| Literature DB >> 31803179 |
Joanna Majewska1, Zuzanna Kaźmierczak1, Karolina Lahutta1, Dorota Lecion1, Aleksander Szymczak1, Paulina Miernikiewicz1, Jarosław Drapała2, Marek Harhala1, Karolina Marek-Bukowiec3, Natalia Jędruchniewicz3, Barbara Owczarek1, Andrzej Górski1, Krystyna Dąbrowska1,3.
Abstract
In therapeutic phage applications oral administration is a common and well-accepted delivery route. Phages applied per os may elicit a specific humoral response, which may in turn affect phage activity. We present specific anti-phage antibody induction in mice receiving therapeutic staphylococcal bacteriophage A3R or 676Z in drinking water. The schedule comprised: (1) primary exposure to phages for 100 days, followed by (2) diet without phage for 120 days, and (3) secondary exposure to the same phage for 44 days. Both phages induced specific antibodies in blood (IgM, IgG, IgA), even though poor to ineffective translocation of the phages to blood was observed. IgM reached a maximum on day 22, IgG increased from day 22 until the end of the experiment. Specific IgA in the blood and in the gut were induced simultaneously within about 2 months; the IgA level gradually decreased when phage was removed from the diet. Importantly, phage-specific IgA was the limiting factor for phage activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Multicopy proteins (major capsid protein and tail morphogenetic protein H) contributed significantly to phage immunogenicity (IgG), while the baseplate protein gpORF096 did not induce a significant response. Microbiome composition assessment by next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed that no important changes correlated with phage treatment.Entities:
Keywords: 676Z phage; A3R phage; Staphylococcus phage; antibodies; gastrointestinal tract; immune response; oral administration; translocation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31803179 PMCID: PMC6871536 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Phage transit through the GI tract (A) and changes of specific anti-phage IgA levels in murine fecal samples (B) in mice treated with phages A3R or 676Z. Antibody levels were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Mice (N = 6) were administered purified preparations of phages A3R or 676Z in drinking solution of the final concentration 4 × 109 pfu/ml. Phage-enriched drinking water was administered as the only water source continuously for 100 days. For the following 120 days phage preparations were removed from the diet and then introduced again for the final 44 days of the experiment. The periods of phage treatment are indicated in the figure as a light blue background. Control mice were separated from phage-treated mice and received no phage in the diet. They were examined for presence of phages active against A3R and 676Z bacterial S. aureus host strains and no phage activity was detected during the whole experiment. The experiment was repeated twice with concordant results. One representative experiment is presented in the figure.
Figure 2Kinetics of phage-specific antibody production in blood of mice treated with phages A3R or 676Z. IgM, IgG, and IgA levels were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Mice (N = 6) were administered purified preparations of phages A3R or 676Z in drinking solution of the final concentration 4 × 109 pfu/ml. Phage-enriched drinking water was administered as a sole water source continuously for 100 days. For the following 120 days phage preparations were removed from the diet and then applied again for the final 44 days of the experiment. The periods of phage treatment are indicated in the figure as a light blue background. Control mice were separated from phage-treated mice and received no phage in the diet. They were examined for presence of phages active against A3R and 676Z bacterial S. aureus host strains and no phage activity was detected during the whole experiment. Blood was collected from the tail vein; thus the same mice were sampled for the whole experiment. The experiment was repeated twice with concordant results. One representative experiment is presented in the figure.
Figure 3Individual immunogenicity of three selected structural proteins of phages A3R and 676Z in mice treated with the phage per os assessed by IgG ELISA units. Mice (N = 6) were administered purified preparations of phages A3R or 676Z in drinking water mixed with PBS to a final concentration of 4 × 109 pfu/ml. Phage-enriched drinking water was administered as a sole water source continuously for 100 days. Separated plasma samples from these mice were examined for IgG antibodies specific to selected structural proteins: Mcp, TmpH, and gpORF096. Results were normalized and ELISA units were calculated with regard to a standard curve obtained for OVA-coated wells and OVA-specific murine serum (41, 48, 49). Statistically significant differences between groups are marked with asterisks: *p < 0.008, **p < 0.005 (one-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test).
Figure 4Comparison of A3R and 676Z phage immunogenicity in different administration routes: intraperitoneal (IP) and per os. Intensity of anti-phage IgG induction by A3R and 676Z phages applied per os or intraperitoneally (A), and efficiency of plating of A3R and 676Z phages with plasma samples from mice treated with A3R or 676Z phage per os and intraperitoneally (B). Mice (N = 5, 6, or 7) were administered purified preparations of phages A3R or 676Z in drinking water as a sole water source continuously for 100 days or they were injected with the phages intraperitoneally (IP). For oral treatment a dose of 4 × 109 pfu/ml was used, thus making ~2 × 1010 pfu/mouse daily, 2 × 1012 in total. Intraperitoneal immunization was done with three successive injections of 1 × 1010 pfu/mouse on days 0, 20, and 50. Antibody levels were tested in samples collected on day 100. Results were normalized and ELISA units were calculated with regard to a standard curve obtained for reference phage-specific sera (41, 48, 49). EOP was tested for plasma samples collected on day 100 and diluted 2,000-fold. Exemplary results are presented. Statistically significant differences between groups are marked with asterisks: *p < 0.04, **p < 0.006, ***p ≤ 0.0003, ****p < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA Brown-Forsythe and Welch test; outliers were excluded).