Literature DB >> 31802995

Assessment of Cucumber Genotypes for Salt Tolerance Based on Germination and Physiological Indices.

Asma Marium1, Abida Kausar1, Syed Muhammad Ali Shah2, Muhammad Yasin Ashraf3, Noreen Akhtar1, Muhammad Akram2, Muhammad Riaz4.   

Abstract

Soil salinity is one of the primary problem for agricultural crops which causes a great loss in crop production in Pakistan and worldwide. Various approaches have been implemented to overcome salinity problem. Assembly of crops for the enhancement of salt tolerance is a good strategy to achieve cost-effective yields. Cucumber is considered as one of the leading vegetable crop around the world for the nourishment of human being as source of nutrients, minerals, and vitamins. Screening of 12 cucumber genotypes using some physiological indices, that is, seedling germination stress tolerance index, plant height stress tolerance index, root length stress tolerance index, shoot and root dry weight stress tolerance index, and shoot and root fresh weight stress tolerance index were performed for the identification of salt tolerance. Using the above characteristics genotypes, Valley and HC-999 were categorized as tolerant, Safaa and Debra as medium tolerant, while Thamin-II identified as medium sensitive and NSC-CM1 and Akbar are classified as sensitive genotypes of cucumber. According to the current study findings, the screened cucumber genotypes for salinity tolerance can also be suggested to farmers for the improved production and yield of crop at saline soil.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cucumber; physiological indices; salt tolerance

Year:  2019        PMID: 31802995      PMCID: PMC6876182          DOI: 10.1177/1559325819889809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


Introduction

Saline soil is an important problem of agricultural lands which causes a great loss in crop productivity all over the world.[1] Soluble salts accumulated in soil at harmful levels adversely affects development and productivity of plants in many areas of the world with low rainfall because of improper precipitation for leaching[2] and as a result of severe loss in crop production which leads to low economic returns and soil erosions at large scale. High levels of salts affects approximately 6% (400 million hectares) of world’s land, which cover almost half of the irrigated land and 40% of the cultivated area.[3] Several factors such as deficiency in rainfall, increased rate of surface evaporation, weathering of soil, irrigation with water containing high salt contents, and poor cultural practices are considered the fundamental factors causing 10% annual increase in saline soil.[4] For the retrieval of saline soil, billions are consumed annually.[5] Salinity generally disrupts the photosynthetic mechanism inside the plants in several aspects.[6] The damaging and inhibitory effect of salinity varies from species to species.[7] The salt stress severely caused the reduction in biomass and overall plant productivity due to osmotic stress and ion toxicity. As a consequence, reduction in reproductive development of plants, nutrients uptake, and reactive oxygen species production in plants[8,9] reduced activity of photosynthetic process, antioxidant production, ionic homeostasis,[7] osmotic stress, and nutrient imbalance including the sodium and chloride toxicity,[10] membrane injury,[11] anxious leaf water relations,[12] and disturbance in hormonal balance.[13] Plant species differ in their salt tolerance depending on their genetic makeup ranging from high to low levels of salts in the soil. Increased salinity causes osmotic effect, which slow down the seed germination and emergence of roots leading to improper management of nutritional requirements of plants for their vigorous growth.[14] In conclusion, agronomical and several physiological attributes are highly affected by the salinity, ultimately resulting in reduced plant growth and productivity.[14] It is therefore necessary either to renovate such soils into useable land or either economically use that saline area by growing salt tolerant plants for the better production of crops in salt-hit areas.[15] Vegetables are essential for numerous metabolic processes in the human body due to the presence of phytochemicals and nutrients.[16] High level of salinity threatened the crops productivity, primarily in irrigated crop lands which produce 40% of the world’s food.[17] Cucumber is considered as one of the leading vegetable crop throughout the world for the nourishment of human being and considered as salt-sensitive crop.[18] Salinity level more than 1.3 dS·m−1 significantly influenced the growth of cucumber, and with the increase in each unit of EC decreases the crop productivity by 15.9% (Chartzoulakis, 1992).[19] Cucumber yield is highly affected by salt stress, which is one of the most destructive abiotic stress resulting in the reduction of farmers’ income.[20] There is dire need to identify the salt tolerant genotypes of plants, so that better production can be achieved even under saline irrigated lands. Salinity tolerance can be enhanced by effective screening techniques that might be constructive in evolving the salt-tolerant genotypes with increased productivity. Many experiments have been done to study the physiological responses of cucumber for the production of salt-tolerant cucumber varieties. The physiological indices have been used as screening tools for the identification of salt-tolerant plant species in many crops.[21,22] The main aim of the present study was the assessment of salt-tolerant cucumber genotypes through effective screening tools under salt stress which in future may be helpful for breeding programs and also to calculate the negative impacts of various levels of salinity on cucumber.

