Literature DB >> 31802277

The rise of quality indicators in neurosurgery: 30-day unplanned reoperation rate evaluated in 3760 patients-a single-center experience.

Eric Suero Molina1, Cheyenne Schildmacher2, Justin Doods3, Moritz Freistühler4, Sönke Josua Hellwig2, Walter Stummer2, Stephanie Schipmann2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Quality indicators are emerging as tools to evaluate health care outcomes. Few studies have evaluated indicators suitable for neurosurgery so far. Among others, reoperation rate has been suggested as a possible indicator. We aimed to evaluate the reoperation rate in a large neurosurgery adult collective.
METHODS: In this exploratory post hoc analysis, we evaluated all patients operated in our service for elective and emergency surgery between January 2014 and May 2016. Planned and unplanned reoperations were filtered and a quantitative analysis, including uni- and multivariate analyses, was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 3760 patients were included in this evaluation. From 378 reoperated patients within 30 days (10.1%), 51 underwent planned procedures (1.4%). Three hundred twenty-seven patients (8.7%) represented the analyzed collective of patients having undergone unplanned surgical procedures, causing a total of 409 from 4268 additional procedures (9.6%). Early unplanned 7-day reoperation rate was 4.5% (n = 193), occurring in 4.5% of patients (n = 193). Postoperative hemorrhage (n = 107, 26.2%) and external ventricle drainage-associated infections or dislocation (n = 105, 25.7 %) were the most common indication for unplanned surgery.
CONCLUSION: Unplanned re-operation rate of a neurosurgical service can help to internally evaluate health care outcome and improve quality of care. Benchmarking with this indicator however is not recommendable as results can vary distinctly due to the heterogenic patient collective of each institution. We expect unplanned reoperation rates to be higher in large university hospitals and tertiary centers with complex cases, as compared to center with less complex cases treating patients with lower morbidity. In this study, we deliver an authentic portrait of a large neurosurgical center in Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality indicators; Reoperation rate; Value-based healthcare

Year:  2019        PMID: 31802277     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-04146-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  5 in total

1.  Classical and disease-specific quality indicators in glioma surgery-Development of a quality checklist to improve treatment quality in glioma patients.

Authors:  Christiane Menke; Sebastian Lohmann; Andrea Baehr; Oliver Grauer; Markus Holling; Benjamin Brokinkel; Michael Schwake; Walter Stummer; Stephanie Schipmann
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-10-11

2.  Analysis of risk factors for unplanned reoperation following primary repair of gastrointestinal disorders in neonates.

Authors:  Yu Cui; Rong Cao; Jia Li; Ling-Mei Deng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Analysis of neurosurgical procedures with unplanned reoperation for quality improvement: A 5-year single hospital study.

Authors:  Wei-Chao Huang; Yin-Ju Chen; Martin Hsiu-Chu Lin; Ming-Hsueh Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Risk Factors and Outcomes of Redo Craniotomy: A Tertiary Care Center Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Faraz Raghib; Muhammad Usman Khalid; Noor Malik; Mir Ibrahim Sajid; Umm E Hani Abdullah; Asra Tanwir; Syed Ather Enam
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-20

5.  Applicability of contemporary quality indicators in vestibular surgery-do they accurately measure tumor inherent postoperative complications of vestibular schwannomas?

Authors:  Stephanie Schipmann; Sebastian Lohmann; Bilal Al Barim; Eric Suero Molina; Michael Schwake; Özer Altan Toksöz; Walter Stummer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.216

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.