Literature DB >> 31799102

Effect on background checks of newly-enacted comprehensive background check policies in Oregon and Washington: a synthetic control approach.

Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia1,2,3, Daniel W Webster4, Garen J Wintemute5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive background check (CBC) laws extend background check requirements to private party firearm transfers to prevent firearm acquisitions by prohibited persons. The aim of our study was to estimate the association between CBC policies and changes in background check rates for firearm acquisition in two states (Oregon and Washington) that have newly-enacted CBC policies.
METHODS: We used data on handgun background checks from January 1999 to December 2018 from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Observed trends in exposed states were contrasted with counterfactual trends estimated with the synthetic control group method.
FINDINGS: CBC policies were associated with increases in background checks in Oregon (by 18.0%; p = 0.074), but not in Washington (4%; p = 0.321). A gradual increase in private party checks was seen following enactment in Washington; however, firearm transactions coded as "private" represent less than 5% of total background checks in that state.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive background check policies appear to be effective in increasing pre-firearm-sale background checks in Oregon but not in Washington. Differences appear to be related to variations in the proportion of firearm sales that are private party transfers and to gradual adaptation to the new law by private gun sellers.
© The Author(s). 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Firearms; Policy; Violence

Year:  2019        PMID: 31799102      PMCID: PMC6880454          DOI: 10.1186/s40621-019-0225-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Epidemiol        ISSN: 2197-1714


Introduction

Public mass shootings and rising rates of firearm homicide and suicide have given new urgency to efforts to prevent firearm violence in the United States. Comprehensive background check (CBC) policies are one such effort, and they enjoy broad public support (Barry et al. 2018). CBC laws extend background check requirements to private party firearm transfers to prevent firearm acquisitions by prohibited persons. In states without CBC policies, approximately 57% of private party transfers precede without background checks; this decreases to 26% in states where CBC policies are in effect (Miller et al. 2017). Nearly all prohibited persons (95%) who acquire firearms for criminal purposes rely on sellers not required to conduct checks (Vittes et al. 2013). Studies of CBC laws adopted in the 1990s that did not require a permit or license to purchase firearms have not produced evidence that the laws reduce homicides or suicides (Kagawa et al. 2018; Castillo-Carniglia et al. 2019). Recently-adopted CBC laws did not even reliably increase the overall number of background checks (Castillo-Carniglia et al. 2018). Such an increase would be an expected intermediate outcome if CBC policies are to have their intended effect on firearm violence. In this report, we assess the effect of the enactment of CBC laws on handgun background check rates in two US states, extending our preliminary findings for Washington, which considered 2 post-intervention years through December 2016 (Castillo-Carniglia et al. 2018), and adding data for Oregon.

Methods

We used monthly counts from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) from January 1999 through December 2018. Washington implemented its CBC law in December 2014 and Oregon in August 2015. We used the synthetic control group method (Abadie et al. 2010) to assess whether the number of monthly handgun background checks per 100,000 people in each state changed following policy enactment in ways different from those forecasted by state-specific counterfactuals. With this method, synthetic controls for each of the two new CBC states were created from a weighted average of a pool of potential control states—the 28 states that did not implement CBC policies during the study period—that minimizes the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE) for CBC state outcome measures for the pre-CBC law period. The states with potential of being part of the synthetic controls were: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming. Weights for control states sum to 1 and are estimated based on state-specific values for variables shown to predict background check rates in the two study states during the time before their CBC laws took effect. We again used the following variables (Castillo-Carniglia et al. 2018): percentages of the population between ages 18–24 years, male, Latino, black, having a high school diploma or higher, under the poverty line, or living in urban areas, and median household income, Gini coefficient measure of income inequality, violent crime rate, prevalence of firearm ownership (estimated as the proportion of firearm suicide among all suicides) and values of the outcome at 3 pre-intervention time points: January 1999, 2007, and 2012. The synthetic control group method does not produce a traditional measure of uncertainty or a test of statistical significance. Inference is based on permutation tests (also called placebo interventions), in which the same analysis is replicated, but the intervention assignment is “permuted” across control states. There is no theoretical reason to expect an effect of a non-existent intervention, but random variation in the post-intervention period can exist. The original results are therefore compared with those from the permutation tests. P-values are estimated as the quotient of the number of control states with standardized differences (estimated as post-intervention RMSPE/pre-intervention RMSPE) larger than the treated states and the total number of states in the donor pool.