Materials and Methods

The screening of 12 genotypes of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L) in Petri plates with varying levels of NaCl like 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mM for salt tolerance was done using physiological indices as screening tool. The seeds were obtained from AARI (Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan). The experiment was conducted at Plant Stress Physiology Lab, GCWUF (Government College Women University Faisalabad). Cucumber seeds were surface sterilized with 10% sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 minutes, then washed with distilled water 3 times. Fifteen seeds per cucumber genotype were allowed to mature in Petri dishes containing filter paper and shifted them to growth chamber (Sanyo-Gallenkamp, Loughborough, United Kingdom) running at 28°C ± 2°C. The experiment was designed in growth chamber sustained at 10-hour photoperiod with 80 µM·s−1·m−2 light strength for 15 days. The germination was noted on a daily basis and their stress tolerance indices were calculated using given formula. After 2 weeks of germination, several morphological attributes like plant shoot and root lengths and plant biomass were examined. For the determination of dry weight, the seedlings were dried at 70 C for 48 hours.

Physiological Indices

Germination stress tolerance index (GSI) is calculated by determining the promptness index by means of following formula[23]: where nd1, nd2, nd3 and nd4 = number of seeds germinated on the first, second, third, and fourth day, respectively. GSI, physiological index of plant height (PHSI), root length stress tolerance index (RLSI), shoot fresh weight stress tolerance index (SFSI), RFSI, shoot dry weight stress tolerance index (SDSI), root dry weight stress tolerance index (RDSI) were found using following formula:

Statistical Analysis

Averages and standard deviation (SD) values of obtained data have been computed on Microsoft Excel 2007 for Microsoft Windows 2007. The obtained data have been subjected to statistical analysis by applying analysis of variance test followed by multiple comparison tests to evaluate the significance of the data using statistical software Minitab version 19.0. The P values less than .05 (P < .05) are considered statistically significant.

Results

Increased salt concentration in soil showed the negative effects on germination rate of cucumber and its GSI was highly deteriorated under the influence of salt stress. All the salinity treatments differ significantly, Valley, HC-999, Safaa, and Debra showed maximum values of GSI at 50 mM NaCl, whereas minimum GSI was noted in NSC-CM1 (Table 1). At 100 mM NaCl level, the highest germination (GSI) was noted in Valley followed by HC-999 and the lower most was observed in Akbar. The genotypes valley and HC-999 were again maintained the highest GSI at 150 mM NaCl level, with the least performance shown by Akbar. At 200 mM NaCl level, few genotypes showed good performance in which Valley and HC-999 were at the highest number and Akbar remained at the lowest position in the list. Cluster analysis for salt tolerance in different cucumber genotypes based on physiological indices is shown as dandrogram in Figure 1.
Table.1.

Germination Stress Tolerance Index (GSI) of 12 Genotypes of Cucumber.

No.Cucumber VarietiesNaCl Levels (mmol)MeansRanking
50100150200
1Valley100a 92.7a 85.6a 82.1a 90.1a 1
2Safaa98.2ab 84.2c 73.2c 57c 78.1d 4
3Debra100a 87b 78.4b 65.3b 82.6c 3
4HC-999100a 88.2b 83a 76.4a 86.9b 2
5Alfa prime87c 76.7e 63.2e 056.7h 8
6NSC-CM170f 62h 49.6h 045.4l12
7Thamin-II 83.2d 73.1f 60f 054i 9
8Akad95.2b 78.4d 69.3d 55c 74.4e 5
9HCU-171C76.6e 70f 57f 50d 63.4f 6
10Cucumber Kalam90b 80d 65e 058.7g 7
11Early king80e 75e 55.2g 052.5j 10
12Akbar72f 67.4g  51047.6k 11
Mean87.6A 77.8B 65.8C 32.15D

Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05.

Figure 1.

