| Literature DB >> 31802949 |
Sierra Cheng1, Vanessa Arciero1, Hanan Goldberg2, Camilla Tajzler3, Aileen Manganaro4, Natascha Kozlowski4, Leigha Rowbottom1, Rachel McDonald1, Ronald Chow1, Gaurav Vasisht3, Sharon Shaji3, Emily Chu Lee Wong3, Michele Petrovic2, Liying Zhang1, Cameron Phillips1, Pawel Zalewski4, Anil Kapoor3, Neil E Fleshner2, Edward Chow1, Urban Emmenegger1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Radium-223 (Ra223) prolongs the survival and improves the quality of life of men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to bones. However, compared to other mCRPC therapies, using Ra223 comes with its unique challenges. Hence, we aimed to identify Ra223 utilization patterns under real-world conditions, as well as factors predicting treatment completion and outcome.Entities:
Keywords: metastatic prostate cancer; predictive markers of outcome; radium 223; real-world
Year: 2019 PMID: 31802949 PMCID: PMC6827438 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S213051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Figure 1Consort diagram and listing of reasons for early Ra223 discontinuation. One hundred and six of 198 patients (53.5%) did not receive 6 cycles of Ra223, and disease progression was the most common reason for early treatment discontinuation in those patients.
Figure 2Distribution of the number of Ra223 cycles administered overall, and when comparing the number of Ra223 cycles given in patients supervised by medical versus radiation oncologists. There was no significant difference in the distribution of Ra223 cycles administered under the supervision of medical oncologists (Med Onc) versus radiation oncologists (Rad Onc). *“All patients” includes patients administered Ra223 by medical oncologists (n=100), radiation oncologists (n=94), and uro-oncologists (n=4).
Patient Characteristics
| TotalN = 198 | Received 1-5 Cycles n=106 | Received 6 Cycles n=92 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.0574 | |||
| N | 198 | 106 | 92 | |
| Mean ± SD | 74.1 ± 9.5 | 73.0 ± 10.0 | 75.4 ± 8.8 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 75.0 (68.0, 81.0) | 72.0 (66.0, 80.0) | 77.0 (69.5, 81.5) | |
| Range | 52, 93 | 52, 93 | 55, 92 | |
| Treatment centre | 0.0996 | |||
| Sunnybrook | 33 (16.67%) | 16 (15.09%) | 17 (18.48%) | |
| Princess Margaret | 77 (38.89%) | 42 (39.62%) | 35 (38.04%) | |
| Lakeridge | 28 (14.14%) | 10 (9.43%) | 18 (19.57%) | |
| Hamilton | 60 (30.30%) | 38 (35.85%) | 22 (23.91%) | |
| Specialty of treating physician | 0.3040 | |||
| Medical Oncologist | 100 (50.51%) | 58 (54.72%) | 42 (45.65%) | |
| Radiation Oncologist | 94 (47.47%) | 47 (44.34%) | 47 (51.09%) | |
| Urological Oncologist | 4 (2.02%) | 1 (0.94%) | 3 (3.26%) | |
| Local versus referred patients | 0.2648 | |||
| Local | 110 (55.56%) | 55 (51.89%) | 55 (59.78%) | |
| Referred | 88 (44.44%) | 51 (48.11%) | 37 (40.22%) | |
| Initial stage | 0.8334 | |||
| Localized | 116 (58.59%) | 64 (60.38%) | 52 (56.52%) | |
| Metastatic | 36 (18.18%) | 19 (17.92%) | 17 (18.48%) | |
| Unknown | 46 (23.23%) | 23 (21.70%) | 23 (25.00%) | |
| Local therapy | 0.0869 | |||
| Prostatectomy | 67 (33.84%) | 30 (28.30%) | 37 (40.22%) | |
| Radiation | 61 (30.81%) | 40 (37.74%) | 21 (22.83%) | |
| Prostatectomy/Radiation | 20 (10.10%) | 12 (11.32%) | 8 (8.70%) | |
| No local therapy | 50 (25.25%) | 24 (22.64%) | 26 (22.26%) | |
| Adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy | 0.3608 | |||
| No | 140 (70.71%) | 77 (72.64%) | 63 (68.48%) | |
| Yes | 56 (28.28%) | 29 (27.36%) | 27 (29.35%) | |
| Unknown | 2 (1.01%) | 0 (0.00%) | 2 (2.17%) | |
| Gleason score categories | 0.5814 | |||
| 6 | 5 (2.53%) | 2 (1.89%) | 3 (3.26%) | |
| 7 | 57 (28.79%) | 32 (30.19%) | 25 (27.17%) | |
| 8-10 | 94 (47.47%) | 53 (50.00%) | 41 (44.57%) | |
| Unknown | 42 (21.21%) | 19 (17.92%) | 23 (25.00%) | |
| Time from start of androgen deprivation therapy to castration resistance (months) | 0.3861 | |||
| N | 119 | 61 | 58 | |