Results

States with and without CBC policies exhibited an upward trend in monthly handgun background check rates from early 2000s until 2016–2017 and a small decrease more recently (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Rates were lower in states with CBC policies. Table 1 displays weights for control states and RMSPEs from synthetic control group comparisons. For Oregon and Washington, eight and five control states, respectively, had nonzero weights. The largest weights for Oregon were assigned to Arizona, New Hampshire, North Dakota, and Montana; for Washington, the largest weights were assigned to Florida, Minnesota, and South Dakota.
Table 1

Weights and goodness of fit from the synthetic control analyses for Oregon and Washington

StateOregonWashington
Alabama00
Alaska00.051
Arizona0.2050
Arkansas00
Florida00.167
Georgia00
Idaho00
Kansas00
Kentucky00
Louisiana00
Maine00
Minnesota00.448
Mississippi00
Montana0.1220
Nevada00
New Hampshir0.1780
New Mexico0.1490
North Dakota00
Ohio0.0710
Oklahoma0.0780
South Carolina00
South Dakota00.307
Texas00
Utah00.027
Virginia00
West Virginia0.1000
Wisconsin00
Wyoming0.0960
RMSPE11.311.6

RMSPE root mean square prediction error

Weights and goodness of fit from the synthetic control analyses for Oregon and Washington RMSPE root mean square prediction error There was a good match between the pre-intervention trend in background checks in each of the new CBC states and its synthetic control (Fig. 1). Further detail is in Table 2 and Fig. 2. The observed average background check rates in the post-intervention period, and the counterfactual rates for the two case states are presented in the first and second rows of the table. The estimated absolute effect of the CBC laws is the difference between the observed and the counterfactual rates, presented in the third row. The last row shows the number of control states with a difference associated with a hypothetical CBC policy greater than the observed difference in the case state. CBC law enactment was associated with a background check rate increase of 52.8 per 100,000 population in Oregon (an 18.0% increase); only 2 out of 27 states in the comparison pool experienced an increase greater than Oregon’s. No change was observed for Washington (4.9%; P = 0.3214).
Fig. 1

Trend in monthly handgun background check rates per 100,000 people in Oregon and Washington and their synthetic controls, January 1999 to December 2018. Note. P-value computed as the proportion of states in the donor pool with standardized change (post-intervention RMSPE/pre-intervention RMSPE) ≥ the standardized change in the treated state. Abbreviation: Diff = Percentage difference

Table 2

Change in handgun background check rate (per 100,000 People) after implementation of CBC policies in Oregon and Washington, January 1999 to December 2018

MeasureOregonaWashington
Observed mean rate of BCs in treated states following implementation349.9237.7
Counterfactual mean rate of BCs following implementation297.1228.6
Absolute difference in BC rate following implementationb52.89.1
Estimated % difference in BC rate following implementationc18.04.0
N states in the donor pool with change ≥ treated state (n = 28)d29

CBC comprehensive background checks, BCs background checks

a Permutation test for Alaska did not converged, resulting in 27 control states. b Mean difference in background check rate between the treated states and their synthetic control after policy implementation. c Percentage difference in background checks rate in reference to BC rate of the synthetic controls after policy implementation. d Results from permutation test, measured as the post-intervention RMSPE/pre-intervention RMSPE

Fig. 2

Effect of comprehensive background check policies on monthly handgun background check rate per 100,000 people in Oregon and Washington, January 1999 to December 2018. Note: Effect estimated as the difference between the treated states and their synthetic controls (black lines). Grey lines present the placebo effect for each of the control states in the donor pool

Trend in monthly handgun background check rates per 100,000 people in Oregon and Washington and their synthetic controls, January 1999 to December 2018. Note. P-value computed as the proportion of states in the donor pool with standardized change (post-intervention RMSPE/pre-intervention RMSPE) ≥ the standardized change in the treated state. Abbreviation: Diff = Percentage difference Change in handgun background check rate (per 100,000 People) after implementation of CBC policies in Oregon and Washington, January 1999 to December 2018 CBC comprehensive background checks, BCs background checks a Permutation test for Alaska did not converged, resulting in 27 control states. b Mean difference in background check rate between the treated states and their synthetic control after policy implementation. c Percentage difference in background checks rate in reference to BC rate of the synthetic controls after policy implementation. d Results from permutation test, measured as the post-intervention RMSPE/pre-intervention RMSPE Effect of comprehensive background check policies on monthly handgun background check rate per 100,000 people in Oregon and Washington, January 1999 to December 2018. Note: Effect estimated as the difference between the treated states and their synthetic controls (black lines). Grey lines present the placebo effect for each of the control states in the donor pool Washington did experience an increase in checks arising from private-party sales following enactment of its CBC law (Additional file 1: Figure S2). However, checks for private-party transfers accounted for only 3.4% of background checks during the study period; 1.3% in the first year following implementation and 4.8% in the last year available.

