BACKGROUND: We assessed whether body mass index (BMI) affects social and socio-economic outcomes. METHODS: We used Mendelian randomization (MR), non-linear MR and non-genetic and MR within-sibling analyses, to estimate relationships of BMI with six socio-economic and four social outcomes in 378 244 people of European ancestry in UK Biobank. RESULTS: In MR of minimally related individuals, higher BMI was related to higher deprivation, lower income, fewer years of education, lower odds of degree-level education and skilled employment. Non-linear MR suggested both low (bottom decile, <22 kg/m2) and high (top seven deciles, >24.6 kg/m2) BMI, increased deprivation and reduced income. Non-genetic within-sibling analysis supported an effect of BMI on socio-economic position (SEP); precision in within-sibling MR was too low to draw inference about effects of BMI on SEP. There was some evidence of pleiotropy, with MR Egger suggesting limited effects of BMI on deprivation, although precision of these estimates is also low. Non-linear MR suggested that low BMI (bottom three deciles, <23.5 kg/m2) reduces the odds of cohabiting with a partner or spouse in men, whereas high BMI (top two deciles, >30.7 kg/m2) reduces the odds of cohabitation in women. Both non-genetic and MR within-sibling analyses supported this sex-specific effect of BMI on cohabitation. In men only, higher BMI was related to lower participation in leisure and social activities. There was little evidence that BMI affects visits from friends and family or having someone to confide in. CONCLUSIONS: BMI may affect social and socio-economic outcomes, with both high and low BMI being detrimental for SEP, although larger within-family MR studies may help to test the robustness of MR results in unrelated individuals. Triangulation of evidence across MR and within-family analyses supports evidence of a sex-specific effect of BMI on cohabitation.
BACKGROUND: We assessed whether body mass index (BMI) affects social and socio-economic outcomes. METHODS: We used Mendelian randomization (MR), non-linear MR and non-genetic and MR within-sibling analyses, to estimate relationships of BMI with six socio-economic and four social outcomes in 378 244 people of European ancestry in UK Biobank. RESULTS: In MR of minimally related individuals, higher BMI was related to higher deprivation, lower income, fewer years of education, lower odds of degree-level education and skilled employment. Non-linear MR suggested both low (bottom decile, <22 kg/m2) and high (top seven deciles, >24.6 kg/m2) BMI, increased deprivation and reduced income. Non-genetic within-sibling analysis supported an effect of BMI on socio-economic position (SEP); precision in within-sibling MR was too low to draw inference about effects of BMI on SEP. There was some evidence of pleiotropy, with MR Egger suggesting limited effects of BMI on deprivation, although precision of these estimates is also low. Non-linear MR suggested that low BMI (bottom three deciles, <23.5 kg/m2) reduces the odds of cohabiting with a partner or spouse in men, whereas high BMI (top two deciles, >30.7 kg/m2) reduces the odds of cohabitation in women. Both non-genetic and MR within-sibling analyses supported this sex-specific effect of BMI on cohabitation. In men only, higher BMI was related to lower participation in leisure and social activities. There was little evidence that BMI affects visits from friends and family or having someone to confide in. CONCLUSIONS: BMI may affect social and socio-economic outcomes, with both high and low BMI being detrimental for SEP, although larger within-family MR studies may help to test the robustness of MR results in unrelated individuals. Triangulation of evidence across MR and within-family analyses supports evidence of a sex-specific effect of BMI on cohabitation.
Authors: Cathie Sudlow; John Gallacher; Naomi Allen; Valerie Beral; Paul Burton; John Danesh; Paul Downey; Paul Elliott; Jane Green; Martin Landray; Bette Liu; Paul Matthews; Giok Ong; Jill Pell; Alan Silman; Alan Young; Tim Sprosen; Tim Peakman; Rory Collins Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Simon Haworth; Ruth Mitchell; Laura Corbin; Kaitlin H Wade; Tom Dudding; Ashley Budu-Aggrey; David Carslake; Gibran Hemani; Lavinia Paternoster; George Davey Smith; Neil Davies; Daniel J Lawson; Nicholas J Timpson Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jessica Tyrrell; Anwar Mulugeta; Andrew R Wood; Ang Zhou; Robin N Beaumont; Marcus A Tuke; Samuel E Jones; Katherine S Ruth; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Seth Sharp; William D Thompson; Yingjie Ji; Jamie Harrison; Rachel M Freathy; Anna Murray; Michael N Weedon; Cathryn Lewis; Timothy M Frayling; Elina Hyppönen Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: David A Raichlen; Yann C Klimentidis; M Katherine Sayre; Pradyumna K Bharadwaj; Mark H C Lai; Rand R Wilcox; Gene E Alexander Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Pascal M Mutie; Hugo Pomares-Milan; Naeimeh Atabaki-Pasdar; Daniel Coral; Hugo Fitipaldi; Neli Tsereteli; Juan Fernandez Tajes; Paul W Franks; Giuseppe N Giordano Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-10-12 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Brenda Cabrera-Mendoza; Frank R Wendt; Gita A Pathak; Flavio De Angelis; Antonella De Lillo; Dora Koller; Renato Polimanti Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 9.685
Authors: Iyas Daghlas; Rebecca C Richmond; Jacqueline M Lane; Hassan S Dashti; Hanna M Ollila; Eva S Schernhammer; George Davey Smith; Martin K Rutter; Richa Saxena; Céline Vetter Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Francesco Casanova; Jessica O'Loughlin; Susan Martin; Robin N Beaumont; Andrew R Wood; Edward R Watkins; Rachel M Freathy; Saskia P Hagenaars; Timothy M Frayling; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Jess Tyrrell Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sean Harrison; Alisha R Davies; Matt Dickson; Jessica Tyrrell; Michael J Green; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Desmond Campbell; Marcus Munafò; Padraig Dixon; Hayley E Jones; Frances Rice; Neil M Davies; Laura D Howe Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 9.685