Literature DB >> 31798921

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with unusual cytogenetic findings: one more case and review of the literature.

Maria Ioannou1, Konstantinos Perivoliotis2, Nikolaos-Marios Zaharos1, Athanasios Tsanakas1, Konstantinos Tepetes2, George Koukoulis1.   

Abstract

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS), a histological subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), is characterized by an unfavorable clinical outcome. In most ARMS cases, an indicative chromosomal alteration is identified. The recurrent translocation of FKHR with either PAX3 or PAX7 genes results in the encoding of chimeric transcription factors that boost tumorigenesis. Besides structural mutations, the copy number of these genes also contributes to the oncogenic activity. In our case, a 12-year-old female patient was diagnosed with a 4 cm pelvic mass. Histopathological examination indicated an alveolar type of RMS. Subsequent FISH analysis with a dual color break-apart probe identified positive signals of FKHR3 gene break, as well as the rare event of a synchronous aneuploidy and gene deletion of FKHR. Our findings lead to the conclusion that a systematic break-apart probe FKHR FISH analysis in ARMS, confirms the diagnosis and elucidates the full spectrum of genomic alterations of this malignancy.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31798921      PMCID: PMC6874863          DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omz107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oxf Med Case Reports        ISSN: 2053-8855


INTRODUCTION

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma and accounts for 3–4% of all pediatric malignancies [1]. Among the various histological subtypes that have been described, are the embryonal (ERMS), alveolar (ARMS), spindle cell, mixed-type, pleomorphic and ganglionic differentiated rhabdomyosarcoma [1]. Although ERMS is the most common RMS form, ARMS is characterized by an increased metastatic potential (25.9%), a lower 10-year survival rate (35.3%) and a worse overall prognosis [1]. Cytogenetic studies of ARMS have identified a characteristic chromosomal alteration [2-4]. More specifically, the majority of ARMSs display a recurrent translocation between genes encoding for transcription factor FKHR with either PAX3 or PAX7 (fusion-positive ARMS) [2]. The resulting chimeric genes encode transcription factors that promote tumorigenesis [2]. Besides these, in a notable portion of fusion-positive tumors, chimeric genes are amplified, thus confirming the significance of the somatic copy number alterations in ARMS tumorigenesis [5]. However, the concurrent chromosomal amplification and gene deletion in fusion-positive ARMSs is still a rare entity [5]. Therefore, in our study, we present the case of a pediatric ARMS, with evidence of chromosomal translocation on FISH analysis, as well as with FKHR3 gene amplification and deletion. We also review the relevant literature.

CASE REPORT

Α 12-year-old Caucasian female, with no significant medical history and without pathological laboratory results, presented to our tertiary hospital emergency department, with dull inguinal pain symptoms. An abdomen CT scan revealed a 4 cm right pelvic mass. Initial diagnostic work-up included a chest CT scan, abdomen MRI and a 99Tc bone scintigraphy. Since the lesion did not infiltrate any regional structures and there were no metastases, the patient was submitted to a local mass excision and pelvic lymph node dissection. Postoperative recovery was eventless. The excised tissues were fixed in a formalin solution and processed in paraffin. Microscopic evaluation validated a R0 excision and excluded the presence of lymph node metastatic foci. In hematoxylin and eosin light microscopy, patternless sheets of discohesive tumor cells with fibrovascular septae were identified (Fig. 1a). Polylobated and multinucleated tumor cells and many mitotic figures were also observed. Immunohistochemistry showed diffuse strong cytoplasmic and membranous positivity for desmin, vimentin and strong nuclear staining for MyoD1 and myogenin (Fig. 1b). Other immunostains including cytokeratins AE1/AE3, LCA, S-100, HMB-45 and CD34 were negative. Therefore, the diagnosis of an alveolar type of rhabdomyosarcoma was suggested.
Figure 1

(a) Neoplastic cells with medium to large nuclei, homogeneous chromatin and a variable amount of cytoplasm are separated by fibrovascular septae (Hematoxylin and Eosin stain, original magnification ×20). (b) Neoplastic cells displaying strong nuclear positivity for myogenin.

