Literature DB >> 31802949

Population-Based Analysis Of The Use Of Radium-223 For Bone-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer In Ontario, And Of Factors Associated With Treatment Completion And Outcome.

Sierra Cheng1, Vanessa Arciero1, Hanan Goldberg2, Camilla Tajzler3, Aileen Manganaro4, Natascha Kozlowski4, Leigha Rowbottom1, Rachel McDonald1, Ronald Chow1, Gaurav Vasisht3, Sharon Shaji3, Emily Chu Lee Wong3, Michele Petrovic2, Liying Zhang1, Cameron Phillips1, Pawel Zalewski4, Anil Kapoor3, Neil E Fleshner2, Edward Chow1, Urban Emmenegger1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Radium-223 (Ra223) prolongs the survival and improves the quality of life of men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) to bones. However, compared to other mCRPC therapies, using Ra223 comes with its unique challenges. Hence, we aimed to identify Ra223 utilization patterns under real-world conditions, as well as factors predicting treatment completion and outcome.
METHODS: In this retrospective chart analysis, 198 mCRPC patients were identified that had received Ra223 outside of clinical trials or access programs from January 2015 to October 2016 at four cancer centres in Ontario. The main outcomes studied were Ra223 completion rate, reasons for early treatment discontinuation, overall survival, and survival differences in patients completing Ra223 therapy versus patients receiving <6 cycles of Ra223. In addition, patient and disease characteristics were analysed to identify predictors of treatment completion and survival.
RESULTS: In this cohort of patients mostly pretreated with abiraterone and/or enzalutamide (92.4%), almost half of which had also received docetaxel (48.5%), the Ra223 completion rate was 46.5%, and the actuarial median survival was 13.3 months. The main reason for early Ra223 discontinuation was disease progression, and Ra223 non-completion was associated with poorer outcome (median survival 8.1 months [6.0-12.2] versus 18.7 months [15.3-22.3] in men completing Ra223, p<0.0001). Lymph node metastases and a high baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were independent predictors of early treatment discontinuation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models revealed early Ra223 discontinuation, baseline anemia, high PSA, prior skeletal-related events, visceral metastases, and being referred to another centre for Ra223 therapy as predictors of worse outcome.
CONCLUSION: Despite a lower completion rate than observed under clinical trial conditions, the real-world results achieved with Ra223 are encouraging. If prospectively validated, predictive patient and disease characteristics identified in our cohort might become instrumental to identify mCRPC patients likely to complete and to most benefit from Ra223 therapy.
© 2019 Cheng et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metastatic prostate cancer; predictive markers of outcome; radium 223; real-world

Year:  2019        PMID: 31802949      PMCID: PMC6827438          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S213051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


Introduction

Bone is the most common site of metastasis in men with prostate cancer, and bone metastases are the main contributor of prostate cancer-related morbidity and mortality.1 While antiresorptive agents (eg, denosumab and zoledronic acid) delay the onset and reduce the frequency of skeletal-related events (SRE) such as pain, pathological fractures, and cord compressions, they do not alter the overall survival (OS) of men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).2,3 Radium-223 (Ra223) is the first, and thus far only, alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical approved for the treatment of bone metastases in men with mCRPC.4 Due to the high linear energy transfer of alpha particles, combined with a low range of tissue penetration, Ra223 treatment allows for the safe administration of high levels of radiation to areas of bone metastases.5 In fact, the calcium-mimetic Ra223 is deposited in areas of high bone turnover such as the matrix of bone metastases, induces DNA double-strand breaks in prostate cancer cells, and decreases the number of osteoblasts as well as osteoclasts.6 In the randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled ALSYMPCA Phase III registration trial, mCRPC patients with symptomatic bone metastases who had received, were not eligible for, or declined docetaxel chemotherapy were treated with Ra223 versus best supportive care.4 Ra223 improved OS by 3.6 months (14.9 versus 11.3 months, HR 0.7, P<0.001), delayed the median time to first symptomatic SRE by 5.8 months (15.6 versus 9.8 months, HR 0.66, P<0.001), and was well tolerated with typically low-grade treatment-related adverse events, such as myelosuppression, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue. In fact, men undergoing Ra223 therapy experienced less adverse events overall than patients in the placebo arm. In the experimental arm, the median number of Ra223 cycles of 50 kBq per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 4 weeks was six (ie, the maximal number of cycles studied), whereas the median number of placebo treatments in the control arm was four. Based on these findings, Ra223 was made available to men with mCRPC to bones in Ontario through Cancer Care Ontario’s New Drug Funding Program (NDFP) in January 2015. An analysis of mCRPC patients undergoing docetaxel chemotherapy in routine practice at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto/ON, Canada) showed that real-world patients were older, had a worse performance status, and received fewer treatment cycles compared to clinical trial patients, even though the reasons for docetaxel discontinuation were similar.7 The OS of patients seen in routine practice was shorter, whereas the rate of treatment-associated adverse events was higher. Thus, we found it of great interest to study whether the real-world experience with Ra223 in Ontario showed similar trends, notably if there was a higher rate of early treatment discontinuation (ie, before completion of six cycles) compared to ALSYMPCA. In addition, we aimed to study patient and disease characteristics predicting early treatment discontinuation and outcome in men with mCRPC undergoing Ra223 therapy.

