Literature DB >> 31802587

Does public reporting of the detection of fetal growth restriction improve clinical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

R J Selvaratnam1,2, M-A Davey1,2, S Anil2, S J McDonald3,4, T Farrell2,4, E M Wallace1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of publicly reporting a statewide fetal growth restriction (FGR) performance indicator.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from 2000 to 2017.
SETTING: All maternity services in Victoria, Australia. POPULATION: A total of 1 231 415 singleton births at ≥32 weeks of gestation.
METHODS: We performed an interrupted time-series analysis to assess the impact of publicly reporting an FGR performance indicator on the rate of detection for severe cases of small for gestational age (SGA). Rates of perinatal mortality and morbidity and obstetric intervention were assessed for severe SGA pregnancies and pregnancies delivered for suspected SGA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestation at delivery, obstetric management and perinatal outcome.
RESULTS: The public reporting of a statewide FGR performance indicator was associated with a steeper reduction per quarter in the percentage of severe SGA undelivered by 40 weeks of gestation, from 0.13 to 0.51% (P = 0.001), and a decrease in the stillbirth rate by 3.3 per 1000 births among those babies (P = 0.01). Of babies delivered for suspected SGA, the percentage with birthweights ≥ 10th centile increased from 41.4% (n = 307) in 2000 to 53.3% (n = 1597) in 2017 (P < 0.001). Admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit for babies delivered for suspected SGA but with a birthweight ≥ 10th centile increased from 0.8 to 2.0% (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The public reporting of an FGR performance indicator has been associated with the improved detection of severe SGA and a decrease in the rate of stillbirth among those babies, but with an increase in the rate of iatrogenic birth for babies with normal growth. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The public reporting of hospital performance is associated with a reduction in stillbirth, but also with unintended interventions.
© 2019 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; fetal growth restriction; pregnancy; public reporting; stillbirth

Year:  2019        PMID: 31802587     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  4 in total

1.  Texas Hospital's Perspectives About NICU Performance Measures: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Julie R Doherty; Andrew Schaefer; David C Goodman
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.147

2.  Application of Prospect Theory in Obstetrics by Evaluating Mode of Delivery and Outcomes in Neonates Born Small or Appropriate for Gestational Age.

Authors:  Jennia Michaeli; Ofir Michaeli; Ariel Rozitzky; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Naomi Feldman; Naama Srebnik
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Association Between Iatrogenic Delivery for Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction and Childhood School Outcomes.

Authors:  Roshan John Selvaratnam; Euan Morrison Wallace; Rory Wolfe; Peter John Anderson; Mary-Ann Davey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Widespread implementation of a low-cost telehealth service in the delivery of antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten R Palmer; Michael Tanner; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Andrea Rindt; Kerrie Papacostas; Michelle L Giles; Kate Brown; Helen Diamandis; Rebecca Fradkin; Alice E Stewart; Daniel L Rolnik; Andrew Stripp; Euan M Wallace; Ben W Mol; Ryan J Hodges
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 79.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.