Dandrogram from cluster analysis for salt tolerance in different cucumber genotypes based on physiological indices: a screening tool. Clusters detail; Cluster: 1, 1-Valley, 4-HC-999, 2-Safaa, 8-Akad, 3-Debra; Cluster 2: 5-Alfa prime, 7-Thamin-II, 9-HCU-171C, 11-Early king, 10-Cucumber Kalam, 6-NSC-CM1, 12-Akbar.

Germination Stress Tolerance Index (GSI) of 12 Genotypes of Cucumber. Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05. Dandrogram from cluster analysis for salt tolerance in different cucumber genotypes based on physiological indices: a screening tool. Clusters detail; Cluster: 1, 1-Valley, 4-HC-999, 2-Safaa, 8-Akad, 3-Debra; Cluster 2: 5-Alfa prime, 7-Thamin-II, 9-HCU-171C, 11-Early king, 10-Cucumber Kalam, 6-NSC-CM1, 12-Akbar. For plant height stress tolerance index, Valley and HC-999 gave maximum values at 50 mM salinity level followed by Debra and Safaa, while Akbar and NSC-CM1 showed minimum values (Table 2). Under increased level of salinity, as 100 mM NaCl, the genotypes Valley and HC-999 showed higher values, whereas Akbar and NSC-CM1 showed minimum values. Similarly, at salt stress levels 150 and 200 mM, only Valley and HC-999 achieved the maximum plant height and Akbar and NSC-CM1 has the minimum height.
Table 2.

Plant Height Stress Tolerance Index (PHSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber.

NoCucumber VarietiesNaCl Levels (mmol)MeansRanking
50100150200
1Valley93a 86a 81.1a 67.1a 81.8a 1
2Safaa87.6c 75.2c 61c 42.4c 66.3c 4
3Debra88b 78.5c 66.6c 47.6c 70.1c 3
4HC-99989.7b 81.6b 71.4b 59.1b 75.4b 2
5Alfa prime82.1d 63.1e 53.6d 049.7e 7
6NSC-CM172.8g 47.1h 27.1036.7f 12
7Thamin-II81.4e 69.4d 44.3e 048.6e 8
8Akad81.5e 66.9d 55.3d 34.9d 59.6d 5
9HCU-171C76.6f 51.1g 35.5f 15.5e 44.610
10Cucumber Kalam84.5c 76.1c 46.4e 051.7e 6
11Early king83.6d 59.1f 42.8e 046.3e 9
12Akbar77.1f 52.8g 22.8g 038.1f 11
Mean83.1 A 67.1B 50.5 C 22.2 D

Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05.

Plant Height Stress Tolerance Index (PHSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber. Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05. For root length index, all the abovementioned concentrations of NaCl significantly affected all the cucumber genotypes. Root length index was reduced with the increased level of salt stress, the genotype Valley and then HC-999 achieved good length of plant root as compared to rest of all (Table 3). However, at 50 and 100 mM salinity levels, minimum values were observed in NSC-CM1 and Akbar, while at 200 mM NaCl, only few genotypes, that is, Valley, HC-999, Safaa, showed maximum results.
Table 3.

Roots Lengths Stress Tolerance Index (RLSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber.

No.Cucumber VarietiesNaCl Levels (mmol)MeansRanking
50100150200
1Valley94.3a 87a 77.7a 66.8a 81.41
2Safaa89.7c 82.3c 75.5b 65.3b 78.23
3Debra89.6c 81c 70.6c 58.6d 74.94
4HC-99991.3b 84.7b 76.6a 61.9c 78.62
5Alfa prime78.1e 56.334.4i 042.29
6NSC-CM175f 53.5h 33.3h 040.411
7Thamin-II79.855.8g 35.6h 042.88
8Akad85.1d 76.5d 63.8d 51e 69.15
9HCU-171C75.7f 56g 42f 14f 46.97
10Cucumber Kalam75.4f 58.4f 37.7g 04110
11Early king85.4d 69.4e 54.9e 052.46
12Akbar72g 57.3f 29.3j 039.612
Mean82.6 A 68.1 B 52.6 C 26.4 D

Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05.

Roots Lengths Stress Tolerance Index (RLSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber. Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05. Shoot fresh weight of all cucumber genotypes was highly affected by the high level 150 and 200 mM of salinity. With the increased level of salinity, SFSI of all genotypes was reduced significantly. The maximum reduction was noted in Akbar and then in Thamin -II at 50 mM NaCl, while Valley followed by HC-999 showed maximum results. Under 100 mM NaCl, maximum shoot fresh weight stress index was observed again in Valley and HC-999 and maximum reduction was noted in Akbar followed by NSC-CM1 (Table 4). Under the observation of SFSI results, Valley and HC-999 genotypes behaved well in all the salinity levels as compared to others, whereas Akbar and NSC-CM1 presented the least values under salt stress.
Table 4.

