| Literature DB >> 31799077 |
Yingying Yang1,2, Tingting Yang3, Shengxin Liu2, Zhijuan Cao1, Yan Zhao1, Xiujuan Su1, Zehuan Liao4,5, Xiaoming Teng6, Jing Hua1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies suggested that PM2.5 exposure could lead to adverse reproductive effects on male animals. However, the underlying mechanism is still not clear. Besides, animals in the majority of previous studies were exposed to PM2.5 through intratracheal instillation which should be improved. In addition, limited amount of research has been conducted in China where the PM2.5 concentration is higher and the PM2.5 components are different. The aim of this work is to explore the effects of concentrated ambient PM2.5 (CAP) on mice sperm quality and testosterone biosynthesis.Entities:
Keywords: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5); Reproductive health; Sperm quality; Testosterone biosynthesis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31799077 PMCID: PMC6885350 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Organ weights of C57BL/6 mice exposed to PM2.5.
| Group | Sample size | Body weight (g) | Testis weight (g) | Relative weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | 6 | 28.05 ± 1.20 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.07 |
| CAP | 6 | 28.27 ± 1.57 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.06 |
| – | 0.788 | 0.379 | 0.407 |
Note:
FA, filtered air; CAP, concentrated ambient PM2.5. Students’ t-test were used to test the difference between the two groups.
Sperm parameters in different mice group.
| Group | Sample size | Sperm concentration (×106) | PR (%) | PR + NP (%) | DFI (%) | HDS (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | 6 | 43.00 ± 10.80 | 63.58 ± 4.83 | 84.00 ± 2.43 | 2.96 ± 1.14 | 0.90 ± 0.18 |
| CAP | 6 | 25.33 ± 9.39 | 55.15 ± 3.83 | 77.08 ± 3.22 | 4.39 ± 1.56 | 1.52 ± 0.66 |
| – | 0.013 | 0.007 | 0.002 | 0.100 | 0.074 |
Note:
FA, filtered air; CAP, concentrated ambient PM2.5; PR, progressive motility; NP, non-progressive motility; DFI, DNA fragmentation index; HDS, high DNA stainability. Students’ t-test were used to test the difference between the two groups.
Figure 1The effects of CAP exposure on seminiferous tubule morphology in testis.
(A) Seminiferous tubule morphology in testis of FA group; (B) the magnification image of the selected area from A; (C) the magnification image of the selected area from B. A, B and C showing normal spermatogenesis with normal features of spermatogonia (Sg), Spermatocytes (Sp), spermatids (Sd), elongated spermatids (ES); (D) seminiferous tubule morphology in testis of CAP group; (E) the magnification image of the selected area from D; (F) the magnification image of the selected area from E. D, E and F exhibiting damage on tubules and spermatogenesis. The basal lamina degenerated with less basal cells. Spermatogenesis stopped at the primary spermatocyte stages as seen in the lumen (LU). The germ cells showed overall decrease in cytoplasmic ground substance followed by vacuolization (arrow). A and D, 100×; B and E, 200×; C and F, 400×.
Figure 2Sperm morphology.
(A) Normal sperm; (B) two tails defect; (C) no-head defect; (D) no-tail defect; (E) coiled tail defect; (F) bent tail defect.
Figure 3The expressions of testosterone synthesis and function related genes.
(A) StAR. (B) P450 scc. (C) 3βHSD. (D) 17βHSD. (E) P450 arom. (F) ER. (G) AR. (H) FSHR. The data are expressed as the (mean ± SD). N = 6 per group. *P < 0.05 compared with FA group. Abbreviations: FA, filtered air; CAP, concentrated ambient PM2.5. Students’ t-test were used to test the difference between the two groups.