Patients And Methods

Study Design And Patient Population

In Ontario, the NDFP provides universal funding of new intravenous or subcutaneous systemic therapies for the treatment of cancer. To review Ra223 utilization in Ontario, we identified men with mCRPC who received at least one dose of Ra223 via NDFP funding in three participating centres from January 2015 to April 2016 (Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre [Toronto], Juravinski Hospital [Hamilton], and Lakeridge Health [Oshawa]), and at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre [Toronto] from January 2015 to October 2016. The provincial funding criteria are as follows: 1) Ra223 is for the treatment of patients with CRPC with symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastatic disease; 2) Ra223 cannot be combined with cabazitaxel, abiraterone, or enzalutamide; 3) if Ra223 is funded in the pre-docetaxel setting, no subsequent funding will be considered in the post-docetaxel setting; and 4) there is a mandatory consult with a medical or radiation oncologist prior to starting Ra223 treatment. For our analyses, patients that received Ra223 as part of clinical trials or early access programs were excluded. With approval from local research ethics boards (ie, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), we retrospectively collected 1) patient and disease characteristics, 2) details of Ra223 treatment, 3) baseline as well as on-treatment hematological and biochemical parameters, 4) adverse events, and 5) Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores (assessing 9 symptoms on a scale from 0 to 10, including pain).8 The study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Based on the absence of any therapeutic or diagnostic interventions, and accounting for the fact that many patients had expired at the time of data collection we obtained permission to proceed without obtaining informed consent from patients. Data were de-identified immediately after collection to guarantee confidentiality.

Ra223 Treatment And Response Evaluation

We collected information on the number of Ra223 cycles per patient and the reasons for early Ra223 discontinuation, defined as having received <6 cycles. For prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-based parameters we used definitions applied in ALSYMPCA and the International Ra223 Early Access Program (iEAP),4,9 as follows: 1) PSA30: ≥30% PSA decrease (whenever) during Ra223 therapy compared to baseline value, confirmed by a second PSA value approximately 4 or more weeks later 2) PSA50: ≥50% PSA decrease (whenever) during Ra223 therapy compared to baseline value, confirmed by a second PSA value approximately 4 or more weeks later, 3) ALP30: ≥30% ALP reduction from baseline value (whenever), confirmed 4 or more weeks later, 4) ALP normalization: ALP decrease to below upper limit of normal within 12 weeks of Ra233 therapy (in patients with elevated ALP at baseline), confirmed by two consecutive measurements at least 2 weeks apart. June 2017 was the cut-off for following up on the vital status of each patient.

Statistical Analyses

To compare patient and disease characteristics in men receiving 1–5 vs 6 cycles of Ra223, Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-squared/Fisher exact tests were applied for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered significant. The findings of time-to-event analyses were illustrated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and the log-rank test was applied for detecting statistical significance of differential OS (defined as the time from first dose of Ra223 to death or last follow-up date) seen between patients who completed Ra223 therapy and those that received 1–5 treatments only. To identify predictive factors of receiving less than 6 cycles of Ra223, univariate logistic regression analysis was applied to create a logit prediction model of 1–5 vs 6 cycles of Ra223 using demographic/clinical factors as possible predictors. R2 was applied for measure of fit in the modeling. R2 equals (LO–LM)/LO, where LO and LM represent the maximized –2(log-likelihood) of the null model and the fitted model, respectively. R2 indicates the proportion of the overall response variation that can be explained by the predictive factors. The larger the R2, the better the model fit. Natural log-transformation was applied for some covariates for normalizing their distribution (eg, PSA, ALP, hemoglobin (Hb), and ESAS pain score subscale). P-values, OR, and 95% CIs were calculated for each predictive factor. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All variables with a p-value of <0.10 obtained from univariate analysis were added in a backward stepwise selection procedure in the logistic regression analysis to find the most significant predictive factors for receiving less than 6 cycles of Ra223. To identify predictive factors of OS, we applied the univariate Cox proportional hazards model. Natural log-transformation was used for some covariates to normalize their distribution (ie, PSA, ALP, Hb, and ESAS pain score subscale). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. HR and CI were calculated for each covariate. The generalized R2 statistic was calculated based on the likelihood ratio statistic (LRT) for testing the global null hypothesis using the formula R2=1–e–(LRT/n) (where LRT=−2logL(0)–[−2logL(p)]; n is the sample size used; logL(0) is the log-likelihood for a null model with no covariates; and logL(p) is the log-likelihood for the fitted model with p covariates).10 R2 (between 0 and 1) is larger when the covariates are more strongly associated with the outcome. Variables from univariate analysis with a p-value of <0.10 were included in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Applying a stepwise backward selection procedure, we performed separated stepwise selection procedures due to co-linearity between continuous and categorical ALP and Hb variables, respectively. The following steps were used: All variables with p<0.10+ALP continuous variable+Hb continuous variable All variables with p<0.10+ALP ≥115 versus <115+Hb continuous variable All variables with p<0.10+ALP continuous variable+Hb ≤100 versus >100 All variables with p<0.10+ALP ≥115 versus <115+Hb ≤100 versus >100 Comparing R2 values among all the above 4 selected models, we chose the model with the largest R2 value as the final model, including only significant covariates (p<0.05). The statistical analyses were performed by Dr L. Zhang, PhD, biostatistician, using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS version 9.4, Cary, NC) and R package (version 3.5.2).

