Danielle R Heller1, Norman G Nicolson1, Nita Ahuja1,2, Sajid Khan1,2, John W Kunstman1,2. 1. Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Smilow Cancer Hospital, Gastrointestinal Cancers Program, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
Importance: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a higher incidence and worse outcomes among black patients than white patients, potentially owing to a combination of socioeconomic, biological, and treatment differences. The role that these differences play remains unknown. Objectives: To determine the level of survival disparity between black and white patients in a modern PDAC cohort and whether treatment inequity is associated with such a disparity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data on 278 936 patients with PDAC with database-defined race from the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2015. The median follow-up for censored patients was 24 months. The National Cancer Database, comprising academic and community facilities, includes about 70% of new cancer diagnoses in the United States. Race-stratified receipt of therapy was the primary variable of interest. Multivariable analyses included additional demographic and clinical parameters. Data analysis was initially completed on November 30, 2018, and revised data analysis was completed on June 27, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was the primary outcome, analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Results: The cohort included 278 936 patients (137 121 women and 141 815 men; mean [SD] age, 68.72 [11.57] years); after excluding patients from other racial categories, 243 820 of the 278 936 patients (87.4%) were white and 35 116 of the 278 936 patients (12.6%) were black. Unadjusted median overall survival was longer for white patients than for black patients (6.6 vs 6.0 months; P < .001). Black patients presented at younger ages than white patients (15 819 of 35 116 [45.0%] vs 83 846 of 243 820 [34.4%] younger than 65 years; P < .001) and with more advanced disease (20 853 of 31 600 [66.0%] vs 135 317 of 220 224 [61.4%] with stage III or IV disease; P < .001). Black patients received fewer surgical procedures than white patients for potentially resectable stage II disease (4226 of 8097 [52.2%] vs 39 214 of 65 124 [60.2%]; P < .001) and slightly less chemotherapy for advanced disease (2756 of 4067 [67.8%] vs 17 296 of 25 227 [68.6%] for stage III disease [P = .001]; 8208 of 16 104 [51.0%] vs 58 603 of 105 616 [55.5%] for stage IV disease [P < .001]). Decreased survival for black patients persisted in multivariable modeling controlled for sociodemographic parameters (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.05]). Conversely, modeling that controlled specifically for clinical parameters such as disease stage and treatment revealed a modest survival advantage (hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.96]) among black patients. Resection was the factor most strongly associated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.38-0.39]). Conclusions and Relevance: Black patients with PDAC present at younger ages and with more advanced disease than white patients, suggesting that differences in tumor biology may exist. Black patients receive less treatment stage for stage and fewer surgical procedures for resectable cancers than white patients; these findings may be only partly associated with socioeconomic differences. When disease stage and treatment were controlled for, black patients had no decrease in survival.
