| Literature DB >> 31803592 |
Anuradha V Khadilkar1, Nikhil Lohiya1, Sejal Mistry1, Shashi Chiplonkar1, Vaman Khadilkar1, Neha Kajale1, Veena Ekbote1, Smruti Vispute1, Rubina Mandlik1, Hemchand Prasad2, Narendra Singh3, Sanwar Agarwal4, Sonal Palande1, Dipali Ladkat1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE AND AIMS: Overweight/obese children are at risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Random glucose elevations provide early warning signs of glycemic dysregulation. To assess random blood glucose (RBG) concentrations and risk factors associated with prediabetes in children aged 3-18 years from six Indian regions.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Indian; overweight; prediabetes; random blood glucose
Year: 2019 PMID: 31803592 PMCID: PMC6873251 DOI: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_536_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 2230-9500
Figure 1Consort Diagram of children studied
Percentage contribution of cereals and miscellaneous foods and beverages to calorie consumption: major States, 2011-12
| State | Percentage of calories from cereals | Percentage of calories from miscellaneous foods and beverages | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural | Urban | Rural | Urban | |
| Assam | 67.4 | 59.4 | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Chhattisgarh | 65.7 | 58.3 | 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Gujarat | 48.1 | 41.4 | 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Maharashtra | 49.7 | 42.7 | 10.1 | 12.1 |
| Punjab | 42.5 | 41.8 | 8.6 | 7.6 |
| Tamil Nadu | 53.3 | 46.2 | 12.1 | 15.1 |
Source: National sample survey data of 68th nutrition round (2011-12)[21]
Figure 3Center-wise Comparison of Proportion of subjects in different BMI categories
Anthropometric characteristics and mean random blood glucose concentrations of study population
| Centre | Parameters | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI (kg/ht-m2) | HAZ†* | WAZ† | BMIZ† | RBG (mmol/L)† | ||||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Maharashtra | |||||||||||||||||
| Urban* | 968 | 10.6 | 2.8 | 139.9 | 16.6 | 34.4 | 14.3 | 16.8 | 3.9 | 0.03 | 1.2 | -0.2 | 1.1 | -0.4 | 1.2 | 5.49 | 0.98 |
| Rural | 1569 | 9.3 | 2.4 | 127.5 | 13.6 | 23.5 | 8.2 | 14.1 | 2.2 | -0.8 | 12 | -1.2 | 1.1 | -1.2 | 1.1 | 5.89 | 0.81 |
| Gujarat | |||||||||||||||||
| Urban* | 1045 | 10.2 | 3.1 | 134.4 | 17.8 | 30.8 | 13.6 | 16.3 | 3.7 | -0.4 | 0.9 | -0.5 | 1.1 | -0.4 | 1.1 | 5.93 | 0.72 |
| Rural | 1332 | 13.1 | 2.6 | 146.2 | 13.7 | 35.9 | 11.4 | 16.4 | 3.3 | -0.7 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -0.9 | 1 | 6.04 | 0.69 |
| Tamil Nadu | |||||||||||||||||
| Urban* | 1409 | 13.4 | 2.5 | 152.5 | 14 | 45 | 15.3 | 18.9 | 4.3 | -0.1 | 1 | -0.1 | 1.1 | -0.1 | 1.2 | 6.53 | 1.0 |
| Rural | 1477 | 10.9 | 3.4 | 140.4 | 18.7 | 36.3 | 16.1 | 17.5 | 4.3 | 0.01 | 1 | -0.08 | 1.1 | -0.2 | 1.2 | 6.15 | 0.65 |
| Punjab | |||||||||||||||||
| Urban* | 901 | 13.5 | 3.1 | 150.4 | 16.6 | 41.4 | 14.7 | 17.7 | 3.5 | -0.4 | 1.1 | -0.5 | 1 | -0.4 | 1 | 5.44 | 0.73 |