Results

Patients, Treatment Completion Rates, And Reasons For Early Ra223 Discontinuation

We identified 203 patients of which 198 were treated with at least one dose of Ra223 (Figure 1). Medical oncologists (100 patients, 50.5%) and radiation oncologists (94 patients, 47.5%) supervised the majority of Ra223 treatments. Uro-oncologists prescribed Ra223 in 4 patients (2%) only, likely due to the provincial funding guidelines mandating uro-oncologists in Ontario to obtain a medical or radiation oncology opinion before initiating Ra223 therapy. One hundred and ten patients (55.6%) were already undergoing CRPC therapy at the four participating centres (hereafter termed “local patients”) prior to the start of Ra223, whereas 88 patients (44.4%) were external referrals (named “referred patients”) sent from peripheral centres for treatment.
Figure 1

Consort diagram and listing of reasons for early Ra223 discontinuation. One hundred and six of 198 patients (53.5%) did not receive 6 cycles of Ra223, and disease progression was the most common reason for early treatment discontinuation in those patients.

Consort diagram and listing of reasons for early Ra223 discontinuation. One hundred and six of 198 patients (53.5%) did not receive 6 cycles of Ra223, and disease progression was the most common reason for early treatment discontinuation in those patients. Ninety-two men (46.5%) received a full treatment course of 6 doses, and overall, the median number of Ra223 cycles was 5 (Figure 2). There was a trend for a higher Ra223 therapy completion rate over time, with 45.2% of men finishing 6 courses of Ra223 when treatment started during the period from May to August 2015, compared to 54.4% of men starting treatment from January to April 2016.
Figure 2

Distribution of the number of Ra223 cycles administered overall, and when comparing the number of Ra223 cycles given in patients supervised by medical versus radiation oncologists. There was no significant difference in the distribution of Ra223 cycles administered under the supervision of medical oncologists (Med Onc) versus radiation oncologists (Rad Onc). *“All patients” includes patients administered Ra223 by medical oncologists (n=100), radiation oncologists (n=94), and uro-oncologists (n=4).

Distribution of the number of Ra223 cycles administered overall, and when comparing the number of Ra223 cycles given in patients supervised by medical versus radiation oncologists. There was no significant difference in the distribution of Ra223 cycles administered under the supervision of medical oncologists (Med Onc) versus radiation oncologists (Rad Onc). *“All patients” includes patients administered Ra223 by medical oncologists (n=100), radiation oncologists (n=94), and uro-oncologists (n=4). Amongst the 106 patients that did not complete 6 cycles of Ra223, the main reasons for treatment discontinuation as indicated by the prescribing physicians were “disease progression” (44.3%) and “symptomatic progression” (28.3%) (Figure 1). Another 12 patients (11.3%) stopped Ra223 therapy early because of low blood counts. Due to the retrospective nature of our analysis, we were not able to differentiate between Ra223-mediated myelotoxicity versus disease progression (notably progressive bone marrow infiltration) as the reason for low blood counts. “Disease progression” and “symptomatic progression” combined accounted for 69.6% of treatment discontinuations in men prescribed Ra223 from May to August 2015, compared to a higher rate of 84.6% for patients starting Ra223 from January to April 2016. In contrast, “low blood counts” was less frequently cited as reason for treatment discontinuation over time (29.1% versus 3.9% of patients that started Ra223 therapy from May to August 2015 compared to January to April 2016, respectively).

Baseline Patient And Disease Characteristics

Demographic and other patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age of the overall cohort was 74.1 years. The majority of patients were initially diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Almost half of all patients featured Gleason Score 8–10 disease. Prior to Ra223, two-thirds of men had received at least two lines of systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease (excluding androgen deprivation therapy), including 92.4% of men with exposure to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, and 48.5% with prior docetaxel chemotherapy. The sequences of systemic therapies preceding Ra223 are detailed in . Thirty-one patients (15.7%) had experienced a SRE before starting Ra223, and 36 (18.2%) had been subjected to prior denosumab and/or zoledronic acid therapy.
Table 1

