Jong-Lyul Park1,2,3, Sora Jeon4,5, Eun-Hye Seo1,3, Dong Hyuck Bae1,3, Young Mun Jeong4, Yourha Kim4,5, Ja Seong Bae5,6, Seon-Kyu Kim3, Chan Kwon Jung5,7, Yong Sung Kim1,2. 1. Genome Editing Research Center; Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 2. Personalized Genomic Medicine Research Center; Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Functional Genomics, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Biomedicine and Health Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Cancer Research Institute; College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 7. Department of Hospital Pathology; The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Background: There are no reliable biomarkers to accurately differentiate indolent thyroid tumors from more aggressive thyroid cancers. This study aimed to develop new DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and recurrence risk stratification of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Methods: Thyroid tumor-specific DNA methylation profiling was investigated in 34 fresh frozen tissues, which included nontumor (n = 7), noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP, n = 6) and PTC (n = 21), using the Illumina HumanMethylation EPIC array. We performed a genome-wide assessment of thyroid tumor-specific differentially methylated CpG sites in the discovery set, then validated the top candidate markers in an independent set of 293 paraffin tissue samples comprised of follicular adenoma (FA, n = 61), Hürthle cell adenoma (HA, n = 24), NIFTP (n = 56), PTC (n = 120), follicular thyroid carcinoma (n = 27), and Hürthle cell carcinoma (n = 5), by pyrosequencing. Results: Three selected markers (cg10705422, cg17707274, and cg26849382) differentiated nonmalignant (FA, HA, and NIFTP) tumors from differentiated thyroid cancers with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83, 0.83, and 0.80, respectively. Low DNA methylation levels for three markers were significantly associated with recurrent or persistent disease (odds ratio (OR) = 3.860 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.194-12.475]) and distant metastasis (OR = 4.009 [CI 1.098-14.632]) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. A subgroup analysis for the validation set showed that PTC patients with low DNA methylation levels more frequently had aggressive histology, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, BRAFV600E mutations, and recurrent or persistent disease than those with high levels of methylation markers. All PTC patients who developed disease recurrence had low DNA methylation levels for three markers. Conclusions: DNA methylation levels of three markers can be useful for differentiating differentiated thyroid cancer from nonmalignant follicular thyroid lesions, and may serve as prognostic biomarkers for predicting recurrent or persistent disease after surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer.
Background: There are no reliable biomarkers to accurately differentiate indolent thyroid tumors from more aggressive thyroid cancers. This study aimed to develop new DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and recurrence risk stratification of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Methods:Thyroid tumor-specific DNA methylation profiling was investigated in 34 fresh frozen tissues, which included nontumor (n = 7), noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP, n = 6) and PTC (n = 21), using the Illumina HumanMethylation EPIC array. We performed a genome-wide assessment of thyroid tumor-specific differentially methylated CpG sites in the discovery set, then validated the top candidate markers in an independent set of 293 paraffin tissue samples comprised of follicular adenoma (FA, n = 61), Hürthle cell adenoma (HA, n = 24), NIFTP (n = 56), PTC (n = 120), follicular thyroid carcinoma (n = 27), and Hürthle cell carcinoma (n = 5), by pyrosequencing. Results: Three selected markers (cg10705422, cg17707274, and cg26849382) differentiated nonmalignant (FA, HA, and NIFTP) tumors from differentiated thyroid cancers with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83, 0.83, and 0.80, respectively. Low DNA methylation levels for three markers were significantly associated with recurrent or persistent disease (odds ratio (OR) = 3.860 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.194-12.475]) and distant metastasis (OR = 4.009 [CI 1.098-14.632]) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. A subgroup analysis for the validation set showed that PTCpatients with low DNA methylation levels more frequently had aggressive histology, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, BRAFV600E mutations, and recurrent or persistent disease than those with high levels of methylation markers. All PTCpatients who developed disease recurrence had low DNA methylation levels for three markers. Conclusions: DNA methylation levels of three markers can be useful for differentiating differentiated thyroid cancer from nonmalignant follicular thyroid lesions, and may serve as prognostic biomarkers for predicting recurrent or persistent disease after surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer.