| Literature DB >> 31797703 |
Yazgı Dizdaroglu1, Canan Albay1, Tayfun Arslan1,2, Abdulilah Ece3, Emir A Turkoglu4, Asiye Efe5, Murat Senturk5, Claudiu T Supuran6, Deniz Ekinci7.
Abstract
In this study, newly synthesised compounds 6, 8, 10 and other compounds (1-5, 7 and 9) and their inhibitory properties against the human isoforms hCA I and hCA II were reported for the first time. Compounds 1-10 showed effective inhibition profiles with KI values in the range of 5.13-16.9 nM for hCA I and of 11.77-67.39 nM against hCA II, respectively. Molecular docking studies were also performed with Glide XP to get insight into the inhibitory activity and to evaluate the binding modes of the synthesised compounds to hCA I and II. More rigorous binding energy calculations using MM-GBSA protocol which agreed well with observed activities were then performed to improve the docking scores. Results of in silico calculations showed that all compounds obey drug likeness properties. The new compounds reported here might be promising lead compounds for the development of new potent inhibitors as alternatives to classical hCA inhibitors.Entities:
Keywords: ADME; Pyrazole; carbonic anhydrase; molecular docking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31797703 PMCID: PMC6896446 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2019.1695791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.(a) 60% Aq NaOH, EtOH, 24 h; (b) Thiosemicarbazide, KOH, EtOH, reflux 18 h.
Figure 2.13 C NMR spectrum of compound 6.
The data of hCA I and II inhibition with compounds 1–10 and AZA.
| Compound | Yield (%) | M.p. (°C) | hCA I | hCA II |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | 159–161 | 10.17 | 33.75 | |
| 93 | 130–132 | 8.03 | 17.09 | |
| 90 | 106–108 | 16.90 | 67.39 | |
| 92 | 132–134 | 9.71 | 21.50 | |
| 85 | 122–124 | 8.28 | 11.77 | |
| 65 | 121–123 | 12.19 | 16.94 | |
| 62 | 119–121 | 12.57 | 18.45 | |
| 60 | 102–104 | 10.99 | 26.09 | |
| 35 | 175–177 | 5.13 | 20.45 | |
| 52 | 180–182 | 11.94 | 41.31 | |
| 250b | 12b | |||
aMean from at least three determinations. Errors in the range of 3% of the reported value (data not shown). bFrom Ref. 31.
Figure 3.A representative hydrophobic/philic surfaces of the active site of hCA I complexed with a native ligand. (PDB ID: 2NMX; hydrophilic surfaces cyan colour; hydrophobic surfaces: orange colour).
Glide XP Docking scores, MM-GBSA ΔGbinding energy values and selected molecular properties of compounds 1–10 and AZA.
| Comp | Dscore (GlideXP)(kcal/mol) | MMGBSAdG Bind (kcal/mol) | Dipole μ (D) | QPlogPo/w | %Human oral absorption | PSA | Rule of five | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hCA I | hCA II | hCA I | hCA II | ||||||
| −4.59 | −4.05 | −33.89 | −38.42 | 6.19 | 3.11 | 100.00 | 76.58 | + | |
| −4.89 | −3.12 | −33.83 | −22.51 | 2.29 | 4.44 | 100.00 | 50.28 | + | |
| −4.12 | −2.69 | −35.34 | −28.05 | 3.85 | 4.06 | 100.00 | 50.29 | + | |
| −4.35 | −3.89 | −35.19 | −29.32 | 4.47 | 2.91 | 100.00 | 68.95 | + | |
| −4.58 | −3.35 | −34.16 | −34.74 | 5.18 | 3.35 | 100.00 | 53.94 | + | |
| −4.31 | −4.52 | −47.95 | −42.91 | 11.54 | 3.15 | 96.37 | 95.65 | + | |
| −4.51 | −3.19 | −37.08 | −38.80 | 6.26 | 4.67 | 100.00 | 69.34 | + | |
| −4.45 | −3.79 | −38.70 | −38.47 | 8.63 | 4.40 | 100.00 | 69.38 | + | |
| −4.00 | −3.77 | −44.31 | −31.38 | 11.23 | 2.97 | 94.83 | 88.11 | + | |
| −4.13 | −3.58 | −42.48 | −24.89 | 7.82 | 3.34 | 100.00 | 72.54 | + | |
| −5.93 | −6.34 | −29.97 | −35.51 | 13.35 | −1.77 | 44.26 | 133.03 | + | |
aLogarithm of the partition coefficient of the compound between n-octanol and water (recommended value <5).
bPercentage of human oral absorption (<25% is weak and >80% is strong).
cPolar surface area (recommended value ≤140Å2).