Patient Characteristics

TotalN = 198Received 1-5 Cycles n=106Received 6 Cycles n=92p-value
Age (years)0.0574
 N19810692
 Mean ± SD74.1 ± 9.573.0 ± 10.075.4 ± 8.8
 Median (interquartiles)75.0 (68.0, 81.0)72.0 (66.0, 80.0)77.0 (69.5, 81.5)
 Range52, 9352, 9355, 92
Treatment centre0.0996
 Sunnybrook33 (16.67%)16 (15.09%)17 (18.48%)
 Princess Margaret77 (38.89%)42 (39.62%)35 (38.04%)
 Lakeridge28 (14.14%)10 (9.43%)18 (19.57%)
 Hamilton60 (30.30%)38 (35.85%)22 (23.91%)
Specialty of treating physician0.3040
 Medical Oncologist100 (50.51%)58 (54.72%)42 (45.65%)
 Radiation Oncologist94 (47.47%)47 (44.34%)47 (51.09%)
 Urological Oncologist4 (2.02%)1 (0.94%)3 (3.26%)
Local versus referred patients0.2648
 Local110 (55.56%)55 (51.89%)55 (59.78%)
 Referred88 (44.44%)51 (48.11%)37 (40.22%)
Initial stage0.8334
 Localized116 (58.59%)64 (60.38%)52 (56.52%)
 Metastatic36 (18.18%)19 (17.92%)17 (18.48%)
 Unknown46 (23.23%)23 (21.70%)23 (25.00%)
Local therapy0.0869
 Prostatectomy67 (33.84%)30 (28.30%)37 (40.22%)
 Radiation61 (30.81%)40 (37.74%)21 (22.83%)
 Prostatectomy/Radiation20 (10.10%)12 (11.32%)8 (8.70%)
 No local therapy50 (25.25%)24 (22.64%)26 (22.26%)
Adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy0.3608
 No140 (70.71%)77 (72.64%)63 (68.48%)
 Yes56 (28.28%)29 (27.36%)27 (29.35%)
 Unknown2 (1.01%)0 (0.00%)2 (2.17%)
Gleason score categories0.5814
 65 (2.53%)2 (1.89%)3 (3.26%)
 757 (28.79%)32 (30.19%)25 (27.17%)
 8-1094 (47.47%)53 (50.00%)41 (44.57%)
 Unknown42 (21.21%)19 (17.92%)23 (25.00%)
Time from start of androgen deprivation therapy to castration resistance (months)0.3861
 N1196158
 Mean ± SD34.67 ± 37.5228.83 ± 25.0440.82 ± 46.68
 Median (interquartiles)18.0 (11.0, 49.0)19.0 (10.0, 44.4)18.0 (12.0, 49.0)
 Range1.0, 224.41.0, 100.01.0, 224.4
Number of lines of prior therapies0.0977
 N19810692
 Mean ± SD2.0 ± 1.12.2 ± 1.11.9 ± 1.0
 Median (interquartiles)2.0 (1.0, 3.0)2.0 (1.0, 3.0)2.0 (1.0, 3.0)
 Range0, 50, 50, 5
Distribution of number of lines of prior therapies0.6994
 07 (3.54%)3 (2.83%)4 (4.35%)
 164 (32.32%)30 (28.30%)34 (36.96%)
 262 (31.31%)34 (32.08%)28 (30.43%)
 350 (25.25%)29 (27.36%)21 (22.83%)
 410 (5.05%)7 (6.60%)3 (3.26%)
 55 (2.53%)3 (2.83%)2 (2.17%)
Prior Abiraterone and/or Enzalutamide0.2743
 No15 (7.58%)6 (5.66%)9 (9.78%)
 Yes183 (92.42%)100 (94.34%)83 (90.22%)
Prior Docetaxel0.0596
 No102 (51.52%)48 (45.28%)54 (58.70%)
 Yes96 (48.48%)58 (54.72%)38 (41.30%)
Prior Denosumab and/or Zoledronic Acid0.1143
 No25 (12.63%)10 (9.43%)15 (16.30%)
 Yes36 (18.18%)16 (15.09%)20 (21.74%)
 Unknown137 (69.19%)80 (75.47%)57 (61.96%)
Prior skeletal related events0.1735
 No166 (83.84%)86 (81.13%)80 (86.96%)
 Yes31 (15.66%)20 (18.87%)11 (11.96%)
 Unknown1 (0.51%)0 (0.00%)1 (1.09%)
Vital status June 20170.0045
 Alive128 (64.65%)59 (55.66%)69 (75.00%)
 Dead70 (35.35%)47 (44.34%)23 (25.00%)
Time to death/last follow-up (months)<.0001
 N19810692
 Mean ± SD8.31 ± 5.165.60 ± 3.8711.43 ± 4.70
 Median (interquartiles)7.5 (4.1, 12.0)4.4 (3.1, 7.8)11.0 (8.0, 15.1)
 Range0.0, 22.30.0, 18.41.3, 22.3

Notes: Patient characteristics significantly different in patients receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223 are highlighted (bold).

Patient Characteristics Notes: Patient characteristics significantly different in patients receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223 are highlighted (bold). Median baseline PSA, ALP, and Hb values were 78 μg/L, 111 U/L, and 120 g/L, respectively (Table 2). The presence of nodal metastases was documented in 34 patients (17.2%), and although Ra223 use is not advised in case of visceral metastases we found evidence for visceral metastatic disease in 18 men (9.1%). The median ESAS pain score was 2 (range 0 to 10), indicating typically mild pain in the majority of patients.11 The median ESAS total score was found to be 6 (range 0 to 15) and thus was corresponding to an overall low self-reported symptom burden.
Table 2

