| Literature DB >> 31798891 |
Evelyn G Bigini1, Eileen R Chasens2, Yvette P Conley3, Christopher C Imes4.
Abstract
Objective: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common among adults with diabetes. However, little is known about the impact of OSA treatment on DNA methylation levels. The purpose of this study is to explore changes in DNA methylation levels among adults with these conditions enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Research design and methods: Participants were randomized to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment or sham-CPAP placebo for 12 weeks. All participants received diabetes education and counseling. At baseline and 12 weeks, white blood cell DNA methylation levels for five candidate genes (ANGPTL4, DAPK3, KAT5, PER1, and TNFAIP3) and hemoglobin A1C (A1C) levels were obtained from blood. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) assessed sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, respectively. T-tests examined within-subject changes from baseline to 12 weeks. Regression analyses explored associations between DNA methylation changes and baseline variables, minutes of therapeutic CPAP use, and changes in A1C levels, PSQI scores, and ESS scores.Entities:
Keywords: adult; intervention; obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2019 PMID: 31798891 PMCID: PMC6861104 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ISSN: 2052-4897
Figure 1Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram.
Participant characteristics (n=10)
| Baseline characteristic | Percentage with number or mean with SD | Range |
| Female | 70% (n=7) | |
| White | 80% (n=8) | |
| Married/partnered | 70% (n=7) | |
| Retired | 80% (n=8) | |
| Age (years) | 61.7±7.9 | 42–70 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 35.1±7.8 | 23.8–48.9 |
| AHI | 20.9±12.4 | 11–53 |
| A1C | 7.6%±0.88% | 6.5–8.9 |
| ESS | 8.8±4.8 | 2–17 |
A1C, hemoglobin A1C; AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; BMI, body mass index; ESS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
Figure 2CpG islands with statistically significant changes in DNA methylation levels. (A) Plot differences for participants’ TNFAIP3 CpG island 112782 methylation at baseline and 12 weeks. (B) Plot differences for participants’ PER1 CpG island 105731 methylation at baseline and 12 weeks. (C) Plot differences for participants’ PER1 CpG island 105730 methylation at baseline and 12 weeks. Participant line colors are consistent across plots. Female participants noted with solid lines; male participants noted with dashed lines.
Figure 3CpG islands without statistically significant changes in DNA methylation levels. (A) Plot differences for participants’ ANGPTL4 CpG island 106986 methylation at baseline and 12 weeks. (B) Plot differences for participants’ DAPK3 CpG island 106887 methylation at baseline and 12 weeks. (C) Plot differences for participants’ DAPK3 CpG island 106887 methylation at baseline and 12 weeks. (D) Plot differences for participants’ KAT5 CpG island 102491 methylation at baseline and 12 weeks. Participant line colors are consistent across plots. Female participants noted with solid lines; male participants noted with dashed lines.
Figure 4Percent change in PER1 CpG island 105730 methylation based on sex.