2S | Eu3+,Mg2+,Ti4+ | Regular NP shape, bimodality optical/MRI | Rosticher et al., |
| Ca3(PO4)2/hydroxyapatite | Mn2+,Tb3+,Dy3+ | Fully biocompatible, NPs and | Rosticher et al., |
| Ca2Si5N8 | Eu2+,Tm3+ | Bioimaging applications | Maldiney et al., |
| SrAl2O4 | Eu2+,Dy3+ | NPs, functionalization, Bioimaging applications, green emission | Zeng et al., |
| Ca0.2Zn0.9Mg0.9Si2O6 | Mn2+,Eu2+,Dy3+ | NPs, functionalization, pioneer work for bio-imaging: cancer cells imaging, cell targeting | de Chermont et al., |
| Ca1.86Mg0.14ZnSi2O7 | Eu2+,Dy3+ | FRET and various bio-sensing applications | Sun et al., |
| CaMgSi2O6 | Mn2+,Eu2+,Pr3+ | NPs, functionalization, bio-imaging | Maldiney et al., |
| MAlO3 (M = La, Gd) | Mn4+/Ge4+ | Bio-imaging in pork tissue | Liu et al., |
| GdAlO3 | Mn4+,Ge4+Au | Trimodality imaging | Liu et al., |
| ZnGa2O4 | Cr3+ | NPs, functionalization, bio-imaging (cancer cells imaging), Cell targeting, cytotoxicity, visible Light NIR | Maldiney et al., |
| ZnGa2O4 in hollow cavity | Cr3+ | Photodynamic therapies | Wang et al., |
| ZnGa2O4 | Cr3+,Gd3+ | NPs, functionalization, bimodality optical/NMR imaging | Maldiney et al., |
| ZnGa2O4/SiO2 | Cr3+ | Core-shell structure, drug delivery | Maldiney et al., |
| ZnGa2O4/Fe2O3 | Cr3+ | Cell labeling and magnetic vectorization | Teston et al., |
| ZGOCS@m-SiO2@Gd2O3 | Cr3+ | Multimodal nanoprobes | Zou et al., |
| Zn1.1Ga1.8Ge0.1O4/SiO2 | Cr3+,Eu3+ | NPs, core-shell structure, drug delivery | Shi et al., |
| Zn3Ga2Ge2O10 | Cr3+ | Imaging of pork tissue, Photostimulation, cytotoxicity | Li et al., |
| Zn1.1Ga1.8Ge0.1O4@SiO2 | Cr3+ | Bio-imaging and drug delivery | Liu et al., |
| Zn1.25Ga1.5Ge0.25O4 | Cr3+,Yb3+,Er3+ | Metastasis tracking and chemo-photodynamic therapy | Li et al., |
| Zn1.1Ga1.8Ge0.1O4 | Cr3+ | Nanothermometry | Yang et al., |
| Zn3Ga2Sn1O10 | Cr3+ | Imaging of goldfish | Li et al., |
| Zn2.94Ga1.96Ge2O10 | Cr3+,Pr3+ | NPs, functionalization | Abdukayum et al., |
| Zn3Ga2Ge2O10 | Cr3+ | Recognition of breast cancer cells | Li et al., |
| Zn3Ga2GeO8 | Cr3+,Yb3+,Er3+ | Upconversion | Liu et al., |
| LiGa5O8 | Cr3+/PEG-OCH3 | NPs, functionalization, bio-imaging, Visible light stimulation, photostimulation | Liu et al., |
| Ca3Ga2Ge3O12 | Cr3+,Yb3+,Tm3+ Pr3+,Yb3+ | NIR stimulation, upconversion | Chen et al., |
| m-SiO2@Gd3Ga5O12 | Cr3+,Nd3+ | Multimodal imaging and cancer therapy | Shi et al., |
| Sr2SnO4 | Nd3+ | Finger image | Kamimura et al., |
| SiO2/CaMgSi2O6 | Eu2+,Pr3+,Mn2+ | Bio-imaging, intraperitoneal injection | Li et al., |
| Y3Al2Ga3O12 | Er3+,Cr3+ | Imaging in the second biological window | Xu et al., |
| NaYF4 + SrAl2O4 | Yb3+,Tm3+, Eu2+,Dy3+ | Upconversion & photodynamic therapy | Hu et al., |
| Sr2MgSi2O7 | Eu2+/3+,Dy3+ | Photodynamic activation | Homayoni et al., |
| La3Ga5GeO14@SiO2@Van(vancomycin) | Cr3+,Zn2+ | Bio-imaging-guided | Zhan et al., |
| CaTiO3 | Pr3+,Yb3+,Tm3+ | Upconverting and guided photothermal therapy | Zhao et al., |
| ZnSn2O4 | Cr3+,Eu3+ | Cellular and deep tissue imaging | Li et al., |
| Sr3Sn2O7 | Nd3+ | Second window imaging | Kamimura et al., |
Figure 3(A) Characterization of SERS nanoprobes: (a–c) TEM images of GNRs, GNR-PANI, and GNR-PPy, respectively. (d) UV-vis-NIR absorbance spectra of the nanostructures. Raman spectra of GNR-PPy (e) and GNR-PANI (f) under 785 nm (red line) and 514.5 nm (blue line) laser excitation, respectively. Black lines show the normal Raman spectra of CP molecules. (B) NIR SERS imaging of A549 cells after incubation with GNRs (a–c), GNR-PANI (e–g), and GNR-PPy (h–j) for 4 h. (d) Raman spectra in the cytoplasmic compartments. Arrows indicate the Raman peaks used for SERS imaging. (k–n) Two-color imaging after incubation with a mixture of two tags [brightfield image (k), GNR-PANI (l), GNR-PPy (m), merged image (n)].
