Literature DB >> 31800749

Correlation between Bond Strength to Dentin and Sealers Penetration by Push-Out Test and CLSM Analysis.

Maybell Tedesco1, Marcelo Carvalho Chain1, Wilson Tadeu Felippe1, Ana Maria Hecke Alves1, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia1, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi1, Mabel Rodriguez Cordeiro2, Cleonice Silveira Teixeira1.   

Abstract

This study correlated the bond strength (BS) and dentin penetration of different sealers by push-out test and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) analysis. Forty-five root canals were prepared according to the crown-down technique and filled with gutta-percha associated to the following sealers (n=15): Endofill, AH Plus and MTA Fillapex. Five canals of each group were filled with the sealers added with 0.1% Rhodamine B dye. Next, the specimens were transversely sectioned and submitted to the push-out test (n=10) and CLSM analysis (n=5). The BS data showed the following means (MPa) and standard deviation: AH Plus (4.17±1.86); MTA Fillapex (3.13±1.96) and Endofill (2.10±1.03). Statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA, α=0.05) showed significant difference among sealers (p<0.001) and root canal thirds (p<0.001). The BS results of Endofill and MTA Fillapex were statistically similar (p>0.05), however, they were statistically different from AH Plus (p<0.001). The regional analysis of BS showed similarity between middle and apical thirds (p>0.05), and both were different from coronal portion (p<0.001). CLSM analysis verified tags formation in all groups and higher penetration of the specimens filled with AH Plus (p<0.05). The Kendall test (correlation between BS to dentin and sealer penetration into dentinal tubules) and the Pearson test (between failures pattern and sealer penetration into dentinal tubules) did not show correlation between the variables evaluated for all the tested sealers (p>0.05). AH Plus group had higher BS to dentin, and deeper tags formation than the other sealers. There was no significant correlation between BS and intratubular penetration of the tested sealers.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31800749     DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  4 in total

1.  Lack of Correlation Between the Penetration of Two Types of Sealers and Interfacial Adaptation to Root Dentine.

Authors:  Roula El Hachem; Nada El Osta; Hala Sacre; Pascale Salameh; Elie Wassef; Guy Le Brun; Fabrice Pellen; Bernard Le Jeune; Maha H Daou; Issam Khalil; Marie Abboud
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use.

Authors:  Josette Camilleri; Amre Atmeh; Xin Li; Nastaran Meschi
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on the Diffusion of MTA Cement into the Root Canal Dentin.

Authors:  José Pedro Martinho; Sara França; Siri Paulo; Anabela Baptista Paula; Ana Sofia Coelho; Ana Margarida Abrantes; Francisco Caramelo; Eunice Carrilho; Carlos Miguel Marto; Maria Filomena Botelho; Henrique Girão; Manuel Marques-Ferreira
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers.

Authors:  Sanda Ileana Cimpean; Adela Loredana Colceriu Burtea; Radu Stefan Chiorean; Mircea Cristian Dudescu; Aurora Antoniac; Alina Robu; Radu Septimiu Campian; Lucia Iacobina Timis
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.748

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.