Discussion

Inconsistent association between CBC laws and the overall rate of background checks in these two neighboring states may reflect differences in the proportion of firearm transfers that occur between private parties, in compliance (i.e., adaptation to the new law by private gun sellers), and implementation (e.g., mechanism to detect prohibited persons through integrated data systems, police enforcement) (Vittes et al. 2013; Crifasi et al. 2018). For example, while Oregon showed a consistent increase in handgun background checks following CBC implementation, Washington only experienced a modest nonsignificant increase in background checks by mid-2017, almost two years after implementation of the law. Further comparisons between these two states on factors potentially associated with the effects of CBC policies on background checks such as measures of enforcement (e.g., persons charged with CBC law violations) would be very helpful. The new laws may have had effects that we were unable to measure or detect. For example, Washington’s increase in private-party checks after its CBC policy took effect suggests a gradual adaptation to the new law by private gun sellers, which warrants the use of longer post-intervention data when evaluating CBC policies. In the case of Washington, however, these checks accounted for less than 5% of total handgun background checks, which is still a very small proportion compared with what has been estimated at the national level (Miller et al. 2017). No pre-enactment data were available, and the increase cannot be attributed to the policy with any certainty. In contrast to the CBC laws studied here, permit-to-purchase (PTP) laws require handgun purchasers to apply for purchase permits directly to law enforcement agencies who perform background checks and ensure that applicants meet all eligibility requirements (e.g., safety training). PTP laws have been associated with reduced firearm homicides and suicides (Rudolph et al. 2015; Hasegawa et al. 2019). Further research will be needed to determine whether newly-enacted CBC laws in our study states and Vermont (enactment in April 2018) (Vermont General Assembly 2018) are associated with similar benefits. CBC laws have inconsistent effects on background checks, potentially by several mechanisms acting jointly. All these mechanisms, along with incomplete reporting of prohibiting events, may be responsible for the observed modest or absent effect of CBC laws on rates of firearm violence (Wintemute 2019). Identifying and implementing measures to improve their effectiveness is an urgent public health priority. Additional file 1: Figure S1. Trend in the rate (per 100,000 people) of monthly handgun background checks in the United State by CBC status, 1999 – 2018. Figure S2. Trend in the rate (per 100,000 people) of monthly private party handgun background checks in Washington, July 2013 to December 2018. Additional file 2. Stata code for synthetic control group method and figures.
  10 in total

1.  Legal status and source of offenders' firearms in states with the least stringent criteria for gun ownership.

Authors:  Katherine A Vittes; Jon S Vernick; Daniel W Webster
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Association Between Connecticut's Permit-to-Purchase Handgun Law and Homicides.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Elizabeth A Stuart; Jon S Vernick; Daniel W Webster
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Evaluating Missouri's Handgun Purchaser Law: A Bracketing Method for Addressing Concerns About History Interacting with Group.

Authors:  Raiden B Hasegawa; Daniel W Webster; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  California's comprehensive background check and misdemeanor violence prohibition policies and firearm mortality.

Authors:  Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia; Rose M C Kagawa; Magdalena Cerdá; Cassandra K Crifasi; Jon S Vernick; Daniel W Webster; Garen J Wintemute
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Public Support for Gun Violence Prevention Policies Among Gun Owners and Non-Gun Owners in 2017.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Daniel W Webster; Elizabeth Stone; Cassandra K Crifasi; Jon S Vernick; Emma E McGinty
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Comprehensive background check policy and firearm background checks in three US states.

Authors:  Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia; Rose M C Kagawa; Daniel W Webster; Jon S Vernick; Magdalena Cerdá; Garen J Wintemute
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  Changes in the legal environment and enforcement of firearm transfer laws in Pennsylvania and Maryland.

Authors:  Cassandra K Crifasi; Molly Merrill-Francis; Daniel W Webster; Garen J Wintemute; Jon S Vernick
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.399

8.  Background Checks For Firearm Purchases: Problem Areas And Recommendations To Improve Effectiveness.

Authors:  Garen J Wintemute
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Repeal of Comprehensive Background Check Policies and Firearm Homicide and Suicide.

Authors:  Rose M C Kagawa; Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia; Jon S Vernick; Daniel Webster; Cassandra Crifasi; Kara E Rudolph; Magdalena Cerdá; Aaron Shev; Garen J Wintemute
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Firearm Acquisition Without Background Checks: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  Matthew Miller; Lisa Hepburn; Deborah Azrael
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 25.391

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic Control Methodology for Examining Firearm Policy.

Authors:  Michelle Degli Esposti; Douglas Wiebe; Elinore Kaufman; Carl Bonander
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2022-07-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.