| Literature DB >> 31797561 |
Luca Gobbi1, Joël Mercier2, Benny Bang-Andersen3, Jean-Marie Nicolas2, John Reilly4, Björn Wagner1, David Whitehead4, Emmanuelle Briard4, R Paul Maguire2, Edilio Borroni1, Yves P Auberson4.
Abstract
Nonspecific binding (NSB) is a key parameter in optimizing PET imaging tracers. We compared the ability to predict NSB of three available methods: LIMBA, rat fu,brain , and CHI(IAM). Even though NSB is often associated with lipophilicity, we observed that logD does not correlate with any of these assays, clearly indicating that lipophilicity, while influencing NSB, is insufficient to predict it. A cross-comparison of the methods showed that all three correlate and are useful predictors of NSB. The three assays, however, rank the molecules slightly differently, illustrating the challenge of comparing molecules within a narrow chemical space. We also noted that CHI(IAM) values more effectively predict VNS , a measure of in vivo NSB in the human brain. CHI(IAM) measurements might be a closer model of the actual physicochemical interaction between PET tracer candidates and cell membranes, and seems to be the method of choice for the optimization of in vivo NSB.Entities:
Keywords: fraction unbound; imaging agents; nonspecific binding; positron emission tomography; radiopharmaceuticals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31797561 DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201900608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemMedChem ISSN: 1860-7179 Impact factor: 3.466