| Mean ± SD | 34.67 ± 37.52 | 28.83 ± 25.04 | 40.82 ± 46.68 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 18.0 (11.0, 49.0) | 19.0 (10.0, 44.4) | 18.0 (12.0, 49.0) | |
| Range | 1.0, 224.4 | 1.0, 100.0 | 1.0, 224.4 | |
| Number of lines of prior therapies | 0.0977 | |||
| N | 198 | 106 | 92 | |
| Mean ± SD | 2.0 ± 1.1 | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 1.9 ± 1.0 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) | |
| Range | 0, 5 | 0, 5 | 0, 5 | |
| Distribution of number of lines of prior therapies | 0.6994 | |||
| 0 | 7 (3.54%) | 3 (2.83%) | 4 (4.35%) | |
| 1 | 64 (32.32%) | 30 (28.30%) | 34 (36.96%) | |
| 2 | 62 (31.31%) | 34 (32.08%) | 28 (30.43%) | |
| 3 | 50 (25.25%) | 29 (27.36%) | 21 (22.83%) | |
| 4 | 10 (5.05%) | 7 (6.60%) | 3 (3.26%) | |
| 5 | 5 (2.53%) | 3 (2.83%) | 2 (2.17%) | |
| Prior Abiraterone and/or Enzalutamide | 0.2743 | |||
| No | 15 (7.58%) | 6 (5.66%) | 9 (9.78%) | |
| Yes | 183 (92.42%) | 100 (94.34%) | 83 (90.22%) | |
| Prior Docetaxel | 0.0596 | |||
| No | 102 (51.52%) | 48 (45.28%) | 54 (58.70%) | |
| Yes | 96 (48.48%) | 58 (54.72%) | 38 (41.30%) | |
| Prior Denosumab and/or Zoledronic Acid | 0.1143 | |||
| No | 25 (12.63%) | 10 (9.43%) | 15 (16.30%) | |
| Yes | 36 (18.18%) | 16 (15.09%) | 20 (21.74%) | |
| Unknown | 137 (69.19%) | 80 (75.47%) | 57 (61.96%) | |
| Prior skeletal related events | 0.1735 | |||
| No | 166 (83.84%) | 86 (81.13%) | 80 (86.96%) | |
| Yes | 31 (15.66%) | 20 (18.87%) | 11 (11.96%) | |
| Unknown | 1 (0.51%) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (1.09%) | |
| Alive | 128 (64.65%) | 59 (55.66%) | 69 (75.00%) | |
| Dead | 70 (35.35%) | 47 (44.34%) | 23 (25.00%) | |
| N | 198 | 106 | 92 | |
| Mean ± SD | 8.31 ± 5.16 | 5.60 ± 3.87 | 11.43 ± 4.70 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 7.5 (4.1, 12.0) | 4.4 (3.1, 7.8) | 11.0 (8.0, 15.1) | |
| Range | 0.0, 22.3 | 0.0, 18.4 | 1.3, 22.3 |
Notes: Patient characteristics significantly different in patients receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223 are highlighted (bold).
Baseline Laboratory And Radiological Findings, And ESAS Scores
| TotalN = 198 | Received 1-5 Cycles n=106 | Received 6 Cycles n=92 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 164 | 89 | 75 | |
| Mean ± SD | 271.50 ± 692.83 | 354.70 ± 776.24 | 172.76 ± 567.95 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 78.0 (28.3, 193.0) | 112.0 (48.9, 376.0) | 43.1 (12.8, 101.9) | |
| Range | 0.8, 6500.7 | 9.2, 6500.7 | 0.8, 4081.5 | |
| N | 151 | 79 | 72 | |
| Mean ± SD | 191.3 ± 254.0 | 230.2 ± 320.5 | 148.6 ± 141.1 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 111.0 (72.0, 206.0) | 148.0 (76.0, 234.0) | 94.5 (71.0, 167.5) | |
| Range | 12, 2152 | 12, 2152 | 38, 739 | |
| <115 | 76 (38.38%) | 30 (28.30%) | 46 (50.00%) | |
| ≥115 | 75 (37.88%) | 49 (46.23%) | 26 (28.26%) | |
| Unknown | 47 (23.74%) | 27 (25.47%) | 20 (21.74%) | |
| N | 178 | 97 | 81 | |
| Mean ± SD | 119.3 ± 17.1 | 114.4 ± 16.8 | 125.1 ± 15.6 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 120.0 (109.0, 132.0) | 115.0 (104.0, 126.0) | 125.0 (116.0, 134.0) | |
| Range | 75, 161 | 75, 160 | 85, 161 | |
| >100 | 154 (77.78%) | 78 (73.58%) | 76 (82.61%) | |
| ≤100 | 24 (12.12%) | 19 (17.92%) | 5 (5.43%) | |
| Unknown | 20 (10.10%) | 9 (8.49%) | 11 (11.96%) | |
| Neutrophils (×109/L) | 0.1005 | |||
| Mean ± SD | 4.83 ± 2.28 | 4.96 ± 1.99 | 4.65 ± 2.63 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 4.5 (3.3, 5.7) | 4.9 (3.3, 6.1) | 4.1 (3.2, 5.4) | |
| Range | 0.8, 20.4 | 0.8, 10.9 | 1.2, 20.4 | |
| Neutrophils >3×109/L | 0.0815 | |||
| ≤3 | 27 (13.64%) | 15 (14.15%) | 12 (13.04%) | |
| >3 | 121 (61.11%) | 71 (66.98%) | 50 (54.35%) | |
| Unknown | 50 (25.25%) | 20 (18.87%) | 30 (32.61%) | |
| Bone metastases | 0.1388 | |||
| No | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Yes | 172 (86.87%) | 96 (90.57%) | 76 (82.61%) | |
| Unknown | 26 (13.13%) | 10 (9.43%) | 16 (17.39%) | |
| No | 138 (69.70%) | 70 (66.04%) | 68 (73.91%) | |
| Yes | 34 (17.17%) | 26 (24.53%) | 8 (8.70%) | |
