Literature DB >> 31800475

The Relationship Between Army Physical Fitness and Functional Capacities in Infantry Members of the Slovenian Armed Forces.

Jožef Šimenko1, Bogdan Kovčan2, Primož Pori3, Janez Vodičar3, Miha Vodičar4, Vedran Hadžić3.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Šimenko, J, Kovčan, B, Pori, P, Vodičar, J, Vodičar, M, and Hadžić, V. The Relationship between army physical fitness and functional capacities in infantry members of the Slovenian Armed Forces. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3506-3512, 2021-The primary purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between traditional army physical fitness test (APFT) and a novel functional testing battery that included countermovement jump (CMJ) testing, stork balANce test, pUll-ups, single leg hAmstring bridge test, and loaded prone pLank test-MANUAL battery. The secondary purpose was to explore additional baseline fitness aspects traditionally not covered by APFT. This cross-sectional study involved 181 Slovenian Armed Forces (SAF) infantry members (age 31.4 ± 6.1 years) that were tested using both the regular annual APFT and the MANUAL battery (testing was conducted 2 weeks apart). At the significance level of p ≤ 0.05, significant but weak associations between the MANUAL testing battery and APFT battery (0.2 ≤ r < 0.5; p ≤ 0.05) were observed. The MANUAL battery has highlighted possible hamstring (less than 20 repetitions on a single leg bridge test in 26% of SAF infantry members) and posterior shoulder pull-up muscle weakness (mean score 5 ± 4 pull-ups). Functional predictors from the MANUAL explained only 33.6% of the APFT score (R2 = 0.336). Significant predictors of APFT score were single leg hamstring left (p = 0.048), loaded plank (p = 0.049), number of pull-ups (p < 0.001), CMJ (p = 0.01), and loaded CMJ (p = 0.026). The findings suggest that higher APFT marks are associated with better performance on the MANUAL tests and indicate the problem of hamstring and pull-up muscle weakness. The general recommendation is that the physical condition military programs should include more exercises to strengthen those muscle groups.
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31800475     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  2 in total

1.  Single Leg Bridge Test is Not a Valid Clinical Tool to Assess Maximum Hamstring Strength.

Authors:  Gabriela Bissani Gasparin; João Breno Araujo Ribeiro-Alvares; Bruno Manfredini Baroni
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 2.  Monitoring Neuromuscular Performance in Military Personnel.

Authors:  Justin J Merrigan; Jason D Stone; Andrew G Thompson; W Guy Hornsby; Joshua A Hagen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.