Baseline Laboratory And Radiological Findings, And ESAS Scores

TotalN = 198Received 1-5 Cycles n=106 Received 6 Cycles n=92p-value
PSA (µg/L)<.0001
 N1648975
 Mean ± SD271.50 ± 692.83354.70 ± 776.24172.76 ± 567.95
 Median (interquartiles)78.0 (28.3, 193.0)112.0 (48.9, 376.0)43.1 (12.8, 101.9)
 Range0.8, 6500.79.2, 6500.70.8, 4081.5
ALP (U/L)0.0322
 N1517972
 Mean ± SD191.3 ± 254.0230.2 ± 320.5148.6 ± 141.1
 Median (interquartiles)111.0 (72.0, 206.0)148.0 (76.0, 234.0)94.5 (71.0, 167.5)
 Range12, 215212, 215238, 739
ALP ≥115 U/L0.0052
 <11576 (38.38%)30 (28.30%)46 (50.00%)
 ≥11575 (37.88%)49 (46.23%)26 (28.26%)
 Unknown47 (23.74%)27 (25.47%)20 (21.74%)
Hb (g/L)<.0001
 N1789781
 Mean ± SD119.3 ± 17.1114.4 ± 16.8125.1 ± 15.6
 Median (interquartiles)120.0 (109.0, 132.0)115.0 (104.0, 126.0)125.0 (116.0, 134.0)
 Range75, 16175, 16085, 161
Hb ≤100 g/L0.0205
 >100154 (77.78%)78 (73.58%)76 (82.61%)
 ≤10024 (12.12%)19 (17.92%)5 (5.43%)
 Unknown20 (10.10%)9 (8.49%)11 (11.96%)
Neutrophils (×109/L)0.1005
 Mean ± SD4.83 ± 2.284.96 ± 1.994.65 ± 2.63
 Median (interquartiles)4.5 (3.3, 5.7)4.9 (3.3, 6.1)4.1 (3.2, 5.4)
 Range0.8, 20.40.8, 10.91.2, 20.4
Neutrophils >3×109/L0.0815
 ≤327 (13.64%)15 (14.15%)12 (13.04%)
 >3121 (61.11%)71 (66.98%)50 (54.35%)
 Unknown50 (25.25%)20 (18.87%)30 (32.61%)
Bone metastases0.1388
 No0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 Yes172 (86.87%)96 (90.57%)76 (82.61%)
 Unknown26 (13.13%)10 (9.43%)16 (17.39%)
Nodal metastases0.0067
 No138 (69.70%)70 (66.04%)68 (73.91%)
 Yes34 (17.17%)26 (24.53%)8 (8.70%)
 Unknown26 (13.13%)10 (9.43%)16 (17.39%)
Visceral metastases0.2548
 No154 (77.78%)86 (81.13%)68 (73.91%)
 Yes18 (9.09%)10 (9.43%)8 (8.70%)
 Unknown26 (13.13%)10 (9.43%)16 (17.39%)
ESAS Pain Score0.0516
 N1165561
 Mean ± SD2.7 ± 2.73.1 ± 2.72.3 ± 2.8
 Median (interquartiles)2.0 (0.0, 4.0)3.0 (1.0, 5.0)1.0 (0.0, 3.0)
ESAS Total Score0.0282
 N1175562
 Mean ± SD6.4 ± 3.47.1 ± 3.55.8 ± 3.3
 Median (interquartiles)6.0 (4.0, 9.0)7.0 (4.0, 10.0)5.0 (4.0, 7.0)

Notes: Patient findings significantly different in patients receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223 are highlighted (bold).

Baseline Laboratory And Radiological Findings, And ESAS Scores Notes: Patient findings significantly different in patients receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223 are highlighted (bold).

Patient Outcome

The PSA30 and PSA50 response rates were 16% and 8%, respectively, whereas an ALP30 response was observed in 44% of evaluable patients, and ALP normalization in 35% (Table 3). The median OS of the entire study population was 13.3 months (Figure 3). By comparison, the OS of men receiving 6 cycles of Ra223 was 18.7 months, and thus significantly longer than the survival of patients with early treatment discontinuation (8.1 months; log-rank test p<0.0001) (Figure 4).
Table 3

Biochemical Response Rates

Ontario CohortALSYMPCA(n=614, Ra223 Treatment Arm)InternationalRa223 EAP(n=696)
n (%)Evaluable Patients
PSA 30% response21 (16)13498 (16)97 (14)
PSA 50% response10 (8)134N/A57 (8)
ALP 30% response54 (44)123233 (47)327 (47)
ALP normalization18 (35)51109 (34)N/A

Abbreviations: EAP, early access program; N/A, not available.

Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier overall survival analysis from the first dose of Ra223. In the entire cohort of patients, the actuarial median overall survival from the first dose of Ra223 was 13.3 months. Seventy patients had died, 128 patients were censored. Dashed lines: 95% CI.

Figure 4

Comparison of the overall survival of patients completing Ra223 therapy (6 cycles) versus patients with early treatment discontinuation (1–5 cycles). Log-rank testing revealed a significant (p<0.0001) overall survival benefit of patients completing Ra223 therapy compared to men receiving 1–5 treatments only, with an actuarial median survival time of 18.7 versus 8.1 months, respectively.

Biochemical Response Rates Abbreviations: EAP, early access program; N/A, not available. Kaplan–Meier overall survival analysis from the first dose of Ra223. In the entire cohort of patients, the actuarial median overall survival from the first dose of Ra223 was 13.3 months. Seventy patients had died, 128 patients were censored. Dashed lines: 95% CI. Comparison of the overall survival of patients completing Ra223 therapy (6 cycles) versus patients with early treatment discontinuation (1–5 cycles). Log-rank testing revealed a significant (p<0.0001) overall survival benefit of patients completing Ra223 therapy compared to men receiving 1–5 treatments only, with an actuarial median survival time of 18.7 versus 8.1 months, respectively.

