| Literature DB >> 31801501 |
Lizhu Guo1,2, Jiahuan Li1,2, Wei He3, Li Liu1,2, Ding Huang1,2, Kun Wang4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stellera chamaejasme L. is a poisonous plant widely distributes in degraded grasslands in China. The mechanism underlying its spread remains unknown. In some degraded grasslands, S. chamaejasme has gradually replaced previous dominant species, such as Leymus chinensis, Stipa krylovii, Artemisia eriopoda on typical steppes. Apart from its unpalatability by livestock, we hypothesized that the survival strategy (nutrient uptake and water use efficiency) of S. chamaejasme in degraded grasslands could be distinct from other coexisting species in the community. Recently, ecological stoichiometry has been suggested as a new approach for studying the demand for natural resources of plants in a changing world, and the leaf carbon isotopic composition (δ13C leaf) as a rapid and effective high throughput phenotyping method for water use efficiency (WUE), both of which can reveal the survival and adaptive strategies of plants. Therefore, in this study we aimed to fill the knowledge gap concerning ecological stoichiometry in the leaf, stem, and root of S. chamaejasme and its surrounding soil on grasslands with different degrees of degradation, and comparing the leaf nutrient content and δ13C of S. chamaejasme with the coexisting species (L. chinensis, S. krylovii, A. eriopoda) in the communities. Toward this goal, we conducted a field survey in which plants and soils were sampled from four different degraded grasslands on typical steppes in China.Entities:
Keywords: Coexisting species; Degraded grassland; Ecological stoichiometry; Stellera chamaejasme L.; Water use efficiency
Year: 2019 PMID: 31801501 PMCID: PMC6894284 DOI: 10.1186/s12898-019-0267-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Statistics of C, N and P contents and C:N:P characteristics (Mean ± SE) of all soil and S. chamaejasme samples
| C% | N% | P% | C/N | C/P | N/P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 38.64 ± 2.39 | 4.51 ± 0.31 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 161.6 ± 35.1 | 18.8 ± 3.5 |
| Stem | 37.33 ± 2.32 | 2.37 ± 0.14 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 15.8 ± 0.8 | 427.1 ± 119.8 | 27.0 ± 7.0 |
| Root | 36.60 ± 3.06 | 2.19 ± 0.25 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 16.8 ± 1.5 | 606.9 ± 245.3 | 35.7 ± 12.9 |
| Soil (0–10 cm) | 3.60 ± 1.55 | 0.37 ± 0.10 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 9.3 ± 1.7 | 53.3 ± 20.1 | 5.6 ± 1.2 |
| Soil (10–20 cm) | 2.87 ± 1.21 | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 10.3 ± 2.5 | 50.2 ± 15.9 | 5.0 ± 1.3 |
| Soil (20–30 cm) | 2.08 ± 1.14 | 0.20 ± 0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 10.7 ± 4.2 | 40.3 ± 16.0 | 4.0 ± 1.5 |
| Soil (30–40 cm) | 1.74 ± 1.02 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 11.3 ± 5.2 | 39.2 ± 21.0 | 3.5 ± 1.5 |
Fig. 1Stoichiometric characteristics (Mean ± SE) of C, N, P, C/N, C/P and N/P ratios in S. chamaejasme as affected by degradation degree. Values designated by different capital letters were significantly different among the four degraded grasslands levels (P < 0.05). The same applies below
Fig. 2Stoichiometric characteristics (Mean ± SE) of C, N, P, C/N, C/P and N/P ratios in soil as affected by degradation degree
Fig. 3Comparison of stoichiometric characteristics of leaves (Mean ± SE) between S. chamaejasme and three coexisting species (L. chinensis, S. krylovii and A. eriopoda). Values designated by different lowercase letters were significantly different among four species. Different capital letters indicate a significant difference among the four degrees of degradation, respectively (P < 0.05)
Comparison of leaf carbon isotope composition (δ13C) (Mean ± SE) between S. chamaejasme and the three coexisting species (L. chinensis, S. krylovii and A. eriopoda) (‰)
| D1 | − (23.22 ± 0.06)aD | − (27.96 ± 0.02)bD | − (27.99 ± 0.03)bC | − (28.20 ± 0.06)cC |
| D2 | − (22.99 ± 0.04)aB | − (26.29 ± 0.09)bC | − (27.42 ± 0.04)cB | − (28.38 ± 0.05)dD |
| D3 | − (22.70 ± 0.02)aA | − (26.08 ± 0.04)bA | − (26.83 ± 0.01)cA | − (26.02 ± 0.03)bA |
| D4 | − (23.10 ± 0.05)aC | − (26.20 ± 0.04)bB | − (26.89 ± 0.04)cA | − (27.76 ± 0.02)dB |
Values designated by different lowercase letters were significantly different among four species. Different capital letters indicate significant difference among the four degrees of degradation, respectively (P < 0.05)
Fig. 4Map of the study site. Map created with free version of carto (https://carto.com/) by using 1:400 million dataset in China national fundamental geographic information (http://www.data.ac.cn/)
Plant community features in different degraded grassland (Mean ± SE)
| Number of species | Total biomass (g/m2) | Ratio of grasses biomass (%) | Coverage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 37 | 174.74 ± 44.83 | 88.17 ± 18.04 | 61.87 ± 17.32 |
| D2 | 23 | 133.85 ± 27.23 | 84.18 ± 11.34 | 31.63 ± 5.28 |
| D3 | 23 | 126.14 ± 9.17 | 69.79 ± 2.61 | 36.55 ± 7.69 |
| D4 | 46 | 144.96 ± 39.04 | 48.05 ± 12.26 | 50.54 ± 10.46 |
Surface soil features in different degraded grassland (Mean ± SE)
| Water content (%) | pH | Electrical conductivity (μS/cm) | Total carbon (mg/g) | Total nitrogen (mg/g) | Hydrolytic nitrogen (mg/kg) | Total phosphorus (mg/g) | Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 17.95 ± 3.26 | 8.30 ± 0.10 | 273.93 ± 24.57 | 96.68 ± 16.88 | 5.62 ± 0.80 | 367.62 ± 66.08 | 1.74 ± 0.31 | 1.42 ± 0.37 |
| D2 | 11.48 ± 1.19 | 8.65 ± 0.11 | 213.57 ± 12.42 | 50.53 ± 6.37 | 2.96 ± 0.56 | 178.18 ± 32.32 | 0.89 ± 0.31 | 0.88 ± 0.16 |
| D3 | 14.39 ± 5.90 | 8.24 ± 0.03 | 246.07 ± 7.92 | 50.45 ± 5.81 | 3.78 ± 0.10 | 229.25 ± 14.86 | 1.93 ± 0.29 | 1.34 ± 0.39 |
| D4 | 7.76 ± 1.23 | 9.39 ± 0.83 | 672.00 ± 55.50 | 25.54 ± 2.39 | 1.53 ± 0.96 | 116.67 ± 66.83 | 0.41 ± 0.20 | 1.03 ± 0.31 |