Literature DB >> 31802223

Different impact of task switching and response-category conflict on subsequent memory.

Michèle C Muhmenthaler1, Beat Meier2.   

Abstract

The impact of cognitive control demands on long-term memory is mixed, with some conflicts leading to better, others leading to worse subsequent memory. The current study was designed to investigate how different types of cognitive control demands modulate the effects on memory. At study, participants had to switch between two classification tasks and later, free recall performance was assessed. The stimuli consisted of two interleaved words, one word had to be categorized and the other word had to be ignored. In four experiments, the congruency between target and ignored words was manipulated by changing the distractor category. This allowed us to investigate the impact of different types of conflict (i.e., task switching, perceptual load, response-category conflict, stimulus-category conflict). The results revealed that task switching impaired memory in all experiments. In Experiment 1, higher perceptual load also impaired memory. Experiments 2-4 showed that the co-activation of two words which required different responses (i.e., response-category conflict) enhanced memory performance but only when the conflict stimuli were presented in pure blocks. Overall, memory performance seems to depend on attentional policies. Withdrawing attention from target encoding results in lower memory performance. In contrast, focusing attention on the target results in enhanced memory performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31802223      PMCID: PMC7900092          DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01274-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  35 in total

1.  The spread of attention and learning in feature search: effects of target distribution and task difficulty.

Authors:  M Ahissar; S Hochstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Bivalency is costly: bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding.

Authors:  Todd S Woodward; Beat Meier; Christine Tipper; Peter Graf
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2003

3.  Item- and task-level processes in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: positive and negative correlates of encoding.

Authors:  Jeremy R Reynolds; David I Donaldson; Anthony D Wagner; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Yoav Kessler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Selective attention and recognition: effects of congruency on episodic learning.

Authors:  Tamara M Rosner; Maria C D'Angelo; Ellen MacLellan; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-24

6.  A cow on the prairie vs. a cow on the street: long-term consequences of semantic conflict on episodic encoding.

Authors:  Javier Ortiz-Tudela; Bruce Milliken; Fabiano Botta; Mitchell LaPointe; Juan Lupiañez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-16

7.  Procedural differences in processing intact and degraded stimuli.

Authors:  S A Los
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-03

8.  Memory and cognitive control in task switching.

Authors:  Franziska R Richter; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12

9.  Distractor-relevance determines whether task-switching enhances or impairs distractor memory.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Task Switching Hurts Memory Encoding.

Authors:  Michèle C Muhmenthaler; Beat Meier
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2019-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.140

2.  Stimulating the parietal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): no effects on attention and memory.

Authors:  Mirela Dubravac; Beat Meier
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.