(a) Neoplastic cells with medium to large nuclei, homogeneous chromatin and a variable amount of cytoplasm are separated by fibrovascular septae (Hematoxylin and Eosin stain, original magnification ×20). (b) Neoplastic cells displaying strong nuclear positivity for myogenin. FISH analysis was performed using a dual color break-apart probe for FKHR (also known as FOXO1). A Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a Plan Neofluar x100/1.3 oil objective lens was introduced for the fluorescence image capture. The recording of the analysis results was achieved by using a monochrome progressive scan CV-M4/CL camera (Applied Imaging Corp., CA, USA) and CytoVision software, 3.93.1 release (Applied Imaging Corp.). Our analysis (Fig. 2a and b) on the sarcoma tissue, revealed one normal fusion signal (yellow), two split signals for the telomeric region of FKHR (red) and multiple split signals for the centromeric region of FKHR (green). These results indicated a rearrangement at FKHR3 locus. Moreover, the multiple green and red signals confirmed gene amplification. The uniqueness of our case is based on the fact that besides gene translocation and aneuploidy, FKHR3 gene deletion (Fig. 2 a and b) was recorded. This observation was suggested by the different and not even number of green and red signals in a cell nuclei during FISH analysis.
Figure 2

(a and b) FISH analysis shows one normal fusion signal (yellow), two split signals for the telomeric region of FKHR (red) and multiple split signals for the centromeric region of FKHR (green). Many of cells show more green than red signals (insert).

(a and b) FISH analysis shows one normal fusion signal (yellow), two split signals for the telomeric region of FKHR (red) and multiple split signals for the centromeric region of FKHR (green). Many of cells show more green than red signals (insert). Postoperatively, the patient received an adjuvant vincristine, dactinomycin and cyclophosphamide regimen. Moreover, a 36 Gy radiotherapy course was also administered. There was no recurrence at 6 months follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Among the various subtypes, ARMS is considered to be among the pediatric RMSs with the worst overall survival outcomes. Regarding histologic presentation, ARMS is characterized by round cells, clustered in nests and separated by fibrous septa with periseptal rows and peripheral discohesion. Myogenesis-related factors, such as MyoD or myogenin, are also positive [4]. Differential diagnosis of ARMS includes other soft tissue sarcomas with overlapping cytological features and the embryonal type of rhabdomyosarcoma which presents overlapping immunohistochemical characteristics. The final diagnosis is reached by identification of one of two transcription factor translocations: t(2;13)(q35;q14), i.e. PAX3- FKHR or t(1;13)(p36;q14), i.e. PAX7-FKHR [6]. PAX3 -FKHR and PAX7-FKHR mutations have been reported in 64% and 18% of ARMS cases, respectively [2]. Other genomic rearrangements that have been reported in ARMS, include the generation of the PAX3-AFX, PAX3-NCOA1 and PAX3-NCOA2 fusion genes [7]. The oncogenic potential of the chimeric proteins, derives from the stimulation of cell proliferation, promotion of cell survival and suppression of terminal differentiation. The interphase cytogenetic findings of our case are unique, based on the simultaneously observed amplification and deletion of FKHR3 gene. Early publications have demonstrated genomic amplification in ARMS tumors. Amplification has been detected in 47 of 84 ARMS tumors (56%) and the amplification events were derived from the 1p36, 2p24, 12q13-q14, 13q14 and 13q31 chromosomal regions [8]. In addition to this, the majority of fusion-positive ARMSs, show amplification of the chimeric PAX7-FKHR gene [5]. In our study, we used a break-apart FKHR3 probe, which does not allow the fusion partner to be recognized. However, the multiple signals for the centromeric region of FKHR3 are indicative of gene amplification. Moreover, in our case, we detected a synchronous deletion of the FKHR gene. Previous publications have reported RMS cases with somatic copy number alterations, detected in parallel to chromosomal structural rearrangements [4, 5]. However, they are generally more prevalent in ERMS than in ARMS [4]. Interestingly, Harrison et al. [9] reported a case of disseminated alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, where chromosome analysis showed a deletion of chromosome 13(q14). This was the first reported case, in which this deletion occurred without involvement of chromosome 2 and the authors correlated this cytogenetic feature with the possible oncogenic role of the retinoblastoma (RB1) gene located at the related breakpoint. Recently, Liu et al. [10], using an array comparative genomic hybridization technique, provided a spectrum of gene amplification and deletion regions in RMS. The clinical significance of identifying gene amplification and deletion lies to the fact that these regions contain oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes [5]. In our case FKHR3 gene deletion occurred simultaneously with gene amplification and gene rearrangement. To our knowledge, this cytogenetic profile is reported for first time in the literature. Identification of ARMS fusion genes can be detected through real-time PCR, or FISH analysis [6]. When comparing FISH FKHR to PCR analysis, FISH displays a higher sensitivity rate, with lower technical and cost requirements [6]. Furthermore, a diagnostic enhancement can be achieved by replacing single-fusion probes with break-apart probes, which present a higher FKHR rearrangement detection rate (34.5% vs 92.3%) including cases with unknown fusion partners [3, 6]. Therefore, FISH analysis with a break-apart probe for FKHR, should be performed on all sarcomas with histological evidence of alveolar features for diagnostic purposes, as well as, to select cases with aberrant cytogenetic findings for further cytogenetic studies. Histological classification of the tumor and identification of genetic aberrations may help the development of diagnostic and predictive biomarkers and possible drug targets implicated in the diagnosis and the targeted therapy of rhabdomyosarcoma.
  10 in total

