Literature DB >> 31799513

Correcting Undersampled Cardiac Sources in Equivalent Double Layer Forward Simulations.

Jess D Tate1, Steffen Schuler2, Olaf Dössel2, Rob S MacLeod1, Thom F Oostendorp3.   

Abstract

Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) requires robust ECG forward simulations to accurately calculate cardiac activity. However, many questions remain regarding ECG forward simulations, for instance: there are not common guidelines for the required cardiac source sampling. In this study we test equivalent double layer (EDL) forward simulations with differing cardiac source resolutions and different spatial interpolation techniques. The goal is to reduce error caused by undersampling of cardiac sources and provide guidelines to reduce said source undersampling in ECG forward simulations. Using a simulated dataset sampled at 5 spatial resolutions, we computed body surface potentials using an EDL forward simulation pipeline. We tested two spatial interpolation methods to reduce error due to undersampling triangle weighting and triangle splitting. This forward modeling pipeline showed high frequency artifacts in the predicted ECG time signals when the cardiac source resolution was too low. These low resolutions could also cause shifts in extrema location on the body surface maps. However, these errors in predicted potentials can be mitigated by using a spatial interpolation method. Using spatial interpolation can reduce the number of nodes required for accurate body surface potentials from 9,218 to 2,306. Spatial interpolation in this forward model could also help improve accuracy and reduce computational cost in subsequent ECGI applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activation times; Body surface potentials; Boundary element method; ECG forward simulation; Equivalent double layer; Spatial interpolation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31799513      PMCID: PMC6889815          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21949-9_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Imaging Model Heart


  6 in total

1.  Noninvasive electroanatomic mapping of human ventricular arrhythmias with electrocardiographic imaging.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Phillip S Cuculich; Junjie Zhang; Kavit A Desouza; Ramya Vijayakumar; Jane Chen; Mitchell N Faddis; Bruce D Lindsay; Timothy W Smith; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Non-invasive imaging of cardiac activation and recovery.

Authors:  Peter M van Dam; Thom F Oostendorp; André C Linnenbank; Adriaan van Oosterom
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Forward problem of electrocardiography: is it solved?

Authors:  Laura R Bear; Leo K Cheng; Ian J LeGrice; Gregory B Sands; Nigel A Lever; David J Paterson; Bruce H Smaill
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Effect of Segmentation Variation on ECG Imaging.

Authors:  Jess D Tate; Nejib Zemzemi; Wilson W Good; Peter van Dam; Dana H Brooks; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Comput Cardiol (2010)       Date:  2018-09

5.  Cardiac position sensitivity study in the electrocardiographic forward problem using stochastic collocation and boundary element methods.

Authors:  Darrell J Swenson; Sarah E Geneser; Jeroen G Stinstra; Robert M Kirby; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Reducing Error in ECG Forward Simulations With Improved Source Sampling.

Authors:  Jess Tate; Karli Gillette; Brett Burton; Wilson Good; Brian Zenger; Jaume Coll-Font; Dana Brooks; Rob MacLeod
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.