Predictors Of Early Treatment Discontinuation

When comparing men receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223, patients who completed Ra223 therapy tended to be older and less likely to have undergone docetaxel chemotherapy, but none of the patient characteristics detailed in Table 1 were significantly different in the two treatment cohorts. However, early Ra223 discontinuation was associated with higher total EASA scores (p=0.0282) (Table 2). Similarly, higher PSA and ALP values were significantly related to receiving less than 6 cycles of Ra223, whereas Hb values were found to be higher in patients completing Ra223 therapy. Nodal metastases were reported more frequently in men with early Ra223 discontinuation (p=0.0067). In univariate logistic regression analysis, the same type of covariates were significantly associated with early Ra223 discontinuation (). However, only nodal metastasis (yes versus no) and PSA (log, continuous) remained significant in multivariable analysis (Table 4).
Table 4

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis Of 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223

Outcome: 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223Independent CovariateR2 (%) In The Final Model
Multivariable Analysisp-valueOR (95% CI)
Nodal metastases (yes versus no)0.04572.7071.0597.64916.53%
PSA (log, continuous)<0.00011.7371.3592.290
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis Of 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223

Predictors Of OS

To find predictors of OS in men undergoing Ra223 therapy, we applied the Cox proportional hazards model. Univariate analysis revealed numerous characteristics associated with poor survival: prior SRE (yes versus no), number of lines of prior therapies (categorical ≥2 versus 0–1, and continuous), and history of abiraterone and/or enzalutamide exposure (yes versus no); 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223; treatment centre, referred versus local patients, type of treating medical specialty supervising Ra223 administration; initial localized versus metastatic stage; visceral metastases (yes versus no); higher ESAS total score; and PSA, ALP, and Hb-related parameters (). In multivariable analyses, receiving 1–5 versus 6 cycles of Ra223 was the strongest predictor of survival, but Hb (≤100 g/L versus >100 g/L), referred versus local patients, the presence of visceral metastases, and prior SRE remained significant factors in the final model (Table 5). In the model excluding the number of Ra223 cycles, Hb (≤100 g/L versus >100 g/L) was the strongest predictor of survival, aside from referred versus local patients, the presence of visceral metastases, and prior SRE. In addition, in this model PSA (log, continuous) was negatively associated with survival (Table 6).
Table 5

Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Model Of Overall Survival (Including 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Treatment)

Including 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223Independent CovariateR2 (%) In The Final Model
Final Model (No. Of Patients Used =166)p-valueHR (95% CI)
Ra223 therapy (1–5 cycles versus 6 cycles)<0.00016.0503.34810.93235.09%
Hb ≤100 versus >100 g/L0.01042.4631.2374.906
Referred versus local patients<0.00013.4971.9686.216
Visceral metastases (yes versus no)0.00014.0881.9818.434
Prior skeletal related event (yes versus no)0.03481.9081.0473.474
Table 6

Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Model Of Overall Survival (Excluding 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Treatment)

Excluding 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Ra223Independent CovariateR2 (%) In The Final Model
Final Model (No. Of Patients Used = 150)p-valueHR (95% CI)
Hb ≤100 versus >100 g/L0.00452.8531.3835.88422.00%
Referred versus local patients0.00642.2951.2644.167
PSA (log, continuous)0.00341.3051.0921.559
Visceral metastases (yes versus no)0.00473.0521.4076.622
Prior skeletal related event (yes versus no)0.02372.0141.0983.694
Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Model Of Overall Survival (Including 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Treatment) Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Model Of Overall Survival (Excluding 1–5 Cycles Versus 6 Cycles Of Treatment)