1.  Use of a novel FISH assay on paraffin-embedded tissues as an adjunct to diagnosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Jun Nishio; Pamela A Althof; Jacqueline M Bailey; Ming Zhou; James R Neff; Frederic G Barr; David M Parham; Lisa Teot; Stephen J Qualman; Julia A Bridge
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.662

2.  Genomic gains and losses are similar in genetic and histologic subsets of rhabdomyosarcoma, whereas amplification predominates in embryonal with anaplasia and alveolar subtypes.

Authors:  Julia A Bridge; Jian Liu; Stephen J Qualman; Ron Suijkerbuijk; Gail Wenger; Ji Zhang; Xiaoying Wan; K Scott Baker; Poul Sorensen; Frederic G Barr
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 3.  Classification of rhabdomyosarcoma and its molecular basis.

Authors:  David M Parham; Frederic G Barr
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.875

4.  In vivo amplification of the PAX3-FKHR and PAX7-FKHR fusion genes in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  F G Barr; L E Nauta; R J Davis; B W Schäfer; L M Nycum; J A Biegel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Epidemiology, Incidence, and Survival of Rhabdomyosarcoma Subtypes: SEER and ICES Database Analysis.

Authors:  Kamil M Amer; Jennifer E Thomson; Dominick Congiusta; Andrew Dobitsch; Ahmed Chaudhry; Matthew Li; Aisha Chaudhry; Anthony Bozzo; Brianna Siracuse; Mahmut Nedim Aytekin; Michelle Ghert; Kathleen S Beebe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Comprehensive genomic analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a landscape of alterations affecting a common genetic axis in fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors.

Authors:  Jack F Shern; Li Chen; Juliann Chmielecki; Jun S Wei; Rajesh Patidar; Mara Rosenberg; Lauren Ambrogio; Daniel Auclair; Jianjun Wang; Young K Song; Catherine Tolman; Laura Hurd; Hongling Liao; Shile Zhang; Dominik Bogen; Andrew S Brohl; Sivasish Sindiri; Daniel Catchpoole; Thomas Badgett; Gad Getz; Jaume Mora; James R Anderson; Stephen X Skapek; Frederic G Barr; Matthew Meyerson; Douglas S Hawkins; Javed Khan
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 39.397

7.  Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with del(13q14).

Authors:  C J Harrison; P R Johnson; J A Yin; M Bhavnani
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1991-09

8.  Advantage of FISH analysis using FKHR probes for an adjunct to diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Tadaki Matsumura; Takehiko Yamaguchi; Kunihiko Seki; Tadakazu Shimoda; Takuro Wada; Toshihiko Yamashita; Tadashi Hasegawa
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Analysis of molecular cytogenetic alteration in rhabdomyosarcoma by array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Chunxia Liu; Dongliang Li; Jinfang Jiang; Jianming Hu; Wei Zhang; Yunzhao Chen; Xiaobin Cui; Yan Qi; Hong Zou; WenJie Zhang; Feng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical and Cytogenetic Profiles of Rhabdomyosarcoma with Bone Marrow Involvement in Korean Children: A 15-Year Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Lee; Chan Jeoung Park; Seongsoo Jang; Young Uk Cho; Jong Jin Seo; Ho Joon Im; Kyung Nam Koh; Kyung Ja Cho; Joon Seon Song; Eul Ju Seo
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.464

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  A case of ovarian Teratoma with nephroblastoma presenting abdomen metastasis.

Authors:  Yinan Wu; Chu Chu; Jingyuan Zhang; Beharee Nitish; Jing Ni; Xinyu Xu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.124

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.