Shoot Fresh Weight Stress Tolerance Index (SFSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber.

No.Cucumber VarietiesNaCl Levels (mmol)MeansRanking
50100150200
1Valley87.7a 74.8a 57.8a 46.5a 66.71
2Safaa78.5d 65.7d 50c 26.4e 55.14
3Debra81.1c 62.4e 46.4d 32.9c 55.73
4HC-99986.2a 72.4b 52.1b 42.8b 63.32
5Alfa prime74.4f 49.7g 34.5g 039.610
6NSC-CM177.7e 42.8h 26.5h 036.711
7Thamin-II68.1g 57.2f 49.6c 043.79
8Akad77e 62.5e 47.2d 29.7d 545
9HCU-171C71.946.7g 41.9f 15.4f 43.98
10Cucumber Kalam85.7b 67.4c 42.3e 048.86
11Early king79.4d 63.6e 43.6e 046.67
12Akbar67.9g 42.5h 22.9i 033.312
Mean77.9 A 58.9 B 42.9 C 16.1 D

Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows in superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05.

Shoot Fresh Weight Stress Tolerance Index (SFSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber. Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows in superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05. Same trend was observed in SDSI, which was gradually decreased with the increased level of NaCl (Table 5). Maximum value of shoot dry weight stress tolerance index at 50 mM salt stress was presented by HC-999, Valley, and Akad, whereas the minimum was in Thamin-II, NSC-CM1, and Akbar. Under 100 mM NaCl level, genotype Akbar followed by NSC-CM1 exhibited poor values and increased shoot dry weight was recorded in Valley, HC-999, Debra, and Akad. With the increasing level of salinity at 150 and 200 mM NaCl, HCU-171C, Akbar, and NSC-CM1 exhibited low values and HC-999, Valley, Debra, and early king showed maximum, and at 200 mM NaCl level, few genotypes presented good values including Valley, HC-999, Debra, and Safaa.
Table 5.

Root Fresh Weight Stress Tolerance Index (RFSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber.

NoCucumber Varieties MeansRanking
50100150200
1Valley95.8a 87.5a 65.2b 79a 81.81
2Safaa85.2c 74.9d 46.3e 67.1c 68.34
3Debra87.2c 77.1c 69.6a 51d 71.23
4HC-99991.4b 85.5b 62.4b 74.5b 78.52
5Alfa prime69.6g 52.5g 35.6f 039.310
6NSC-CM172f 46.1h 26.2g 03611
7Thamin-II77.7e 60.4f 40.8f 044.79
8Akad82d 69e 60c 43.8e 63.65
9HCU-171C74.5f 51.4g 36.4f 18.7f 45.28
10Cucumber Kalam78.6e 68.1e 50.6d 049.16
11Early king76.8e 66e 46.2e 47.27
12Akbar68g 47.6h 23.6h 034.812
Mean79.8 A 65.5 B 50.7 C 23.9 D

Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05.

Root Fresh Weight Stress Tolerance Index (RFSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber. Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05. The influence of salinity on the index value of plant root fresh weights represented the same trend as in SFSI, and maximum results were recorded on the genotypes Valley and HC-999, while Alfa-Prime and Akbar listed in the last at salt stress level of 50 mM. Same results were observed at 100 mM, 150 mM, 200 mM NaCl, according to which Valley and HC-999 followed by Debra and Safaa achieved maximum weights while HCU-171C, Akbar, and NSC-CM1 showed minimum values (Table 6). Plant root dry weight value considerably decreased with the increased concentration of salinity.
Table 6.

Shoot Dry Weight Stress Tolerance Index (SDSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber.