Figure 4(A) Schematic illustration of the PA imaging process of brain tumor in vivo by PDI NPs. (B) UV-vis-NIR absorption spectrum of PDI NPs in aqueous solution. (C) Ultrasonic (gray), photoacoustic (green), and their overlay brain coronal sections of the tumor model after tail vein injection of PDI NPs. (D) PA spectra of PDI NPs in different media. Skull region in the red dotted circle of (C) before NP injection (red line) and tumor region in the blue dotted circle of (C) after 2 d NP injection (blue line).
Examples of PA contrast agent explored in PA imaging.
| Inorganic | Metallic nanomaterials | Au nanorods; | (+) tunable physiochemical properties; | Chen et al., |
| Carbon-based nanomaterials | Carbon nanotubes; | (+) able to carry cargoes; | Zhang et al., | |
| Transition metal chalcogenides | CuS; WS2; MoS2; | (+) high photothermal conversion efficiency; | Cheng et al., | |
| Organic | Dyes | Porphyrin- and | (+) good biocompatibility/biodegradability. | Sheng et al., |
| Polymer-based nanomaterials | Polypyrrole; | (+) good biocompatibility and photothermal stability; able to carry cargoes. | Yang et al., |
Figure 5(A) Design of TPETCAQ. (B) Synthesis of TPETCAQ-1 NPs and TPETCAQ NPs. (C) Time-dependent bioluminescent 4T1-luc tumor imaging of mice after intratumoral administration of TPETCAQ NPs (30 μL, 1 mg mL−1 for TPETCAQ, top panel) or saline (bottom panel) with light irradiation (300 mW cm−2, 5 min) at 1 h post-injection. (D) Tumor volume measurement for different groups of mice. ***P < 0.001.
Figure 6(A) Schematic illustration of construction of theranostic Ag2S nanodots in HSA Nanocages. (B) Fluorescence spectra of Ag2S-NDs. (C) Temperature elevations of Ag2S-NDs under 5 min irradiation (785 nm, 1.5 W cm−2). (D) Biodistribution of Ag2S-NDs at 24 h post-injection. (E) NIR fluorescence imaging of 4T1-tumor-bearing mice treated with Cy7.5-labeled Ag2S-NDs at 72 h post-injection. (F) Long-term distributions of Ag2S-NDs in various major tissues during 30 days post-injection. Dose: 50.0 μmol kg−1 Ag.
Figure 7(A) Schematic illustration for the preparation of charge-convertible CD-based drug nanocarrier. pHe means tumor extracellular pH. (B) Schematic illustration for the drug delivery process: (1) negative charge/PEGylation to prolong circulation time, (2) accumulation at the tumor site through the EPR effect, (3) responsiveness to tumor extracellular pH, (4) effective uptake by cancer cells, (5) facilitated endosome escape by the “proton sponge” effect and controlled cisplatin release, and (6) cisplatin binding with DNA to exhibit cytotoxicity. (C) Relative tumor volume achieved from mice after intravenous treatments with CD-based drug nanocarrier. (D) Photographs of mice and excised tumors from representative euthanized mice. (E) H&E stained tumor slices from different groups after 14-day treatment. ***P < 0.001.