| Literature DB >> 31801501 |
Lizhu Guo1,2, Jiahuan Li1,2, Wei He3, Li Liu1,2, Ding Huang1,2, Kun Wang4,5.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Coexisting species; Degraded grassland; Ecological stoichiometry; Stellera chamaejasme L.; Water use efficiency
Year: 2019 PMID: 31801501 PMCID: PMC6894284 DOI: 10.1186/s12898-019-0267-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Statistics of C, N and P contents and C:N:P characteristics (Mean ± SE) of all soil and S. chamaejasme samples
| C% | N% | P% | C/N | C/P | N/P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 38.64 ± 2.39 | 4.51 ± 0.31 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 161.6 ± 35.1 | 18.8 ± 3.5 |
| Stem | 37.33 ± 2.32 | 2.37 ± 0.14 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 15.8 ± 0.8 | 427.1 ± 119.8 | 27.0 ± 7.0 |
| Root | 36.60 ± 3.06 | 2.19 ± 0.25 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 16.8 ± 1.5 | 606.9 ± 245.3 | 35.7 ± 12.9 |
| Soil (0–10 cm) | 3.60 ± 1.55 | 0.37 ± 0.10 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 9.3 ± 1.7 | 53.3 ± 20.1 | 5.6 ± 1.2 |
| Soil (10–20 cm) | 2.87 ± 1.21 | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 10.3 ± 2.5 | 50.2 ± 15.9 | 5.0 ± 1.3 |
| Soil (20–30 cm) | 2.08 ± 1.14 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 10.7 ± 4.2 | 40.3 ± 16.0 | 4.0 ± 1.5 |
| Soil (30–40 cm) | 1.74 ± 1.02 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 11.3 ± 5.2 | 39.2 ± 21.0 | 3.5 ± 1.5 |
Fig. 1Stoichiometric characteristics (Mean ± SE) of C, N, P, C/N, C/P and N/P ratios in S. chamaejasme as affected by degradation degree. Values designated by different capital letters were significantly different among the four degraded grasslands levels (P < 0.05). The same applies below
Fig. 2Stoichiometric characteristics (Mean ± SE) of C, N, P, C/N, C/P and N/P ratios in soil as affected by degradation degree
Fig. 3Comparison of stoichiometric characteristics of leaves (Mean ± SE) between S. chamaejasme and three coexisting species (L. chinensis, S. krylovii and A. eriopoda). Values designated by different lowercase letters were significantly different among four species. Different capital letters indicate a significant difference among the four degrees of degradation, respectively (P < 0.05)
Comparison of leaf carbon isotope composition (δ13C) (Mean ± SE) between S. chamaejasme and the three coexisting species (L. chinensis, S. krylovii and A. eriopoda) (‰)
| D1 | − (23.22 ± 0.06)aD | − (27.96 ± 0.02)bD | − (27.99 ± 0.03)bC | − (28.20 ± 0.06)cC |
| D2 | − (22.99 ± 0.04)aB | − (26.29 ± 0.09)bC | − (27.42 ± 0.04)cB | − (28.38 ± 0.05)dD |
| D3 | − (22.70 ± 0.02)aA | − (26.08 ± 0.04)bA | − (26.83 ± 0.01)cA | − (26.02 ± 0.03)bA |
| D4 | − (23.10 ± 0.05)aC | − (26.20 ± 0.04)bB | − (26.89 ± 0.04)cA | − (27.76 ± 0.02)dB |
Values designated by different lowercase letters were significantly different among four species. Different capital letters indicate significant difference among the four degrees of degradation, respectively (P < 0.05)
Fig. 4Map of the study site. Map created with free version of carto (https://carto.com/) by using 1:400 million dataset in China national fundamental geographic information (http://www.data.ac.cn/)
Plant community features in different degraded grassland (Mean ± SE)
| Number of species | Total biomass (g/m2) | Ratio of grasses biomass (%) | Coverage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 37 | 174.74 ± 44.83 | 88.17 ± 18.04 | 61.87 ± 17.32 |
| D2 | 23 | 133.85 ± 27.23 | 84.18 ± 11.34 | 31.63 ± 5.28 |
| D3 | 23 | 126.14 ± 9.17 | 69.79 ± 2.61 | 36.55 ± 7.69 |
| D4 | 46 | 144.96 ± 39.04 | 48.05 ± 12.26 | 50.54 ± 10.46 |
Surface soil features in different degraded grassland (Mean ± SE)
| Water content (%) | pH | Electrical conductivity (μS/cm) | Total carbon (mg/g) | Total nitrogen (mg/g) | Hydrolytic nitrogen (mg/kg) | Total phosphorus (mg/g) | Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 17.95 ± 3.26 | 8.30 ± 0.10 | 273.93 ± 24.57 | 96.68 ± 16.88 | 5.62 ± 0.80 | 367.62 ± 66.08 | 1.74 ± 0.31 | 1.42 ± 0.37 |
| D2 | 11.48 ± 1.19 | 8.65 ± 0.11 | 213.57 ± 12.42 | 50.53 ± 6.37 | 2.96 ± 0.56 | 178.18 ± 32.32 | 0.89 ± 0.31 | 0.88 ± 0.16 |
| D3 | 14.39 ± 5.90 | 8.24 ± 0.03 | 246.07 ± 7.92 | 50.45 ± 5.81 | 3.78 ± 0.10 | 229.25 ± 14.86 | 1.93 ± 0.29 | 1.34 ± 0.39 |
| D4 | 7.76 ± 1.23 | 9.39 ± 0.83 | 672.00 ± 55.50 | 25.54 ± 2.39 | 1.53 ± 0.96 | 116.67 ± 66.83 | 0.41 ± 0.20 | 1.03 ± 0.31 |