No.Cucumber VarietiesNaCl Levels (mmol)MeansRanking
50100150200
1Valley84.3b 71.8b 55.1b 39.6a 62.72
2Safaa77.7d 58.4e 43.1e 33.7c 53.35
3Debra83.4b 70.4b 52c 37.3b 60.73
4HC-99987.6a 73.2a 57a 37.3b 63.71
5Alfa prime78.7d 62.5d 41.5e 045.67
6NSC-CM176.4e 51.6g 31.5g 039.810
7Thamin-II76.4e 57.9e 35.5f 042.59
8Akad83.6b 68.8c 41.5e 25.7d 54.84
9HCU-171C79.6c 56.6f 34.614.1e 46.26
10Cucumber Kalam80.5c 58.5e 37.5f 044.18
11Early king80.6c 63.9d 49.5d 048.45
12Akbar74.3f 47.1h 31.6g 038.211
Mean79.8 A 61.1 B 42.5 C 15.6 D

Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05.

Shoot Dry Weight Stress Tolerance Index (SDSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber. Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05. Plant root dry weight was increased by decreasing the salinity level. Maximum values of RDSI were attained at 50 mM in genotypes Valley, HC-999 followed by Debra, Akad, and cucumber Kalam, while minimum values were observed in Akbar and Thamin-II (Table 7). Whereas at increased salt level 100 mM, the Valley, HC-999, Debra, and Akad exhibited good values, while NSC-CM1 and Akbar showed poor results. The genotypes Valley, HC-999, and Safaa accomplished maximum values of RDSI at 150 mM and 200 mM of NaCl, followed by Akbar and NSC-CM1which were remained at the lowest rank. Mean square values of data for plant Germination, Shoot length, Root length, Shoot fresh weight, Root fresh weight, Shoot dry weight, Root dry weight stress tolerance indices are given in Table 8.
Table 7.

Root Dry Weight Stress Tolerance Index (RDSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber.

NoCucumber VarietiesNaCl Levels (mmol)MeansRanking
50100150200
1Valley90.3a 78.9a 71.7a 58.5a 74.81
2Safaa84.6c 71.2c 62.4b 44.3d 65.64
3Debra88.6b 74.2b 64.3b 49.2c 693
4HC-99989.4b 76.4a 71a 52.3b 72.32
5Alfa prime76.1e 56.9f 39.1d 0438
6NSC-CM171.8f 38.2h 20.6g 032.611
7Thamin-II70.7f 51.9g 33.2e 038.910
8Akad87.5c 72c 60.8c 40.2e 65.15
9HCU-171C80.3d 59.2e 38.7d 8.3f 46.67
10Cucumber Kalam84.8c 68.4d 58.4c 052.96
11Early king73.6e 60.6e 36.7e 042.89
12Akbar65.6f 35.1i 21.7f 030.612
Mean80.2 A 61.9 B 48.2 C 21 D

Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05.

Table 8.

Mean Square Values of Data for Plant Germination, Shoot Length, Root Length, Shoot Fresh Weight, Root Fresh Weight, Shoot dry Weight, Root Dry Weight Stress Tolerance Indices.

TechniquesDFGSISLSIRLSISFWSIRFWSISDWSIRDWSI
V11869.51a 1199.90a 370.00a 1124.60a 316.56a 1008.28a
T38136.59a 6933.29a 7962.69a 6852.50a 9164.12a 7466.73a
Error33110.27115.4082.0488.5352.5981.51
Total47

Abbreviations: GSI, Germination stress tolerance index; RDWSI = Root dry weight stress tolerance indices; RLSI, Root length stress tolerance index; RFWSI =Root fresh weight stress tolerance index; SLSI, Shoot length stress tolerance index; SFWSI = Shoot fresh weight stress tolerance index; SDWSI = Shoot dry weight stress tolerance index.

a Significant (P < .01).

Root Dry Weight Stress Tolerance Index (RDSI) in 12 Genotypes of Cucumber. Note: The values bearing the same small letters in columns and same capital letters in rows as superscript differ nonsignificantly at P > .05. Mean Square Values of Data for Plant Germination, Shoot Length, Root Length, Shoot Fresh Weight, Root Fresh Weight, Shoot dry Weight, Root Dry Weight Stress Tolerance Indices. Abbreviations: GSI, Germination stress tolerance index; RDWSI = Root dry weight stress tolerance indices; RLSI, Root length stress tolerance index; RFWSI =Root fresh weight stress tolerance index; SLSI, Shoot length stress tolerance index; SFWSI = Shoot fresh weight stress tolerance index; SDWSI = Shoot dry weight stress tolerance index. a Significant (P < .01).