| Rural | 770 | 13.6 | 3.3 | 148 | 17.7 | 38.4 | 13.7 | 16.9 | 3.3 | -0.6 | 1 | -0.9 | 1 | -0.8 | 0.9 | 5.54 | 0.83 |
| Chhattisgarh | |||||||||||||||||
| Urban* | 1433 | 12 | 2.3 | 147.1 | 13 | 41.2 | 14.2 | 18.6 | 4.4 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.04 | 1.1 | 0.03 | 1.2 | 5.65 | 0.64 |
| Rural | 1220 | 13.8 | 3.2 | 145.6 | 15.3 | 36.7 | 11.2 | 16.9 | 2.9 | -1 | 1 | -1.1 | 0.9 | -0.8 | 0.8 | 5.91 | 0.72 |
| Assam | |||||||||||||||||
| Urban* | 1003 | 10.8 | 3.1 | 138.2 | 16.3 | 33.5 | 12.9 | 16.9 | 3.6 | -0.3 | 0.9 | -0.3 | 1 | -0.3 | 1 | 5.86# | 0.79 |
| Rural | 1212 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 144.5 | 15.4 | 38.1 | 12 | 17.7 | 3.1 | -0.7 | 1 | -0.6 | 0.9 | -0.4 | 0.8 | 5.83 | 0.66 |
| Sub-total | |||||||||||||||||
| Urban* | 6759 | 11.9 | 3.0 | 144.7 | 16.8 | 38.6 | 15.1 | 17.7 | 4.1 | -0.2 | 1 | -0.2 | 1.1 | -0.2 | 1.1 | 5.86 | 0.91 |
| Rural | 7580 | 12 | 3.4 | 141 | 17.3 | 34.1 | 13.4 | 16.4 | 3.5 | -0.6 | 1.1 | -0.8 | 1.1 | -0.7 | 1.1 | 5.92 | 0.74 |
| Total | 14339 | 11.7 | 3.5 | 141.3 | 18.6 | 35.4 | 14.7 | 16.9 | 3.8 | -0.4 | 1.1 | -0.5 | 1.1 | -0.5 | 1.1 | 5.89 | 0.83 |
†HAZ, WAZ, BAZ and RBG were significantly different in all urban and rural centers except in Assam (marked as #), *P<0.01
Figure 2BMI-Z Means vs. RBG Means
Figure 4Comparison of Children and Adolescents from various centers with RBG and BMI within reference range
Generalized linear regression model for factors associated with elevated blood glucosea among Indian children and adolescents
| Parameter | Model I OR (95%CI) | Model II OR (95%CI) | Model III OR (95%CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban residency | 1.34 (1.25, 1.43) | 0.0001 | 1.32 (1.23, 1.42) | 0.0001 | 1.32 (1.23, 1.417) | 0.0001 |
| Boys | 1.21 (1.12, 1.29) | 0.0001 | 1.19 (1.1, 1.27) | 0.0001 | 1.19 (1.11,1.285) | 0.0001 |
| Age >10 yr girls or age >13 y boys | 1.31 (1.13, 1.52) | 0.0001 | 1.296 (1.1, 1.52) | 0.002 | 1.57 (1.34, 1.84) | 0.0001 |
| Overweight | 1.167 (1.0,1.36) | 0.046 | - | - | ||
| Obese | 1.38 (1.15, 1.65) | 0.001 | - | - | ||
| Percent calories from cereals (Reference low- Gujarat and Punjab) | - | |||||
| Maharashtra | 0.856* (0.753, 0.974) | 0.019 | ||||
| Assam | 1.285** (1.13, 1.46) | 0.0001 | ||||
| Tamil Nadu | 5.02** (4.39, 5.74) | 0.0001 | ||||
| Percent calories from Miscellaneous foods and Beverages (Reference low Assam and Punjab) | - | |||||
| Tamil Nadu | 6·23** (5.48, 7.08) | 0.0001 | ||||
| Gujarat | 2.357** (2.08, 2.67) | 0.0001 | ||||
| Chhattisgarh | 1.138* (1.01, 1.278) | 0.029 |
*Significant if P <0.05, **Significant if P <0.001. a: Random blood sugar >7.2 mmol/L. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) obtained from generalized linear model. Model I: Independent variables: Residence, gender, age group, BMI group. Model II: Independent variables: Residence, gender, age group, percent calories from cereal intake. Model III: Independent variables: Residence, gender, age group, percent calories from miscellaneous foods and beverages intake