Discussion

Ra223 is amongst six different treatment modalities that prolong the survival and improve the quality of life of men with mCRPC.3 While the use of different control arms and targeting of different disease stages preclude direct comparisons between the corresponding registration trials, the survival benefit provided by these agents is consistently in the order of a few months. Aside from life prolongation compared to best supportive care, Ra223 excels with a beneficial safety profile.4 On the other hand, Ra223 utilization comes with a number of unique challenges. First, the anti-mCRPC activity of Ra223 is restricted to bone metastases, an anatomical location that is difficult to monitor with conventional imaging techniques.12 Interestingly, Etchebehere et al describe skeletal tumor burden as assessed by baseline 18F-PET/CT as a predictor of OS in patients undergoing Ra223 therapy.13 However, the results await prospective validation, and 18F-PET/CT is not widely available and/or utilized. Furthermore, men treated within ALSYMPCA achieved a similar OS benefit across a wide range of disease burden as assessed by conventional bone scan (ie, 6–20 bone metastases vs >20 bone metastases vs superscan presentation).4 Second, Ra223-associated PSA responses are rare, and there are no validated biochemical surrogate markers of survival in patients undergoing Ra223 therapy.14 Third, Ra223 use is limited to centers with nuclear medicine capability, which could result in access disparities. In addition, the benefit provided by mCRPC therapies might be decreased in a population-based setting compared to study conditions, as has been shown for docetaxel chemotherapy.7 Herein we present the results of a retrospective chart analysis of 198 men with mCPRC to characterize the real-world utilization of Ra223. To the best of our knowledge this represents that largest study of its kind, comprising patients treated with Ra223 at four cancer centres in Ontario (Canada) outside of clinical trials or early access programs. Overall, our patients tended to be older, had lower baseline PSA and ALP levels, but featured similar Hb values compared to the ALSYMPCA Ra223 registration trial (n=614 in the Ra223 arm) or the iEAP (N=696).4,9 Our frequency of prior docetaxel chemotherapy was 48.5% and thus lower than the rate described in ALSYMPCA (57%) or in the iEAP (60%). However, prior to Ra223 therapy 92.4% of our patients had been exposed to abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, drugs that were not available to patients in ALSYMPCA. In the iEAP, previous exposure to abiraterone or enzalutamide took place in 40% and 8% of participants, respectively. In our cohort, 46% of patients received 6 cycles of Ra223, with a median number of Ra223 treatments of 5. These numbers are lower than seen in ALSYMPCA (63%, median of 6 cycles) and in the iEAP (58%, median of 6 cycles). However, despite reduced Ra223 exposure we found a median OS similar to ALSYMPCA (13.3 versus 14.9 months), albeit shorter than in the iEAP (16 months)(Figure 3). PSA and ALP-based response parameters were also found to be comparable to both ALSYMPCA and the iEAP (Table 3). When further accounting for other population-based retrospective analyses reporting OS times between 10.5 and 13.0 months, including a population-based study from British Columbia (Canada), altogether our results document encouraging patient outcomes.15–18 Nonetheless, early treatment discontinuation was common, and the median survival of patients receiving less than 6 cycles of Ra223 was 8.1 months only (Figure 4). The median survival in our early discontinuation cohort is numerically superior to ALSYMPCA, the iEAP, and retrospective analyses revealing median survival times between 4.5 and 6.3 months for patients that did not complete Ra223 therapy (ie, that received ≤4–5 cycles of Ra223).9,15,16,18,19 Similar to other analyses, disease progression was found to be the main cause of early Ra223 discontinuation. In order to help guiding Ra223 treatment initiation, we were interested to identify markers predicting Ra223 non-completion. While the presence of nodal metastases, and both presumed surrogate markers of high disease burden (high PSA, elevated ALP, anemia) as well as symptom burden (ESAS total score) were associated with early treatment discontinuation in univariate analysis (), only the association between high baseline PSA levels and the presence of nodal metastases remained significant predictors in multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 4). Higher baseline PSA levels were associated with early treatment discontinuation in exploratory analyses of ALSYMPCA and the iEAP, but no such correlation was found in other retrospective studies.15,16,19,20 The predictive value of nodal metastases for Ra223 non-completion is a novel finding. Of note, ALSYMPCA allowed the enrollment of men with malignant lymphadenopathy of up to 3 cm in short-axis, whereas the upper limit was 6 cm in the iEAP. Adding to a growing body of evidence, we found early treatment discontinuation to be a strong predictor of poor OS (Figure 4).15,16,18,19,21 Furthermore, in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model of OS excluding the number of Ra223 cycles administered as covariate, surrogate markers of high disease burden (high PSA, anemia), the presence of visceral metastases, and a history of prior SRE were all significant predictors of poor survival. Intriguingly, patients referred for Ra223 therapy as opposed to local patients also did worse, which merits further investigation. The latter finding and the association of prior SRE with worse OS in men undergoing Ra223 therapy are novel. On the other hand, mCRPC patients with visceral metastases were purposely excluded from Ra223 trials, and our analysis supports this decision. Although available analyses have identified multiple demographic (age), patient (baseline pain, performance status), disease (biochemical markers of disease burden), and treatment-related (early Ra223 discontinuation, concurrent therapies) factors predicting survival in men subjected to Ra223 therapy, they all await prospective validation.9,15,17,18 In Ontario, Ra223 is not funded for use in combination with other treatment modalities (such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, or cabazitaxel). While there are ongoing efforts to define the role of Ra223 in combination with taxane chemotherapy or enzalutamide, the combination of Ra223 and abiraterone (plus prednisone) as first-line therapy for bone-predominant mCRPC resulted in a higher rate of bone fractures compared to Ra223 and placebo in the ERA 223 study.22 Our study has numerous strengths, including the sizeable number of patients included, and the strict focus on patients treated with Ra223 outside of clinical trials or access programs. Furthermore, our findings reflect the benefit of using Ra223 in a contemporary mCPRC patient population mainly pretreated with abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, the most frequently used first-line treatment options for mCRPC these days. There are also shortcomings, notably the retrospective nature of data collection. In addition, the study was limited to patients treated between 2015 and 2016, and thus may not account for changes in the utilization patterns of Ra223 thereafter. However, it is reassuring that there was a trend for increased treatment completion over time. Finally, our findings might not apply to constituencies with different Ra223 access criteria than in Ontario.23

Conclusions

Our study supports the notion that the benefit of Ra223 described in ALSYMPCA is maintained under real-world conditions, although the treatment completion rate is lower. We have identified novel factors associated with treatment completion and superior OS in men undergoing Ra223 therapy. Furthermore, there was an encouraging trend over time for an increasing Ra223 treatment completion rate. Given that Ra223 therapy is restricted to centres with nuclear medicine capability, further studies are needed to understand why patients referred for Ra223 therapy seem to do worse than patients already known to the centre where Ra223 is administered.
  21 in total

1.  Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Skeletal Tumor Burden on Baseline 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in Predicting Overall Survival.

