Literature DB >> 31798644

Factors influencing social demands of aquatic ecosystems.

Joseph E Flotemersch1, Samantha M Shattuck2, Kelsey B Aho3,4, Clayton E Cox5, Maryann R Cairns6.   

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems provide services essential to human health and economies. Therefore, resource management programs aim to ensure the sustainable flow of these services. Stakeholder engagement is often a critical tool in learning what services are of priority to the public and may be integral to the success of aquatic ecosystem management because public participation in planning and decision making can generate broader support, e.g., financial, intellectual, and labor, for the management plan. The collection of such information may even be statutorily mandated, such as in the Clean Water Act of the United States, which requires that water bodies be classified for the beneficial uses, e.g., fisheries, drinking water, or recreation, they provide. Past evaluations of stakeholder engagement with aquatic ecosystems have considered a wide range of factors influencing engagement. We conducted a critical review of the literature on characteristics of stakeholders and characteristics of the environment that influence stakeholder engagement and participation with aquatic ecosystems. Our objective was to identify factors that should be considered in the creation of surveys to help encourage the inclusion of ecological and social beneficial uses data in large-scale water monitoring programs. Factors identified in our review were, extent and influence of place-based knowledge; proximity to, and frequency of visitation of the resource(s) being considered; basic demographics such as age, gender, education, and income; home community type; aesthetic appeal of the resource; and primary reason for engagement with the resource. We propose these factors, with subfactors, as a template for survey development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecosystem services; environmental factors; natural resources; public perception; public value; social factors; stakeholder engagement

Year:  2019        PMID: 31798644      PMCID: PMC6889873          DOI: 10.5751/ES-11165-240409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Soc            Impact factor:   4.403


  11 in total

1.  Capital assets and intercultural borderlands: socio-cultural challenges for natural resource management.

Authors:  Elaine Stratford; Julie Davidson
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Replacing natural wetlands with stormwater management facilities: Biophysical and perceived social values.

Authors:  R C Rooney; L Foote; N Krogman; J K Pattison; M J Wilson; S E Bayley
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 3.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

Authors:  Maria J Grant; Andrew Booth
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2009-06

4.  Effects of place identity, place dependence, and experience-use history on perceptions of recreation impacts in a natural setting.

Authors:  Dave D White; Randy J Virden; Carena J van Riper
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies: eradication and prevention.

Authors:  Marina García-Llorente; Berta Martín-López; Paulo A L D Nunes; José A González; Paloma Alcorlo; Carlos Montes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Perception of braided river landscapes: implications for public participation and sustainable management.

Authors:  Yves-François Le Lay; Hervé Piégay; Anne Rivière-Honegger
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Mapping watershed integrity for the conterminous United States.

Authors:  Darren J Thornbrugh; Scott G Leibowitz; Ryan A Hill; Marc H Weber; Zachary C Johnson; Anthony R Olsen; Joseph E Flotemersch; John L Stoddard; David V Peck
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.958

8.  Environmental mercury release, special education rates, and autism disorder: an ecological study of Texas.

Authors:  Raymond F Palmer; Steven Blanchard; Zachary Stein; David Mandell; Claudia Miller
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 9.  A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services.

Authors:  J K Summers; L M Smith; J L Case; R A Linthurst
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences.

Authors:  Berta Martín-López; Irene Iniesta-Arandia; Marina García-Llorente; Ignacio Palomo; Izaskun Casado-Arzuaga; David García Del Amo; Erik Gómez-Baggethun; Elisa Oteros-Rozas; Igone Palacios-Agundez; Bárbara Willaarts; José A González; Fernando Santos-Martín; Miren Onaindia; Cesar López-Santiago; Carlos Montes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing perceptions of aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Joseph Flotemersch; Kelsey Aho
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Global Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Approaches: Anthropological Contributions and Future Directions for Engineering.

Authors:  Cassandra L Workman; Maryann R Cairns; Francis L de Los Reyes; Matthew E Verbyla
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.907

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.