Literature DB >> 31800031

Comparing the performance of artificial intelligence and conventional diagnosis criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy using electrocardiography.

Joon-Myoung Kwon1,2, Ki-Hyun Jeon2,3, Hyue Mee Kim3, Min Jeong Kim3, Sung Min Lim3, Kyung-Hee Kim3, Pil Sang Song3, Jinsik Park3, Rak Kyeong Choi3, Byung-Hee Oh3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Although left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has a high incidence and clinical importance, the conventional diagnosis criteria for detecting LVH using electrocardiography (ECG) has not been satisfied. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting LVH. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study involved the review of 21 286 patients who were admitted to two hospitals between October 2016 and July 2018 and underwent 12-lead ECG and echocardiography within 4 weeks. The patients in one hospital were divided into a derivation and internal validation dataset, while the patients in the other hospital were included in only an external validation dataset. An AI algorithm based on an ensemble neural network (ENN) combining convolutional and deep neural network was developed using the derivation dataset. And we visualized the ECG area that the AI algorithm used to make the decision. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AI algorithm based on ENN was 0.880 (95% confidence interval 0.877-0.883) and 0.868 (0.865-0.871) during the internal and external validations. These results significantly outperformed the cardiologist's clinical assessment with Romhilt-Estes point system and Cornell voltage criteria, Sokolov-Lyon criteria, and interpretation of ECG machine. At the same specificity, the AI algorithm based on ENN achieved 159.9%, 177.7%, and 143.8% higher sensitivities than those of the cardiologist's assessment, Sokolov-Lyon criteria, and interpretation of ECG machine.
CONCLUSION: An AI algorithm based on ENN was highly able to detect LVH and outperformed cardiologists, conventional methods, and other machine learning techniques. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Electrocardiography; Hypertrophy; Left ventricular

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31800031     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  18 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence: Review of Current and Future Applications in Medicine.

Authors:  L Brannon Thomas; Stephen M Mastorides; Narayan A Viswanadhan; Colleen E Jakey; Andrew A Borkowski
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-11

2.  A systematic review and Meta-data analysis on the applications of Deep Learning in Electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Nehemiah Musa; Abdulsalam Ya'u Gital; Nahla Aljojo; Haruna Chiroma; Kayode S Adewole; Hammed A Mojeed; Nasir Faruk; Abubakar Abdulkarim; Ifada Emmanuel; Yusuf Y Folawiyo; James A Ogunmodede; Abdukareem A Oloyede; Lukman A Olawoyin; Ismaeel A Sikiru; Ibrahim Katb
Journal:  J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in personalized cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Ikram-Ul Haq; Iqraa Haq; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

4.  Deep Learning to Predict Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Derived Left Ventricular Mass and Hypertrophy From 12-Lead ECGs.

Authors:  Shaan Khurshid; Samuel Friedman; James P Pirruccello; Paolo Di Achille; Nathaniel Diamant; Christopher D Anderson; Patrick T Ellinor; Puneet Batra; Jennifer E Ho; Anthony A Philippakis; Steven A Lubitz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 8.589

5.  Artificial intelligence algorithm for detecting myocardial infarction using six-lead electrocardiography.

Authors:  Younghoon Cho; Joon-Myoung Kwon; Kyung-Hee Kim; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Ki-Hyun Jeon; Soohyun Cho; Soo Youn Lee; Jinsik Park; Byung-Hee Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of the Electrocardiography Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (Cornell Voltage Criteria, Sokolow-Lyon Index, Romhilt-Estes, and Peguero-Lo Presti Criteria) Compared to Transthoracic Echocardiography.

Authors:  Nurseli Bayram; Haldun Akoğlu; Erkman Sanri; Sinan Karacabey; Melis Efeoğlu; Ozge Onur; Arzu Denizbasi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-14

7.  Deep learning and the electrocardiogram: review of the current state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Sulaiman Somani; Adam J Russak; Felix Richter; Shan Zhao; Akhil Vaid; Fayzan Chaudhry; Jessica K De Freitas; Nidhi Naik; Riccardio Miotto; Girish N Nadkarni; Jagat Narula; Edgar Argulian; Benjamin S Glicksberg
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 8.  ECG Monitoring Systems: Review, Architecture, Processes, and Key Challenges.

Authors:  Mohamed Adel Serhani; Hadeel T El Kassabi; Heba Ismail; Alramzana Nujum Navaz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting cardiac arrest using electrocardiography.

Authors:  Joon-Myoung Kwon; Kyung-Hee Kim; Ki-Hyun Jeon; Soo Youn Lee; Jinsik Park; Byung-Hee Oh
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Electrocardiography for Early Diagnosis of Thyrotoxic Periodic Paralysis.

Authors:  Chin Lin; Chin-Sheng Lin; Ding-Jie Lee; Chia-Cheng Lee; Sy-Jou Chen; Shi-Hung Tsai; Feng-Chih Kuo; Tom Chau; Shih-Hua Lin
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.