Discussion

The main purpose of the study was to identify salt-tolerant genotypes in cucumber germplasm in relation to biomass production at early vegetative growth stages under different levels of salinity. Results showed that germination percentages were reduced in all genotypes of cucumber at all salt levels. However, saline solution with the range of 50 to 100 mM NaCl level, the genotypes valley, HC-999, Debra, Akad, and cucumber Kalam showed better results as compared to other genotypes (Table 1). Likewise, at 150 to 200 mM NaCl, Valley, HC-999, Debra, and Safaa exhibited better performance as compared to other cucumber genotypes. It is well-documented that under the influence of salt stress, genotypes with greater germination produced significant morphological traits with high yield,[7,24] whereas through GSI, salt-tolerant cultivars can be recognized and salinity affects the seed potency and seed storage conditions during germination. In this experiment, strong and vigorous seeds with good capability were sown. So, plant germination rate may have been reduced because of the negative effect of increased levels of salt stress. The present findings are in agreement with the studies of Hamid et al.[14] Increased salt stress can reduce seed germination as well as root emergence because of the osmotic effect which inhibits the plants for retaining their appropriate nutritional requirements essential for better plant growth.[24] However, in the present experiment, healthy seeds with similar size and good capability were used. So, in this case, the reduction in GSI might be due to the effect of salinity. Results of Hamid et al[14] also confirmed the present findings in which germination of cucumber genotypes may have been reduced under the influence of salt stress. Physiological index of plant height data demonstrated that genotypes Valley and HC-999 are considered as salt tolerant, whereas Nsc_m1 and Akbar as salt sensitive. The differences between genotypes might be due to the genetic variations.[24] The overall trend of the experiment was that with the increasing level of salinity, plant height stress tolerance index was decreased. Among various crops, salt stress plays negative effects resulting in the reduction of plant growth.[25,26] Present study elaborated the results of root length index, which revealed that Valley and HC-999 could be grown up to 200 mM NaCl of salt stress as they showed higher values up to this salt level (Table 3) because maximum value of biomass has been recorded and several studies demonstrated that tolerant varieties enhance the yield and biomass under salinity as compared to the sensitive lines.[23] Root growth was highly decreased in cucumber from Kalam, NSC-CM1, and Akbar at decreased levels of NaCl as 50 mM and 100 mM (Table 3). Plants vary in their tolerance to salinity that depends on their efficiency of root system with regard to nutrient absorption and K, Na uptake discrimination.[27] At lower levels of salinity (50 mM, 100 mM NaCl) according to the results of SFSI, the genotypes Valley, HC-999, Debra, and cucumber Kalam exhibited good results than that of the others, whereas Thamin-II followed by Akbar showed minimum values (Table 4). However, salinity levels 150 mM and 200 mM, Valley, HC-999, Safaa, and Debra showed highest values and categorized as the most salt-tolerant genotypes and Akbar, NSC-CM1, HCU-171C, and Akad as sensitive ones. These findings are in accordance with the results of previous studies.[21,23] Saline soil with the salt level from 100 mM to 200 mM, Valley, and HC-999 can be recommended to farmers for better results. The results of root fresh weight stress tolerance index clearly revealed that genotypes Valley and HC-999 achieved highest biomass at all applied NaCl levels followed by Debra, Safaa, and Akhad, whereas NSC-CM1 and Akbar showed lowest values and can be categorized as the salt-sensitive genotypes (Table 5). These results are consistent with the studies of Hasegawa et al.[26] Similarly Akram et al[28] and Hamid et al,[14] revealed that root fresh and dry weights and shoot length decrease with increasing levels of salinity in several crops like all hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.), sugarcane, and wheat, respectively. Genotypes HC-999, Valley, Debra, and Akad at all salinity levels behave positively and showed maximum biomass production for shoot dry weight tolerance index and can be considered as salt tolerant for cultivation, and cucumber Kalam, Thamin-II, NSC-CM1, and Akbar produced minimum biomass and behave as sensitive genotypes (Table 6). These results showed reduced biomass by shoot under the saline stress. It is documented that increased salinity enhances the stunted plant growth.[29] In cucumber, enhanced concentration of sodium ions are accumulated in the leaves resulting in the reduction in dry mass of both roots and shoots.[27] However, the finding of Ashraf et al[23] described that Na+ uptake is less in salt-tolerant varieties.[23] Roots are the primary organ which showed sensitivity under all levels of salinity.[28] Under saline condition, oxygen deficiency removes the plants from energy sources, resulting in the accretion of high concentration of ethylene which constrains the growth of plant root.[28] Salinity affects the root dry weights stress tolerance index (Table 7); it was clear from the results of RDSI that growth of roots was decreased under all recommended salinity. Maximum root biomass was attained in Valley followed by HC-999 and Debra; however, NSC-CM1 and Akbar continued with the lowest position and behave as salt-sensitive genotypes. These results are confirmed by the finding of a previous study.[23] According to the mentioned results, it is concluded that all levels of salinity pay negative impacts on all agronomical traits. Salinity causes nutrient imbalance like lower transport of essential ions as NO3, which causes reduction in nitrogen compounds, which may be the basic reason of reduction in plants growth.[14,30] Biomass production was deteriorating at 50 and 100 mM salt stress by 48% and 59% in beans and by 14% in cotton.[31] The relative shoot length of seedlings in salt tolerance enhances the biomass production and plant and also increase the absorption of K+ ions while lower the shoot Na+ ions resulting in an increase of K+ and Ca2+ ions in plants,[24] whereas by increasing salinity levels, biomass production was decreased. The results of present experiment as regard to the biomass decreased due to the effect of NaCl stress as justified by the previous findings.[24,32,33] Various studies demonstrated the negative effects of salinity on several plant morphological traits, hence reducing the leaf surface expansion and biomass of plant by increased level of salinity[19,25,34]; however, other researchers described the same results under salt stress.[24,29,35] Plants are specific in their behavior toward the stress and can be improved through genetic variability.[36] Crops with good genetic variability can tolerate to salt stress, that is, sorghum has great potential of variability.[33] These genetic modifications among cucumber genotypes provide good information through which these genotypes could be grown in saline areas to enhance the productivity of crop, and also with the help of these information, salt-tolerant species can be identified for further utilization in breeding program. Cluster analysis is used to group different cucumber genotypes based on various characteristics, and the genotypes which are related to one another are placed in one cluster. The cluster 1 comprised of 5 genotypes and these have similarities with each other and consider as salt-tolerant one, whereas cluster 2 consisted of 5 genotypes and showed less similarities with the genotypes present in cluster 1 and considered as medium salt-tolerant genotypes, and in cluster 3, 2 genotypes are present and they also show less similarities with other genotypes for the characters under study and not performed well so they are categorized as sensitive one. Literature emphasizes on the use of cluster analysis to screen the crop germplasm for stress tolerance.[37-39] Selected genotypes could be used in further breeding programs for salt tolerance.