Authors:  Elba C Etchebehere; John C Araujo; Patricia S Fox; Nancy M Swanston; Homer A Macapinlac; Eric M Rohren
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate and prednisone or prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (ERA 223): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Matthew Smith; Chris Parker; Fred Saad; Kurt Miller; Bertrand Tombal; Quan Sing Ng; Martin Boegemann; Vsevolod Matveev; Josep Maria Piulats; Luis Eduardo Zucca; Oleg Karyakin; Go Kimura; Nobuaki Matsubara; William Carlos Nahas; Franco Nolè; Eli Rosenbaum; Axel Heidenreich; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Amily Zhang; Heiko Krissel; Michael Teufel; Junwu Shen; Volker Wagner; Celestia Higano
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  High-linear energy transfer irradiation targeted to skeletal metastases by the alpha-emitter 223Ra: adjuvant or alternative to conventional modalities?

Authors:  Øyvind S Bruland; Sten Nilsson; Darrell R Fisher; Roy H Larsen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Radium-223 and concomitant therapies in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an international, early access, open-label, single-arm phase 3b trial.

Authors:  Fred Saad; Joan Carles; Silke Gillessen; Axel Heidenreich; Daniel Heinrich; Jeremy Gratt; Jérémy Lévy; Kurt Miller; Sten Nilsson; Oana Petrenciuc; Marcello Tucci; Manfred Wirth; Judith Federhofer; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  223Ra Therapy in Patients With Advanced Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases: Lessons from Daily Practice.

Authors:  Maarten J van der Doelen; Malou C P Kuppen; Marianne A Jonker; Niven Mehra; Marcel J R Janssen; Inge M van Oort; Winald R Gerritsen
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 6.  Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Sartor; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients.

Authors:  E Bruera; N Kuehn; M J Miller; P Selmser; K Macmillan
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.250

8.  Radium-223 Use in Clinical Practice and Variables Associated With Completion of Therapy.

Authors:  Rana R McKay; Susanna Jacobus; Matthew Fiorillo; Elisa M Ledet; Patrick M Cotogna; Allie E Steinberger; Heather A Jacene; Oliver Sartor; Mary-Ellen Taplin
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Parker; S Nilsson; D Heinrich; S I Helle; J M O'Sullivan; S D Fosså; A Chodacki; P Wiechno; J Logue; M Seke; A Widmark; D C Johannessen; P Hoskin; D Bottomley; N D James; A Solberg; I Syndikus; J Kliment; S Wedel; S Boehmer; M Dall'Oglio; L Franzén; R Coleman; N J Vogelzang; C G O'Bryan-Tear; K Staudacher; J Garcia-Vargas; M Shan; Ø S Bruland; O Sartor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  An exploratory analysis of alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, and prostate-specific antigen dynamics in the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial with radium-223.

Authors:  O Sartor; R E Coleman; S Nilsson; D Heinrich; S I Helle; J M O'Sullivan; N J Vogelzang; Ø Bruland; S Kobina; S Wilhelm; L Xu; M Shan; M W Kattan; C Parker
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk Scoring System for Ra-223 Discontinuation and Its Effect on Prognosis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ito; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Yoshiyuki Okada; Takafumi Shimada; Toshihide Yamaoka; Kazutoshi Okubo; Takashi Sakamoto; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2021-07-03

2.  Prognostic Value of the BIO-Ra Score in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radium-223 after the European Medicines Agency Restricted Use: Secondary Investigations of the Multicentric BIO-Ra Study.

Authors:  Matteo Bauckneht; Sara Elena Rebuzzi; Marta Ponzano; Roberto Borea; Alessio Signori; Viviana Frantellizzi; Elisa Lodi Rizzini; Manlio Mascia; Valentina Lavelli; Alberto Miceli; Maria Silvia De Feo; Antonio Rosario Pisani; Susanna Nuvoli; Vincenzo Tripoli; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Paolo Mammucci; Salvatore Caponnetto; Guglielmo Mantica; Angelo Domenico Di Nicola; Carlo Villano; Luca Cindolo; Silvia Morbelli; Gianmario Sambuceti; Stefano Fanti; Renato Patrizio Costa; Angela Spanu; Giuseppe Rubini; Fabio Monari; Giuseppe De Vincentis; Giuseppe Fornarini
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet E Squires; Danielle Cho-Young; Laura D Aloisio; Robert Bell; Stephen Bornstein; Susan E Brien; Simon Decary; Melissa Demery Varin; Mark Dobrow; Carole A Estabrooks; Ian D Graham; Megan Greenough; Doris Grinspun; Michael Hillmer; Tanya Horsley; Jiale Hu; Alan Katz; Christina Krause; John Lavis; Wendy Levinson; Adrian Levy; Michelina Mancuso; Steve Morgan; Letitia Nadalin-Penno; Andrew Neuner; Tamara Rader; Wilmer J Santos; Gary Teare; Joshua Tepper; Amanda Vandyk; Michael Wilson; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 16.859

4.  Real-world patient characteristics associated with survival of 2 years or more after radium-223 treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EPIX study).

Authors:  Daniel J George; Neeraj Agarwal; Oliver Sartor; Cora N Sternberg; Bertrand Tombal; Fred Saad; Kurt Miller; Niculae Constantinovici; Helen Guo; John Reeves; XiaoLong Jiao; Per Sandström; Frank Verholen; Celestia S Higano; Neal Shore
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.455

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.