Importance: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a higher incidence and worse outcomes among black patients than white patients, potentially owing to a combination of socioeconomic, biological, and treatment differences. The role that these differences play remains unknown. Objectives: To determine the level of survival disparity between black and white patients in a modern PDAC cohort and whether treatment inequity is associated with such a disparity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data on 278 936 patients with PDAC with database-defined race from the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2015. The median follow-up for censored patients was 24 months. The National Cancer Database, comprising academic and community facilities, includes about 70% of new cancer diagnoses in the United States. Race-stratified receipt of therapy was the primary variable of interest. Multivariable analyses included additional demographic and clinical parameters. Data analysis was initially completed on November 30, 2018, and revised data analysis was completed on June 27, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was the primary outcome, analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Results: The cohort included 278 936 patients (137 121 women and 141 815 men; mean [SD] age, 68.72 [11.57] years); after excluding patients from other racial categories, 243 820 of the 278 936 patients (87.4%) were white and 35 116 of the 278 936 patients (12.6%) were black. Unadjusted median overall survival was longer for white patients than for black patients (6.6 vs 6.0 months; P < .001). Black patients presented at younger ages than white patients (15 819 of 35 116 [45.0%] vs 83 846 of 243 820 [34.4%] younger than 65 years; P < .001) and with more advanced disease (20 853 of 31 600 [66.0%] vs 135 317 of 220 224 [61.4%] with stage III or IV disease; P < .001). Black patients received fewer surgical procedures than white patients for potentially resectable stage II disease (4226 of 8097 [52.2%] vs 39 214 of 65 124 [60.2%]; P < .001) and slightly less chemotherapy for advanced disease (2756 of 4067 [67.8%] vs 17 296 of 25 227 [68.6%] for stage III disease [P = .001]; 8208 of 16 104 [51.0%] vs 58 603 of 105 616 [55.5%] for stage IV disease [P < .001]). Decreased survival for black patients persisted in multivariable modeling controlled for sociodemographic parameters (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.05]). Conversely, modeling that controlled specifically for clinical parameters such as disease stage and treatment revealed a modest survival advantage (hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93-0.96]) among black patients. Resection was the factor most strongly associated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.38-0.39]). Conclusions and Relevance: Black patients with PDAC present at younger ages and with more advanced disease than white patients, suggesting that differences in tumor biology may exist. Black patients receive less treatment stage for stage and fewer surgical procedures for resectable cancers than white patients; these findings may be only partly associated with socioeconomic differences. When disease stage and treatment were controlled for, black patients had no decrease in survival.
Authors: Sivesh K Kamarajah; William R Burns; Timothy L Frankel; Clifford S Cho; Hari Nathan Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lola Rahib; Benjamin D Smith; Rhonda Aizenberg; Allison B Rosenzweig; Julie M Fleshman; Lynn M Matrisian Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: H A Burris; M J Moore; J Andersen; M R Green; M L Rothenberg; M R Modiano; M C Cripps; R K Portenoy; A M Storniolo; P Tarassoff; R Nelson; F A Dorr; C D Stephens; D D Von Hoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anasooya Abraham; Waddah B Al-Refaie; Helen M Parsons; Vikas Dudeja; Selwyn M Vickers; Elizabeth B Habermann Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Debra T Silverman; Robert N Hoover; Linda M Brown; G Marie Swanson; Mark Schiffman; Raymond S Greenberg; Richard B Hayes; Keith D Lillemoe; Janet B Schoenberg; Ann G Schwartz; Jonathan Liff; Linda M Pottern; Joseph F Fraumeni Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Lauren D Arnold; Alpa V Patel; Yan Yan; Eric J Jacobs; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Graham A Colditz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lisa Scarton; Saunjoo Yoon; Sungho Oh; Edward Agyare; Jose Trevino; Bo Han; Eunsook Lee; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Jennifer B Permuth; Thomas D Schmittgen; Folakemi G Odedina; Diana J Wilkie Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Jonathan Pastrana Del Valle; Nathanael R Fillmore; George Molina; Mark Fairweather; Jiping Wang; Thomas E Clancy; Stanley W Ashley; Richard D Urman; Edward E Whang; Jason S Gold Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Nadia N Khan; Tennille Lewin; Amy Hatton; Charles Pilgrim; Liane Ioannou; Luc Te Marvelde; John Zalcberg; Sue Evans Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Andrea M Schiefelbein; John K Krebsbach; Amy K Taylor; Jienian Zhang; Chloe E Haimson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Melissa C Skala; John M Eason; Sharon M Weber; Patrick R Varley; Syed N Zafar; Noelle K LoConte Journal: WMJ Date: 2022-07
Authors: Alexander S Thomas; Rahul K Sharma; Wooil Kwon; Kazuki N Sugahara; John A Chabot; Beth A Schrope; Michael D Kluger Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Andrea N Riner; Selamawit Girma; Vignesh Vudatha; Nitai Mukhopadhyay; Nevena Skoro; Tamas S Gal; Devon C Freudenberger; Kelly M Herremans; Thomas J George; Jose G Trevino Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 50.717