| Unknown | 26 (13.13%) | 10 (9.43%) | 16 (17.39%) | |
| Visceral metastases | 0.2548 | |||
| No | 154 (77.78%) | 86 (81.13%) | 68 (73.91%) | |
| Yes | 18 (9.09%) | 10 (9.43%) | 8 (8.70%) | |
| Unknown | 26 (13.13%) | 10 (9.43%) | 16 (17.39%) | |
| ESAS Pain Score | 0.0516 | |||
| N | 116 | 55 | 61 | |
| Mean ± SD | 2.7 ± 2.7 | 3.1 ± 2.7 | 2.3 ± 2.8 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 2.0 (0.0, 4.0) | 3.0 (1.0, 5.0) | 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) | |
| N | 117 | 55 | 62 | |
| Mean ± SD | 6.4 ± 3.4 | 7.1 ± 3.5 | 5.8 ± 3.3 | |
| Median (interquartiles) | 6.0 (4.0, 9.0) | 7.0 (4.0, 10.0) | 5.0 (4.0, 7.0) |
Notes: Patient findings significantly different in patients receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223 are highlighted (bold).
Biochemical Response Rates
| Ontario Cohort | ALSYMPCA | International | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | Evaluable Patients | |||
| PSA 30% response | 21 (16) | 134 | 98 (16) | 97 (14) |
| PSA 50% response | 10 (8) | 134 | N/A | 57 (8) |
| ALP 30% response | 54 (44) | 123 | 233 (47) | 327 (47) |
| ALP normalization | 18 (35) | 51 | 109 (34) | N/A |
Abbreviations: EAP, early access program; N/A, not available.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier overall survival analysis from the first dose of Ra223. In the entire cohort of patients, the actuarial median overall survival from the first dose of Ra223 was 13.3 months. Seventy patients had died, 128 patients were censored. Dashed lines: 95% CI.
Figure 4Comparison of the overall survival of patients completing Ra223 therapy (6 cycles) versus patients with early treatment discontinuation (1–5 cycles). Log-rank testing revealed a significant (p<0.0001) overall survival benefit of patients completing Ra223 therapy compared to men receiving 1–5 treatments only, with an actuarial median survival time of 18.7 versus 8.1 months, respectively.
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis Of 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223
| Outcome: 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223 | Independent Covariate | R2 (%) In The Final Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multivariable Analysis | p-value | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Nodal metastases (yes versus no) | 0.0457 | 2.707 | 1.059 | 7.649 | 16.53% |
| PSA (log, continuous) | <0.0001 | 1.737 | 1.359 | 2.290 | |
Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Model Of Overall Survival (Including 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Treatment)
| Including 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223 | Independent Covariate | R2 (%) In The Final Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Model (No. Of Patients Used =166) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Ra223 therapy (1–5 cycles versus 6 cycles) | <0.0001 | 6.050 | 3.348 | 10.932 | 35.09% |
| Hb ≤100 versus >100 g/L | 0.0104 | 2.463 | 1.237 | 4.906 | |
| Referred versus local patients | <0.0001 | 3.497 | 1.968 | 6.216 | |
| Visceral metastases (yes versus no) | 0.0001 | 4.088 | 1.981 | 8.434 | |
| Prior skeletal related event (yes versus no) | 0.0348 | 1.908 | 1.047 | 3.474 | |
Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Model Of Overall Survival (Excluding 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Treatment)
| Excluding 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223 | Independent Covariate | R2 (%) In The Final Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final Model (No. Of Patients Used = 150) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Hb ≤100 versus >100 g/L | 0.0045 | 2.853 | 1.383 | 5.884 | 22.00% |
| Referred versus local patients | 0.0064 | 2.295 | 1.264 | 4.167 | |
| PSA (log, continuous) | 0.0034 | 1.305 | 1.092 | 1.559 | |
| Visceral metastases (yes versus no) | 0.0047 | 3.052 | 1.407 | 6.622 | |
| Prior skeletal related event (yes versus no) | 0.0237 | 2.014 | 1.098 | 3.694 | |