| Literature DB >> 31799284 |
Giuseppe Piegari1, Davide De Biase1, Ilaria d'Aquino1, Francesco Prisco1, Rosario Fico2, Raffaele Ilsami1, Nicola Pozzato3, Angelo Genovese4, Orlando Paciello1.
Abstract
The detection of diatoms into the organs is considered an important "biological marker" for the diagnosis of drowning in human pathology, but it still has a high possibility for false positive results. The aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate the contribution of pathological examination in drowning cases and (2) to investigate the differences in the number and location of diatoms between animals who died in drowning and non-drowning conditions. For these purposes, 30 dead adult dogs were selected for the study and subdivided into five groups. The group A comprised six cadavers dead for drowning; the group B comprised six control animals; the groups C, D, and E comprised six animals dead for causes other than drowning and subsequently immersed in water for 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. On each animal, a complete macroscopic and histological examination and diatom test were performed. Diatoms test and quantification were also performed on drowning mediums. Pathological findings of the animals in the group A showed pulmonary congestion, oedema, and hemorrages in the lung. However, similar injuries were also observed in control and experimentally submerged cadavers. In contrast, we observed a statistically differences between drowning animals and all experimentally submerged groups and control animals regarding diatom numbers recovered from organ tissue samples (p < 0.05). Therefore, these findings suggest that the number of diatoms may be used as a valid tool to differentiate animals who died in drowning and non-drowning conditions, even if the latter were found in an aquatic environment.Entities:
Keywords: diatoms; diatoms test; drowning; forensic medicine; veterinary forensic pathology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31799284 PMCID: PMC6868027 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Diatom test protocol and internal protocol used to avoid diatom contamination.
| Necropsy | Sterile blades, change of the blade after skinning to avoid skin contact with organs |
| Sample collection | Sterile blade, separate instruments for each sample, diatom-free glass containers |
| Samples treated with HCL (20%) for 24 h | Sterile blade, separate instruments for each sample, diatom-free glass containers |
| Washing | Diatom-free water for washing |
| Samples treated with H2O2 (40%) | diatom-free glass containers |
| Overnight sedimentation and decanting of excess liquid | // |
| Sediment centrifuged three times at 1,000 rpm and washed | Diatom-free water for washing, diatom-free glass containers |
Macroscopic lesions of drowning observed in study animals stratified by group.
| GA.1 | X | X | X | X | X | – | X | – | Drowning |
| GA.2 | X | X | X | X | – | X | – | – | Drowning |
| GA.3 | X | X | X | X | X | – | – | X | Drowning |
| GA.4 | X | X | X | – | – | X | – | – | Drowning |
| GA.5 | X | X | X | – | X | – | – | – | Drowning |
| GA.6 | X | X | X | – | X | X | X | – | Drowning |
| GB.1 | – | X | X | – | – | – | – | X | Blunt trauma |
| GB.2 | – | X | X | – | – | – | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GB.3 | – | X | X | – | X | X | – | – | Dilatative cardiomyopathy |
| GB.4 | X | X | X | X | X | – | – | X | Blunt trauma |
| GB.5 | X | X | X | X | – | – | – | X | Blunt trauma |
| GB.6 | X | X | X | X | X | X | – | X | Blunt trauma |
| GC.1 | X | X | X | – | – | – | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GC.2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | – | X | Blunt trauma |
| GC.3 | X | X | X | – | – | X | – | – | Dilatative cardiomyopathy |
| GC.4 | X | X | X | X | X | X | – | – | Kidney failure |
| GC.5 | X | X | – | – | – | – | – | X | Traumatic Brain Injury |
| GC.6 | X | X | X | – | – | X | – | – | Hypovolemic shock |
| GD.1 | X | X | X | – | – | X | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GD.2 | X | X | X | X | X | X | – | – | Dilatative cardiomyopathy |
| GD.3 | X | X | X | – | X | X | – | – | Splenic cancer |
| GD.4 | X | X | X | – | – | X | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GD.5 | X | X | X | X | X | – | – | – | Septic shock |
| GD.6 | X | X | X | – | – | X | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GE.1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GE.2 | X | X | X | – | X | X | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GE.3 | X | X | X | – | X | X | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GE.4 | X | X | X | X | X | X | – | – | Septic shock |
| GE.5 | X | X | X | – | X | X | – | – | Euthanasia |
| GE.6 | X | – | – | – | – | – | – | X | Traumatic brain injury |
Group A (GA), Group B (GB), Group C (GC), Group D (GD), Group E (GE).
Figure 1Representative H&E –stained sections from lung tissues of animals of the groups (A–C). (A) Lung section from drowned animals showing proteinaceous fluid within alveoli. (B) Lung section from downed animals showing mild to moderate vasodilatation and emphysema. (C,D) Lung section from animals of the group B showing proteinaceous fluid in alveolar space, vasodilatation and emphysema. (E) Lung section from animals of the Group C showing proteinaceous fluid within alveoli, vasodilatation and intra-alveolar hemorrhages. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification 20×. (F) Lung section from animals in the group A showing foreign and unstained material, characterized by small and elongate structures, often with multiple striae perpendicular to their major axis, consisting of diatoms Hematoxylin and eosin Stain, original magnification 10×.
No. of diatoms per 100 μl recovered from drowning mediums and animal tissue samples.
| GA.1 | Well | 720–782 (749 ± 31) | 29 | 6 | 2 | n/d | n/d | n/d |
| GA.2 | Well | 720–782 (749 ± 31) | 28 | 5 | 2 | n/d | n/d | n/d |
| GA.3 | Pond | 2.323–2850 (2.524 ± 284) | 91 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
| GA.4 | Brulamacca canal | 560–581 (571 ± 10) | 37 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GA.5 | Mediterranean Sea in Naples | 310–383 (342 ± 37) | 29 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| GA.6 | Mediterranean Sea in Agropoli | 452–461 (458 ± 4) | 27 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| GB.1 | Terrestrial environment | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GB.2 | Terrestrial environment | – | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| GB.3 | Terrestrial environment | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GB.4 | Terrestrial environment | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GB.5 | Terrestrial environment | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GB.6 | Terrestrial environment | – | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Group A (GA), Group B (GB);
no data.
Figure 2The most common diatoms identified in animals of the Group A. (A) Nitzschia spp. (B) Gomphonema micropus. (C) Cyclotella spp. (D) Gomphonema acuminatum. (E) Amphora ovalis. (F) Fragment of diatom. Original magnification 100×.
Mann–Whitney rank sum test between control and drowned animals.
| Median (group A) | 29 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Median (group B) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 |
No. of diatoms per 100 μl recovered from animal tissue samples.
| GC.1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GC.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GC.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GC.4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GC.5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GC.6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GD.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GD.2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GD.3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GD.4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GD.5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GD.6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GE.1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GE.2 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GE.3 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GE.4 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GE.5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GE.6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Group C (GC), Group D (GD), Group E (GE).
Mann–Whitney rank sum test of diatom test results in lung.
| Group C vs. D | >0.05 |
| Group C vs. E | <0.05 |
| Group D vs. E | <0.05 |