Conclusion

The outcomes of this experiment showed that physiological indices can be used for the screening of cucumber genotypes for salinity stress, and the genotypes Valley and HC-999 are tolerant and can be further utilized in saline areas to increase the development and yield of cucumber genotypes in salt hit areas of the world.
  7 in total

1.  Effects of NaCl on Flows of N and Mineral Ions and on NO3- Reduction Rate within Whole Plants of Salt-Sensitive Bean and Salt-Tolerant Cotton.

Authors:  H. Gouia; M. H. Ghorbal; B. Touraine
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  PLANT CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR RESPONSES TO HIGH SALINITY.

Authors:  Paul M. Hasegawa; Ray A. Bressan; Jian-Kang Zhu; Hans J. Bohnert
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06

3.  Oxidative stress protection and stomatal patterning as components of salinity tolerance mechanism in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa).

Authors:  Lana Shabala; Alex Mackay; Yu Tian; Sven-Erik Jacobsen; Daowei Zhou; Sergey Shabala
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.500

4.  Arabidopsis DREB1A/CBF3 bestowed transgenic tall fescue increased tolerance to drought stress.

Authors:  Junsheng Zhao; Wei Ren; Daying Zhi; Lin Wang; Guangmin Xia
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Effect of Cl-, SO4(2-), and fulvate anions on Cd2+ free ion concentrations in simulated rhizosphere soil solutions.

Authors:  Shui-Wen Chang Chien; Jui-Hung Liao; Min-Chao Wang; Madhava Rao Mannepalli
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Assessment of variation in antioxidative defense system in salt-treated pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars and its putative use as salinity tolerance markers.

Authors:  Zahra Noreen; Muhammad Ashraf
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.549

Review 7.  Salt tolerance mechanisms in Salt Tolerant Grasses (STGs) and their prospects in cereal crop improvement.

Authors:  Swarnendu Roy; Usha Chakraborty
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.787

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.